I viewed a video not long ago about Modern Abstract Art and MOMA basically being CIA created as an art "genre" and "museum" funded during the Cold War.
Supposedly to show the artistic "freedom" in the West compared to Soviet Realism. Like the people in the East Block, standing for hours in lines to buy from empty food shelves, would rise up because of Modern Abstract Art?? Freedom of artistic expression? vs freedom to buy and eat food?!?
So money laundering? The artists themselves supposedly were unaware that their fame and fortunes were not an organic art movement, but orchestrated by the CIA!
An artificial, subsidized art "movement" created and funded by the CIA! Let THAT sink in!
Back in the Wikileaks days of Podesta's and HRC's emails, I remember HRC's State Department paying outrages sums for outrageous "art" for foreign embassies! As though taxpayers should actually be expected to pay for non-essential State Dept expenditures in the Millions of $, for "art"? Let the artists just donate those works, right? if it were merely for recognition of artists and artistry?
[search Podesta art collection, BARF alert! He was HRC's campaign manager]
Some money laundering for sure. Some using taxpayer $ to pay for normalizing degeneracy to Americans and the rest of the world.
Seperate but related, Naked Communist, written in 1958, details the 45 goals of communism to undermine American. While they include things like wide open trade and letting go of US control over the Panama Canal, the goals also do talk about art....
Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all forms of artistic expression. An American Communist cell was told to "eliminate all good sculpture from parks and buildings, substitute shapeless, awkward and meaningless forms."
Control art critics and directors of art museums. "Our plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art."
Mirrors what is being done to Christian cathedrals and churches via Insurrection from Within.
Novus Ordo churches, squat, dark, clunky structures. apparently are built without any consideration of beauty or upliftment,
Beauty is one of the graces. Not merely something of one's own opinion. True beauty comes with its own power: sublimely altering the viewer, beauty becomes transformative.
Modern Abstract Art and MOMA basically being CIA created as an art "genre" and "museum" funded during the Cold War.
Supposedly to show the artistic "freedom" in the West compared to Soviet Realism.
Your source is wrong about when it began. It started before the Cold War with the USSR, and had nothing to do with the Cold War (though, no doubt, it was continued and ramped up during that time).
Of course, they will lie about this, because they don't want you to know the truth.
So-called abstract "art" was created for the purpose of demoralization. There is no beauty in it, but the "experts" demand everyone pretend it somehow represents beauty.
Art is supposed to be representative of what is great, what is possible.
But this garbage represents nothing but empty, random lines or a distortion of a fake reality.
It was created in the 1920's by jews in Germany.
Destroying this abomination was one of the first things Hitler did, returning the German people to the exposure of great works of art.
He also destroyed the porn (which, back then, was mostly magazines), as well as books promoting communism. These were the burning books you have seen in photos, but you are never told what books or magazines they were. Why is that?
These were also the products of jews, who had turned Berlin into the depravity capital of Europe in the 1920's (same thing they have been trying to do to America, 100 years later).
Here is a short, intesting video on the subject. The creator of the video does not like what Hitler did. He seems to think "modern art" is somehow great, and wants the viewer to think so, too. Nevertheless, he put together an interesting video showing the stark differences.
My pet theory is that he was anti khazarian/ancient civ nobles and merchants who later became bankers and run the world as fake Jews now and he just didn't have the ability to sort the real from the fake during an overextended war and stuff like destroyed food chains and syphillus killed most or many of the Jews, and it wasn't 6 million of them.
The jews today are not "fake jews." They are real jews.
The jews of today are decended from the Edomites of the Bible, and NOT the Israelites. I have written quite a bit about this on GAW, and you can probably search through some of my posts.
The Khazarians were jews. The Jewish Encyclopedia (the "official" document that is in the jewish synogogues, which tells the history of the jews) confirms this.
