Nope, never been. Find a copy of Ho'Canada written by one of the original writers of BNA and get real story. His name was Russell Roger Smith and the Inc destroyed him later for telling the truth.
Shawn says goodbye to Doug the creator of this huge site packed with information on true status of Canada. Link to site. Give short video on home page a go.
I.. I feel like I woke up in an alternate reality…
Correct me if I'm wrong but… How the fuck did everyone NOT know this?
I've known this for so long I forgot what decade it was when I first learned it.
I thought it was common knowledge?? Wow OK breaking news frens!!!: The same is true for Australia as well.
The Crown owns both their asses.
Like I'm dumbfounded here... The fact that this was NOT common knowledge is the most mind blowing thing I've learned all week month.
Edit: The Bottom Line:
Here's the oath the Australian Prime Minister takes before taking office: "I, (name), do solemnly and sincerely affirm and declare that I will well and truly serve His MajestyKing Charlesthe Third, His heirs and successors according to law, in the office of Governor‑General of the Commonwealth ofAustralia..."
And New Zealand: ""I, [name], swear that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to His MajestyKing Charles the Third, King of New ZealandHis heirs and successors..."
Aaand... ere's the oath the Canadian Prime Minister takes before taking office: "I, [name], do swear that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to His MajestyKing Charles the Third, King of Canada,his heirs and successors..."
Sorry to kick you out of your bubble,not lol. Thanks for reply.
'The fact that this is not common knowledge is the most mind blowing thing I've learned all week month.'
My fren, we been trying to bring out this info for many years. But I get it is a huge pill to swallow. I had to deal with everything I thought I knew was truely a lie and yes that incl the realization that I been duped. Since I thought I was a pretty smart fellow that was a nasty thought by it self.
But I got over it and started digging into, took several years and most do not have the time or attention span to do this. Anyways, I hope you will learn and shard this mind blowing info.
ok, Australia. Yes almost same situation except there are a constitution there but it does not include general main land but only Islands of coast. Here is a link to a fellow down under explaining the AUS issue very well. Random pick on his channel.
Don't get me wrong… The OP is good. And I guess pretty sensational to those who didn't know, but I honestly just had no idea that it wasn't common knowledge so from my point of view it's hilarious that everyone is so shocked
JT17 in conversations with 100's on matter I have found that most know bits but have never connected the dots. Trying to show them the dots connected is the hard part lol
It seems to me that the entire Canadian "government" has been a series of dictates from the UK Royals for centuries. There is no actual voting or decision making by We The People of Canada, Eh. It's all what the King or Queen or their heirs decide to do. Oh, and it is all just symbolic according to Grok. 😉😉😉😏
My favorite quote from my conversation with Grok is this one.
For Canada, the King’s presence as head of state is a nod to continuity and tradition. It ties back to the country’s roots as a British colony and its gradual, peaceful evolution into independence, unlike, say, the U.S. with its revolution.
IMO: It's because Canada is still controlled by the UK Monarchy. It's not just a nod to continuity. I think Grok is confused by all this. Adding the answer to your question about Letters Patent just proves the Crown is still in control.
If you want your own country Canada, you need to claim it for yourself, eh!
Feel free to ask more and I will ask Grok on the same thread.
I'm still laughing at Grok's last line.
If you meant a different document—like a provincial or hypothetical one—give me a nudge, and I’ll adjust the lens! Where’d this idea of a voted constitution come from for you?
Its contents are an amalgamation of various codified acts, treaties between the Crown and Indigenous Peoples (both historical and modern), uncodified traditions and conventions.
An uncodified constitution is a type of constitution where the fundamental rules often take the form of customs, usage, precedent and a variety of statutes and legal instruments.[1] An explicit understanding of such a constitution can be developed through commentary by the judiciary, government committees or legal experts. In such a constitutional system, all these elements may be (or may not be) recognized by courts, legislators, and the bureaucracy as binding upon government and limiting its powers. Such a framework is sometimes imprecisely called an "unwritten constitution"; however, all the elements of an uncodified constitution are typically written down in a variety of official documents, though not codified in a single document. However, there may be truly "unwritten" constitutional conventions which while not usually legally enforceable may hold just as much sway as the letter of the law.
An uncodified constitution has the advantages of elasticity, adaptability, and resilience.
