They have no issue with swearing unfaithful oaths if it is in pursuit of their religion. The religion needs to be banned as anathema to western civilization. Its been a threat to our people and faith since its inception.
I REALLY do believe that ALL muslims need to repatriate back to their own countries...they WILL NEVER BE PART OF ANY LOCAL HERE IN THE UNITED STATES and are a detriment to what America stands for...they are anathema to OUR Countries Beliefs that we are a Christian Country...NOT A MUSLIM COUNTRY and FREEDOM OF RELIGION cannot be used because they believe in an eye-for-eye concept...do them wrong then the scimitars come out of the scabbard!!!!!!
Barry freaking Soetoro did this mess, they need to leave and get their us citizenship back to us. They can’t be here because their culture DO NOT align with ours.
We went to war with the Islamist Barbary Pirates immediately following the Revolutionary War. One of the biggest disservices our Founding Fathers did was NOT banning Islam here in our own country. They KNEW what they were facing with these people and did nothing to ensure we wouldn't be experiencing a new Me uslim Conquest.
One of the biggest disservices our Founding Fathers did was NOT banning Islam here in our own country
I agree. Islam is an underhanded scheme to take over the world by fraud, deceit, and violence, and NOT a true religion.
ANY group that denies the brotherhood of Man -- that opposes and actively violates Jesus' commandment to love one another -- is anti-life and a danger to civilized society.
Jesus is not the only religious leader to tell followers to love their fellow humans, of course. Other religions teach the same need for love and compassion -- and so does Islam -- but Islam negates that by ALSO teaching the need for Muslims to FORCE Islam on everyone else, including by force and violence.
John: 13:34
A new commandment I give unto you, That ye love one another; as I have loved you, that ye also love one another.
13:35
By this shall all men know that ye are my disciples, if ye have love one to another.
You are either a liar or incredibly misled. I am gonna need you to produce receipts here are just some of mine-
. Jesus Himself Testified to a Global Mission
• John 3:16 – “For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life.”
👉 Not Israel alone — the world.
• John 10:16 – “I have other sheep that are not of this sheep pen. I must bring them also. They too will listen to my voice, and there shall be one flock and one shepherd.”
👉 Jesus foresaw Gentiles (non-Israelites) being gathered to Him.
⸻
The Great Commission
• Matthew 28:19–20 – “Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you.”
👉 Jesus commands the Gospel to go to all nations.
• Acts 1:8 – “You will be my witnesses in Jerusalem, and in all Judea and Samaria, and to the ends of the earth.”
👉 The mission expands outward, not inward.
⸻
The Apostolic Witness
• Acts 10:34–35 (Peter with Cornelius, a Gentile): “I now realize how true it is that God does not show favoritism but accepts from every nation the one who fears Him and does what is right.”
👉 The Holy Spirit falls on Gentiles — proof Christ’s salvation is for all.
• Romans 10:12–13 – “There is no difference between Jew and Gentile—the same Lord is Lord of all and richly blesses all who call on Him, for ‘Everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved.’”
• Galatians 3:28–29 – “There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus. If you belong to Christ, then you are Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise.”
👉 The covenant family is expanded to all who are in Christ. Unless you are actually willing to claim you rather than the apostle Paul are correct? Are you making THAT claim? Can you match his record of miraculous intervention and acts in the name of Christ? Or of any of the multitude of Believers that have followed? If not then I suggest you put down your poor translations garbage argument and recognize you are not playing a game. You are potentially misleading souls and THAT has consequences even if you don’t believe in them. Ye shall know the truth and it shall set you free.
I could just tell you to go fuck yourself, but where would that get us?
Let's put the insults aside, and have a civil debate and discussion about what the Bible actually says, if possible.
Most Christians today have fallen into the trap of believing the DOCTRINES of the denominational churches and NOT the Bible itself.
MOST will simply listen to or read what a DOCTRINE says, and not actually try to read and understand the BIBLE ITSELF.
90% or more of the people attending church on Sunday really do not understand the Bible, and MOST of that is the fault of the preachers and their FALSE doctrines.
That's because the preachers do EXACTLY what you just did: take one little snippet from a verse of the Bible and claim it has a particular meaning, without ANY CONTEXT to validate it.
The churches have created THEIR OWN BIBLE(S), in a sense, via their doctrines, which in many cases are NOT accurate.
And yes, there are many false translations in our modern English versions of the Bible.
John 3:16 --
Many people want to point to this ONE verse in the Bible as the holy grail -- the ONE verse that TRUMPS all other biblical versus. But let's put it into perspective. It is only ONE verse, and it MUST be construed within the overall context of the ENTIRE Bible, not just this one passage standing alone to "prove" something.
To understand the Bible, we must consider how the people who wrote it lived and experienced the "world" at that time. Just like understanding the Constitution requires us to understand what the Founding Fathers meant, we need to understand the Greeks at the time the New Testament books were written.
The word "world" in English is translated from several Greek words. One of them means the Greco-Roman geographic territory that the people of that time understood as the "world."
They knew about the Middle East (as we call it today), because that is where they lived. They knew about north Africa and part of Europe and part of near Asia, but they did not know much beyond that, and did not know of any "people" beyond their immediate area.
The people living in this "world" that they knew were mostly White. The blacks were still in Africa, the Asians in far east Asia, etc.
As I said previously, Paul wrote ALL of his letters to his FELLOW Israelites (in Europe), and none to anyone else -- because they were not known to him, and were not a part of this new thing called Christianity.
