Yeah, I do enjoy when he talks astrophysics, but all that woke bullshit he needs to stay away from - he doesn’t know what he’s talking about. You want me to take a vaccine to prevent someone else from getting sick? If someone wants to take a vaccine thinking it will keep them from getting sick, what does that have to do with me? So stoopid
I used to love the guy , until I realized how FOS he is.......he is no dummy and that is why I despise him, instead of telling truth , he tells lies for money
Tuberculosis is such a strawman argument only valid when we're fending off a jogger invasion. Same with all other diseases and vaxxes. Get rid of invaders, and no one needs a vaxx, nor the left gets elected, ever.
I was trained in the sciences. Chemistry and physics. I love them. The way that chemistry pushed past the "trust the science, bro" phase of its journey back in the days of "ether" and "phlogiston" made me realise true, proper science is about always asking questions, and checking if a hypothesis is right or wrong, constantly. Even if the established belief in a theory is challenged, it is worth doing a test of that theory.
NdGT is not a proper scientist IMO. He's a science evangelist. He is someone who seems to believe that "if you are an expert, you must be right". He doesn't question the established narrative around any of the sciences. He goes around as a spokesman for science, and thus defends the people and institutions, instead of the process. The process isn't "listen and believe!". It isn't a religion. The process is "question and verify everything, mathematically and empirically, and never stop doing that because you one day may find out we were wrong about something".
He is an astronomer, by education (his masters was astronomy, and his doctorate was through the astronomy dept), and his claim of "astrophysicist" is meh at best. He has admitted he wasn't very deep in the research or lab side for most of his training. To me, that screams "wtf bro". But he doesn't deal with any theory, just observations. It's a wysiwyg field, and he isn't involved in any of the ground breaking phenomenon of the quantum mechanical world. His biggest contribution has been to popularised science, nothing more. And his version of "trust me bro" on most not space related fields does nothing but make what he does know look weaker.
The process isn't "listen and believe!". It isn't a religion. The process is "question and verify everything, mathematically and empirically, and never stop doing that because you one day may find out we were wrong about something".
As a science-loving atheist pede myself (I love all you God-fearing pedes, and even though I don't believe, I will fight for your right to do so with my dying breath), let me just say:
Hallelujah and Amen! Science is a discovery process that never ends. Thank you for your reasoned comment.
Ok ill say it. Bill just laid out a commonly used logical fallacy. Appeal to authority. Gotta call it out even if you agree with the notion. I dislike NDT very much but he doesn't have to be a doctor to know XYZ. For example, Bill's not a republican but he sure knows alot about republiican antics. Don't have to be a republican to read an article on the internet is the point.
He’s an Astrophysicist. With frankly an uninspiring career. And were it not for the T.V/Documentary series he’s done. It’s doubtful most, even within his own discipline, would probably know who he is.
My first exposure to this goofball was that documentary series he did. At the time, I was impressed. Turns out, I should have just been impressed by the scriptwriters.
If you you can't make a compelling argument without being loud, aggressive and demeaning, then you have a weak argument.
Every time I see him debate he is trying to physically dominate the space, belittle his opponent and drown them out. If you were to read a transcript of these discussions instead, you would wonder why he was invited to the conversation.
He's just like that vax quack Peter Hotez. Can you imagine a debate between those two? That is, IF you could find a scientific point upon which they disagree.
Bill take your own advice and quit commentkng on 99 percent of the shit you speak about.
Tyson is an insufferable shill fake scientist hack. Dumber that the average 5th grader. Real scientist are doing real science not trying to be a fraudulent social influencer on TV. Puke
Neil Degrrasse: "There's a social contract not to infect other people"
Pfizer: "The covid-19 vaccine doesn't stop people from spreading it"
And I'll add: "There's a social contract for doctors and scientists to be honest and transparent with their research and testing results to provide enough information that we can excercise INFORMED CONSCENT."
DeGrasse is a Cabal owned twat.
What did the one Cabal agent say to the other.... I guess we know now.
Woodchipper live is the show I am waiting for. These 2 asshats can be first with Bill Nye the Pseudoscience guy.