In other words, the government can do whatever the hell it wants to the people with ZERO restrictions. They can just adapt to what they want. Hmmm, trucker protest? Seizing bank accounts, arresting peaceful protesters.
It's hard enough to make a government conform to a written constitution that the people actually voted on through Constitutional Conventions. There's no hope for Canada. Sorry. Canada has no Constitution if it can be changed whenever the government wants to change the law on any whim they want.
EDIT:
I asked Grok about the Canadian Constitution and its uncodified nature. What a hot mess. Answers here.
Yup this is a load of crap but we will try to trap Grog.
There is a way. If a country,state or any geographical area with a constitution want to change or upgrade their constitution it is the right of the people at Any given time to do so. Ratification.
If an area without a constitution decide to constitute they can do so at any given time and do not need permission to do so. It is a contract between the individuals and nothing stands above an individual in decision making.
This whole conversation is very important as it could work as the ice breaker freeing a trapped in ice tanker :)
There is hope but the people need to know they can vote on new or ratified constitutional proposal if they choose to. This is the hard part lol Generally they are scared of rocking the boat as Canadian gov is a nasty entity to deal with.
OHH I have a question for Grog. How would the perfect constitution for a Republic look ? Based of already active constitutions cross globe. Hmm this be fun to see :)
Just seen your edit hahaha, wow You are right what a mess. and zero foundational papers anywhere lol
Ok, now do not ask yet, but the 'constitution' Grog leans on hard is a British constitution.
To best of my knowledge there is no such paper. My understanding is that the British constitution is based on 'traditional values' and 'practices' but a people's contract does in fact not exist there as well. Yup huge can of worms here. ok, my friend been a slice but RL calling for a bit. I thank you very much and will return tomorrow.
Keep the questions coming. Grok is a LLM that is most likely searching existing docs highly censored by the crown. So the more questions the more likely we will break through the firewall. At some point, Grok is going to realize we're serious about getting to the bottom of this!
What like a subsidiary? Is the US a sovereign nation or merely a corporation owned by the City of London?
I dont know what the truth is but theres been all kinds of legal fuckery when it comes to North America. Im sure South America is similar.
This issue has really come between my wife and I. Shes Canadian and sees it all emotionally through the lens of Patriotism. I can hardly blame her and my more logical fact based take simply doesnt fly with her. We have agreed not to speak about this issue ever again.
Yes, there has been a lot of stuff buried from prying eyes. I believe that Britain’s commonwealth and our status literally changed hands to the US during Trump’s first term. Some of it is difficult to understand. Like why Trump eliminated the position of post master general and moved the post office to commerce.
Unfortunately nope. I have anecdotal evidence. Perhaps the documents I even read were falsified. I have no sauce. I just I know what I read and that I believed what I read.
This is news? I've known since a child that Canada was a dominion of the British crown. All the government services were termed "Royal," as in the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, or the Royal Canadian Air Force. They are still, on paper, subservant to a crown governor.
I looked into the topic of "constitution for Alberta" and it was eyebrow-raising. Apparently, U.S. citizens are spared (but Canadians are not) of the old English tradition of the "unwritten constitution", consisting of all laws and decrees pertaining to the governance of a region. Kind of like government on the principle of "Didn't you get the memo?"
The fact that we have a King is definitive proof that we’re not sovereign. The reigning monarch (or a delegate) is required to sign any bill into law. Just because they seemingly always rubber stamp parliament doesn’t mean that someday they won’t. If Covid taught us anything it’s that things can change fast, and if Canada stops cooperating they may again.
For what it's worth, I view Canada as a sovereign nation...... at least until we invade.
And Canadian patriot pedes don't worry, we'll set you all up as governors along with a 2nd amendment-celebrating armory for you so that you can ruthlessly maintain order.
Nope, never been. Find a copy of Ho'Canada written by one of the original writers of BNA and get real story. His name was Russell Roger Smith and the Inc destroyed him later for telling the truth.
https://nomoretyranny.net/a-story-about-russell-roger-smith-the-myth-is-canada/
https://www.themythiscanada.com/r-r-smith/
Shawn says goodbye to Doug the creator of this huge site packed with information on true status of Canada. Link to site. Give short video on home page a go.
https://www.themythiscanada.com/
I.. I feel like I woke up in an alternate reality…
Correct me if I'm wrong but…
How the fuck did everyone NOT know this?
I've known this for so long I forgot what decade it was when I first learned it.
