A bullet fired from the distance they are claiming would have needed to be from a rifle with a scope in order to have the necessary accuracy
They aren't claiming tiny caliber like .22, which could have made an exit wound like we saw in the neck - they are claiming 30.06
A 30.06 rifle shot like they are claiming it was would have blown Charlie's head off, not made a neat little round hole in his neck - plus the gory splatter from the exit would would have been tough to miss
THEREFORE IT WASN'T THE GUY THEY SAID, SHOOTING FROM WHERE THEY SAID, USING THE GUN THEY SAID.
Also the two "security guards" behind Charlie were issuing very obvious, very unnatural hand signals, like a first-base coach, immediately before the fatal shot - the fact that this is not being investigated or even discussed speaks volumes
You don't touch the brim of your cap without moving or adjusting it; then touch the side of your nose without rubbing or scratching it; then stroke firmly down your upper arm with your other hand in one single deliberate downward stroke from your shoulder to your elbow, and then stop. No up and down. No scratch, no muscle rub, just a single, methodical stroke in one direction.
Obvious to all with observational power and critical thinking skills.
I once shot a deer from about 250 yards with a 3.06. When i skinned it you could see the damage to the rib cage. The exit wound was fist sized. The over pressure burst the heart with out even touching it. I lost the heart meat which i live grilled with onions and butter and the right side rib cage, and a fragment broke off and hit the should roast. Im surprised they think that was an ought six.
Exactly - they have to KNOW that we would know it couldn't have been that, even many who are without military experience; but they go with it anyway, and the FBI goes "Yup he used a bazooka to make a tiny hole, no splatter and no exit! Sure, this is no more credible than our assertion that the Trump shooting was just a random series of human errors by a hard-working USSS and FBI, but hey—you've bought THAT so far, so why not this??"
As creepy as they think Trump is, that is 1000 times creepier
A 30.06 rifle shot like they are claiming it was would have blown Charlie's head off, not made a neat little round hole in his neck - plus the gory splatter from the exit would would have been tough to miss
This is my number one reason that causes me to think that the lone gunman claim is false.
At the moment, my thinking is that none of the theories are correct and that all of them are part of the psyop to muddy the waters. I can’t keep from going back to the DC shooter. They had a heck of a time figuring those shootings out. It ended up being that one of the shooters hid in the trunk and shot through a hole in the trunk. When the crowd turned to see where the shot came from, there was just another inconspicuous car that no one paid much attention to. I think the bullet came from a similar type of situation where you could look around and look directly at the shooter and your mind immediately discounted them as a possibility.
General Flynn says he doesn't believe the official narrative of a lone wolf tranny single-handedly assassinating Charlie Kirk.
"I personally don't believe it was a lone wolf....All the issues about taking a weapon apart...I sat down with experts and looked at the various footage.
I want our government to stand there and tell the American people, we are still investigating this...
It was clear that they had dirtied up the crime scene.
Just level with us...
Stop all this nonsense about we've caught our guy..There's just been too much.
What it does is it damages and continues to eat away and erode the trust between the people of this country and the government...
People want to trust our law enforcement
This particular issue with Charlie Kirk was such a seminal event in the history of the United States of America.
It smells bad. It looks bad...Something about it is not right...
The American people, we have decided that we just aren't going to put up with this anymore..."
Does anyone actually believe the official story they are telling us?
There are just way too many suspicious things coming up.
The American people have become well-versed in questioning the official narratives and doing our own research.
They no longer just blindly believe what the government tells us. @GenFlynn @LizCrokin
Listening to the whole clip, I think its significant. Personally, think there are few people that are so consistently on point as Flynn.
What I find curious is the people like Candace Owens, who (to my mind) have their own narrative that they are pushing, relentlessly. Folks that like that narrative tend to chime in and see her as a fount of truth. I don't.
Flynn, however, ALWAYS points to the key issues of mobilizing the American people to get involved in the process, act locally, and always points to the core necessity of restoring the proper relationship between the Govt and the People of the USA.
In this case, other folks seem to be deflecting to me: "Tha Joos!"
People do not know. Flynn emphasized here that something isn't right, but is also very clear and does NOT make claims about what the real story is, unlike some folks, who, apparently, are never wrong.
It was Israel it’s not that complicated. They have the most motive and all the circumstantial evidence points to them. There are probably other co conspirators with in TPUSA and they used some idiot Antifa patsies
Just saying we’re yelling “mmmuuuuhhh jjjoooossss” shows a lack of critical thinking. And shows you haven’t really looked into our point.
