I can definitely see many of those old cathode-edrals and buildings with modular components...If you look carefully, you can see it.
Also those bell towers/cupolas with "antiquitech" masts on them... and you have to look very hard to find what is in the center of those old "cupolas" - which some say contained mercury... which up until say 2015, you could literally buy gallons of off of Amazon...
Interesting tidbit - knotzi submarine with cargo hold FILLED with mercury, marooned in the water near Sweden...It was allegedly headed to New Schwabenland. You can verify the sub location...
Many lighthouses used to float the big fresnel lens on a pool of mercury... before they swapped that out for bearings...
There's plenty lost or hidden/obscured to keep you on the metered plantation...
Do you have any interesting links related to ancient uses of mercury? I fear your post is too vague and cryptic to be useful to me, though I am always interested in potential evidence of antiqutech.
Other than potential flying devices/antigravity from ancient Indian accounts, I haven't found any "suspicious antiquitech" regarding the uses of mercury. As far as I've found, it was used in alchemy (AKA chemistry) and medicine, but nothing regarding ancient electrical conduction (as implied in your post).
In the case of the tower/masts what were they used for? I can't find anything related to "bell towers/cupolas" and the use of mercury or why that would be suspicious.
knotzi submarine with cargo hold FILLED with mercury
A quick search suggests the sub was just carrying mercury (used for explosion manufacturing) to protect it from the enemy during it's transportation mission. There was speculation that the mercury may have been holding Uranium oxide. While that is interesting with regards to the nuclear fuel and the potential for it's nuclear bomb program (which had links to Rockefeller and the US government, AKA the nazis and the government were colluding in nuclear bombs), that doesn't have anything to do with antiquitech. Why do you think it was more suspicious?
Many lighthouses used to float the big fresnel lens on a pool of mercury... before they swapped that out for bearings...
The Fresnel lens holder was quite ingenious, but it didn't come into use until the late 19th century. I don't see any evidence of it being used for it's conductivity properties in that instance. It was phased out, according to accounts, because it was too dangerous for its benefits. Is there more to the story?
you could literally buy gallons of off of Amazon
It is dangerous (over medium to long periods), but you can still buy it.
Do you have any interesting links related to ancient uses of mercury? I fear your post is too vague and cryptic to be useful to me, though I am always interested in potential evidence of antiqutech.
No. Not handy anyway. Most were probably just observations from bitchute videos watched over the course if the past decade...
If you come across anything in your research please let me know. Not just about mercury. Any antiquitech that gives actual reasonable evidence is very interesting to me.
To reduce the signal from the noise, I'm not interested in information that doesn't provide any evidence but just makes claims. In my investigation, I've tracked down several sources (with hints of many others) that don't provide any actual evidence. Those sources are either created by the PTB (with direct links to the C_A e.g.) as a form of misdirection and discrediting. Those sources carefully craft unprovable claims that sound convincing to make earnest investigators look like idiots ("conspiracy theorists"). Without the evidential support that can convince others of the claims, they accomplish the opposite of their pretended intent (by design). Others sources (researchers acting in earnest) then come and parrot those claims without evidence, and become unwitting "true believers" that help increase the web of the Matrix.
Even more subtle however, are the researchers that give some quality evidence, and then mix in the unprovable claims as if they are of the same quality. Alex Jones is a perfect example of that, thought he is not the only one.
All of those sources of information work together to craft the box in which the truth hides in plain sight.
I must say I am very interested in the second variety of C_A asset like AJ and his version of "limited hangout". They do give good evidence and that is very useful, even if it is designed to be a misdirection. As long as you never trust someone, you can extract the good from the mixed bag by looking for corroborating evidence.
I think one of the most promising things in light of what we know about "antiquitech" are the videos demonstrating harnessing electricity from the atmosphere, like this: https://youtu.be/2rVdEhyMR6A
But most of the information regarding things like storing energy in the "bones & stones" of the old buildings are in videos mixed in with other things that don't make them easy to find.
I might have to dig out my old analog Matrix 1,2,3 books and see if there's anything in them .... it's been a number of years since I perrused them...