Another Greek word that has been translated into "world" in English actually means something more close to "society." It is not a geographic term, but a social term.
This is "our world" or "our society." It's that kind of idea.
When it comes to the Constitution, the government was founded and organized by the White men of America. The Indians played no part and were outside the scope of "America" in the governmental sense.
Likewise, the blacks were mostly slaves, and the few blacks who were free also played no role. So, when the Preamble says, "... our Posterity," it is not talking about anyone who is not a part of "us" or "our."
The Bible was written by men who lived in a time and place where the White man lived in the "world," both in terms of the geographic territory and the society -- the "world" that they knew.
By the time of Jesus, there were also non-Whites there, such as Canaanites and Edomites (ancestors to modern-day Jews), but they looked more or less white, as well. There were no Africans, Chinese, etc. living where Jesus was.
This is why Jesus often spoke to the "multitudes." They were all the various people living in Judea, not just the Israelites who were still there.
"World" to them was the geographic territory AND society of the Israelites, for whom the Bible was written in the first place.
Remember, God promised that the Israelites would inherit the Earth -- ONLY the Israelites. The others were not a factor in the big picture story of the Bible, other than various mentions of how they interfered with the Israelites.
1 Kings 8:53 --
For thou didst separate them [Israelites] from among all the people of the earth, to be thine inheritance, as thou spakest by the hand of Moses thy servant, when thou broughtest our fathers out of Egypt, O Lord God.
And later, Matthew 15:24 --
I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.
Jesus did not come to Earth for everyone. Said so himself.
The Israelites were the "world" that Christ came to save.
He came SPECIFICALLY to save the Israelites from sin by sacrificing Himself because The Law required DEATH for many sins, and the Israelites just could not live up to it. But The Law still REQUIRED the death penalty, so Jesus took the "bullet" for all Israelites, so that in the future their death penalty was already paid.
They were still not supposed to sin, but now any sin would be accounted for in Heaven, rather than the death penalty.
Matthew 5:17 & 19 --
17 Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
19 Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.
That was His primary, though not only purpose.
The phrase "only begotten son" also needs to be examined. We are told elsewhere in the Bible that Adam is the "son of God," and that the children of Israel are the "children of God."
This seems to be another contradiction. Is "only begotten son" translated accurately in John 3:16?
In Hebrews 11:17, Isaac is called Abraham's "only begotten son," even though Ishmael was also Abraham's' son.
By faith Abraham, when he was tried, offered up Isaac: and he that had received the promises offered up his only begotten son,
What gives? How can someone have an ONLY begotten son, when he has more than one son?
Does the phrase mean something the churches are not telling us (maybe because they don't even know, since they mostly follow their man-made doctrines)?
What did the Greeks mean in their language at the time when using this phrase?
The Septuagint does not say "only begotten son." It says "beloved son." The Greek phrase "only begotten son" was an idiom of the time that meant "most beloved son" of all the sons a man might have.
It is more akin to "most favored son." It can also mean "one of a kind" or "unique."
In the Constitution, the 2nd Amendment says, "... right to bear arms." It does not mean your biceps. It means your pistol or rifle. Words can SEEM to mean one thing, but you have to look beyond the surface to find out which meaning really applies.
Personally, I think that Jesus Christ was God in human form, and not actually a "son" of God. But the writers of the New Testament did not understand it that way, probably because Christ Himself said he was the "son of God."
If He had come out and said He IS God, that would have been a different conversation, and would have made the message far more difficult to give to mortal humans.
But that is a side issue.
Really, John 3:16 must be understood within the CONTEXT of the ENTIRE Bible. It cannot be taken as a snippet, read as written in the English versions of the Bible, and used to claim it means what you are claiming it means.
The people who wrote the NT did not see planet Earth as the "world" in the way we do today, and did not see "people" of their society the same, either.
They only understood their "world" and society of their day.
And they wrote about it from THEIR perspective.
The rest of your post would take even longer to respond to, as you are using a number of terms that are also out-of-context ("Jew," "Gentile," and "nation" in particular), and I'm sure you got that from the denominational churches who have their doctrines that are made-up by men, and not necessarily taken from the Bible, as originally written.
Most Christians today have this same problem, and that's why nobody seems to understand the story of the Bible.
It has been purposely mistranslated and misunderstood -- over many centuries. That's what should be expected from the enemy, after all.
You are potentially misleading souls ...
I would say YOU are the one misleading by falling for a false understanding of the Bible, that the writers never intended.
Why didn't Paul write any epistles to the Zulus in Africa? Why didn't he write to the Mongolians in Asia?
Because they lived outside of the story of the Bible, and were never intended to be a part of Christian society.
Same exact concept when the Founding Fathers created the United States of America. It was written by and for the People, and THEIR Posterity.
Our modern understanding of both the Constitution and the Bible have been ... corrupted.
That should not shock anyone, since we all know what a corrupt society we find ourselves in.
What you’re teaching is not the gospel of Jesus Christ—it’s a distortion. The story of Scripture from beginning to end is God redeeming all nations, not just one bloodline.
God’s promise was global from the start.
• Genesis 12:3 — “All peoples on earth will be blessed through you.”
• Isaiah 49:6 — “I will make you a light for the Gentiles, that my salvation may reach to the ends of the earth.”
Jesus made the scope crystal clear.
• John 3:16 — “God so loved the world…”
• Matthew 28:19 — “Go and make disciples of all nations.”