Autists on X and Instagram have already broken down all the connections, all the Zionist and Free masonry symbolism, all the weird events that happened that day.
Known Mossad agents like Laura Loomer trying to deflect blame to China is laughable.
If you can give us a well thought out argument with evidence that it wasn’t Israel I will listen to it. And if you can explain what narrative people like Candace are pushing and why despite her saying she will stop if Erika Kirk tells her to I will listen.
Fantastic. I guess everyone can just sit back and relax now, because ... you KNOW it was Israel? /sarc
If you can give us .... And if you can explain... I will listen.
Kek. Nah, I'm not interested in that sort of bargaining. I have zero concern about whether you listen or not. Any ideas I share here are offered freely, and people can absorb (or listen) at their own free choice.
But, if YOU can put up a well-written, articulate theory of why and how it was "Israel", I'd be interested to read it.
EDIT: actually, can you point me to somewhere where I could read on this? An article, for example, that outlines and articulates the theory (theories)? I'd rather be able to scan a write up than tune in to a video. I'm really not big on inflooencer videos these days. sic.
Just saying we’re yelling “mmmuuuuhhh jjjoooossss” shows a lack of critical thinking.
Yeah, but I didn't say that. What I DID say (albeit ambiguously and rather clumsily!) was that certain people saying "Israel did this!" in the public sphere, like Owens, for example, (If that's what she's doing), are deflecting from more critical issues. "seem to be" indicates opinion. I'm sharing an impression.
And shows you haven’t really looked into our point.
Well, yeah, I'll give you that. It might be my bias at work, but I'm yet to see an articulate theory of Who / What, and in general, my info war radar tends to take note of sensationalism and sees red flags in that, because there are psyops literally everywhere. Certain topics or themes will generate lots of sensational response from certain sectors, and of those, I tend to be wary.
I should mention that, fwiw, I think the (general) attachment to Israel and the Joos is a psyop, used by those further behind the scenes, like a sort of limited hangout. "Anti-Semitic vs Israel" is a smoke screen, imo.
Where do all the threads gather? Where do all the paths lead? Where do all the arrows point?
To the trans-national criminal organization we loosely know as 'The Cabal', of which (I accept as an unproven fact) the Israel DS and Israel project is a significant part.
In other words, different clothes, but same operator. (Corrupt) C_A? Mossad? British DS? WEF? All simply different agents of the same fundamental entity. imo.
Hey Frac - What I thought was interesting were the text messages between CK and ?
Essentially calling out the fact that the namestealers were pissing him off and that he'd have to deal with it - right before he got clipped.
I think Candace is just another voice "chipping away" or gnawing away at the proverbial insulation that faction has been using to counter any finger pointing. I don't really dig on her show but it is what it is.
I also find it interesting how Candace came to acquire those text messages...Who sent them to her? Was it someone @ TP? Someone in the govt?
What's his face @ TP verified those text messages from CK were "le git" and also mentioned that in "those first critical hours" he didn't "leave any stone unturned" so he "gave those texts to someone in the govt".
Jury's out on what the REAL DEAL is...but for certain suspects - the optics are not good...Like N'Yahoo coming out, unsolicited explaining how he had nothing to do with it...multiple times...
I continue to observe, albeit without a great focus, as I get the feeling that a lot of this is distraction.
I think Candace is just another voice "chipping away" or gnawing away
If that's the case, that's a positive, I guess. But I personally feel like Candace is more of a distraction from more important matters. But that's me.
Flynn, pardoned by trump, in the white house as we speak, is saying this? So, does Trump not know what happened? Did his administration let this happen for real? Are they not intelligent enough to have seen it coming and fake the plan? They let it happen? They're running a campaign with a narrative that us including Flynn doesn't agree with? In the same house as them? What's the plan here? To trust the plan?
If anyone's in on the plan, that were supposed to trust, it's Flynn. He literally spends half his time IN the white house.
Do you understand this?
This is a problem. Maybe the biggest this forum has seen.
I think we pretty much agree with Flynn here. It has been discussed ad nauseam. Something isn’t right about the official narrative on the Kirk assassination.
I disagree with your narrative on Flynn. Trump fired him almost a decade ago. I don’t put much stock into what Flynn has to say in particular and I don’t trust him in particular.
