And SCOTUS approved Rule 11 on this case. Meaning SCOTUS accepted the case without the lower courts ruling, thus bypassing the Appellate court. NOTE: "imperative public importance.
Rule 11. Certiorari to a United States Court of Appeals before Judgment
A petition for a writ of certiorari to review a case pending in a United States court of appeals, before judgment is entered in that court, will be granted only upon a showing that the case is of such imperative public importance as to justify deviation from normal appellate practice and to require immediate determination in this Court. See 28 U. S. C. § 2101(e).
The court didn’t accept the case, they rejected it on Jan 9 2023 and then on Feb 21 refused Brunson’s request that they reconsider the initial rejection.
Understood. But, wouldn't they have ruled or sent back to the lower courts? The position is that the case is still in SCOTUS and they can can bring it up at anytime. I'm no legal scholar, but it's been done before. Cases sit in limbo for years.... Backlogs and all.
They could have left it in limbo, but that would have been a relist which isn’t what happened here.
They could have sent it back to the lower court, but they do that by granting cert, then after oral argument releasing an opinion explaining what the lower court got wrong and directing the lower court to act in accordance with the opinion.
This is a page from the Petition for Writ of Certiorari for Supreme Court Case 22-380. TRUMPET quartets brothers, Rayland and Arlan (Aka Loy) have been filing lawsuits against government officials and Loy has one pending with the Supreme Court. This case case could remove 388 defendants from office. Please search other posts here to learn more.
Hmmm could this be why they passed a bill discussing how to move forward in a "mass casualty event"? Instead of viewing that "event" as an attack with death involved, what if they just setup the playbook for when this case is ruled on and the majority of them that went along with the steal will be removed due to treason? 🤔 ✌
Grasshopper. The Brunson Case lists 388 govt officials as defendants in a case where they didn't uphold their Oath of Office in respects to the 2020 certification of the election results.
I'll try but it's been posted on GAW.
The Brunson Brothers are Four Trumpet (coincidence?) entertainers; I think they were first on Johnny Carson (80's?) and even played for President Reagan at the WH. Two brothers have filed many lawsuits against corruption in our govt; Arlan aka Loy, and Rayland. One of Loy's cases is at the Supreme Court. They've denied hearing it twice, but haven't thrown it out; meaning they can bring it back anytime. 388 govt officials are named as defendants for not upholding their Oath of Office on Jan 6 to send the election results back to the states. All the provisions were met for them to have a pause in the results. They failed and need to be held to account. This is how you do a clean sweep of the swamp. Could be HUUUGE.
Downvoted? Do you know them personally? We have to take emotions out if it. My rep, Tom McClintock, I thought was a good guy. He's on the list. So don't take it personally because YOUR GUY is on this list.
Yes, I was thinking the same thing yesterday. The Brunson case popped its head up again simultaneously as McConnel announced he was having a secret vote for Senate majority leader.
I immediately thought Brunson case was being used as a threat or counter play against the RINO's to keep them in check.
Done in 30 from November 5th? That's December 5th. D5 u/#q970 u/#q1332
Lots of RINOS on the list.
They're more scared of our lists than we are of their lists now.
For sauce go here and click the blue petition. Couldn't upload the pdf.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22-380.html
You can provide a direct link to it.
Here: http://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22-380/243739/20221027152243533_20221027-152110-95757954-00007015.pdf
Alternatively, you can upload the file to catbox.moe and then share the link.
Thanks Fren. Do you also know how I can add images in comments using an iPhone?
You mean like this?
u/#popcornmonster
If so, then I suggest you take a look at this thread:
https://greatawakening.win/p/1995CSSpkb/-the-new-and-improved-gifs-and-q/
If you are still unsure of how, I can help you further on this!
Additionally, if you happen to forget where that thread is, it's on the sidebar, entitled "GIFs and QPosts", under "Resources".
Thanks Fren!
u/#hideinthepopcorn
No problem!
downloadable pdf https://files.catbox.moe/04cn5o.pdf
Rand Paul?
Chuck Grassley is up there too
They may have voted to certify the results on Jan 6, 2020.
The only 6 senators who voted not to certify the 2020 election results were as follows:
Josh Hawley, Missouri
Ted Cruz, Texas
Tommy Tuberville, Alabama
Roger Marshall, Kansas
John Kennedy, Louisiana
Cindy Hyde-Smith, Mississippi
The rest all voted to certify.
Yes. So does Marco Rubio, Mike Lee,Joni Ernst, Tom Cotton…I wonder if they have some sort of ‘get out of jail free’ card….
Maybe if blackmailed? Or maybe they're closet RINOS? Q Said The end won't be for everyone.
Could very well be. Yup. The end wont be for everyone.
So is Rick Scott!