• John 1:29 — “The Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world.”
The early church lived this out.
• Acts 2 — The Spirit poured out on “every nation under heaven.”
• Acts 10:34–35 — Peter: “God does not show favoritism but accepts from every nation.”
• Galatians 3:28 — Paul: “There is neither Jew nor Gentile… you are all one in Christ.”
Twisting “world” into “only Israelites” is false.
Yes, kosmos has shades of meaning, but John is explicit:
• 1 John 2:2 — “He is the atoning sacrifice for our sins, and not only for ours but also for the sins of the whole world.”
The end of the story leaves no doubt.
• Revelation 7:9 — “A great multitude… from every nation, tribe, people and language, standing before the throne and before the Lamb.”
So let’s be clear:
• Jesus did not die for one race.
• Paul did not preach to one bloodline.
• The Spirit is not parceled out by genes it is received by consent and surrender
Your teaching is not hidden wisdom. It’s an old lie, recycled. The true gospel is open and plain: Christ crucified, arms stretched wide for the world. Anything smaller is not the gospel—it’s idolatry.
I stand by my “insult” because it is one or the other. If you are misled I beg you to seek Christ. Truly seek him go to him and ask that he guide you into all truth. If you are misusing the word for twisted purposes to deceive or to as a blade of your hate- then know you will be called to account. Your true motives will be made evident. Ye shall know the truth and the truth shall set you free. It is a blessing for those who seek truth and a curse to deceivers.
“Why didn’t Paul write letters to the Zulus or Mongolians?” Because Paul wasn’t Google Maps. He traveled as a Roman citizen on Roman roads. His letters went to churches in the Mediterranean basin—Corinth, Rome, Philippi—where he could physically go. That’s not exclusion, that’s geography.
And Christianity reached Africa immediately:
• Acts 8:27–39 — Philip baptizes the Ethiopian eunuch, bringing the gospel into Africa.
• By the 2nd–3rd centuries, Africa produced giants like Tertullian and Augustine of Hippo who shaped Christian theology.
• The Zulu nation itself didn’t even exist until 1,700 years after Paul.
Asking why Paul didn’t write to the Zulus is like asking why he didn’t write to George Washington—it’s an anachronism, not an argument.
The Founding Fathers Analogy
Equating the U.S. Constitution with the Bible is false and dangerous:
• The Constitution was written by fallible men in 1787. The Bible is God-breathed (2 Tim. 3:16), written over 1,500 years by 40+ inspired authors.
• The “posterity” of the Founders was a legal phrase, not a covenantal one. Scripture says in Christ, “You are no longer foreigners and strangers, but fellow citizens with God’s people” (Eph. 2:19). God’s “posterity” is belief, not bloodline.
• Jesus Himself said, “My kingdom is not of this world.” (John 18:36). The Kingdom of God is not America, not Rome, not any earthly nation.
The Constitution is IMHO an inspired by God document a way to create a government most likely to allow true pursuit of God without interference. That is not the same as the word of God. The Constitution is vital and the most important document written by man to date. It is men mostly men of God struggling to create an ideal larger than them. It is not a Holy Scripture capable of filling the same place in human history or hearts as the Holy Bible. In both your comparisons you seek to undermine both suggesting that neither are valid because they were not universal enough and therefore false and must be rejected. Current corruption of society at its root preaches universalism as the standard for all things. All things must be for all people or be rejected even that which is detestable. Your argument seems to agree with that tenet. I disagree.
It does NOT mean the modern concept of a geographical territory inhabited by ANYONE who might wander in.
That would be ridiculous.
Why does the OT have all the "this man BEGAT that son, who BEGAT these sons, one of whom BEGAT that son?"
It is a BLOOD LINE story.
Why ELSE would that be in there at all?
It is there for a REASON, but you can't explain it.
Your understanding is the modern Disney version of the Bible, not what was originally written.
All peoples on earth will be blessed through you.
Yes, the Israelites (the White race) HAS blessed everyone on Earth, having created most of the inventions that made the world a better place to live.
• John 3:16 — “God so loved the world…
I already addressed that.
• Matthew 28:19 — “Go and make disciples of all nations.”
Again ... "nation" is a PEOPLE that are related by BLOOD.
• John 1:29 — “The Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world.”
I already addressed that, as well.
You don't seem willing or able to reply to the points I make. You just regurgitate the same thing over and over, pretending like I didn't address those points.
The Spirit poured out on “every nation ... accepts from every nation.”
Like I said before, you are misunderstanding certain words, including "nation."
• Galatians 3:28 — Paul: “There is neither Jew nor Gentile… you are all one in Christ.”
First of all, he says YOU are all one in Christ -- meaning the people he was writing to, the Galatians (Galatae). He was talking about THEM ... NOT YOU.
Second, it does not say "Jew or Gentile" in my various translations. It says "Jew or Greek."
But again, the words must be explained because of the false translations.
"Jew" was not in the Bible originally. In the OT, it was Judahite and in the NT it was Judean. Jesus was accused of being "king of the Judeans," which was a mockery, since Judea was a province of Rome, and nobody could be a "king" there.
Anyway ...
Paul of Tarsus was a Roman citizen. His family was wealthy, so they were allowed to be Roman citizens, but not everyone on Anatolia (modern day Turkey) were allowed to be Roman citizens.
The word "gentile" comes from the Latin word "gentilus" which meant someone who was NOT a Roman citizen. It has NOTHING TO DO with non-Jew.
