It would be a shame if Joe Biden ISN'T PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, but is only "president of USA Corporation and the occupied territory of Washington DC ".
If the U.S. is under military rule with a Commander in Chief, but not an acting president... then Biden can declare anything he wants. It's not legally binding.
Also, I think we all know that isn't really Joe Biden. It's an actor playing the role.
Maybe this is what will bring about the "surprise" revelation.
Biden also has Immunity. But, they would have to testify. However, Hunter needs to only answer that he isn't sure because of the drugs and Joe due to his age. No one gets convicted of anything. However, Hunter can only be pardoned for federal crimes. Find state crimes or local crimes. Joe is sitting pretty unless Russia or another country grabs him for international crimes - so Joe won't travel.
I'm fairly certain the 2020 election will come under scrutiny likely being rectified and overturned. Once it's deemed Biden's term was illegitimate, so will his pardoning Hunter.
Good post and consideration OP. The "any and all" portion of that pardon can include anything related to FARA violations and Burisma along with the weapons charges - showing that the gun charges were actually PART IN PARCEL of the setup to do this because of the time frame when they happened and so the pardon would cover much of the illegal foreign $ op.
The people mentioning state crimes have it. Glenn Beck once did a whiteboard of all the crimes committed by Hunter and which states they were in - CT, Nevada, take your pick there have to be 20 or more. Nothing ever pushed along seriously.
Most likely that's all she wrote. No one is going to raise those old ghosts in a Republican led administration. Such blatant faggotry is reserved for Democratic regimes and their flagrant newspeak partners. 🤣
For those offenses against the United States which he has committed or may have committed or taken part in during the period from January 1, 2014 through December 1, 2024, including but not limited to all offenses charged or prosecuted (including any that have resulted in convictions) by Special Counsel David C. Weiss in Docket No. 1:23-cr-00061-MN in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware and Docket No. 2:23-CR-00599-MCS-1 in the United States District Court for the Central District of California.
Also interesting that January 1st 2014 is the starting cutoff. Wonder if that is a statute of limitations boundary? It would not include all of his time as VP and certainly not his Senate time...
It would be a shame if Joe Biden ISN'T PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, but is only "president of USA Corporation and the occupied territory of Washington DC ".
If the U.S. is under military rule with a Commander in Chief, but not an acting president... then Biden can declare anything he wants. It's not legally binding.
Also, I think we all know that isn't really Joe Biden. It's an actor playing the role.
Maybe this is what will bring about the "surprise" revelation.
The power of a a LEGITIMATE President is absolute, he can pardon anyone for any federal crime.
Legitimate? Good one. So toss 2020 to get them all?
What ever happened to that Brunson case?
Biden also has Immunity. But, they would have to testify. However, Hunter needs to only answer that he isn't sure because of the drugs and Joe due to his age. No one gets convicted of anything. However, Hunter can only be pardoned for federal crimes. Find state crimes or local crimes. Joe is sitting pretty unless Russia or another country grabs him for international crimes - so Joe won't travel.
Immunity for official acts only.
Biden stole the election none of this is legal.
He just went to Angola
Can Hunter get away with all his pedophilia? Can Joe? Fuck that!
I'm fairly certain the 2020 election will come under scrutiny likely being rectified and overturned. Once it's deemed Biden's term was illegitimate, so will his pardoning Hunter.
That's mu thinking anyway.
Even if that happened it would take quite some time - and be well past the statute of limitations for many - if not all - of the provable crimes.
Face it - Hunter is not going to jail. He may, however, be critical in the prosecution of the rest of the family.
He's being pardoned for the unconstitutional gun charges. They never brought any of the bigtime bribery/treason charges.
True that.
Yet, for what it's worth, the pardon is said to include any and all acts committed within a time frame.
Wow, I think this person has it figured out:
https://patriots.win/p/199hzSatGy/with-a-full-federal-pardon-now-i/c/
!!! There's loads of good discussion on it over there:
https://x.com/seanmdav
Good post and consideration OP. The "any and all" portion of that pardon can include anything related to FARA violations and Burisma along with the weapons charges - showing that the gun charges were actually PART IN PARCEL of the setup to do this because of the time frame when they happened and so the pardon would cover much of the illegal foreign $ op.
The people mentioning state crimes have it. Glenn Beck once did a whiteboard of all the crimes committed by Hunter and which states they were in - CT, Nevada, take your pick there have to be 20 or more. Nothing ever pushed along seriously.
Most likely that's all she wrote. No one is going to raise those old ghosts in a Republican led administration. Such blatant faggotry is reserved for Democratic regimes and their flagrant newspeak partners. 🤣
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2024/12/01/statement-from-president-joe-biden-11/
Interesting.
Also interesting that January 1st 2014 is the starting cutoff. Wonder if that is a statute of limitations boundary? It would not include all of his time as VP and certainly not his Senate time...
And tax evasion charges. True they never brought any of the big crimes against Hunter, or Joe-so they may still be open to being charged.
What would happen if Hitler issued pardons?
Yeah, pardons all around!.......no....wait... _____ The Devil
"legality" ! 😂
Excellent point https://bidenreport.com/#p=1
I think Obama pardoned himself, didn't he?
No
He had legitimate votes, though.
good question
I was wondering the same thing but you phrased it much better!