According to Lin Wood Valhalla is a Military Base.
(twitter.com)
Comments (39)
sorted by:
Tina Peters should be there instead of a Colorado prison.
FREE TINA PETERS for a really Merry CHRISTmas!!!
The "Valhalla" statement by Kash Patel is Item #4 on my list of reasons to doubt the official Charlie Kirk story out of 695.
Yup. Odd statement to say. And Kash knew it. He knows anons are gonna dig into things that stick out.
Craziness. Kash doesn't believe in heaven so Valhalla is the best he could come up with.
Thank you.
The premise that this narrative by - Controlled Opposition Infiltrate Destroy Maga Asset extraordinaire, Lin Woods, is completely dumb. Really.
That people can swallow it defies belief. People here.
LOL
Yep. Right. So, Kirk was removed from the public sphere and taken into a federal witness protection program, and FBI director Kash Patel just told everyone "Hey! See you in that, you know, federal protection program facility, Charlie!!!"
Sure. Sure. And monkeys fly like in the Wizard of Oz.
This narrative is so idiotic, its ludicrous.
Oooh, let's play black/hat white, shall we?
Kash is a black hat, he spills the beans. Tells everyone.
Kash is a white hat. He's dumb. He just tells everyone.
Seriously, I do NOT know how anyone can swallow this narrative. The premise is bona fide nonsense.
Recognizing that is not a comment on doubts re: the official Kirk story. Lot's of smudgy facts, there, and it makes sense to ask questions. But the notion that Kash just decided to say, in the most public way, for the whole world to hear, "Oh, btw, see you Charlie that, you know, wink wink, facility....." that's just nonsensical.
But this is what people like Woods do. Throw garbage into the information sphere. Manipulation. Dangle crap, see if confirmation bias or sensationalism will bite it, and whip it up into a thing.
What's the core message here? >>>> Trump's Chosen FBI head is lying to you (even tho apprently he'll indirectly tell you where Kirk is) and yes, talk more and focus more on the Charlie Kirk thing. You know, with Candy and everyone else.
I support you doubting the official story, and asking questions, but if you think about is, the premise that Woods is pushing here is nonsensical: Kash Patel, head of the FBI, decided to just say, outloud, the name (or code-word for) of the federal witness protection facility Kirk would supposedly have been taken to.
What possible rational reason would Patel have for doing that?
IF Kirk was taken into a federal witness program, the WHOLE point of those programs is to KEEP witnesses safe by making them untraceable. Aka secret. Aka not telling every person in the country that they are doing it.
I agree with what wood is saying here. It’s not like we’re throwing money at Lin wood for his opinions.😂 I haven’t even heard from Lin wood since 2020 and I don’t care if I ever will find him speaking on anything ever again. Kash could be throwing it out there because the white hats do not give a single shit about who knows what. There’s no way to prove that it is a witness protection program. And if you do know what it is, say you’re Hillary Clinton and you know it is real…that’s Kash rubbing it in that they pulled off a reverse hoax on the deep state assclown killers.
Yeah, he could. But I don't that theory it makes much sense, myself. Not much sense, and not really much evidence.
Q dropped disinformation on purpose, as part of his operation. Is Patel now in the job of 'rubbing it in'', while potentially exposing the wider community to the information that, gee, see, Charlie's murder was a hoax!?
Stretching, imo. But we can agree to disagree.
Thanks for the reply.
“We’ll see you in Valhalla”
Valhalla Danish House
Leigh 0985
Goat Island
New Zealand
I don’t buy Wood’s take, but there’s also quite likely some reason Kash said that.
“Where do actors go when they exit the stage?”
Yeah I really don’t see what’s so ridiculous about the theory. Him being held at a witness protection facility, I assume temporarily for safe keeping, is not the same as putting him in witness protection for life with a new identity, etc.
I have no idea if Charlie is really there but practically vomiting at the idea in a huge dramatic display like u/fractal just did is…well…somehow almost suspect to me. Like really, man? That idea is THAT hard to believe and Lin Wood is the big bad reason for that literary eye roll? Okay….
Kekkeke. Pretty apt description.
But.... I think either you misread what I wrote, or perhaps, in my enthusiasm to vomit up a big (huge) dramatic display, I expressed the idea poorly. Although, maybe not, because Doi seemed to get it pretty clearly. Ironic that you are even replying to Doi, while missing the very point he's addressing.
In any case, perhaps I can clarify
Idea that Kirk is in witness protection, a witness protection theory - not a ridiculous idea or theory
Idea that FBI Director Kash Patel would blurt out "See you at that facility, Charlie" - a ridiculous idea or theory
For what reasons?
Patel constantly presents himself as very serious about his job. He's not trolling anymore, like he was when he jived with the (little) "q" account on Truth Social, etc.
Patel is going to openly admit to the public that the Kirk assassination is a hoax because....? Is he trying to undermine the credibility of the Administration? Of the FBI which he heads?
There is already plenty of distrust out there in - let's call it the non-MSM sphere - i.e. anons, truthers, alt-media (on the <ahem> 'right'), podsters, etc. So for what rationale reason would Patel want to further undermine public support by conducting and then openly admitting - by saying "See you Charlie at the <ahem> facility!"?
To me, the idea that Patel would do this is ridiculous, NOT the idea that in fact, the Kirk 'assassination' was a hoax, and that Kirk is in federal protection somewhere.
Although that Idea I find a little unacceptable, its not completely ridiculous. (Even though I have my own ideas about it, I won't voice them here.)
End: Doi actually makes a reasonable argument (even if I don't agree with it) about why Patel would do this. Personally, I find that line of thinking a little... gee, I mean, after a while, it seems like some of us just cram the evidence in to an ill-fitting box for the sake of preserving our perspective - aka the White Hats did it!!!!
Nonetheless, its a reasoned argument by Doi, addressing what I actually find a bit ridiculous - that Patel would openly and very prominently name the facility where - if he was actually in protection, