First they came for the communists,
and I did not speak out -
Because I was not a communist. Then they came for the socialists,
and I did not speak out -
Because I was not a socialist. Then they came for the trade unionists,
and I did not speak out -
Because I was not a trade unionist. Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out -
Because I was not a Jew. Then they came for me - and there was
no one left to speak for me.
Martin Niemöller (1892-1984)
I know it's beside the point, but this does invite a question.
If they came for the Communists, and then they came for the Socialists... and then they came for the Trade Unionists... then "They" might have just been tired of the lies, corruption and destruction of society.
The communists, the socialists, the trade unionists, and even the capitalists are all created and controlled by the same group. All groups are controlled opposition.
The only viable path to help people is to help them understand that we are ALL controlled opposition, our particular ideologies given to us; canned belief systems that each person has the freedom to choose from. The choice of what box we chose is the only true freedom we have. From that path forward we are locked in the Matrix
However, with a large scale understanding of how that small group of people create and control ALL beliefs, we will come together, united in one purpose.
"Come for the communists" etc. is not the path. That's a victory for that small group ("the cabal") that created ALL of our beliefs.
United We Stand. The enemy is not the communists etc. The enemy is just the cabal. Until we stop thinking of our boxed groups as " other" we can't win.
We are all We The People. Act like it, and then we automatically win.
We sometimes think of "showing" as a purely physical thing, but the act of showing v. telling is perfectly reasonable using just words. For example, in my initial report (book), I started on something that is largely non-controversial. Indeed, there is nothing there to offend hardly anyone (I do need to go over the beginning just a bit to make it better, but it's not too bad atm). Having said that, just because it's not "offensive" doesn't mean it's as interesting as I'd like. You can't please all of the people all of the time. But for many people, it seems to be interesting enough. Some even call it "amazing" or "brilliant" or "completely changed my life." It might not be perfect for some people here (those aware of Q and the general fuckery), because it's designed as an exposure to the Matrix for normies, but for anyone even slightly interested in the stock market, or history, or economics, etc., it is pretty damn good (to toot my own horn).
The point is, I don't talk about "politics" at all. I don't talk about things like vaccines, or religion, or anything that would be offensive to hardly anyone. I don't have to. My goal is very broad; to expose the Matrix. So anything really important and "controversial" automatically comes out by without actually saying anything, but rather showing, as a natural flow, who created the laws, what they really say, what other people (on all sides of the fence) have to say, what they are REALLY saying (with corroborating evidence), etc. I don't *say" anything. I show how the world was created, who created it, and what their stated intentions were.
By not "telling" anything, people can hear it. I start by showing the sources. I explain exactly who they are, and all the relevant details (all verified by non-controversial links (.gov e.g.). I show the money trail. I show who their boss is. For example, if I'm going to show who created the NSF (Vannevar Bush), I first how to go through how the education system was created in explicit detail. To do that, I first how to go through how our economic system was created in explicit detail. I have to go through the media system, who owns it, who created it, otherwise people won't believe what they are reading, or that it "isn't important, because the media or history books aren't reporting it". I have to put in thousands of other details and exposures, all of which have their own vetting process. Only after I do all of that, all done in the right order in order to suspend disbelief, such as the the information about how Vannevar Bush was a long life employee of Rockefeller (and so was everyone else in that endeavor); only then can I talk about how all funding for science is controlled by the same entity.
Of course, talking about science funding is not the primary goal. It takes hundreds of pages to get there. I'm not doing it for that purpose. On the contrary, it's only intended to be corroborating evidence for the primal thesis. But to say anything, like "we are all controlled opposition" you must go through a ridiculous amount of information to show the evidence before you can even hint at the claim. People must come to the conclusion on their own. Your job is to show them the way, not tell them the conclusion.
Obviously I'm not doing that all the time in this board. Some times I do, but it takes so much work. Sometimes I'm just lazy. Sometimes I'm frustrated. Sometimes I do it just to help me work out better arguments for old or new sections of my report. Sometimes that effort gives me new evidence from people who respond to me (both for and against my claims).