There are many stories about the Khazarians, probably to distract from the fact that they are also part of the jewish family tree. The fact that Khazaria simply "disappeared" from all modern history books is a clue.
Yes, jews became bankers because the English Church (and English kings of the time) enforced the biblical principle of not charging usary (interest). So, it was illegal for White Christians to charge each other interest. But the jews were not of the same people or religion, so they could charge interest. Rothschild (jew) got in bed with corrupt English government to insert himself as the central banker, which has now expanded to world central banking. Hopefully, his kind's days are numbered regarding that.
Hitler knew EXACTLY who the jews were. He was not mistaken. He wrote about it in Mein Kampf.
Hitler did not intentionally kill any jews. Maybe a few convicted murderers, yes. But there was no mass extermination of jews. The Holocaust story is fake. It was created by British Intel, but nobody really paid any attention to that story. It wasn't until the 1970's-1980's that the story started being really pushed.
TV shows of the 50's, 60's and 70's that referenced anything to do with Hitler, never mentioned anything about the Holocaust, because it was not a story being pushed (yet).
"Shindler's List" hit the movie screens, and that is when it was really pushed. But that movie was based on a book, which says right in the book that it is a work of fiction, and has no resemblance to any facts of history.
The 6,000,000 figure was made up and pushed going back to before Hitler was even on the scene. First, they pushed this idea about 6 million jews "in peril" in the 1900's-1910's in Russia (not Germany). This was because they were trying to raise money "to help the jews," but the money was really to fund the overthrow of Russia (the communists were jews).
Later, the 6 million figure was used to claim that "jews were in peril" in Eastern Europe, in the 1920's. This was because they were again raising funds to take over Germany, which they tried to do, but Hitler put a stop to it.
The jewish communists, via the USSR, had the goal of going to war in Europe, and taking over all of Europe. It was not Hitler who wanted to take over Europe; it was Stalin and the jews.
Hitler did imprison a lot of jews, and others, too. These were the communists and their supporters, who were trying to overthrow Germany, like they had already done in Russia. They had already murdered 30 million Ukrainians and White Russians, and would do the same in Germany, if they could. THIS is what Hitler was fighting against.
There were probably less than 300,000 people who died in the prison labor camps. Most of that was due to typhus, which was going around Europe. It was spread by lice, which is why the Germans had delousing chambers in the camps. These have been falsely claimed to be "gas chambers" to kill jews.
I have tons of resources. The question is: Which aspect of these lies do you want to explore?
I'll give you a few to consider.
The claim of 6,000,000 jews in peril goes way back:
World's expert on gas chambers, who personally inspected the claims, and found there was no possible way there could have been any. He is the only man in history to be certified as an expert witness to give testimony about the gas chambers, both by German courts and Canadian courts. Of course, they won't let him testify anymore, once they learned the truth about what he found:
True artists cannot cease to do their art why more than you or I can cease breathing. It's more than a compulsion. It's an extension of who what they are. Yeah, it's nice to paid, but they're going to continue doing their art whether they're wealthy or living in the gutter.
Goes even deeper . Look into "living art" and children found jammed up in Box sorting machines over the years. And while your at it the groups responsible for art in Embassies and the special passes they get through TSA.
In my early teens/twenties I was on my way to becoming a Pop Art painter/artist. I wanted to be the next Warhol (the West coast version of Andy). Anyway, I would be invited to these “events” - usually held at a major donor/collectors mansions throughout Southern California. Mind you, I wasn’t yet 21 but casually partied in high school so I could handle my alcohol - or so I thought. More on that in a second. Also, keep in mind, I was raised Republican but the art world is very much controlled by leftists. Anyway my whole shtick was subverting the narrative, “their” narrative. I’d subtly jab the entire establishment with my work. They had no idea I was making fun of them because they “assumed” I was one of them.