It’s very strange they haven’t thrown it out. It’s so “conspiratorial” to the average person there’s a reason they haven’t tossed it for good.
Keeping it in their back pocket for when it's needed...
And SCOTUS approved Rule 11 on this case. Meaning SCOTUS accepted the case without the lower courts ruling, thus bypassing the Appellate court. NOTE: "imperative public importance.
Rule 11. Certiorari to a United States Court of Appeals before Judgment A petition for a writ of certiorari to review a case pending in a United States court of appeals, before judgment is entered in that court, will be granted only upon a showing that the case is of such imperative public importance as to justify deviation from normal appellate practice and to require immediate determination in this Court. See 28 U. S. C. § 2101(e).
The court didn’t accept the case, they rejected it on Jan 9 2023 and then on Feb 21 refused Brunson’s request that they reconsider the initial rejection.
Brunson claimed that he had a rule 11 case, but the court disagreed. https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22-380.html
Understood. But, wouldn't they have ruled or sent back to the lower courts? The position is that the case is still in SCOTUS and they can can bring it up at anytime. I'm no legal scholar, but it's been done before. Cases sit in limbo for years.... Backlogs and all.
They could have left it in limbo, but that would have been a relist which isn’t what happened here.
They could have sent it back to the lower court, but they do that by granting cert, then after oral argument releasing an opinion explaining what the lower court got wrong and directing the lower court to act in accordance with the opinion.
What they did, in the Jan 9 order (https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/010923zor_p860.pdf) is deny cert. That kills the case dead forever.
They tossed it for good, on Feb 21 2023. https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22-380.html
Rand Paul?
What is this???
This is a page from the Petition for Writ of Certiorari for Supreme Court Case 22-380. TRUMPET quartets brothers, Rayland and Arlan (Aka Loy) have been filing lawsuits against government officials and Loy has one pending with the Supreme Court. This case case could remove 388 defendants from office. Please search other posts here to learn more.
Short clip https://youtu.be/XJn62aQzD3I?si=YdAEa133S3bwiihz
Wow, 🤯
Hmmm could this be why they passed a bill discussing how to move forward in a "mass casualty event"? Instead of viewing that "event" as an attack with death involved, what if they just setup the playbook for when this case is ruled on and the majority of them that went along with the steal will be removed due to treason? 🤔 ✌
Hmmmmm. Nice twist! That's certainly plausible. Didn't fencing go up in DC again around the election? Is it still up?
Sure is!!! 😁 🤔 ✌
Yep
What is the Brunson list?
Grasshopper. The Brunson Case lists 388 govt officials as defendants in a case where they didn't uphold their Oath of Office in respects to the 2020 certification of the election results.
Can you give us a quick review of the case.
I'll try but it's been posted on GAW. The Brunson Brothers are Four Trumpet (coincidence?) entertainers; I think they were first on Johnny Carson (80's?) and even played for President Reagan at the WH. Two brothers have filed many lawsuits against corruption in our govt; Arlan aka Loy, and Rayland. One of Loy's cases is at the Supreme Court. They've denied hearing it twice, but haven't thrown it out; meaning they can bring it back anytime. 388 govt officials are named as defendants for not upholding their Oath of Office on Jan 6 to send the election results back to the states. All the provisions were met for them to have a pause in the results. They failed and need to be held to account. This is how you do a clean sweep of the swamp. Could be HUUUGE.
wow thanks....Ill look more into it but this summary helped me grasp the concept for the first time.
Thank you. It's been a couple years since it was on my radar.
Marco Rubio and Rand Paul on there too… so not a good example
Example of what? They may not be who we think they are.
Rand Paul not the son of Ron Paul?
Yes, the son of Ron Paul
Downvoted? Do you know them personally? We have to take emotions out if it. My rep, Tom McClintock, I thought was a good guy. He's on the list. So don't take it personally because YOUR GUY is on this list.
Yes, I was thinking the same thing yesterday. The Brunson case popped its head up again simultaneously as McConnel announced he was having a secret vote for Senate majority leader.
I immediately thought Brunson case was being used as a threat or counter play against the RINO's to keep them in check.
Hope they clear out that weasel Lankford.
I regret voting for him.
So the SPOTLIGHT is for a reason!!! Wonder what he did? Can’t be good for us to now know him!
I said it before and I'll say it again. The Brunson case nullafies everything.
Does SCOTUS have the balls? Three don't, literally. How about the others?
Trump said he caught them all and has it all. I can't imagine it will never come out.
Obama master minded the theft of the government in a conspiracy with domestic and foreign dignitaries. Is that what this means?
Well, Loy Brunson had the balls to sue all three of them! I'm not a lawyer and legal speak is confusing, but this suit is connected.
https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca10/23-4108/23-4108-2024-02-09.html
So who aren’t on the list ?