I thought it was common knowledge?? Wow
OK breaking news frens!!!:
The same is true for Australia as well.
The Crown owns both their asses.
Like I'm dumbfounded here...
The fact that this was NOT common knowledge is the most mind blowing thing I've learned all
weekmonth.Edit:
The Bottom Line:
Here's the oath the Australian Prime Minister takes before taking office:
"I, (name), do solemnly and sincerely affirm and declare that I will well and truly serve His Majesty King Charles the Third, His heirs and successors according to law, in the office of Governor‑General of the Commonwealth of Australia..."
And New Zealand:
""I, [name], swear that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to His Majesty King Charles the Third, King of New Zealand His heirs and successors..."
Aaand... ere's the oath the Canadian Prime Minister takes before taking office:
"I, [name], do swear that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to His Majesty King Charles the Third, King of Canada, his heirs and successors..."
"KING OF CANADA"
5:5?
Maybe I just read too much
Sorry to kick you out of your bubble,not lol. Thanks for reply.
'The fact that this is not common knowledge is the most mind blowing thing I've learned all week month.'
My fren, we been trying to bring out this info for many years. But I get it is a huge pill to swallow. I had to deal with everything I thought I knew was truely a lie and yes that incl the realization that I been duped. Since I thought I was a pretty smart fellow that was a nasty thought by it self.
But I got over it and started digging into, took several years and most do not have the time or attention span to do this. Anyways, I hope you will learn and shard this mind blowing info.
ok, Australia. Yes almost same situation except there are a constitution there but it does not include general main land but only Islands of coast. Here is a link to a fellow down under explaining the AUS issue very well. Random pick on his channel.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hIrSKO1Rx3c
Did you know that the creator of Themythiscanada.com was an ordained minister as well as a freedom fighter ?. Yup, sure was.
Don't get me wrong… The OP is good. And I guess pretty sensational to those who didn't know, but I honestly just had no idea that it wasn't common knowledge so from my point of view it's hilarious that everyone is so shocked
JT17 in conversations with 100's on matter I have found that most know bits but have never connected the dots. Trying to show them the dots connected is the hard part lol
Makes sense in that those were some of the most ridiculously locked down areas with that pretend 'pandemic' oppression
I did a deep dive with Grok an had an interesting conversation.
ok, man long but great read.
Long list of discrepancies found. I will forward to people who will be able to pick this apart and formulate very specific questions for Grog.
Yup interesting for sure. Thanks for this. I would have asked this as well,
Letters Patent what are they ?
Where are Letters Patent given to present day GG held ?
Is a PM royal since he can issue Letters Patent ?
Did Queen Victoria state in her will to free all dominions ?
Where is the constitution the canadian people voted on held ?
I will now build a coffee and read this again. Thanks again good stuff.
Great additional questions!
I've asked Grok and here are the results.
It seems to me that the entire Canadian "government" has been a series of dictates from the UK Royals for centuries. There is no actual voting or decision making by We The People of Canada, Eh. It's all what the King or Queen or their heirs decide to do. Oh, and it is all just symbolic according to Grok. 😉😉😉😏
My favorite quote from my conversation with Grok is this one.
IMO: It's because Canada is still controlled by the UK Monarchy. It's not just a nod to continuity. I think Grok is confused by all this. Adding the answer to your question about Letters Patent just proves the Crown is still in control.
If you want your own country Canada, you need to claim it for yourself, eh!
u/#Ridetofreedom
ohh crap, just seen this addition, thx man. Back to reading hahaha
Haha, I took your pondering as a direct order.
Feel free to ask more and I will ask Grok on the same thread.
I'm still laughing at Grok's last line.
I totally appreciate your move. Never ment as an order lol. them days are over fren :)
I find answers given generally very insecure lol. We will spend some time on this and get back to you if you good with this
Check out this load of bullshit...
Constitution of Canada
Uncodified constitution
In other words, the government can do whatever the hell it wants to the people with ZERO restrictions. They can just adapt to what they want. Hmmm, trucker protest? Seizing bank accounts, arresting peaceful protesters.
It's hard enough to make a government conform to a written constitution that the people actually voted on through Constitutional Conventions. There's no hope for Canada. Sorry. Canada has no Constitution if it can be changed whenever the government wants to change the law on any whim they want.