Most people in Europe/Western Asia spoke Greek at that time.
Diodorus Siculus was an historian who lived about 50-100 years before Christ. He documented that the Galatians (Galatae) were Germanic people with "yellow" hair. Some of them mixed with Greeks, and it is these Galatae to whom Paul of Tarsus wrote his epistle.
He was telling them that it doesn't matter if you are a Roman citizen or not, and goes on to also say in 3:28 that it doesn't matter if you are free or a slave, or male or female.
There is neither Jew (sic) nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
He was talking to THEM, and ONLY them.
He was NOT talking to ... YOU ... or me, or anyone else but THEM.
This passage has NOTHING to do with blacks, Asians, Mexicans or anyone else, who Paul didn't even know about. It also has nothing to do with modern "Jews." It doesn't even have to do with the Edomites (ancestors of modern Jews), as they were not the Galatae to whom the letter was written.
Read the entire chapter from the first verse, and it should be more clear.
This is why if you don't research the original meanings of words, YOU CANNOT UNDERSTAND THE BIBLE.
Twisting “world” into “only Israelites” is false. Yes, kosmos has shades of meaning, but John is explicit: • 1 John 2:2 — “He is the atoning sacrifice for our sins, and not only for ours but also for the sins of the whole world.”
That is circular logic. You are ASSUMING that your definition of "world" is what YOU are thinking it means, and then trying to use it to DEFINE "world."
Also, it says "our" sins. Who are these "our" people?
The Israelites. That's WHO the Bible is ABOUT.
Yes -- a FAMILY (or House) of a PARTICULAR people. Not everyone.
So let’s be clear: • Jesus did not die for one race. • Paul did not preach to one bloodline. • The Spirit is not parceled out by genes it is received by consent and surrender
Let's be CRYSTAL clear: YOU ARE WRONG.
Here is proof:
Matthew 15:24, Jesus says --
I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.
He came for NO ONE ELSE.
Said so HIMSELF.
You want to ignore that.
But you do so at your peril.
Also, Paul wrote his epistles to his FELLOW ISRAELITE BROTHERS.
He mentions this in Romans 11:1 --
For I also am an Israelite, of the seed of Abraham, of the tribe of Benjamin.
He was writing to his BLOOD BROTHERS, spreading the word of Christ, so they would set up proper churches and let their kin know about it.
I stand by my “insult” ...
Your insult means nothing to me, because you won't even respond to my points. You just pretend I didn't say anything so you can repeat yourself.
You don't have the intellectual integrity to engage in a debate or discussion like this.
If you were insulted that was because you were lying. Being misinformed is not insulting the way you took my statement is proof you have a deceptive agenda. I did address your points and you know it- I addressed them by pointing out the fallacy. There is no reason to address each point one by one built on fallacy because your argument fails at the very root. Actually if you had understood parable of the Feast you would not need a break down because Christ truth is clarion for those with eyes to see and ears to hear. I initially leaned into a direction of assuming you were misunderstanding but now I believe you are unable to understand what is not plainly spoken. Before I do- again I urge you seek Christ. Allow him to teach you and lay down this falseness. Allow his love and truth to transform your heart and lead you from hatred to grace-
I am addressing your arguments because they contain very twisted dogma designed to dissuade others from the Gospel. If that is your goal then I pray you turn away. What you can not see and can not understand is not weak people blindly following- It is built on a reality that exist with or without your permission or understanding necessary. Our Lord is love incarnate but he is also the greatest power in all the universe and I caution you STRONGLY to turn to and not away from him. I won’t be baited into wasting anymore time on you. After addressing your lies plainly I will pray for you and nothing else.
Lie: “The Bible is a bloodline story—it’s about race.”
Truth: The Bible is a redemption story. Genealogies show Christ’s fulfillment, not racial supremacy. Outsiders were included: Rahab (Canaanite), Ruth (Moabite) (Matt. 1:5).
Galatians 3:29 — “If you belong to Christ, then you are Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise.”
Lie: “‘Nation’ means only blood relatives.”
Truth: The Greek word ethnos means “peoples, nations, Gentiles.” Paul calls himself “apostle to the Gentiles” (Rom. 11:13). Nations in Scripture = people groups, not genetics.
Revelation 5:9 — “With your blood you purchased for God persons from every tribe and language and people and nation.”
Lie: “Jews corrupted Christianity to manipulate others.”
Truth: Christianity began with Jews, through the Jewish Messiah. Jesus was Jewish. The apostles were Jewish. The first church was Jewish. Jews didn’t corrupt Christianity they faced the same corruptor Christians do. The Corruption happened with the serpent and no people are immune. Christ came for all through the first man who did not seek to define God but instead sought to truly learn. So that people already had the foundation needed to bring the messiah’s message into. Christ himself made it clear that belief not bloodline is most important. The first shall be last and the last shall be first.
John 4:22 — Jesus: “Salvation is from the Jews.”
Romans 1:16 — “First to the Jew, then to the Gentile.”
The apostles died as martyrs, not manipulators.
Lie: “John 3:16 and Galatians only applied to them, not us.”
Truth: John 1:29 — “The Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world.”
1 John 2:2 — “Not only for our sins but also for the sins of the whole world.”
Romans 10:12 — “There is no difference between Jew and Gentile—the same Lord is Lord of all and richly blesses all who call on him.”
Lie: “Christianity was meant for one race.”
