Interestingly, the fonts used in the Sept 2 version and the fonts used in the Sept 12 version are tweaked.
If you draw a horizontal line across the text from In The Bible... The numbers in the Sept 2 version are lower, indicating either a smaller font size, a different font altogether, or a doctored image...
I think what this shows is that the press release was NOT corrected and the letter was NOT updated, but rather that the sept 2 dated letter is in fact a doctored and therefore fake document.
First of all, source? What's the source? Second of all, how easily could a digital image of a letter be doctored? Third of all, what? Why would the Rabbi send this to the Kirk family 8 days before the planned assassination? It's way too bleedingly obvious, no?
If the Rabbi knew that the plan was to kill Kirk, why prepare the letter beforehand? That would be dumb. What if the <planned" assassination was planned for Sept 1? Then why send it a week later.
Seems to me its far more likely that September 12, was doctored to read Sept 2.
The date 9 Elul 5785 corresponds, according to Grok, to August 31, 2025, not Sept 2. So what's with that?
If your bias is that this was a big conspiracy by Israel and Mossad and whoever else to take down Kirk, then your FIRST response to information should be questioning it and pulling it apart, not simply leaping to accept it because it suits your bias.
When people do NOT do that, I find it hard to take them seriously.
My bias is genuinely "wait and see" because multiple groups had reason for Charlie to be dead.
One look at recent polling as to young men's perspectives on more traditional gender roles shows that Charlie was having an enormous impact. Considering that cabal & communist forces have been trying to destroy those roles for decades (and sadly succeeding), they could not have been happy with Charlie's work.
I kept my original post short & sweet because if I do talk about Israel, especially in a "let's not jump to negative conclusions" manner, it tends to arouse a certain segment of the GAW membership, as I'm sure you're aware.
Hence the simple "I'm taking a wait and see" approach.
My spidey senses are telling me that this entire thing is psyop layered on psyop layered on psyop.
I dont trust a single thing about any of it.
I mean really. Whack someone on TV in a graphic manner whose assassination would elicit the most emotional and visceral response possible not involving Trump. Fully activate the MSM with shitty takes on the left and 24/7 mourning and fawning on the right for days on end. Have a sickening response by the leftist foot soldiers and then accuse the right of cancel culture when they fight back against it.
Its all too much. Its all too obviously staged and planned.
"Distraction" to get us arguing enough for more out of context quotes to use against anything truthful? You know how much they love doing that. Especially when tweets like this come out on crisis actors:
This gives credence to those who theorize that the white hats were aware of this planned assassination and staged this event with CK going into witness protection. I can't imagine the Kirks' would not have reported this to the authorities. (Not that I believe this, but this theory is out there, WTPN for example.)
Correct! And what I'm noticing is that whenever that theory is brought up that there is heavy down-voting. As I write this I notice you have 5 down votes. You know what that tells me? It tells me that those who mention this "theory" just might be over the target.
Ps;With the original, it would have been much better to know the truth (even though, of course, it's obvious that the original could also be tampered with).
Or you can use this great online tool used primarily for digital image analysis. It helps in detecting alterations or manipulations in images, such as whether an image has been edited, cropped, or retouched but it can also extract and analyze metadata from an image file. Metadata includes details like the camera model, date and time of capture, software used for editing, and sometimes even GPS location. This can help determine the authenticity of an image or reveal if it has been altered.
That is very interesting. Are there any other "special" meanings for the 2nd and the 12th?
Edit: looked into it, but, not very much for those dates. Sept 2 may be an optional saint day in various places, Sept 12 is an optional day to celebrate Virgin Mary's name. Not much else of note for those dates. Looks like a nothing burger.
I think this is much more impactful. Direct tweet from the Israel Heritage Foundation:
https://x.com/IHF_Heritage/status/1967765490828292216
Archived: https://archive.is/xSnEL
Great find. Thank you.
Strange. This was posted on X on Sept 16, which seems consistent with this press report. https://vinnews.com/2025/09/16/607452/
Interestingly, the fonts used in the Sept 2 version and the fonts used in the Sept 12 version are tweaked.
If you draw a horizontal line across the text from In The Bible... The numbers in the Sept 2 version are lower, indicating either a smaller font size, a different font altogether, or a doctored image...
https://storage.bhol.co.il/media/Storage/d67383d6-ce35-4e78-aafe-071928a8b981.jpg
To me, the font in the Sept 2 version with the dates in question look weird.
But what's weirder is that the dates being offered don't seem to make sense.
(not sure if Grok is off the mark here, but... )
Sept 12 version:
19 Elul 5787 = August 29, 2027
Sept 2 version:
9 Elul 5785 = August 31, 2025
Yeah, that's because it's fake.
Not exactly an unlikely possibility, imo.
Interesting that the logo / menorah is similar to the ground layout where Charlie was shot.
Ok I don't know why but this made me cackle - this is one of the responses to that tweet:
Literal LOL here.
I would love to hear Charlie's family confirm when (if at all) they recieved this letter.
Hmmmm.....Maybe the Rabbi wrote this on the 12th and left off a "1" by mistake?
9 Elul 5785 is September 2, 2025.
Was Kirk making appearances in the days leading up to September 2? They must have aborted an attempt. Oy vey!
Yes, they later sent out a corrected press release with the updated letter.
Can you provide some data around that? I mean, that shows there was a corrected press release, and updated letter?
Source?
It's worse than that. It's appears that someone was caught editing the official press release to stir up controversy. https://x.com/FAmused/status/1968151996751343958?s=19
The comments for that gave me a chuckle
I think what this shows is that the press release was NOT corrected and the letter was NOT updated, but rather that the sept 2 dated letter is in fact a doctored and therefore fake document.