One night at one of these “parties” I was given a martini and on the first sip something was off… I felt super sleepy right away and my face felt numb. As I was chatting with a group of both very older women and men I was struggling to keep my eyes open. I excused myself from the group, sat the martini down and walked (stumbled) to my car that was parked down the street from this mansion. The street was packed with cars. I thought I’d just drive home but I felt drunk beyond imagination and super tired. I struggled to stay awake. Keep in mind this is pre-cell phones and the only internet was BBS boards. Also, this was a time when bottled water was just starting to get popular. But I never bought any because the thought was outrageous to me. I was in desperate need of hydration but I didn’t dare go back up to the house because the vibe I was getting wasn’t a good one.
As other artist acquaintances would pass-by they wanted to walk with me into the party and I’d just wave them off saying I’d be up in a minute. I never went back into the house. Stayed in my car for another 45 minutes before I felt halfway able to drive back home.
The next day I get a call at my house (I was still living with my parents) it was a call from a board member of a pretty prominent museum. This man was basically a go-between artists/galleries/museums. If you wanted to get ahead in the scene he was the one who could make that happen. He was concerned that I had disappeared the night before and wanted to know why I didn’t say goodbye. I made an excuse - although it was true - that I felt ill and went home. Over the next few months I’d get invites and calls to show up at some event or another. When my go-between would call my parents ran interference and would take a message but I'd never return the call.
Turns out not all artist rise to prominence organically. There’s an exchange that happens and it’s not necessarily monetary. True, there are some insanely gifted artist out there. But there’s also a quid pro quo that happens on the way to becoming successful in the art world. Some do it by choice, but some who are too naive at a young age and don’t have the moral judgment or the will to walk away can be sucked into a pretty terrible trade with their souls.
It gutted me to discover how much I’d have to compromise with no guarantee of becoming the next big thing. Only to be passed around at parties until my usefulness was tapped-out. I walked away from the entire scene that fateful night. Some of my paintings are out there - held privately - but I’m an asterisk out of the thousands that play the game.
Of my peers that I ran with at the time, there are 2 that went on to fame and fortune. One bigger than the other. But at what cost?
It’s a sick perverted game, and it happens in all forms of the entertainment industry. Some can bypass the nasty side of becoming famous. But it’s very rare.
I was there when the socialite whose mansion we were at ordered my drink along with her’s. To this day I don’t drink martinis but they typically dont serve beer at these types of events so I was going along to be polite. I was standing two feet away from the bartender but someone had to have slipped something into or it was already on the glass. I was clearly roofied and had I taken or continued to drink what was given to me I would have easily passed out. And God only knows what could have happened.
This is very interesting, thank you for sharing. Wish I could see your stuff but I don’t want to dox of course. I’m a musician so it’s obviously a little different, I always thought the (visual) art world was bananas, and not in a good way.
Yeah, too easy to dox for sure but I’m being vague in a way that it could be hard enough. 15 years ago you could look me up but the internet pushed me to the very bottom of any searches in recent years. I even had pages bookmarked that are completely gone now. It appears the internet is only forever in some cases.
The art world is crazy but you don’t hear of many new breakout household names like back in the 60s, 70s, 80s and 90s.
To this day, Hollywood is way worse as far as the “casting couch” is concerned.
Side note. It’s interesting that Fort Knox is being highlighted so much in recent days. They should audit the museums. Back in the early 90s I know of a few museums who were hiring kids out of college to “repair” damaged artwork. To do so they’d have the apprentice re-create a particular piece of art before they were allowed to touch or do a repair on a piece. Sometimes taking months if not a year to paint a carbon copy. Well, it’s a known fact that some of the most prestigious pieces hanging in museums around the world are indeed copies and not the original for “security” reasons. There is a much speculated rumor that there’s a dark truth to these original pieces of art being sold on the black market into private collections for obscene amounts of money and what people see hanging on the walls are recreations. Not all artwork but some.
I think about it every day. I met an old man who was in his 70s back when I was “learning” we were in a painting class together. Here I was the naive “gonna change the world with my brash art” and he was painting some of the most beautiful photo realistic art of WWII planes flying in amazingly detailed sky's. He wasn’t hungry for fame like I was. He was painting because he enjoyed it, for himself. I want to be that guy, painting WWII planes because they looked so freaking beautiful regardless if people wanted to buy it or not.
My blood is beyond boiling to it's not surprised. Just add this to the very long list (I am still waiting for the meme that gives us a visual on what $50 million of condoms looks like)
I viewed a video not long ago about Modern Abstract Art and MOMA basically being CIA created as an art "genre" and "museum" funded during the Cold War.
Supposedly to show the artistic "freedom" in the West compared to Soviet Realism. Like the people in the East Block, standing for hours in lines to buy from empty food shelves, would rise up because of Modern Abstract Art?? Freedom of artistic expression? vs freedom to buy and eat food?!?
So money laundering? The artists themselves supposedly were unaware that their fame and fortunes were not an organic art movement, but orchestrated by the CIA!
An artificial, subsidized art "movement" created and funded by the CIA! Let THAT sink in!
Back in the Wikileaks days of Podesta's and HRC's emails, I remember HRC's State Department paying outrages sums for outrageous "art" for foreign embassies! As though taxpayers should actually be expected to pay for non-essential State Dept expenditures in the Millions of $, for "art"? Let the artists just donate those works, right? if it were merely for recognition of artists and artistry?
[search Podesta art collection, BARF alert! He was HRC's campaign manager]
Some money laundering for sure. Some using taxpayer $ to pay for normalizing degeneracy to Americans and the rest of the world.
Needs to stop yesterday.
Seperate but related, Naked Communist, written in 1958, details the 45 goals of communism to undermine American. While they include things like wide open trade and letting go of US control over the Panama Canal, the goals also do talk about art....
On point 👍🏻
Mirrors what is being done to Christian cathedrals and churches via Insurrection from Within.
Novus Ordo churches, squat, dark, clunky structures. apparently are built without any consideration of beauty or upliftment,
Beauty is one of the graces. Not merely something of one's own opinion. True beauty comes with its own power: sublimely altering the viewer, beauty becomes transformative.
Not to mention modern libraries! Our new library is more like a steel and granite daycare center. Disgusting
"I remember HRC's State Department paying outrages sums for outrageous "art" for foreign embassies!"
The "art" has been said to have been human trafficking, as the "art" is not checked by customs. "Art" got a free pass into countries.
OH yes!
Is that why Hilary was caught stealing art from the White House upon her husbands departure?
Your source is wrong about when it began. It started before the Cold War with the USSR, and had nothing to do with the Cold War (though, no doubt, it was continued and ramped up during that time).
Of course, they will lie about this, because they don't want you to know the truth.
So-called abstract "art" was created for the purpose of demoralization. There is no beauty in it, but the "experts" demand everyone pretend it somehow represents beauty.
Art is supposed to be representative of what is great, what is possible.
But this garbage represents nothing but empty, random lines or a distortion of a fake reality.
It was created in the 1920's by jews in Germany.
Destroying this abomination was one of the first things Hitler did, returning the German people to the exposure of great works of art.
He also destroyed the porn (which, back then, was mostly magazines), as well as books promoting communism. These were the burning books you have seen in photos, but you are never told what books or magazines they were. Why is that?
These were also the products of jews, who had turned Berlin into the depravity capital of Europe in the 1920's (same thing they have been trying to do to America, 100 years later).
Here is a short, intesting video on the subject. The creator of the video does not like what Hitler did. He seems to think "modern art" is somehow great, and wants the viewer to think so, too. Nevertheless, he put together an interesting video showing the stark differences.
"Hitler's War on Modern Art" --
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=--E0g_s7Fi8
Can you please point me to more info on Hitler?
My pet theory is that he was anti khazarian/ancient civ nobles and merchants who later became bankers and run the world as fake Jews now and he just didn't have the ability to sort the real from the fake during an overextended war and stuff like destroyed food chains and syphillus killed most or many of the Jews, and it wasn't 6 million of them.
My take --
The jews today are not "fake jews." They are real jews.
The jews of today are decended from the Edomites of the Bible, and NOT the Israelites. I have written quite a bit about this on GAW, and you can probably search through some of my posts.
The Khazarians were jews. The Jewish Encyclopedia (the "official" document that is in the jewish synogogues, which tells the history of the jews) confirms this.
There are many stories about the Khazarians, probably to distract from the fact that they are also part of the jewish family tree. The fact that Khazaria simply "disappeared" from all modern history books is a clue.
Yes, jews became bankers because the English Church (and English kings of the time) enforced the biblical principle of not charging usary (interest). So, it was illegal for White Christians to charge each other interest. But the jews were not of the same people or religion, so they could charge interest. Rothschild (jew) got in bed with corrupt English government to insert himself as the central banker, which has now expanded to world central banking. Hopefully, his kind's days are numbered regarding that.
Hitler knew EXACTLY who the jews were. He was not mistaken. He wrote about it in Mein Kampf.
Hitler did not intentionally kill any jews. Maybe a few convicted murderers, yes. But there was no mass extermination of jews. The Holocaust story is fake. It was created by British Intel, but nobody really paid any attention to that story. It wasn't until the 1970's-1980's that the story started being really pushed.
TV shows of the 50's, 60's and 70's that referenced anything to do with Hitler, never mentioned anything about the Holocaust, because it was not a story being pushed (yet).
"Shindler's List" hit the movie screens, and that is when it was really pushed. But that movie was based on a book, which says right in the book that it is a work of fiction, and has no resemblance to any facts of history.
The 6,000,000 figure was made up and pushed going back to before Hitler was even on the scene. First, they pushed this idea about 6 million jews "in peril" in the 1900's-1910's in Russia (not Germany). This was because they were trying to raise money "to help the jews," but the money was really to fund the overthrow of Russia (the communists were jews).
Later, the 6 million figure was used to claim that "jews were in peril" in Eastern Europe, in the 1920's. This was because they were again raising funds to take over Germany, which they tried to do, but Hitler put a stop to it.
The jewish communists, via the USSR, had the goal of going to war in Europe, and taking over all of Europe. It was not Hitler who wanted to take over Europe; it was Stalin and the jews.
Hitler did imprison a lot of jews, and others, too. These were the communists and their supporters, who were trying to overthrow Germany, like they had already done in Russia. They had already murdered 30 million Ukrainians and White Russians, and would do the same in Germany, if they could. THIS is what Hitler was fighting against.
There were probably less than 300,000 people who died in the prison labor camps. Most of that was due to typhus, which was going around Europe. It was spread by lice, which is why the Germans had delousing chambers in the camps. These have been falsely claimed to be "gas chambers" to kill jews.
I have tons of resources. The question is: Which aspect of these lies do you want to explore?
I'll give you a few to consider.
The claim of 6,000,000 jews in peril goes way back:
https://rumble.com/vtv060-six-million-jews-1915-1938-6-6000000.html
What the communists (mostly jews) were trying to do in Germany after WW1 and before Hitler came to power:
https://alphahistory.com/weimarrepublic/weimar-republic-timeline-1918-20/
https://alphahistory.com/weimarrepublic/weimar-republic-timeline-1921-23/
https://alphahistory.com/weimarrepublic/weimar-republic-timeline-1924-28/
https://alphahistory.com/weimarrepublic/weimar-republic-timeline-1924-28/
What life was really like in Hitler's Germany, written by a boy/young man who lived it:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/iEP3VtQ9ZTbR/
Why Hitler hated the jews (2 lectures by 2 jewish rabbis):
https://www.bitchute.com/video/aCR9vWHkqShy
The first 2 laws implemented by Hitler (a lecture by another jewish rabbi):
https://www.bitchute.com/video/3gAIESsl1oLr
There were no gas chambers:
https://rumble.com/v5o7fe5-jewish-historian-david-cole-debunking-auschwitz-death-camp-propaganda-full-.html
World's expert on gas chambers, who personally inspected the claims, and found there was no possible way there could have been any. He is the only man in history to be certified as an expert witness to give testimony about the gas chambers, both by German courts and Canadian courts. Of course, they won't let him testify anymore, once they learned the truth about what he found:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/a3HnaLcw5NBl
Interview of Benton Bradberry, who spent years researching this subject and wrote his own book. This interview is a summary, and excellent:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/fFVxVQkvF0yr
Overall, the best documentary of what was really going on with Hitler's rise to power ...
"The Greatest Story Never Told" (6 hours):
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Ts5pEcRoXhBV
💯 So many of the 'Artists' always say that its not about the money, so....🤷🏻♂️
True artists cannot cease to do their art why more than you or I can cease breathing. It's more than a compulsion. It's an extension of who what they are. Yeah, it's nice to paid, but they're going to continue doing their art whether they're wealthy or living in the gutter.
I'll stop doing photography when I'm dead.
Exactly
Hunter Biden's "painted using his own deuce" "art" enters the chat...
BTW...He insured that "crap" for millions pre-LA fires
Y'all smell popcorn?
💩💩💩+🔥🔥🔥=🤮🤮🤮
Goes even deeper . Look into "living art" and children found jammed up in Box sorting machines over the years. And while your at it the groups responsible for art in Embassies and the special passes they get through TSA.
The promotion of ugly art is also detailed in The Protocols of Zion from 1905.
Wait you mean it's not merely fiction??? 🤔🤣
In my early teens/twenties I was on my way to becoming a Pop Art painter/artist. I wanted to be the next Warhol (the West coast version of Andy). Anyway, I would be invited to these “events” - usually held at a major donor/collectors mansions throughout Southern California. Mind you, I wasn’t yet 21 but casually partied in high school so I could handle my alcohol - or so I thought. More on that in a second. Also, keep in mind, I was raised Republican but the art world is very much controlled by leftists. Anyway my whole shtick was subverting the narrative, “their” narrative. I’d subtly jab the entire establishment with my work. They had no idea I was making fun of them because they “assumed” I was one of them.
One night at one of these “parties” I was given a martini and on the first sip something was off… I felt super sleepy right away and my face felt numb. As I was chatting with a group of both very older women and men I was struggling to keep my eyes open. I excused myself from the group, sat the martini down and walked (stumbled) to my car that was parked down the street from this mansion. The street was packed with cars. I thought I’d just drive home but I felt drunk beyond imagination and super tired. I struggled to stay awake. Keep in mind this is pre-cell phones and the only internet was BBS boards. Also, this was a time when bottled water was just starting to get popular. But I never bought any because the thought was outrageous to me. I was in desperate need of hydration but I didn’t dare go back up to the house because the vibe I was getting wasn’t a good one.
As other artist acquaintances would pass-by they wanted to walk with me into the party and I’d just wave them off saying I’d be up in a minute. I never went back into the house. Stayed in my car for another 45 minutes before I felt halfway able to drive back home.
The next day I get a call at my house (I was still living with my parents) it was a call from a board member of a pretty prominent museum. This man was basically a go-between artists/galleries/museums. If you wanted to get ahead in the scene he was the one who could make that happen. He was concerned that I had disappeared the night before and wanted to know why I didn’t say goodbye. I made an excuse - although it was true - that I felt ill and went home. Over the next few months I’d get invites and calls to show up at some event or another. When my go-between would call my parents ran interference and would take a message but I'd never return the call.
