So for the second time in a week, Colonel Douglas Macgregor is on Redacted absolutely slaughtering Trump about the Ukraine deal. As usual, talking up how great the Russians are. Disappointed as I liked this guy, maybe this is why he is not in the cabinet. Now saying no one gets appointed by Trump unless Israel approves.
Comments (20)
sorted by:
It is strange to me how people can be so binary about things. The Russians are not good guys and they are not bad guys, they're' just guys. Countries are not moral actors.
Russia is not weak, and they are also not insurmountably strong. They have strengths and weaknesses.
Macgregor takes things to an absurd extreme, suggesting that Russia would slaughter the NATO on the battlefield.
Well, judging by the Kursk adventure (75000 dead, so far) the Russians (and NorKs) are in the process of slaughtering NATO on the battlefield - so yes. It prolly was not a good strategy to poke the bear. Akshully. Just imagine a Lithuanian battalion trying to enter near St Petersburg - yes they would get slaughtered - just because they are little and Russia is big, sorry.
The reason McGregor is doing that pro-Russian sounding narrative, IMO, is because there seems to be an echo-chamber of Ukraine-can-still-win, or: Russia-must-not-win mantras floating about, influenced by the likes of Kellogg and the post-Biden factions in Washington. Someone has to sound the alarms.
Also, when analyzing the battle-supply-chain/ casualty stuff, the Russian stats tend to be closer to the truth, yet Washington seems to beleeb the Ukrainian/MI6 narrative, for political reasons.
So, I'll continue to listen to what the colonel has to say, thanks.
There’s a difference between slaughtering half-trained conscripts, and a hodgepodge of foreign fighters, led by Politicians LARPING as Officers. Who are Using Weapons far more advanced than what their doctrine was built around. Versus a professional Army. The Ukrainian Professional Army was mostly expended in the opening months of the war.
So it’s hardly indicative of what would occur with mainline NATO Forces.
And, do we need to find out?
No we do not. The point I was making was it’s not a particularly great comparison to infer what would happen in such a theoretical matchup.
OK granted. The reason I gave the Kursk example, is that there was evidence of Lots of Nationalities - arranged in language-specific battalions. It was not just the 'spent and under-trained' conscripts, as you say. There were a good number of NATO dudes there to handle the NATO gear.
Also the Ukrainians that were involved in the rear, were the Shock-troops - if you like - the ones with the 1930's ideology. But, there definitely was a quotient of fresh conscript meat, judging by PoW testimonies.
So it's a matter of degree.
NATO without the US, definitely doomed
We do have a problem with Israel approved appointees , I liked this guy too , what a bummer ! I will not turn even a hair from loyalty to Trump , however he is swinging in all different directions , he admitted thst last time he depended a lot on advice and referrals from people for appointees etc ,he did talk about how that didn’t alwsys work out and mistakes with his choices were made ! Now this time … Maybe not as many, I don’t believe as many , but I do believe there are a few questionable choices and I don’t understand why unless we all become those little head bobbing dogs that you put on dashboards where our heads just go up and down and agree with everything regardless of red flags. I think it’s crazy that so many believe that we can not question anything and that we’re somehow anti-Trump or anti-Q if we do , this isn’t true. Mistakes were made last time President Trump admitted this himself why so many people believe that no mistakes could ever happen again is beyond me.
I thought Q said, "We have it all". Well, if that's true then 1) Its part of the plan to pop bad actors or 2) The bad actors are better than the Q team. Excuse me there's some black SUVs in my driveway. 😮😂
Ha ha ha , actually it could happen , but in Jesus name not to you !
There will always be brilliant people who miss the point, unfortunately. He's given us good insight before but he probably doesn't follow or understand Q so it robs him of some vital insight to this war. 40K view plus Q that's the winning ticket to understanding the long game, imho.
Please share the link. Thanks.
Mate just go tor redacted on you tube
It’s interesting he stirs the pot using Israel when back in 2020 the Jerusalem Post wrote a glowing article about him. Not to mention the IDF made one of his books required reading and had him come speak to IDF leaders.
My opinion is the guy makes his living (and feeds his ego) consulting with Global Leaders. He is going to say things he believes will bring business his way.
https://m.jpost.com/opinion/antisemitism-accusations-against-dr-douglas-macgregor-are-deeply-upsetting-639119
I trusted this guy too..It is funny, sadly my best friend is a Doomer..Does not matter (What) General I provide to point to for the Truth "I have been using "Macgregor" - my Friend has a MSM General to refute and is saying the exact opposite. IF I remember right, this guy has Never Been a Rah-Rah Trump guy?!?!
If you look at history and humanity, being a doomer is rational and realistic. We, who have hope in Q, are the irrational ones waiting to be proven correct. I think we will be, but the doomers are not wrong, yet.
MPE..I guess you are right. To me, the fact that people are not lining up for their 14th Death Jab...and We here on GA, are not in a FEMA Camp..Spells Winning to me??
I mean, is he completely wrong though?
Its disgusting how remarks and questions have to be phrased so extra carefully when "they " are the topic.
Jeffery Sachs is another one, he seems to ignore the fact that the old status quo is no longer an option.