Yup, the Matrix flicks show more in plain sight than most people realize. Like the anti-gravity pods used to float & drive them. Didn't Ghislane Maxwell have a submarine company, then used it to transport kids? And deep tunnel boring machines. Anyone ever check out the tunnel boring machines of the Robbins Company? They've made them for over 70 years now...
Read "The Giza Power Plant, Technologies of Ancient Egypt" - Christopher Dunn
Not necessarily using mercury but there's evidence to suggest that Great Pyramid was an energy generator.
In more recent times, mercury was used in the plasma engines of antigravity craft. I think its usage has been replaced by other technology because mercury had the disadvantage of transmuting into gold, over time, reducing the efficiency of the engine and requiring a periodic cleanout.
Interesting. This technology helps solve the MAJOR problem with renewable energy. (Solar, Wind) Namely, energy storage for use in off times like darkness or calm winds.
Communities could band together locally (like co-ops) and store solar energy without having to sell it back to the likes of So Cal Edison for pennies and be self sufficient using the concrete block walls between homes to store energy. Just an off the top thought.
If the flags in charge of our society are ever dealt with properly, the release of technologies they've sequestered and hidden from us would negate the need for a material like this.
I like where these research scientist's and engineer's heads are at, though.
I like this concept, and its practical uses. But if history is any guide, money interests will fight to capture such a technology and try to keep it from impacting their industry. We all know how Big Pharma is about protecting their profits, and I would suspect that Big Energy (oil, hydroelectric, etc.) would try to protect their outmoded industry as well.
I recall the energy conservation programs of the late 20th Century, where people were urged to save energy, "go green," sit in freezing rooms in their sweaters so as not to tax the energy grid, and large numbers of people went along with it.... and the ultimate result was that to ensure their profits, energy companies charged MORE for that energy.
I would guess that what people paid for energy, say in the 1960s, per kilowatt, adjusted for inflation, was considerably less than what we pay today. People are using more energy efficient appliances, but paying more for the privilege.
In 1960 it was 2.6c/kWh on average for residential nationwide. In 2005 dollars, the price actually has gone down until about 2005 / the Kenyan became president. But this data stops at 2011, so we should do it to the current year.
Using bls inflation calculator using CPI, the 2.6 cents = 28.749 cents in 2025. The power did get cheaper, but it's probably not cheaper than in the 1970s after we had more consumption by HVAC and were starting to do nuclear power.
1973 was the lowest nominal price, and also the lowest price in 2005 dollars (2.5 cents or 8.9 2005 cents). Those 2.5 cents are equivalent to 19.013 cents in 2025. That's cheaper than power in NYC and more than power in Miami, so it probably very much depends on location. (And the cost of electric power varies substantially from place to place, with multiples of difference, while gas/diesel/oil doesn't fluctuate to that level - this has an interesting anecdote about where electric cars are actually cost effective and where a datacenter should go. In 2016, in Seattle, the electric car was a massive win as power was dirt cheap ($0.05/kWh) and gas was high, over $4/gallon). But gasoline can change a lot more in price in a short period of time.
Kind of like what Red Brick used to accomplish before it was all destroyed. Soon they'll figure out of you put metal spires on top of everything you can pull energy right out of the ether. Just be sure to tell subsequent generations that they were "lightning rods".
I hear about many alternatives to the screw-the-public energy we have now. Nuclear fission seems to be back on the menu, apparently much safer than before. I think there have been breakthroughs with nuclear fusion. Then something about, a long time ago, a discovery that electricity can be taken out of the air. And now this. Any energy nerds out there that can fill us in?
We can grow our own food, take care of our own health. Can we get energy way cheap or free? If so, we won't need Deep State for ANYTHING.
Ty u/Tetartos_Ippeas always bringing great posts
What's old is new again....
All those old world buildings...iron rich red brick.
Our people were no dummies... we've been tricked hardcore...
You and me both, brother...
I can definitely see many of those old cathode-edrals and buildings with modular components...If you look carefully, you can see it.
Also those bell towers/cupolas with "antiquitech" masts on them... and you have to look very hard to find what is in the center of those old "cupolas" - which some say contained mercury... which up until say 2015, you could literally buy gallons of off of Amazon...
Interesting tidbit - knotzi submarine with cargo hold FILLED with mercury, marooned in the water near Sweden...It was allegedly headed to New Schwabenland. You can verify the sub location...
Many lighthouses used to float the big fresnel lens on a pool of mercury... before they swapped that out for bearings...
There's plenty lost or hidden/obscured to keep you on the metered plantation...
u/#catdance
Do you have any interesting links related to ancient uses of mercury? I fear your post is too vague and cryptic to be useful to me, though I am always interested in potential evidence of antiqutech.
Other than potential flying devices/antigravity from ancient Indian accounts, I haven't found any "suspicious antiquitech" regarding the uses of mercury. As far as I've found, it was used in alchemy (AKA chemistry) and medicine, but nothing regarding ancient electrical conduction (as implied in your post).
In the case of the tower/masts what were they used for? I can't find anything related to "bell towers/cupolas" and the use of mercury or why that would be suspicious.
A quick search suggests the sub was just carrying mercury (used for explosion manufacturing) to protect it from the enemy during it's transportation mission. There was speculation that the mercury may have been holding Uranium oxide. While that is interesting with regards to the nuclear fuel and the potential for it's nuclear bomb program (which had links to Rockefeller and the US government, AKA the nazis and the government were colluding in nuclear bombs), that doesn't have anything to do with antiquitech. Why do you think it was more suspicious?
The Fresnel lens holder was quite ingenious, but it didn't come into use until the late 19th century. I don't see any evidence of it being used for it's conductivity properties in that instance. It was phased out, according to accounts, because it was too dangerous for its benefits. Is there more to the story?
It is dangerous (over medium to long periods), but you can still buy it.
No. Not handy anyway. Most were probably just observations from bitchute videos watched over the course if the past decade...
If you come across anything in your research please let me know. Not just about mercury. Any antiquitech that gives actual reasonable evidence is very interesting to me.
To reduce the signal from the noise, I'm not interested in information that doesn't provide any evidence but just makes claims. In my investigation, I've tracked down several sources (with hints of many others) that don't provide any actual evidence. Those sources are either created by the PTB (with direct links to the C_A e.g.) as a form of misdirection and discrediting. Those sources carefully craft unprovable claims that sound convincing to make earnest investigators look like idiots ("conspiracy theorists"). Without the evidential support that can convince others of the claims, they accomplish the opposite of their pretended intent (by design). Others sources (researchers acting in earnest) then come and parrot those claims without evidence, and become unwitting "true believers" that help increase the web of the Matrix.
Even more subtle however, are the researchers that give some quality evidence, and then mix in the unprovable claims as if they are of the same quality. Alex Jones is a perfect example of that, thought he is not the only one.
All of those sources of information work together to craft the box in which the truth hides in plain sight.
I must say I am very interested in the second variety of C_A asset like AJ and his version of "limited hangout". They do give good evidence and that is very useful, even if it is designed to be a misdirection. As long as you never trust someone, you can extract the good from the mixed bag by looking for corroborating evidence.
I think one of the most promising things in light of what we know about "antiquitech" are the videos demonstrating harnessing electricity from the atmosphere, like this: https://youtu.be/2rVdEhyMR6A
But most of the information regarding things like storing energy in the "bones & stones" of the old buildings are in videos mixed in with other things that don't make them easy to find.
I might have to dig out my old analog Matrix 1,2,3 books and see if there's anything in them .... it's been a number of years since I perrused them...
Yup, the Matrix flicks show more in plain sight than most people realize. Like the anti-gravity pods used to float & drive them. Didn't Ghislane Maxwell have a submarine company, then used it to transport kids? And deep tunnel boring machines. Anyone ever check out the tunnel boring machines of the Robbins Company? They've made them for over 70 years now...
Read "The Giza Power Plant, Technologies of Ancient Egypt" - Christopher Dunn
Not necessarily using mercury but there's evidence to suggest that Great Pyramid was an energy generator.
In more recent times, mercury was used in the plasma engines of antigravity craft. I think its usage has been replaced by other technology because mercury had the disadvantage of transmuting into gold, over time, reducing the efficiency of the engine and requiring a periodic cleanout.
Expected lifetime?
Will these walls spontaneously detonate?
A single cubic metre of concrete required just for a fridge doesn’t sound so practical.
Brings a whole new meaning to “Build That Wall” 🤣
😛👍🏻
Interesting. This technology helps solve the MAJOR problem with renewable energy. (Solar, Wind) Namely, energy storage for use in off times like darkness or calm winds. Communities could band together locally (like co-ops) and store solar energy without having to sell it back to the likes of So Cal Edison for pennies and be self sufficient using the concrete block walls between homes to store energy. Just an off the top thought.
If the flags in charge of our society are ever dealt with properly, the release of technologies they've sequestered and hidden from us would negate the need for a material like this.
I like where these research scientist's and engineer's heads are at, though.
There is nothing new under the sun.
~Ecclesiastes
Will ultrafine Carbon black production evolve like DEF production?
I was thinking how Pelosi is tied to DEF..
Thank you for sharing u/Tetartos_Ippeas !! That was very interesting! So many concrete cities, if that is viable, it could change a lot.
All it needs is funding and freedom, like a load of other suppressed technologies.
I like this concept, and its practical uses. But if history is any guide, money interests will fight to capture such a technology and try to keep it from impacting their industry. We all know how Big Pharma is about protecting their profits, and I would suspect that Big Energy (oil, hydroelectric, etc.) would try to protect their outmoded industry as well.
I recall the energy conservation programs of the late 20th Century, where people were urged to save energy, "go green," sit in freezing rooms in their sweaters so as not to tax the energy grid, and large numbers of people went along with it.... and the ultimate result was that to ensure their profits, energy companies charged MORE for that energy.
I would guess that what people paid for energy, say in the 1960s, per kilowatt, adjusted for inflation, was considerably less than what we pay today. People are using more energy efficient appliances, but paying more for the privilege.
In 1960 it was 2.6c/kWh on average for residential nationwide. In 2005 dollars, the price actually has gone down until about 2005 / the Kenyan became president. But this data stops at 2011, so we should do it to the current year.
Using bls inflation calculator using CPI, the 2.6 cents = 28.749 cents in 2025. The power did get cheaper, but it's probably not cheaper than in the 1970s after we had more consumption by HVAC and were starting to do nuclear power.
1973 was the lowest nominal price, and also the lowest price in 2005 dollars (2.5 cents or 8.9 2005 cents). Those 2.5 cents are equivalent to 19.013 cents in 2025. That's cheaper than power in NYC and more than power in Miami, so it probably very much depends on location. (And the cost of electric power varies substantially from place to place, with multiples of difference, while gas/diesel/oil doesn't fluctuate to that level - this has an interesting anecdote about where electric cars are actually cost effective and where a datacenter should go. In 2016, in Seattle, the electric car was a massive win as power was dirt cheap ($0.05/kWh) and gas was high, over $4/gallon). But gasoline can change a lot more in price in a short period of time.
https://www.eia.gov/totalenergy/data/annual/txt/ptb0810.html
https://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/cpicalc.pl?cost1=26&year1=196001&year2=202508
Well that's a great find. Thanks for clarifying that, even though you successfully refuted my thesis. 😁
Kind of like what Red Brick used to accomplish before it was all destroyed. Soon they'll figure out of you put metal spires on top of everything you can pull energy right out of the ether. Just be sure to tell subsequent generations that they were "lightning rods".
Makes you wonder about that story recently about what's under the Pyramids (detected via ground-mapping radar)
Costs $10,000 last 5 years. (I'm guessing)
Carbon black, cubic metre, hmm black cubes again
It doesn't generate energy by itself, it only stores it in a smaller space.
They will spy on you.
The technology is amazing, but if they can store energy in your concrete they can certainly store microphones in cement also.
Laugh now, but check this out.
https://x.com/dutch1777real/status/1976444706684010747
I hear about many alternatives to the screw-the-public energy we have now. Nuclear fission seems to be back on the menu, apparently much safer than before. I think there have been breakthroughs with nuclear fusion. Then something about, a long time ago, a discovery that electricity can be taken out of the air. And now this. Any energy nerds out there that can fill us in?
We can grow our own food, take care of our own health. Can we get energy way cheap or free? If so, we won't need Deep State for ANYTHING.
There remains the problem of where the power to charge up your magic concrete wall will come from.
That site is usually full of crap.