Correct.
I guess it's possible.
Hmm.. my spidey sense says to be careful with this one. I'm taking a wait and see approach.
Yeah, me too. How can we either debunk this or prove its authenticity?
I mean, yeah.
First of all, source? What's the source? Second of all, how easily could a digital image of a letter be doctored? Third of all, what? Why would the Rabbi send this to the Kirk family 8 days before the planned assassination? It's way too bleedingly obvious, no?
If the Rabbi knew that the plan was to kill Kirk, why prepare the letter beforehand? That would be dumb. What if the <planned" assassination was planned for Sept 1? Then why send it a week later.
Seems to me its far more likely that September 12, was doctored to read Sept 2.
The date 9 Elul 5785 corresponds, according to Grok, to August 31, 2025, not Sept 2. So what's with that?
If your bias is that this was a big conspiracy by Israel and Mossad and whoever else to take down Kirk, then your FIRST response to information should be questioning it and pulling it apart, not simply leaping to accept it because it suits your bias.
When people do NOT do that, I find it hard to take them seriously.
Grok is wrong. 9 Elul 5785 is Sept. 2, 2025. Always verify any AI with multiple sources.
Kek. I queried Grok on multiple instances with slightly different texts and questions, and ended up getting 3 different results for9 Elul 5785.
Well, if you want to be confident that the info you have is accurate, anyway!
Or until you find the answer you want lol
My bias is genuinely "wait and see" because multiple groups had reason for Charlie to be dead.
One look at recent polling as to young men's perspectives on more traditional gender roles shows that Charlie was having an enormous impact. Considering that cabal & communist forces have been trying to destroy those roles for decades (and sadly succeeding), they could not have been happy with Charlie's work.
I kept my original post short & sweet because if I do talk about Israel, especially in a "let's not jump to negative conclusions" manner, it tends to arouse a certain segment of the GAW membership, as I'm sure you're aware.
Hence the simple "I'm taking a wait and see" approach.
My spidey senses are telling me that this entire thing is psyop layered on psyop layered on psyop.
I dont trust a single thing about any of it.
I mean really. Whack someone on TV in a graphic manner whose assassination would elicit the most emotional and visceral response possible not involving Trump. Fully activate the MSM with shitty takes on the left and 24/7 mourning and fawning on the right for days on end. Have a sickening response by the leftist foot soldiers and then accuse the right of cancel culture when they fight back against it.
Its all too much. Its all too obviously staged and planned.
100% LTL2.
"Distraction" to get us arguing enough for more out of context quotes to use against anything truthful? You know how much they love doing that. Especially when tweets like this come out on crisis actors:
https://x.com/RealLTCRicBosi/status/1967934208254640470
What else has been going on that they are distracting us from with this big news story?
I really like you guys, making sure something is actually true.
This gives credence to those who theorize that the white hats were aware of this planned assassination and staged this event with CK going into witness protection. I can't imagine the Kirks' would not have reported this to the authorities. (Not that I believe this, but this theory is out there, WTPN for example.)
Correct! And what I'm noticing is that whenever that theory is brought up that there is heavy down-voting. As I write this I notice you have 5 down votes. You know what that tells me? It tells me that those who mention this "theory" just might be over the target.
Maybe people just think its a dumb theory. Psyop a death like that makes you the bad guys.
^
What does CK know that would get him into witsec?
Or is it not just for protecting those with knowledge of something the .gov needs you to stay alive to tell? I'm confused
It's not what he knows, but more that he was effectively deprograming these kids at an alarming rate that the DS didn't like.
I know that but if he is in witsec Im asking for a better understanding of witsec being given to someone. I dont believe he is though sadly.
IMHO, IF he was given that, it would be because the WHs had credible info on a planned hit.
Using "This is interesting" as your post title really does not help anyone for search purposes on this site.
Per the comments, his tour started on the 2nd maybe it was scheduled for that day and postponed.
nice , i missed that. thx
How long will Yakoby keep it up?
Here are the metadata for two letters. The first one is from yakobitch and the second one ( higher resolution) is from here. You decide.
yakobitch
the second one
Ps;With the original, it would have been much better to know the truth (even though, of course, it's obvious that the original could also be tampered with).
cannot access the two links with signing in. Anything more openly available?
Indeed, i'm sorry fren Here are the PDFs. :
yakobitch: https://files.catbox.moe/e0kewd.pdf
The second one: https://files.catbox.moe/6m76rm.pdf
Or you can use this great online tool used primarily for digital image analysis. It helps in detecting alterations or manipulations in images, such as whether an image has been edited, cropped, or retouched but it can also extract and analyze metadata from an image file. Metadata includes details like the camera model, date and time of capture, software used for editing, and sometimes even GPS location. This can help determine the authenticity of an image or reveal if it has been altered.
https://www.fotoforensics.com/
Noice. Def bookmarking that one.
Thank you fren.
What conclusions do you personally draw from the metadata?
FYI, there is also this sepectral (?) analysis done by an X-er:
https://x.com/FAmused/status/1968151996751343958
I agree with @FAmused, I don't think there has been any alteration whatsoever.
That is very interesting. Are there any other "special" meanings for the 2nd and the 12th?
Edit: looked into it, but, not very much for those dates. Sept 2 may be an optional saint day in various places, Sept 12 is an optional day to celebrate Virgin Mary's name. Not much else of note for those dates. Looks like a nothing burger.
Great find op
Don't fall for this. Be best.
Just for fun - https://nitter.poast.org/EYakoby/
Plausible responsibility podcast - https://rumble.com/v6z1asg-defcon-zerq-ep.-009.html