Truth: Acts 2:5 — “God-fearing Jews from every nation under heaven” at Pentecost.
Acts 10:34–35 — “God does not show favoritism but accepts from every nation the one who fears him.”
Revelation 7:9 — “A great multitude… from every nation, tribe, people and language, standing before the throne.”
⚓ Any teaching that pits the people of God against each other is not hidden wisdom—it is an old lie. Christ’s blood was shed for all nations. The cross doesn’t divide by race; it unites by grace.
This is amusing. A muslim is pretending he can make the criminal 'islam' crap part of America. Religion is the cause of Most wars and islam has Never been the cause of ANY Peace. When They Cause a religious war In the USA, Islam will be a footnote in history in a month. That is called stupidity.
Every Muslim that doesn’t support the Constitution needs to go.
They have no issue with swearing unfaithful oaths if it is in pursuit of their religion. The religion needs to be banned as anathema to western civilization. Its been a threat to our people and faith since its inception.
Yes. Islam & their oppressive mandatory religious doctrine (Sharia Law) is anathema to the U.S. Constitution!
I REALLY do believe that ALL muslims need to repatriate back to their own countries...they WILL NEVER BE PART OF ANY LOCAL HERE IN THE UNITED STATES and are a detriment to what America stands for...they are anathema to OUR Countries Beliefs that we are a Christian Country...NOT A MUSLIM COUNTRY and FREEDOM OF RELIGION cannot be used because they believe in an eye-for-eye concept...do them wrong then the scimitars come out of the scabbard!!!!!!
Barry freaking Soetoro did this mess, they need to leave and get their us citizenship back to us. They can’t be here because their culture DO NOT align with ours.
Thank You & God Bless!!!!!!!
Deport him and all the rest of those like him.
We went to war with the Islamist Barbary Pirates immediately following the Revolutionary War. One of the biggest disservices our Founding Fathers did was NOT banning Islam here in our own country. They KNEW what they were facing with these people and did nothing to ensure we wouldn't be experiencing a new Me uslim Conquest.
I agree. Islam is an underhanded scheme to take over the world by fraud, deceit, and violence, and NOT a true religion.
ANY group that denies the brotherhood of Man -- that opposes and actively violates Jesus' commandment to love one another -- is anti-life and a danger to civilized society.
Jesus is not the only religious leader to tell followers to love their fellow humans, of course. Other religions teach the same need for love and compassion -- and so does Islam -- but Islam negates that by ALSO teaching the need for Muslims to FORCE Islam on everyone else, including by force and violence.
You have a misunderstanding of what the Bible actually says about this.
Matthew 15:24 --
Jesus came ONLY for His people -- the Israelites (White people, not jews).
He did NOT come for anyone else.
When He said to love your neighbor, that word meant to love your fellow Israelites.
God commanded they KILL others -- those who would harm the Israelites.
The Bible DOES NOT say to love everyone.
The Bible is focused on God's people.
Notice, ALL of Paul's letters were written to his FELLOW Israelites in Europe, and NONE to anyone in Africa, China, or anywhere else.
You are either a liar or incredibly misled. I am gonna need you to produce receipts here are just some of mine- . Jesus Himself Testified to a Global Mission • John 3:16 – “For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life.” 👉 Not Israel alone — the world. • John 10:16 – “I have other sheep that are not of this sheep pen. I must bring them also. They too will listen to my voice, and there shall be one flock and one shepherd.” 👉 Jesus foresaw Gentiles (non-Israelites) being gathered to Him.
⸻
⸻
Aww ... are we gonna start with insults?
I could just tell you to go fuck yourself, but where would that get us?
Let's put the insults aside, and have a civil debate and discussion about what the Bible actually says, if possible.
Most Christians today have fallen into the trap of believing the DOCTRINES of the denominational churches and NOT the Bible itself.
MOST will simply listen to or read what a DOCTRINE says, and not actually try to read and understand the BIBLE ITSELF.
90% or more of the people attending church on Sunday really do not understand the Bible, and MOST of that is the fault of the preachers and their FALSE doctrines.
That's because the preachers do EXACTLY what you just did: take one little snippet from a verse of the Bible and claim it has a particular meaning, without ANY CONTEXT to validate it.
The churches have created THEIR OWN BIBLE(S), in a sense, via their doctrines, which in many cases are NOT accurate.
And yes, there are many false translations in our modern English versions of the Bible.
John 3:16 --
Many people want to point to this ONE verse in the Bible as the holy grail -- the ONE verse that TRUMPS all other biblical versus. But let's put it into perspective. It is only ONE verse, and it MUST be construed within the overall context of the ENTIRE Bible, not just this one passage standing alone to "prove" something.
To understand the Bible, we must consider how the people who wrote it lived and experienced the "world" at that time. Just like understanding the Constitution requires us to understand what the Founding Fathers meant, we need to understand the Greeks at the time the New Testament books were written.
The word "world" in English is translated from several Greek words. One of them means the Greco-Roman geographic territory that the people of that time understood as the "world."
They knew about the Middle East (as we call it today), because that is where they lived. They knew about north Africa and part of Europe and part of near Asia, but they did not know much beyond that, and did not know of any "people" beyond their immediate area.
The people living in this "world" that they knew were mostly White. The blacks were still in Africa, the Asians in far east Asia, etc.
As I said previously, Paul wrote ALL of his letters to his FELLOW Israelites (in Europe), and none to anyone else -- because they were not known to him, and were not a part of this new thing called Christianity.