Yeah, I do enjoy when he talks astrophysics, but all that woke bullshit he needs to stay away from - he doesn’t know what he’s talking about. You want me to take a vaccine to prevent someone else from getting sick? If someone wants to take a vaccine thinking it will keep them from getting sick, what does that have to do with me? So stoopid
I used to love the guy , until I realized how FOS he is.......he is no dummy and that is why I despise him, instead of telling truth , he tells lies for money
Maher was betting on Kamala to win.
Tuberculosis is such a strawman argument only valid when we're fending off a jogger invasion. Same with all other diseases and vaxxes. Get rid of invaders, and no one needs a vaxx, nor the left gets elected, ever.
I was trained in the sciences. Chemistry and physics. I love them. The way that chemistry pushed past the "trust the science, bro" phase of its journey back in the days of "ether" and "phlogiston" made me realise true, proper science is about always asking questions, and checking if a hypothesis is right or wrong, constantly. Even if the established belief in a theory is challenged, it is worth doing a test of that theory.
NdGT is not a proper scientist IMO. He's a science evangelist. He is someone who seems to believe that "if you are an expert, you must be right". He doesn't question the established narrative around any of the sciences. He goes around as a spokesman for science, and thus defends the people and institutions, instead of the process. The process isn't "listen and believe!". It isn't a religion. The process is "question and verify everything, mathematically and empirically, and never stop doing that because you one day may find out we were wrong about something".
He is an astronomer, by education (his masters was astronomy, and his doctorate was through the astronomy dept), and his claim of "astrophysicist" is meh at best. He has admitted he wasn't very deep in the research or lab side for most of his training. To me, that screams "wtf bro". But he doesn't deal with any theory, just observations. It's a wysiwyg field, and he isn't involved in any of the ground breaking phenomenon of the quantum mechanical world. His biggest contribution has been to popularised science, nothing more. And his version of "trust me bro" on most not space related fields does nothing but make what he does know look weaker.
As a science-loving atheist pede myself (I love all you God-fearing pedes, and even though I don't believe, I will fight for your right to do so with my dying breath), let me just say:
Hallelujah and Amen! Science is a discovery process that never ends. Thank you for your reasoned comment.
That is all.
😁
Ok ill say it. Bill just laid out a commonly used logical fallacy. Appeal to authority. Gotta call it out even if you agree with the notion. I dislike NDT very much but he doesn't have to be a doctor to know XYZ. For example, Bill's not a republican but he sure knows alot about republiican antics. Don't have to be a republican to read an article on the internet is the point.
Real problem is assuming any doctor automatically knows wtf they are talking about. They've dumbed them down like everyone else.
agree
Half of them can't find their own ass with both hands. How are they gonna find YOURS?
well, if it is on the internet...
He’s an Astrophysicist. With frankly an uninspiring career. And were it not for the T.V/Documentary series he’s done. It’s doubtful most, even within his own discipline, would probably know who he is.
My first exposure to this goofball was that documentary series he did. At the time, I was impressed. Turns out, I should have just been impressed by the scriptwriters.
If you you can't make a compelling argument without being loud, aggressive and demeaning, then you have a weak argument.
Every time I see him debate he is trying to physically dominate the space, belittle his opponent and drown them out. If you were to read a transcript of these discussions instead, you would wonder why he was invited to the conversation.
He's just like that vax quack Peter Hotez. Can you imagine a debate between those two? That is, IF you could find a scientific point upon which they disagree.
Tyson is the Obama of science :)
Bill take your own advice and quit commentkng on 99 percent of the shit you speak about.
Tyson is an insufferable shill fake scientist hack. Dumber that the average 5th grader. Real scientist are doing real science not trying to be a fraudulent social influencer on TV. Puke
Is he the only one that likes hearing his irritating voice?
I'll call you when we find a goiter on Uranus
Qek!
Oh i want to play.
Neil Degrrasse: "There's a social contract not to infect other people"
Pfizer: "The covid-19 vaccine doesn't stop people from spreading it"
And I'll add: "There's a social contract for doctors and scientists to be honest and transparent with their research and testing results to provide enough information that we can excercise INFORMED CONSCENT."
/mic drop
Wow two prize fucking clowns. Why are they here?
turning the false appeal to authority back on the idiot that uses it all the time.
Neil DuMbass Tyson.