I wonder if "Gold will destroy the FED" (or whatever that drop said) means that the fact that there is no gold will be discovered and that will point the finger at the Federal Reserve, which will be blamed and dismantled.

Trump had retruthed a video of Jan Halper being interviewed on a BBC talkshow where she claimed that Trump told the Queen that we were no longer a part of the corporation and that we also removed the gold from the Vatican. So, are we just ignoring that bit of information?

There hasn't been gold in Fort Knox for decades. I was stationed there in the 80's. Our supply sergeant had to go into the vault for ammunition ( I think it was an exchange with the Treasury, but I don't recall the exact details now. It didn't seem important at the time.) At one time the crown jewels from some European nation were stored there. I don't remember who, I just remember the pictures that were taken when they were removing them. Anyway, the supply sergeant and I were pretty tight at the time and he told me that what I thought was in there really wasn't. There were no rooms with gold piled up anywhere. Hell, most of the building was empty.

Duh, Let me guess. They quit auditing it, after the gold went missing.

At the legally required book value, set in the 1970s, of $42.44 an ounce and the total of 248 million ounces across all facilities, the total book value is $10.4 billion.

Based on the current market value of $2,899.44 (at this writing) an ounce, the total market value of the gold is $719,063,365,252.29.

When I asked ChatGPT about the impact of the $42.44 book value on US financial policies and the national debt, it gave me this...

Impact of the $42.44 Gold Valuation on U.S. Financial Policies and National Debt

1. Understated National Assets Because the U.S. Treasury records its gold holdings at $42.44 per ounce, the official value of gold reserves is significantly lower than their actual market worth. This means:

-The U.S. government underreports its assets in financial statements. -If gold were valued at market prices (e.g., $2,000 per ounce), the Treasury’s gold reserves would be worth over $500 billion, instead of the $11 billion recorded on the books.

2. No Direct Impact on National Debt -The U.S. national debt is the total amount of money the government owes to creditors. Since gold reserves are not actively sold to reduce debt, their valuation does not directly affect the debt level. -However, if the government decided to revalue its gold holdings to market prices, it could, on paper, reduce the debt-to-assets ratio, making the country’s financial position look stronger.

3. Why Doesn't the U.S. Revalue Gold to Market Price? -If the U.S. revalued its gold reserves to market prices, it could theoretically create “paper wealth” to offset national debt. -However, doing so might signal to markets that the U.S. government is considering using gold reserves to back financial obligations, which could create instability. -Additionally, a revaluation could increase political pressure to sell gold reserves to pay down debt, which the Treasury prefers to avoid.

4. Potential Use of Gold to Back Currency or Reduce Debt Some policymakers and economists argue that the U.S. could:

-Revalue gold to market prices, creating an accounting surplus. Issue gold-backed bonds or digital currency backed by gold to stabilize the dollar. -Sell small portions of gold reserves in extreme situations to help reduce deficits. -However, the U.S. government prefers to keep gold as a strategic asset rather than actively using it in monetary policy.

5. Geopolitical and Economic Considerations -Gold as a Strategic Reserve: The U.S. holds significant gold reserves as a hedge against financial crises and global instability. -Confidence in the Dollar: Since the U.S. dollar is the world’s primary reserve currency, revaluing gold could send mixed signals about confidence in fiat money. -Inflation & Market Impact: A sudden revaluation could impact inflation, interest rates, and global gold markets, leading to unpredictable economic effects.

Bottom Line -The $42.44 per ounce valuation does not affect the national debt but understates U.S. assets. -The U.S. could revalue gold to improve its balance sheet, but this would likely have unintended financial and political consequences. -Gold remains a reserve asset rather than a tool for debt reduction.

Prove it https://www.usmint.gov/learn/tours-and-locations/fort-knox

Id long been under the impression that all the gold was removed from Ft. Knox long ago and moved to the basement of the Federal Reserve in NY where most nations gold is held.

So are the flights from UK to USA with gold a propaganda stunt? (Also Pope in Hospital to keep eyes off of planes) I was seeing on X where the claim is that is happening. Could they be filling up Knox for an inspection then they will ship it back out? If so everything they do is very expensive. Gold is heavy.

Gold shall destroy fed -2619 can mean exactly this.

Selling allusions is what crooks do. Regardless how this pans out it is changing the perception of the value of the fed and gold (PM’s)

Or the bars are all rehypothecated and the ones there are tungsten and will need to be analyzed to prove they are gold.

Im not so sure it isnt there

MOVIEMOVIEMOVIE!!!

What if there is WAY more gold than what is disclosed.

Gold destroying the FED, an abundance of it would certainly do something............

Like Simon in Die Hard 3 once said, “Fort Knox? Ha! It’s for tourists!”