Another Greek word that has been translated into "world" in English actually means something more close to "society." It is not a geographic term, but a social term.
This is "our world" or "our society." It's that kind of idea.
When it comes to the Constitution, the government was founded and organized by the White men of America. The Indians played no part and were outside the scope of "America" in the governmental sense.
Likewise, the blacks were mostly slaves, and the few blacks who were free also played no role. So, when the Preamble says, "... our Posterity," it is not talking about anyone who is not a part of "us" or "our."
The Bible was written by men who lived in a time and place where the White man lived in the "world," both in terms of the geographic territory and the society -- the "world" that they knew.
By the time of Jesus, there were also non-Whites there, such as Canaanites and Edomites (ancestors to modern-day Jews), but they looked more or less white, as well. There were no Africans, Chinese, etc. living where Jesus was.
This is why Jesus often spoke to the "multitudes." They were all the various people living in Judea, not just the Israelites who were still there.
"World" to them was the geographic territory AND society of the Israelites, for whom the Bible was written in the first place.
Remember, God promised that the Israelites would inherit the Earth -- ONLY the Israelites. The others were not a factor in the big picture story of the Bible, other than various mentions of how they interfered with the Israelites.
1 Kings 8:53 --
And later, Matthew 15:24 --
Jesus did not come to Earth for everyone. Said so himself.
The Israelites were the "world" that Christ came to save.
He came SPECIFICALLY to save the Israelites from sin by sacrificing Himself because The Law required DEATH for many sins, and the Israelites just could not live up to it. But The Law still REQUIRED the death penalty, so Jesus took the "bullet" for all Israelites, so that in the future their death penalty was already paid.
They were still not supposed to sin, but now any sin would be accounted for in Heaven, rather than the death penalty.
Matthew 5:17 & 19 --
That was His primary, though not only purpose.
The phrase "only begotten son" also needs to be examined. We are told elsewhere in the Bible that Adam is the "son of God," and that the children of Israel are the "children of God."
This seems to be another contradiction. Is "only begotten son" translated accurately in John 3:16?
In Hebrews 11:17, Isaac is called Abraham's "only begotten son," even though Ishmael was also Abraham's' son.
What gives? How can someone have an ONLY begotten son, when he has more than one son?
Does the phrase mean something the churches are not telling us (maybe because they don't even know, since they mostly follow their man-made doctrines)?
What did the Greeks mean in their language at the time when using this phrase?
The Septuagint does not say "only begotten son." It says "beloved son." The Greek phrase "only begotten son" was an idiom of the time that meant "most beloved son" of all the sons a man might have.
It is more akin to "most favored son." It can also mean "one of a kind" or "unique."
In the Constitution, the 2nd Amendment says, "... right to bear arms." It does not mean your biceps. It means your pistol or rifle. Words can SEEM to mean one thing, but you have to look beyond the surface to find out which meaning really applies.
Personally, I think that Jesus Christ was God in human form, and not actually a "son" of God. But the writers of the New Testament did not understand it that way, probably because Christ Himself said he was the "son of God."
If He had come out and said He IS God, that would have been a different conversation, and would have made the message far more difficult to give to mortal humans.
But that is a side issue.
Really, John 3:16 must be understood within the CONTEXT of the ENTIRE Bible. It cannot be taken as a snippet, read as written in the English versions of the Bible, and used to claim it means what you are claiming it means.
The people who wrote the NT did not see planet Earth as the "world" in the way we do today, and did not see "people" of their society the same, either.
They only understood their "world" and society of their day.
And they wrote about it from THEIR perspective.
The rest of your post would take even longer to respond to, as you are using a number of terms that are also out-of-context ("Jew," "Gentile," and "nation" in particular), and I'm sure you got that from the denominational churches who have their doctrines that are made-up by men, and not necessarily taken from the Bible, as originally written.
Most Christians today have this same problem, and that's why nobody seems to understand the story of the Bible.
It has been purposely mistranslated and misunderstood -- over many centuries. That's what should be expected from the enemy, after all.
I would say YOU are the one misleading by falling for a false understanding of the Bible, that the writers never intended.
Why didn't Paul write any epistles to the Zulus in Africa? Why didn't he write to the Mongolians in Asia?
Because they lived outside of the story of the Bible, and were never intended to be a part of Christian society.
Same exact concept when the Founding Fathers created the United States of America. It was written by and for the People, and THEIR Posterity.
Our modern understanding of both the Constitution and the Bible have been ... corrupted.
That should not shock anyone, since we all know what a corrupt society we find ourselves in.
What you’re teaching is not the gospel of Jesus Christ—it’s a distortion. The story of Scripture from beginning to end is God redeeming all nations, not just one bloodline.
God’s promise was global from the start. • Genesis 12:3 — “All peoples on earth will be blessed through you.” • Isaiah 49:6 — “I will make you a light for the Gentiles, that my salvation may reach to the ends of the earth.”
Jesus made the scope crystal clear. • John 3:16 — “God so loved the world…” • Matthew 28:19 — “Go and make disciples of all nations.” • John 1:29 — “The Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world.”
The early church lived this out. • Acts 2 — The Spirit poured out on “every nation under heaven.” • Acts 10:34–35 — Peter: “God does not show favoritism but accepts from every nation.” • Galatians 3:28 — Paul: “There is neither Jew nor Gentile… you are all one in Christ.”
Twisting “world” into “only Israelites” is false. Yes, kosmos has shades of meaning, but John is explicit: • 1 John 2:2 — “He is the atoning sacrifice for our sins, and not only for ours but also for the sins of the whole world.”
The end of the story leaves no doubt. • Revelation 7:9 — “A great multitude… from every nation, tribe, people and language, standing before the throne and before the Lamb.”
So let’s be clear: • Jesus did not die for one race. • Paul did not preach to one bloodline. • The Spirit is not parceled out by genes it is received by consent and surrender
Your teaching is not hidden wisdom. It’s an old lie, recycled. The true gospel is open and plain: Christ crucified, arms stretched wide for the world. Anything smaller is not the gospel—it’s idolatry. I stand by my “insult” because it is one or the other. If you are misled I beg you to seek Christ. Truly seek him go to him and ask that he guide you into all truth. If you are misusing the word for twisted purposes to deceive or to as a blade of your hate- then know you will be called to account. Your true motives will be made evident. Ye shall know the truth and the truth shall set you free. It is a blessing for those who seek truth and a curse to deceivers.
I almost forgot to reply to your “points”
“Why didn’t Paul write letters to the Zulus or Mongolians?” Because Paul wasn’t Google Maps. He traveled as a Roman citizen on Roman roads. His letters went to churches in the Mediterranean basin—Corinth, Rome, Philippi—where he could physically go. That’s not exclusion, that’s geography.
And Christianity reached Africa immediately: • Acts 8:27–39 — Philip baptizes the Ethiopian eunuch, bringing the gospel into Africa. • By the 2nd–3rd centuries, Africa produced giants like Tertullian and Augustine of Hippo who shaped Christian theology. • The Zulu nation itself didn’t even exist until 1,700 years after Paul.
Asking why Paul didn’t write to the Zulus is like asking why he didn’t write to George Washington—it’s an anachronism, not an argument.
The Founding Fathers Analogy
Equating the U.S. Constitution with the Bible is false and dangerous: • The Constitution was written by fallible men in 1787. The Bible is God-breathed (2 Tim. 3:16), written over 1,500 years by 40+ inspired authors. • The “posterity” of the Founders was a legal phrase, not a covenantal one. Scripture says in Christ, “You are no longer foreigners and strangers, but fellow citizens with God’s people” (Eph. 2:19). God’s “posterity” is belief, not bloodline. • Jesus Himself said, “My kingdom is not of this world.” (John 18:36). The Kingdom of God is not America, not Rome, not any earthly nation.
The Constitution is IMHO an inspired by God document a way to create a government most likely to allow true pursuit of God without interference. That is not the same as the word of God. The Constitution is vital and the most important document written by man to date. It is men mostly men of God struggling to create an ideal larger than them. It is not a Holy Scripture capable of filling the same place in human history or hearts as the Holy Bible. In both your comparisons you seek to undermine both suggesting that neither are valid because they were not universal enough and therefore false and must be rejected. Current corruption of society at its root preaches universalism as the standard for all things. All things must be for all people or be rejected even that which is detestable. Your argument seems to agree with that tenet. I disagree.
"Nation" means a people related by BLOOD.
It does NOT mean the modern concept of a geographical territory inhabited by ANYONE who might wander in.
That would be ridiculous.
Why does the OT have all the "this man BEGAT that son, who BEGAT these sons, one of whom BEGAT that son?"
It is a BLOOD LINE story.
Why ELSE would that be in there at all?
It is there for a REASON, but you can't explain it.
Your understanding is the modern Disney version of the Bible, not what was originally written.
Yes, the Israelites (the White race) HAS blessed everyone on Earth, having created most of the inventions that made the world a better place to live.
I already addressed that.
Again ... "nation" is a PEOPLE that are related by BLOOD.
I already addressed that, as well.
You don't seem willing or able to reply to the points I make. You just regurgitate the same thing over and over, pretending like I didn't address those points.
Like I said before, you are misunderstanding certain words, including "nation."
First of all, he says YOU are all one in Christ -- meaning the people he was writing to, the Galatians (Galatae). He was talking about THEM ... NOT YOU.
Second, it does not say "Jew or Gentile" in my various translations. It says "Jew or Greek."
But again, the words must be explained because of the false translations.
"Jew" was not in the Bible originally. In the OT, it was Judahite and in the NT it was Judean. Jesus was accused of being "king of the Judeans," which was a mockery, since Judea was a province of Rome, and nobody could be a "king" there.
Anyway ...
Paul of Tarsus was a Roman citizen. His family was wealthy, so they were allowed to be Roman citizens, but not everyone on Anatolia (modern day Turkey) were allowed to be Roman citizens.
The word "gentile" comes from the Latin word "gentilus" which meant someone who was NOT a Roman citizen. It has NOTHING TO DO with non-Jew.
Most people in Europe/Western Asia spoke Greek at that time.
Diodorus Siculus was an historian who lived about 50-100 years before Christ. He documented that the Galatians (Galatae) were Germanic people with "yellow" hair. Some of them mixed with Greeks, and it is these Galatae to whom Paul of Tarsus wrote his epistle.
He was telling them that it doesn't matter if you are a Roman citizen or not, and goes on to also say in 3:28 that it doesn't matter if you are free or a slave, or male or female.
He was talking to THEM, and ONLY them.
He was NOT talking to ... YOU ... or me, or anyone else but THEM.
This passage has NOTHING to do with blacks, Asians, Mexicans or anyone else, who Paul didn't even know about. It also has nothing to do with modern "Jews." It doesn't even have to do with the Edomites (ancestors of modern Jews), as they were not the Galatae to whom the letter was written.
Read the entire chapter from the first verse, and it should be more clear.
This is why if you don't research the original meanings of words, YOU CANNOT UNDERSTAND THE BIBLE.
That is circular logic. You are ASSUMING that your definition of "world" is what YOU are thinking it means, and then trying to use it to DEFINE "world."
Also, it says "our" sins. Who are these "our" people?
The Israelites. That's WHO the Bible is ABOUT.
Yes -- a FAMILY (or House) of a PARTICULAR people. Not everyone.
Let's be CRYSTAL clear: YOU ARE WRONG.
Here is proof:
Matthew 15:24, Jesus says --
He came for NO ONE ELSE.
Said so HIMSELF.
You want to ignore that.
But you do so at your peril.
Also, Paul wrote his epistles to his FELLOW ISRAELITE BROTHERS.
He mentions this in Romans 11:1 --
He was writing to his BLOOD BROTHERS, spreading the word of Christ, so they would set up proper churches and let their kin know about it.
Your insult means nothing to me, because you won't even respond to my points. You just pretend I didn't say anything so you can repeat yourself.
You don't have the intellectual integrity to engage in a debate or discussion like this.
That is a damn shame, but it is YOUR shame.
If you were insulted that was because you were lying. Being misinformed is not insulting the way you took my statement is proof you have a deceptive agenda. I did address your points and you know it- I addressed them by pointing out the fallacy. There is no reason to address each point one by one built on fallacy because your argument fails at the very root. Actually if you had understood parable of the Feast you would not need a break down because Christ truth is clarion for those with eyes to see and ears to hear. I initially leaned into a direction of assuming you were misunderstanding but now I believe you are unable to understand what is not plainly spoken. Before I do- again I urge you seek Christ. Allow him to teach you and lay down this falseness. Allow his love and truth to transform your heart and lead you from hatred to grace-
I am addressing your arguments because they contain very twisted dogma designed to dissuade others from the Gospel. If that is your goal then I pray you turn away. What you can not see and can not understand is not weak people blindly following- It is built on a reality that exist with or without your permission or understanding necessary. Our Lord is love incarnate but he is also the greatest power in all the universe and I caution you STRONGLY to turn to and not away from him. I won’t be baited into wasting anymore time on you. After addressing your lies plainly I will pray for you and nothing else.
Lie: “The Bible is a bloodline story—it’s about race.” Truth: The Bible is a redemption story. Genealogies show Christ’s fulfillment, not racial supremacy. Outsiders were included: Rahab (Canaanite), Ruth (Moabite) (Matt. 1:5).
Galatians 3:29 — “If you belong to Christ, then you are Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise.”
Lie: “‘Nation’ means only blood relatives.” Truth: The Greek word ethnos means “peoples, nations, Gentiles.” Paul calls himself “apostle to the Gentiles” (Rom. 11:13). Nations in Scripture = people groups, not genetics.
Revelation 5:9 — “With your blood you purchased for God persons from every tribe and language and people and nation.”
Lie: “Jews corrupted Christianity to manipulate others.” Truth: Christianity began with Jews, through the Jewish Messiah. Jesus was Jewish. The apostles were Jewish. The first church was Jewish. Jews didn’t corrupt Christianity they faced the same corruptor Christians do. The Corruption happened with the serpent and no people are immune. Christ came for all through the first man who did not seek to define God but instead sought to truly learn. So that people already had the foundation needed to bring the messiah’s message into. Christ himself made it clear that belief not bloodline is most important. The first shall be last and the last shall be first.
John 4:22 — Jesus: “Salvation is from the Jews.” Romans 1:16 — “First to the Jew, then to the Gentile.” The apostles died as martyrs, not manipulators.
Lie: “John 3:16 and Galatians only applied to them, not us.” Truth: John 1:29 — “The Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world.” 1 John 2:2 — “Not only for our sins but also for the sins of the whole world.” Romans 10:12 — “There is no difference between Jew and Gentile—the same Lord is Lord of all and richly blesses all who call on him.”
Lie: “Christianity was meant for one race.” Truth: Acts 2:5 — “God-fearing Jews from every nation under heaven” at Pentecost. Acts 10:34–35 — “God does not show favoritism but accepts from every nation the one who fears him.” Revelation 7:9 — “A great multitude… from every nation, tribe, people and language, standing before the throne.”
⚓ Any teaching that pits the people of God against each other is not hidden wisdom—it is an old lie. Christ’s blood was shed for all nations. The cross doesn’t divide by race; it unites by grace.
Deported to Gitmo. FFS.
what a fool!
and he needs to read moar. many accounts of people here Before the Indians.
the 'mound builders' had large communities.
This is amusing. A muslim is pretending he can make the criminal 'islam' crap part of America. Religion is the cause of Most wars and islam has Never been the cause of ANY Peace. When They Cause a religious war In the USA, Islam will be a footnote in history in a month. That is called stupidity.
Foreigners talking like this must be thrown out, and their families, including any extended family.
LOL, 60 IQ goat fucker thinks he has a chance
Stone Age parasites.
Taqiyya
I think we need another holy war
This is a terrorist threat. Prosecute it.
Oh definitely he needs to go, along with every other demented, anti-American shithead..especially the ones in our government, every branch.
How in the world they came from far away to end up here? I know, Barry did it.
💯