https://youtu.be/aWNzq9OWGmY?si=MwIbegPXjuQ-f_0m
A very interesting lecture if you have the time to listen to it. She has an interesting book too.
She talks about how it was physically impossible for the twin towers to collapse in the way we were told when hit by a plane, and that it was likely directed energy weapons responsible for the destruction of the buildings.
This is one of the most convincing takes I've ever heard on how the towers collapsed.
How do you "direct energy" from outside the building to hit primary support points all at the same time, floor by floor? Pre-placed exposives is the only logical conclusion as to how the towers, and bldg7, could collapse the way they did.
I recall watching more than one documentary claiming there to have been a high level of nanothermite in the debris and soil around the site. Areas around the main support columns had been closed for several weeks before 9/11 for ‘painting’.
☝️☝️☝️ Maybe a combination of both tools. Building 7 were most likely pre-placed explosives and the twin towers were maybe a combination of nanothermite, explosives and direct energy weapons. I'm not an expert in this matter.
No, it was a high level of aluminum oxide, melted iron, and ferric oxide---all consistent with a fire in which the vapor of melted aircraft aluminum was ignited and also burned. And thermite is not an explosive.
CNN tell you this haha
I think I said nano-thermite FWIW….which is, of course, explosive and capable of melting steel. You seem very self-assured regarding your 9/11 knowledge tho. Also, iron melting point = 2800F Jet fuel burns at ~ 1800F.
Thermite of any kind is a pyrotechnic, not an explosive (no evolution of hot gases). The adiabatic flame temperature of kerosene (jet fuel) is 3801 F. In rocket engines, it can reach 4000 F. They make it burn at lower temperature (lean mixture) in a jet engine in order to avoid melting the turbine blades, which was a problem for the first jet engines. My career involved jet propulsion thermodynamics. In any case, it does not require that steel actually melt to lose essentially all its strength. 70% of strength is lost by structural steel at a temperature of 600 C (1112 F). (The adiabatic flame temperature of burning aluminum with oxygen is 6750 F. I've seen no one take burning aluminum into account.)
How can paper melt into steel?
https://files.catbox.moe/2u9pb6.mp4
I have a video showing the detonation of building 7 from top to bottom. You can hear the explosions going off.
AND YOU HAVE WON THE INTERNET FOR THE DAY...I also have the video and it shows quite CLEARLY THE EXPLOSIONS STARTING AT THE TOP AND MOVING DOWN...Bld 7 COLLAPSED ON ITSELF...
Also, I remember an article that there were ISRAELI "PAINTERS" IN THE BUILDING and that is WHERE THE PENTAGON WAS HOLDING A FORENSIC AUDIT ON CASH FLOWS TO ISRAEL!!!!!!
Also one of the fire fighters said they were about to pull the building and they needed to get out of there. They knew.
Great work brother!
A directed energy weapon would burn the exterior and melt the outside structural columns. It wouldn't penetrate to the center (columns) or far side. A building is a very poor target for a directed energy weapon...especially one that couldn't penetrate clouds. Or hang around for prolonged periods of time.
Toasted cars. Just like Maui. Just like Malibu
I came here to say this^^^
Nanothermite...
Didn't trump say it was bombs?
That was an off-the-cuff remark. The collapse was a collapse, not a series of detonations.
I just want to add something here on the detonations that the above person and I referenced...
The explosives that are used in perforating VERY THICK oil well casings...the name used for such explosives are "shaped charges". They can be set against any tube or column and can "shear" the column at that point.
Shear means at that point of where the explosive is the column is "sheared" by a SLUG that perforates the column...The VERY HIGH TEMPERATURES OBTAINED when the device goes off "MELTS" steel at that point.
https://www.drillingmanual.com/well-perforation-methods-techniques-in-oil-gas-completion/
Also, a DIRECT ENERGY WEAPON must be ONSITE and functioning WITHOUT ANY THOUGHT OF BEING SEEN!!!!...There have been pictures taken of the buildings around BLDG 7 AND NO SUCH DEVICE WAS FOUND!!!!
I've got no problem with the absence of DEWs. I've always maintained the idea was bonkers.
I understand shaped charges. But they do not leave residue that can be confused for thermite. And a perforation does not equal a shear across the entire column. You can punch holes in column webs without losing the majority of strength. But perhaps you mean a linear shaped charge, which produces a line perforation. It would still be an explosion, and the observed collapse was only a collapse with no explosive signs.
KSP (great name)...the charges from the film that I saw, were going going off floor-by-floor and one can see the charges going off in a LINE across one side...
Now back to what you were saying...too lay that much charge for each side of the building and then the height would take an inordinate amount of explosives even using explosive in a linear fashion would be out of the realm of weight...
The company I worked in Texas, would fill boxes with 100 of these things AND they had different sizes for the casings...so, they would have know (which was obtained from the NYC Building Department: THE NUMBER OF COLUMNS THE SIZE OF SAID COLUMNS HOW MANY COLUMNS ON EACH FLOOR...
From the video that I saw and the other commenter, the building started it's collapse in the MIDDLE, NOT on the outer ages...and the video clearly shows the charges going off around each perimeter first and once the perimeter started the inner charges went off...thus guaranteeing the whole building feel on itself...
VERY Good THOUGHT PROCESS that has come out of this...OUTSTANDING!!!!!!!! AND THANK YOU!!!!!!
You're welcome. Are you aware that the windows will burst from the effects of an apparent explosion? Upper floors collapsing onto a lower floor will compress the air. If the volume is reduced by half, the increased interior air pressure on the windows will be about a ton per square foot (~15 psi). Reduced by 2/3rds, it will be two tons per square foot (~30 psi). Every collapsing floor would look like that.
Yes
I have her book. She covers it well.
Me too. Its a pretty incredible book. I was scratching my head, wondering how one person could put something like this together.
Those buildings erupted from the top down. The release of energy was phenomenal. I don't know what it was. But it could have been multiple technologies used together. But, they did not collapse in the way they want us to believe they did.
Heres a big clue, sportsfans, do your homework on: Jon Hutchinson...
Completely consistent with a cascade of collapse from floor to floor. Nothing happened "from the top down." It only proceeded from the floors that were weakened from the fires. The higher stories were unaffected.
There is no getting past,
<[] <<<
"The Nose Out Shot."
I watched two of her big lectures on the twin towers. Two things struck me. 1) its obvious she knows her physics and physical sciences. 2) unfortunately, the words and phrases she uses makes her sound like a loon. I think its her way of adjusting her physics speak to be palatable to the lay person and I applaud her for trying to do that. Yet, she still "sounds" like a loon. I think that if not for that, her message would have had broader reach. Remember this as you watch her videos and don't dismiss her outright. Don't be surprised if you find the word "dustification" sneaking into your vocabulary though!
When I remember her theory, “dustified” is the word I associate with her.
Where did the towers go????
One of the greatest mysteries of 9-11 is where did all the office furniture go? If the building collapsed, then you would have thousands of crushed file cabinets, and other office equipment. Like a trash compactor. But there was only ONE smashed up file cabinet found.
And then, why would the debris pile from the towers be at street level? You would expect a massive pile of smashed up rubble. But even the early news casts asked "where is all the rubble"???? Then they apparently got the message to shut up.
The book does a fantastic job of presenting the evidence first, and then saying "what could have happened to leave this sort of scene?"