EDIT:
I asked Grok about the Canadian Constitution and its uncodified nature. What a hot mess. Answers here.
Yup this is a load of crap but we will try to trap Grog.
There is a way. If a country,state or any geographical area with a constitution want to change or upgrade their constitution it is the right of the people at Any given time to do so. Ratification.
If an area without a constitution decide to constitute they can do so at any given time and do not need permission to do so. It is a contract between the individuals and nothing stands above an individual in decision making.
This whole conversation is very important as it could work as the ice breaker freeing a trapped in ice tanker :)
There is hope but the people need to know they can vote on new or ratified constitutional proposal if they choose to. This is the hard part lol Generally they are scared of rocking the boat as Canadian gov is a nasty entity to deal with.
OHH I have a question for Grog. How would the perfect constitution for a Republic look ? Based of already active constitutions cross globe. Hmm this be fun to see :)
How would the perfect constitution for a Republic look?
My conversation with Grok. It's a burner!
Just seen your edit hahaha, wow You are right what a mess. and zero foundational papers anywhere lol
Ok, now do not ask yet, but the 'constitution' Grog leans on hard is a British constitution.
To best of my knowledge there is no such paper. My understanding is that the British constitution is based on 'traditional values' and 'practices' but a people's contract does in fact not exist there as well. Yup huge can of worms here. ok, my friend been a slice but RL calling for a bit. I thank you very much and will return tomorrow.
Keep the questions coming. Grok is a LLM that is most likely searching existing docs highly censored by the crown. So the more questions the more likely we will break through the firewall. At some point, Grok is going to realize we're serious about getting to the bottom of this!
Absolutely agree. I will spend time with like minded and try to come up with very specific line of questions.
Very grateful you taking time for this. O7
Interesting stuff.
I believe that the US already owns Canada.
What like a subsidiary? Is the US a sovereign nation or merely a corporation owned by the City of London?
I dont know what the truth is but theres been all kinds of legal fuckery when it comes to North America. Im sure South America is similar.
This issue has really come between my wife and I. Shes Canadian and sees it all emotionally through the lens of Patriotism. I can hardly blame her and my more logical fact based take simply doesnt fly with her. We have agreed not to speak about this issue ever again.
Yes, there has been a lot of stuff buried from prying eyes. I believe that Britain’s commonwealth and our status literally changed hands to the US during Trump’s first term. Some of it is difficult to understand. Like why Trump eliminated the position of post master general and moved the post office to commerce.
What is that province in the far southwest again?
I've seen the 4chan documents showing we do own them.
I've not. Can you share here?
Unfortunately nope. I have anecdotal evidence. Perhaps the documents I even read were falsified. I have no sauce. I just I know what I read and that I believed what I read.
Disney used to own the RCMP. Eisner was in charge then. Licensed merch was all over.
This is news? I've known since a child that Canada was a dominion of the British crown. All the government services were termed "Royal," as in the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, or the Royal Canadian Air Force. They are still, on paper, subservant to a crown governor.
The Governor General picks the PM, not the People.
I looked into the topic of "constitution for Alberta" and it was eyebrow-raising. Apparently, U.S. citizens are spared (but Canadians are not) of the old English tradition of the "unwritten constitution", consisting of all laws and decrees pertaining to the governance of a region. Kind of like government on the principle of "Didn't you get the memo?"
Don't feel alone. We thought we were free here.
The fact that we have a King is definitive proof that we’re not sovereign. The reigning monarch (or a delegate) is required to sign any bill into law. Just because they seemingly always rubber stamp parliament doesn’t mean that someday they won’t. If Covid taught us anything it’s that things can change fast, and if Canada stops cooperating they may again.
So if your not free and if they can't find a copy of the BNA who is in charge and responsible for Canada besides it citizen's?
"Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun" (Chinese: 枪杆子里面出政权) --- Mao Zedong.
Uh... wut?
We have a sovereign. We call our "federal lands" Crown Land FFS. HOW DID YOU NOT KNOW?!
¡!¡We HaVe BeEn LiEd ToO!¡!
Imagine Trump wants the US to join the commonwealth so the US can eventually absorb the commonwealth, starting with Canada.
For what it's worth, I view Canada as a sovereign nation...... at least until we invade.
And Canadian patriot pedes don't worry, we'll set you all up as governors along with a 2nd amendment-celebrating armory for you so that you can ruthlessly maintain order.