I still don’t trust the FBI to get to the truth and I don’t think Trump and Kash have them under control.
There is a lot of evidence that we aren’t privy to at the moment. We will just have to let things play out.
I'd like to strongly encourage you to avoid making generalizations about what "we" think, believe, or see.
It's far too easy to project one's experience on to the "we" that one personally identifies with.
Aside from that, personally, I think Flynn is very much on point here and I give a lot of stock in what Flynn says, pretty much always. I have reasons for that which I've mentioned elsewhere.
I tried to be careful to separate what I think “we” generally think about Charlie Kirk’s assassination and my(I) opinion on Flynn. I think it is fair to say, that for the most part, we think there is something fishy about the official narrative.
If there is a silent group that buys the official narrative, I don’t want them to feel ostracized from voicing it. I am still even open to this point of view and don’t want anyone to feel uncomfortable thinking that.
So far as my opinion on Flynn, I know that is not how we all feel. I don’t want to divide the sub on the subject. I can be persuaded to change my mind on him, and have done so many times over the last couple of years.
First, Charlie Kirk's assassination event undoubtedly has many layers.
One that may need exploring is the possibility of soft disclosure of falsified events on a mass scale. For those who just cannot believe that nine-one-one and countless others were staged productions, what better way to ease into it than be part of the event from the get-go (early shocking video) and be spoon fed the holes in the narrative subsequently?
All data points just add to the 'Operation Demoralization' narrative...Truth will never be known and the perpetrators will never be found, let alone be held accountable. And this is not just limited to the CK saga...In the last 10 years we have seen at least a dozen (very conservative) major crimes against both individuals and against humanity in general take place and not ONE person has been held accountable. We should all be wearing 'Yuri Bezmenov was right' hats
After the shock of his assassination, I personally pushed back thoughts of doubts. After a week, I started really listening, to Owens and other voices who were breaking down the forensic evidence, voices who know their guns. It makes sense to me that the bullet did not travel far enough in his body to expand to its full capacity. The behavior of those involved did not ring true, paving over the site where he was killed, the fact that there is no evidence that the purported shooter had ever been on campus before, yet knew what staircase to climb to get access to the roof. Old enough to have seen Jack Ruby kill Oswald on live TV. Emotionally I watched the Memorial Service, and bought Ericka's public grief for about 48 hours, and then remembered good movies take good actors to succeed. Then researching her past and present. Kash taking his time to go to the scene before his statement. Charlie becoming awake and wanting to back off from supporting Israel, Charlies public opinion stated in regards to the Epstein files. For me, my love of country and freedom, my freedom, surpasses support of any administration or leader. I hold the blood of my ancestors, who claim that land is freedom, these woods and rocks where battles were fought. Living a long time, I know any power that holds the seat of government becomes dangerous when it has all the power. Regardless of public statements or political sides. Would those powers martyr good men to silence them or to gain more power? I've sadly watched it time and time again, since they killed my President as he was smiling and waving in Texas. When the suicides kept piling up during the Clinton years, when planes go down, when Bush the first got elected, one of the orchestrators of the CIA. When the country with the best surveillance and one of the most powerful secret police in the world, Mossad, stood down while Hamas just flew in like monkeys from wizard of oz to slaughter people at a music festival. yes, I think Flynn is on the right track.
I'd like him to explain why 'people getting involved in their communities' is going to stop mass shooter / assassination SIGH OPS from the CIA and other globalism-oriented intelligence groups?
Maybe they want us to distrust the government because there are too many corrupt people still in charge. Maybe we never need to trust the government....
Trust our instincts and our God and we will know the truth.
Quuuicckk!!!1 Caling all shills, we have a CODE PINK! Downdoot General Flynn NNOWWW!NARRATIVE DEVIATION DETECTED! I REPEAT, NARRATIVE DEVIATION DETECTED!
Flynn tweeted a couple days after the assassination that he was hearing from the FBI that a "foreign power" may be involved.
I can't find the tweet but it was posted multiple times here by myself and others.
Flynn keeps pressing this.
Q1281 said "done in 30" re Flynn.
Q said "expand your thinking."
What will be coming out circa October 10, [30] days after the assassination?
Idk...
The autopsy showing an entrance wound where the mic was?