It is my hope (and by from what is happening, my belief) that Q is doing exactly what I am saying; showing the little pieces so everyone will stitch the evidence together for themselves. I do not trust Q. I do not trust that the final picture they are putting together is what I believe it should be. On the contrary, some things I see are far too much "new boss, same as the old boss," stitching a new edition of the Matrix rather than a complete exposure. But in a world of controlled opposition, and reverse psychology, I can't possibly know what their actual intentions are. So it is my hope that they intend to lead us down the right path eventually.
I’m at the “pray” option, because whatever the solution is, I ain’t got it.
Mix that with doing our best to win, finding out who they are and working to lawfully strip them of power, and some other solutions. The “debate” option just had its throat blown out, but lawlessness is not an option, either.
Solzhenitsyn would never have written that - his fight was against the communists, the socialists etc..
He experienced the communists coming for him... not anti-communists coming for the communists and him not saying anything.
Solzhenitsyn would end the passage with "and then they came for me, and we went for drinks at the Opera, followed by a very enjoyable meal, we rejoiced together, at last, justice had been served"
“The most terrifying force of death comes from the hands of Men Who Wanted To Be Left Alone. They try, so very hard, to mind their own business and provide for themselves and those they love. They resist every impulse to fight back, knowing the forced and permanent change of life that will come from it. They know that the moment they fight back, their lives as they have lived them are over. The moment the Men Who Wanted To Be Left Alone are forced to fight back, it is a form of suicide. They are literally killing off who they used to be. Which is why, when forced to take up violence, these Men Who Wanted To Be Left Alone fight with unholy vengeance against those who murdered their former lives. They fight with raw hate, and a drive that cannot be fathomed by those who are merely play-acting at politics and terror. TRUE TERROR will arrive at these peoples’ door, and they will cry, scream, and beg for mercy…but it will fall upon the deaf ears of the Men Who Just Wanted To Be Left Alone.”
I think Musk might have it wrong on, what Orwell would want or what he would do. 1984 was not a warning to freedom lovers as much as it was a roadmap to those who wished to impose total control over a population.
This is 100% AI created. People post this style from Musk all over the place and he has said several times that if you see him with a blurred background or it looks odd, it's AI. He even called this one out in particular in his feed.
Is AI Quietly Sabotaging Itself—And The Internet? - Forbes Aug 26, 2024 In fact, one AI expert and policy advisor has predicted that because of the exponential growth of artificial intelligence adoption, 90% of all internet content is likely to be AI-generated ...
"I'd venture to say that 90% of what we think is real, is not." I said nothing about EVERYTHING WE SEE. And in the context of the conversation, I assumed all would understand my comment was related to Internet Content.
Honest question; what does everyone here think is coming down the pike now?
I spent a LOT of time & resources getting prepared for a lot of wild shit during covid / race riots / etc.
I'm not gonna say I'm fatigued, but don't really have the energy & bandwidth to do like I used to, which is scan all the sites, blogs, etc. looking for traces of "holy shit its starting!!!"
I'm planning on staying prepared, polishing up my preps, and largely going on about my life.
I think what violence comes depends to some extent on what state one lives in, and what neighborhood you live in within a demographic makeup.
For example I am in Florida, in a red city, in a red neighborhood. On one corner of my neighborhood, a bit off in distance, is a minority majority neighborhood, but I don't think they would give us much trouble. Otherwise surrounded by red neighborhoods.
All People should be getting into top Physical, Mental and Spiritual readiness. STORE Food and have enough cash on hand to last you a few months at least. Start by going on long walks and breathing fresh air daily..
Absolutely.
Polish up, top off, review & get more clear / double / triple check all preps.
I mean no offense to anyone, but if you lived through 2020 and STILL didn't make HUGE preparations......holy crap......Everyone should already be very well prepared....
🫣🫣😐😐😐
There is a drum beat that many have been hearing for a long time. It has not faded. It is prominent. There is also another drum beat that is becoming more prominent.
It was never about politics.
See a little drop of oil can go very far in water and if we think of a little drop of oil as evil and water as good coupled with the logic of those we claim to be deep state and so on. The conclusion would be in order to have a one world government it has to be evil because evil cannot allow good.
With technology, health care, information all in their pocket they believe they are able to remove the uproar from the few.
From my opinion I believe USA will not fall, but I do believe much of western countries will. We might become the first not western nation left and we might see many Westerners try to flock to the USA.
They are grooming us to hate invaders and if real Christian’s from other countries need refuge they believe we will say no.
Texas is purging and hopefully Michigan will soon. Oregon and Washington need help.
First they came for the communists, and I did not speak out - Because I was not a communist. Then they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out - Because I was not a socialist. Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out - Because I was not a trade unionist. Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out - Because I was not a Jew. Then they came for me - and there was no one left to speak for me. Martin Niemöller (1892-1984)
I know it's beside the point, but this does invite a question.
If they came for the Communists, and then they came for the Socialists... and then they came for the Trade Unionists... then "They" might have just been tired of the lies, corruption and destruction of society.
The communists, the socialists, the trade unionists, and even the capitalists are all created and controlled by the same group. All groups are controlled opposition.
The only viable path to help people is to help them understand that we are ALL controlled opposition, our particular ideologies given to us; canned belief systems that each person has the freedom to choose from. The choice of what box we chose is the only true freedom we have. From that path forward we are locked in the Matrix
However, with a large scale understanding of how that small group of people create and control ALL beliefs, we will come together, united in one purpose.
"Come for the communists" etc. is not the path. That's a victory for that small group ("the cabal") that created ALL of our beliefs.
United We Stand. The enemy is not the communists etc. The enemy is just the cabal. Until we stop thinking of our boxed groups as " other" we can't win.
We are all We The People. Act like it, and then we automatically win.
I tried telling someone (a non-communist semi-anti-woke left-leaner) basically that, but to no effect.
Maybe it just takes better presentation? It does seem like it should work.
It seems like it’s also not just what they want, but what they fear, and they won’t say what they fear.
We sometimes think of "showing" as a purely physical thing, but the act of showing v. telling is perfectly reasonable using just words. For example, in my initial report (book), I started on something that is largely non-controversial. Indeed, there is nothing there to offend hardly anyone (I do need to go over the beginning just a bit to make it better, but it's not too bad atm). Having said that, just because it's not "offensive" doesn't mean it's as interesting as I'd like. You can't please all of the people all of the time. But for many people, it seems to be interesting enough. Some even call it "amazing" or "brilliant" or "completely changed my life." It might not be perfect for some people here (those aware of Q and the general fuckery), because it's designed as an exposure to the Matrix for normies, but for anyone even slightly interested in the stock market, or history, or economics, etc., it is pretty damn good (to toot my own horn).
The point is, I don't talk about "politics" at all. I don't talk about things like vaccines, or religion, or anything that would be offensive to hardly anyone. I don't have to. My goal is very broad; to expose the Matrix. So anything really important and "controversial" automatically comes out by without actually saying anything, but rather showing, as a natural flow, who created the laws, what they really say, what other people (on all sides of the fence) have to say, what they are REALLY saying (with corroborating evidence), etc. I don't *say" anything. I show how the world was created, who created it, and what their stated intentions were.
By not "telling" anything, people can hear it. I start by showing the sources. I explain exactly who they are, and all the relevant details (all verified by non-controversial links (.gov e.g.). I show the money trail. I show who their boss is. For example, if I'm going to show who created the NSF (Vannevar Bush), I first how to go through how the education system was created in explicit detail. To do that, I first how to go through how our economic system was created in explicit detail. I have to go through the media system, who owns it, who created it, otherwise people won't believe what they are reading, or that it "isn't important, because the media or history books aren't reporting it". I have to put in thousands of other details and exposures, all of which have their own vetting process. Only after I do all of that, all done in the right order in order to suspend disbelief, such as the the information about how Vannevar Bush was a long life employee of Rockefeller (and so was everyone else in that endeavor); only then can I talk about how all funding for science is controlled by the same entity.
Of course, talking about science funding is not the primary goal. It takes hundreds of pages to get there. I'm not doing it for that purpose. On the contrary, it's only intended to be corroborating evidence for the primal thesis. But to say anything, like "we are all controlled opposition" you must go through a ridiculous amount of information to show the evidence before you can even hint at the claim. People must come to the conclusion on their own. Your job is to show them the way, not tell them the conclusion.
Obviously I'm not doing that all the time in this board. Some times I do, but it takes so much work. Sometimes I'm just lazy. Sometimes I'm frustrated. Sometimes I do it just to help me work out better arguments for old or new sections of my report. Sometimes that effort gives me new evidence from people who respond to me (both for and against my claims).
It is my hope (and by from what is happening, my belief) that Q is doing exactly what I am saying; showing the little pieces so everyone will stitch the evidence together for themselves. I do not trust Q. I do not trust that the final picture they are putting together is what I believe it should be. On the contrary, some things I see are far too much "new boss, same as the old boss," stitching a new edition of the Matrix rather than a complete exposure. But in a world of controlled opposition, and reverse psychology, I can't possibly know what their actual intentions are. So it is my hope that they intend to lead us down the right path eventually.
Man. Updoot. Great comment.
I’m not sure that any worldly force is going to “lead us down the right path” until Jesus returns, but we can hope it happens…
Best to talk to a Rock. You can always pick it up a throw it to make your point 💥
Talking to the rock is equally effective.
Throwing the rock is not the solution, either.
I’m at the “pray” option, because whatever the solution is, I ain’t got it.
Mix that with doing our best to win, finding out who they are and working to lawfully strip them of power, and some other solutions. The “debate” option just had its throat blown out, but lawlessness is not an option, either.
That shit is the [their] game. Let them have it.
One thing Niemöller did was serve as president of the World Council of Churches (1961–1968). That right there raises alarm bells with me.
Agree
Buddy made it to 92 years old. Nobody came for him.
Jokes on him LOL
Ya, go after the communists and socialists.
I thought this was alexander shokzeitzen
Solzhenitsyn would never have written that - his fight was against the communists, the socialists etc..
He experienced the communists coming for him... not anti-communists coming for the communists and him not saying anything.
Solzhenitsyn would end the passage with "and then they came for me, and we went for drinks at the Opera, followed by a very enjoyable meal, we rejoiced together, at last, justice had been served"
“The most terrifying force of death comes from the hands of Men Who Wanted To Be Left Alone. They try, so very hard, to mind their own business and provide for themselves and those they love. They resist every impulse to fight back, knowing the forced and permanent change of life that will come from it. They know that the moment they fight back, their lives as they have lived them are over. The moment the Men Who Wanted To Be Left Alone are forced to fight back, it is a form of suicide. They are literally killing off who they used to be. Which is why, when forced to take up violence, these Men Who Wanted To Be Left Alone fight with unholy vengeance against those who murdered their former lives. They fight with raw hate, and a drive that cannot be fathomed by those who are merely play-acting at politics and terror. TRUE TERROR will arrive at these peoples’ door, and they will cry, scream, and beg for mercy…but it will fall upon the deaf ears of the Men Who Just Wanted To Be Left Alone.”
--Author Unknown
Great quote fren. At the precipice.
I getting that tattoo on my forehead
I think Musk might have it wrong on, what Orwell would want or what he would do. 1984 was not a warning to freedom lovers as much as it was a roadmap to those who wished to impose total control over a population.
IOW - Orwell was not a good guy.
Your opinion I’ll dwell on it
Or are the "Protocols" the road map .....
Upvoted and reposted. The millions in the Soviet gulag,wish they had fought back when they were rounded up. They were going to die anyways.
Where did this take place? Was he live to the audience? Recent?
This is 100% AI created. People post this style from Musk all over the place and he has said several times that if you see him with a blurred background or it looks odd, it's AI. He even called this one out in particular in his feed.
Can you paste the link of him calling it out?
What is real? Can you honestly desern Real from AI.