Turns out not all artist rise to prominence organically. There’s an exchange that happens and it’s not necessarily monetary. True, there are some insanely gifted artist out there. But there’s also a quid pro quo that happens on the way to becoming successful in the art world. Some do it by choice, but some who are too naive at a young age and don’t have the moral judgment or the will to walk away can be sucked into a pretty terrible trade with their souls.
It gutted me to discover how much I’d have to compromise with no guarantee of becoming the next big thing. Only to be passed around at parties until my usefulness was tapped-out. I walked away from the entire scene that fateful night. Some of my paintings are out there - held privately - but I’m an asterisk out of the thousands that play the game.
Of my peers that I ran with at the time, there are 2 that went on to fame and fortune. One bigger than the other. But at what cost?
It’s a sick perverted game, and it happens in all forms of the entertainment industry. Some can bypass the nasty side of becoming famous. But it’s very rare.
Shit, man, I'm glad you got out safely.
I was there when the socialite whose mansion we were at ordered my drink along with her’s. To this day I don’t drink martinis but they typically dont serve beer at these types of events so I was going along to be polite. I was standing two feet away from the bartender but someone had to have slipped something into or it was already on the glass. I was clearly roofied and had I taken or continued to drink what was given to me I would have easily passed out. And God only knows what could have happened.
Good lord, that's scary
This is very interesting, thank you for sharing. Wish I could see your stuff but I don’t want to dox of course. I’m a musician so it’s obviously a little different, I always thought the (visual) art world was bananas, and not in a good way.
Yeah, too easy to dox for sure but I’m being vague in a way that it could be hard enough. 15 years ago you could look me up but the internet pushed me to the very bottom of any searches in recent years. I even had pages bookmarked that are completely gone now. It appears the internet is only forever in some cases.
The art world is crazy but you don’t hear of many new breakout household names like back in the 60s, 70s, 80s and 90s.
To this day, Hollywood is way worse as far as the “casting couch” is concerned.
Side note. It’s interesting that Fort Knox is being highlighted so much in recent days. They should audit the museums. Back in the early 90s I know of a few museums who were hiring kids out of college to “repair” damaged artwork. To do so they’d have the apprentice re-create a particular piece of art before they were allowed to touch or do a repair on a piece. Sometimes taking months if not a year to paint a carbon copy. Well, it’s a known fact that some of the most prestigious pieces hanging in museums around the world are indeed copies and not the original for “security” reasons. There is a much speculated rumor that there’s a dark truth to these original pieces of art being sold on the black market into private collections for obscene amounts of money and what people see hanging on the walls are recreations. Not all artwork but some.
That is one hell of a story. I can absolutely see that. You should go back to art. I bet you were pretty good.
I think about it every day. I met an old man who was in his 70s back when I was “learning” we were in a painting class together. Here I was the naive “gonna change the world with my brash art” and he was painting some of the most beautiful photo realistic art of WWII planes flying in amazingly detailed sky's. He wasn’t hungry for fame like I was. He was painting because he enjoyed it, for himself. I want to be that guy, painting WWII planes because they looked so freaking beautiful regardless if people wanted to buy it or not.
Nothing surprises me...... now. But, the normies are "shooting blood from their eyes". Glenn Beck term.
https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1891689653167620096/pu/vid/avc1/576x1024/TL9OHwU1CBMArDa5.mp4
💥🔥🔥🔥 THIS IS FINE... 🔥🔥🔥💥
u/#EnjoyTheStorm
WTF did I just see? A freaking urinal is art?
Only the bleating sheep are surprised anymore. We entered in to the theatre of the absurd 20+ years ago.
To think we work 4 months out of the year to fund this junk...unbelievable
My blood is beyond boiling to it's not surprised. Just add this to the very long list (I am still waiting for the meme that gives us a visual on what $50 million of condoms looks like)
u/#q247
Looks exactly like Hunters paintings
Odd that USAid money paid for his paintings??