What "foreign power" is known to kill people with explosives hidden in small electronics? u/#q1281
Let's Review
A bullet fired from the distance they are claiming would have needed to be from a rifle with a scope in order to have the necessary accuracy
They aren't claiming tiny caliber like .22, which could have made an exit wound like we saw in the neck - they are claiming 30.06
A 30.06 rifle shot like they are claiming it was would have blown Charlie's head off, not made a neat little round hole in his neck - plus the gory splatter from the exit would would have been tough to miss
THEREFORE IT WASN'T THE GUY THEY SAID, SHOOTING FROM WHERE THEY SAID, USING THE GUN THEY SAID.
Also the two "security guards" behind Charlie were issuing very obvious, very unnatural hand signals, like a first-base coach, immediately before the fatal shot - the fact that this is not being investigated or even discussed speaks volumes
You don't touch the brim of your cap without moving or adjusting it; then touch the side of your nose without rubbing or scratching it; then stroke firmly down your upper arm with your other hand in one single deliberate downward stroke from your shoulder to your elbow, and then stop. No up and down. No scratch, no muscle rub, just a single, methodical stroke in one direction.
Obvious to all with observational power and critical thinking skills.
I once shot a deer from about 250 yards with a 3.06. When i skinned it you could see the damage to the rib cage. The exit wound was fist sized. The over pressure burst the heart with out even touching it. I lost the heart meat which i live grilled with onions and butter and the right side rib cage, and a fragment broke off and hit the should roast. Im surprised they think that was an ought six.
Exactly - they have to KNOW that we would know it couldn't have been that, even many who are without military experience; but they go with it anyway, and the FBI goes "Yup he used a bazooka to make a tiny hole, no splatter and no exit! Sure, this is no more credible than our assertion that the Trump shooting was just a random series of human errors by a hard-working USSS and FBI, but hey—you've bought THAT so far, so why not this??"
As creepy as they think Trump is, that is 1000 times creepier
This is my number one reason that causes me to think that the lone gunman claim is false.
At the moment, my thinking is that none of the theories are correct and that all of them are part of the psyop to muddy the waters. I can’t keep from going back to the DC shooter. They had a heck of a time figuring those shootings out. It ended up being that one of the shooters hid in the trunk and shot through a hole in the trunk. When the crowd turned to see where the shot came from, there was just another inconspicuous car that no one paid much attention to. I think the bullet came from a similar type of situation where you could look around and look directly at the shooter and your mind immediately discounted them as a possibility.
General Flynn says he doesn't believe the official narrative of a lone wolf tranny single-handedly assassinating Charlie Kirk.
"I personally don't believe it was a lone wolf....All the issues about taking a weapon apart...I sat down with experts and looked at the various footage. I want our government to stand there and tell the American people, we are still investigating this... It was clear that they had dirtied up the crime scene. Just level with us... Stop all this nonsense about we've caught our guy..There's just been too much. What it does is it damages and continues to eat away and erode the trust between the people of this country and the government... People want to trust our law enforcement This particular issue with Charlie Kirk was such a seminal event in the history of the United States of America. It smells bad. It looks bad...Something about it is not right...
The American people, we have decided that we just aren't going to put up with this anymore..."
Does anyone actually believe the official story they are telling us?
There are just way too many suspicious things coming up.
The American people have become well-versed in questioning the official narratives and doing our own research.
They no longer just blindly believe what the government tells us. @GenFlynn @LizCrokin
Listening to the whole clip, I think its significant. Personally, think there are few people that are so consistently on point as Flynn.
What I find curious is the people like Candace Owens, who (to my mind) have their own narrative that they are pushing, relentlessly. Folks that like that narrative tend to chime in and see her as a fount of truth. I don't.
Flynn, however, ALWAYS points to the key issues of mobilizing the American people to get involved in the process, act locally, and always points to the core necessity of restoring the proper relationship between the Govt and the People of the USA.
In this case, other folks seem to be deflecting to me: "Tha Joos!"
People do not know. Flynn emphasized here that something isn't right, but is also very clear and does NOT make claims about what the real story is, unlike some folks, who, apparently, are never wrong.
It was Israel it’s not that complicated. They have the most motive and all the circumstantial evidence points to them. There are probably other co conspirators with in TPUSA and they used some idiot Antifa patsies
Just saying we’re yelling “mmmuuuuhhh jjjoooossss” shows a lack of critical thinking. And shows you haven’t really looked into our point.
Autists on X and Instagram have already broken down all the connections, all the Zionist and Free masonry symbolism, all the weird events that happened that day.
Known Mossad agents like Laura Loomer trying to deflect blame to China is laughable.
