Charlie Kirk's Security Team WAS NOT PERMITTED BY THE UNIVERSITY To Use Their Security Drones To Watch The Perimeter Of The Campus- So DYOC...
(modernity.news)
🚔 Crime & Democrats 💸
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (48)
sorted by:
I have a 100% record in detecting when something is 'off' - and that's from over 50 years experience.
I don't always know when something is off, but when I do it has always turned out to be true - and by 'off' I mean not as it is presented/understood by most people at the time.
Sometimes it's obvious what is wrong about a situation, but other times it can take me days/weeks to discern the source of my unease, and with things that are outside my ability to investigate other people have to provide the details that eventually prove I'm right.
I'm telling you right now, something is 'off' about the Charlie Kirk story.
Indeed, J. Things didn't feel right from the start. Then anomalies started jumping out quickly:
#1 regarding the focus of this article, if TPUSA's drones were not allowed, WHOSE DRONES WERE THERE DURING THE EVENT?! @JG_CSTT has done an excellent job of documenting this fact.
#2 Why was a Hades ISR aircraft circling around Utah Lake (within range of the Utah University event) at close to stall speed during the entire event?
#3 Yet again, we have another assassin like Routh who has practically no social media presence. Inexplicable given his alleged age.
EDIT/ADDITION that I neglected to mention:
#4, I'm a gun nut. A .30-06 is an extremely powerful cartridge. If Charlie had been actually hit by this round, the damage would have been catastrophic. Any of you who have hunted with a .30-06 or the slightly less powerful but similar .308 has seen the effects of these rounds on game. I don't believe there's any possibility that Charlie was shot with the .30-06 rifle that's being claimed.
💯
There is virtually no place on the body that you could shoot an elk (or even a horse) with a 30-06 at ~140yds where it would NOT leave an exit wound.
By the very nature of the weight, shape, and velocity of a ('regular/ball') 30-06, it is "inherently armor piercing" at that range to all but high level plate body armor.
I agree.
💯%. Whatever the truth is, that claim is likely false. Saw a video yesterday claiming the bullet didn’t have enough flesh to mushroom. Not convinced. Most (though not all) 30-06 leave significant exit wounds, and the compression and torquing was really weird on top of that.
Agreed, AE. There's a disturbing video that @JG_CSTT that seems to show a low velocity steel ball being fired from behind Charlie Kirk. Still not sure what to make of it, though the reaction by Kirk is more aligned with that scenario than him being hit with a .30-06 bullet.
Though I swear I die a little bit inside every time I see one of these videos and do research on the assassination. Rather grim work :(
To be absent from the body is to be present with The LORD. It’s quite obvious that it was near-instantaneous.
Imagine having to witness one of the old ways of getting taken out…. This was infinitely better. We are in a very real sense only combing over landscaping, a crowd, and the former shell of the spirit of a man to try and find Justice.
If things continue to get more insane (which, I hope not but be ready because it seems likely), this could end up being good training.
Your #2 could lead into this being a show.
Yep. I can't tell you exactly what's wrong, or why, but something stinks.
It was a satanic blood sacrifice. Once you analyze all the symbolism is makes sense.
And I'm convinced that this is how they did it, with no drones and no bullets necessary: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1968489707563549064.html
That looks pretty convincing as far as what might have caused the injury - but how could that have been planned? The directional component would be subject to variation - unless the forces involved would have killed him anyway but the neck injury was more immediate?
Interesting. Puncture wound made by a mic clip. Is the fellow implying that the guy in the frames opposite Charlie as the microphone wire flies is directing what is happening from something in his shirt sleeve?
All death is.
Something sure is off. Rooftops uncovered?
Rooftops have been covered for decades and for smaller people attending political functions.
The butler roof was covered, until it wasn't because rogue SS agents said they were too hot and would come down and look out through the windows. The brand new SS girl who should not have been leading such an event, says okay sounds good and walks off with her little clipboard.
That was an inside job getting off the roof. And now we just have roofs uncovered naturally once again. One of Charlie's people said when they arrived they saw all of those roofs surrounding them. His coworker stated look at all of these uncovered roofs so many I'm uncomfortable about this. They should have been bold and canceled due to no use of drones either.
Roofs are always covered. They proved we have such an ADHD society no one can remember Butler?
I just saw this video which offers up some new talking points (warning - graphic)
https://youtu.be/MbaQadkqkzI
edit: This might offer an explanation as to why the ground was re-laid under where Charlie was shot - perhaps it showed a bullet impact?
While not directly related to your video, this video analyzes the audio only and is pretty interesting. I don’t know enough about the topic to say for sure it means anything but others here may be more informed on the topic.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=UoCApd1PhmY&t=2s
(I’m pretty sure this one is not graphic but I’ve watched a lot of videos recently so best to just tread carefully with any link you click on this topic)
Thanks for this, it is definitely odd and lends weight to something that I thought when I first saw the video of Charlie being shot.
It was a satanic blood sacrifice. I break it down in my recent post.