I'd venture to say that 90% of what we think is real is not.
I don't not like this time we are in where everyone is scrambling to produce content to get views, clicks, shares etc, at any cost.
90% lol
You think I just pulled this 90% number out of my ass.
Experts: 90% of Online Content Will Be AI-Generated by 2026
90% of online content could be ‘generated by AI by 2025,’ expert says
Is AI Quietly Sabotaging Itself—And The Internet? - Forbes Aug 26, 2024 In fact, one AI expert and policy advisor has predicted that because of the exponential growth of artificial intelligence adoption, 90% of all internet content is likely to be AI-generated ...
https://www.forbes.com/sites/torconstantino/2024/08/26/is-ai-quietly-killing-itself-and-the-internet/
I understand the subtle difference between BOT and AI generated content but still....
You said EVERYTHING WE SEE ... do you only look at online content? Do you not go outside and do stuff?
Read my comment again Mr. Congeniality.
"I'd venture to say that 90% of what we think is real, is not." I said nothing about EVERYTHING WE SEE. And in the context of the conversation, I assumed all would understand my comment was related to Internet Content.
Well, I think the sky is real, the grass is real, my truck is real. That's 90% of things, online stuff is like 5% tops.
I pretty much never go online and spend my time in the real world. I don't think 90% of what I see is AI out there.
Link posted...copying here... live on September 13th at the Unite The Kingdom rally.
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/elon-musk-unite-the-kingdom-march-speech-in-full-b1247841.html
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/elon-musk-tommy-robinson-london-protest-b2826032.html
Honest question; what does everyone here think is coming down the pike now?
I spent a LOT of time & resources getting prepared for a lot of wild shit during covid / race riots / etc.
I'm not gonna say I'm fatigued, but don't really have the energy & bandwidth to do like I used to, which is scan all the sites, blogs, etc. looking for traces of "holy shit its starting!!!"
I'm planning on staying prepared, polishing up my preps, and largely going on about my life.
What say you?
I think what violence comes depends to some extent on what state one lives in, and what neighborhood you live in within a demographic makeup.
For example I am in Florida, in a red city, in a red neighborhood. On one corner of my neighborhood, a bit off in distance, is a minority majority neighborhood, but I don't think they would give us much trouble. Otherwise surrounded by red neighborhoods.
https://greatawakening.win/p/1AR0eFl1wg/life-and-death-considerations-he/c/
Thanks. I meant in general; do you think we are going to see increasing / more political assassinations, riots, etc?
Definitely matters very much where you live!
I have no idea.
Hope for the best, plan for the worst.
Gotcha. Never hurts to ask. :-) Obvi if you hear anyting significant, post here! 🐸🙏
All People should be getting into top Physical, Mental and Spiritual readiness. STORE Food and have enough cash on hand to last you a few months at least. Start by going on long walks and breathing fresh air daily..
I agree and definitely don't drink "BudLight"!
Absolutely. Polish up, top off, review & get more clear / double / triple check all preps.
I mean no offense to anyone, but if you lived through 2020 and STILL didn't make HUGE preparations......holy crap......Everyone should already be very well prepared.... 🫣🫣😐😐😐
"Fight back or die" is fueling civil war mas hysteria. I don't approve.
There is a drum beat that many have been hearing for a long time. It has not faded. It is prominent. There is also another drum beat that is becoming more prominent.
It was never about politics.
See a little drop of oil can go very far in water and if we think of a little drop of oil as evil and water as good coupled with the logic of those we claim to be deep state and so on. The conclusion would be in order to have a one world government it has to be evil because evil cannot allow good.
With technology, health care, information all in their pocket they believe they are able to remove the uproar from the few.
From my opinion I believe USA will not fall, but I do believe much of western countries will. We might become the first not western nation left and we might see many Westerners try to flock to the USA.
They are grooming us to hate invaders and if real Christian’s from other countries need refuge they believe we will say no.
Texas is purging and hopefully Michigan will soon. Oregon and Washington need help.
No shit Sherlock now give everyone GUNS