If you can give us a well thought out argument with evidence that it wasn’t Israel I will listen to it. And if you can explain what narrative people like Candace are pushing and why despite her saying she will stop if Erika Kirk tells her to I will listen.
Fantastic. I guess everyone can just sit back and relax now, because ... you KNOW it was Israel? /sarc
Kek. Nah, I'm not interested in that sort of bargaining. I have zero concern about whether you listen or not. Any ideas I share here are offered freely, and people can absorb (or listen) at their own free choice.
But, if YOU can put up a well-written, articulate theory of why and how it was "Israel", I'd be interested to read it.
EDIT: actually, can you point me to somewhere where I could read on this? An article, for example, that outlines and articulates the theory (theories)? I'd rather be able to scan a write up than tune in to a video. I'm really not big on inflooencer videos these days. sic.
Yeah, but I didn't say that. What I DID say (albeit ambiguously and rather clumsily!) was that certain people saying "Israel did this!" in the public sphere, like Owens, for example, (If that's what she's doing), are deflecting from more critical issues. "seem to be" indicates opinion. I'm sharing an impression.
Well, yeah, I'll give you that. It might be my bias at work, but I'm yet to see an articulate theory of Who / What, and in general, my info war radar tends to take note of sensationalism and sees red flags in that, because there are psyops literally everywhere. Certain topics or themes will generate lots of sensational response from certain sectors, and of those, I tend to be wary.
I should mention that, fwiw, I think the (general) attachment to Israel and the Joos is a psyop, used by those further behind the scenes, like a sort of limited hangout. "Anti-Semitic vs Israel" is a smoke screen, imo.
Where do all the threads gather? Where do all the paths lead? Where do all the arrows point?
To the trans-national criminal organization we loosely know as 'The Cabal', of which (I accept as an unproven fact) the Israel DS and Israel project is a significant part.
In other words, different clothes, but same operator. (Corrupt) C_A? Mossad? British DS? WEF? All simply different agents of the same fundamental entity. imo.
Hey Frac - What I thought was interesting were the text messages between CK and ?
Essentially calling out the fact that the namestealers were pissing him off and that he'd have to deal with it - right before he got clipped.
I think Candace is just another voice "chipping away" or gnawing away at the proverbial insulation that faction has been using to counter any finger pointing. I don't really dig on her show but it is what it is.
I also find it interesting how Candace came to acquire those text messages...Who sent them to her? Was it someone @ TP? Someone in the govt?
What's his face @ TP verified those text messages from CK were "le git" and also mentioned that in "those first critical hours" he didn't "leave any stone unturned" so he "gave those texts to someone in the govt".
Jury's out on what the REAL DEAL is...but for certain suspects - the optics are not good...Like N'Yahoo coming out, unsolicited explaining how he had nothing to do with it...multiple times...
RE: https://x.com/Lukewearechange/status/1975606283773300955
TY. Good questions.
I continue to observe, albeit without a great focus, as I get the feeling that a lot of this is distraction.
If that's the case, that's a positive, I guess. But I personally feel like Candace is more of a distraction from more important matters. But that's me.
We all know it's the tiny hat people and I bet Trump and his team know that as well.
Welp. Where's all the Q "fags" on this one?
Flynn, pardoned by trump, in the white house as we speak, is saying this? So, does Trump not know what happened? Did his administration let this happen for real? Are they not intelligent enough to have seen it coming and fake the plan? They let it happen? They're running a campaign with a narrative that us including Flynn doesn't agree with? In the same house as them? What's the plan here? To trust the plan?
If anyone's in on the plan, that were supposed to trust, it's Flynn. He literally spends half his time IN the white house.
Do you understand this?
This is a problem. Maybe the biggest this forum has seen.
I think we pretty much agree with Flynn here. It has been discussed ad nauseam. Something isn’t right about the official narrative on the Kirk assassination.
I disagree with your narrative on Flynn. Trump fired him almost a decade ago. I don’t put much stock into what Flynn has to say in particular and I don’t trust him in particular.
I still don’t trust the FBI to get to the truth and I don’t think Trump and Kash have them under control.
There is a lot of evidence that we aren’t privy to at the moment. We will just have to let things play out.
It's either 5555D chess...or......well......ummm......Occam's razor....
I'd like to strongly encourage you to avoid making generalizations about what "we" think, believe, or see.
It's far too easy to project one's experience on to the "we" that one personally identifies with.
Aside from that, personally, I think Flynn is very much on point here and I give a lot of stock in what Flynn says, pretty much always. I have reasons for that which I've mentioned elsewhere.
I tried to be careful to separate what I think “we” generally think about Charlie Kirk’s assassination and my(I) opinion on Flynn. I think it is fair to say, that for the most part, we think there is something fishy about the official narrative.
If there is a silent group that buys the official narrative, I don’t want them to feel ostracized from voicing it. I am still even open to this point of view and don’t want anyone to feel uncomfortable thinking that.
So far as my opinion on Flynn, I know that is not how we all feel. I don’t want to divide the sub on the subject. I can be persuaded to change my mind on him, and have done so many times over the last couple of years.
Thanks for the thoughtful response. Appreciated!
Rolling this one around in my head.
First, Charlie Kirk's assassination event undoubtedly has many layers.
One that may need exploring is the possibility of soft disclosure of falsified events on a mass scale. For those who just cannot believe that nine-one-one and countless others were staged productions, what better way to ease into it than be part of the event from the get-go (early shocking video) and be spoon fed the holes in the narrative subsequently?
Spit balling.
Um, I think this is literally not true. But if you have the receipts, I'm willing to learn.
All data points just add to the 'Operation Demoralization' narrative...Truth will never be known and the perpetrators will never be found, let alone be held accountable. And this is not just limited to the CK saga...In the last 10 years we have seen at least a dozen (very conservative) major crimes against both individuals and against humanity in general take place and not ONE person has been held accountable. We should all be wearing 'Yuri Bezmenov was right' hats
He's not wrong.
A patsy, by any other name .....
After the shock of his assassination, I personally pushed back thoughts of doubts. After a week, I started really listening, to Owens and other voices who were breaking down the forensic evidence, voices who know their guns. It makes sense to me that the bullet did not travel far enough in his body to expand to its full capacity. The behavior of those involved did not ring true, paving over the site where he was killed, the fact that there is no evidence that the purported shooter had ever been on campus before, yet knew what staircase to climb to get access to the roof. Old enough to have seen Jack Ruby kill Oswald on live TV. Emotionally I watched the Memorial Service, and bought Ericka's public grief for about 48 hours, and then remembered good movies take good actors to succeed. Then researching her past and present. Kash taking his time to go to the scene before his statement. Charlie becoming awake and wanting to back off from supporting Israel, Charlies public opinion stated in regards to the Epstein files. For me, my love of country and freedom, my freedom, surpasses support of any administration or leader. I hold the blood of my ancestors, who claim that land is freedom, these woods and rocks where battles were fought. Living a long time, I know any power that holds the seat of government becomes dangerous when it has all the power. Regardless of public statements or political sides. Would those powers martyr good men to silence them or to gain more power? I've sadly watched it time and time again, since they killed my President as he was smiling and waving in Texas. When the suicides kept piling up during the Clinton years, when planes go down, when Bush the first got elected, one of the orchestrators of the CIA. When the country with the best surveillance and one of the most powerful secret police in the world, Mossad, stood down while Hamas just flew in like monkeys from wizard of oz to slaughter people at a music festival. yes, I think Flynn is on the right track.
I'd like him to explain why 'people getting involved in their communities' is going to stop mass shooter / assassination SIGH OPS from the CIA and other globalism-oriented intelligence groups?
Maybe they want us to distrust the government because there are too many corrupt people still in charge. Maybe we never need to trust the government....
Trust our instincts and our God and we will know the truth.
Quuuicckk!!!1 Caling all shills, we have a CODE PINK! Downdoot General Flynn NNOWWW! NARRATIVE DEVIATION DETECTED! I REPEAT, NARRATIVE DEVIATION DETECTED!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
🤭🤭
Flynn tweeted a couple days after the assassination that he was hearing from the FBI that a "foreign power" may be involved.
I can't find the tweet but it was posted multiple times here by myself and others.
Flynn keeps pressing this.
Q1281 said "done in 30" re Flynn.
Q said "expand your thinking."
What will be coming out circa October 10, [30] days after the assassination?
Idk...
The autopsy showing an entrance wound where the mic was?
What "foreign power" is known to kill people with explosives hidden in small electronics?
u/#q1281
good, because I don't believe it, either
The battery pack on Charlie's collar microphone exploded, just like all those pagers one year ago.
Of course not. The kid didnt figure that out by himself.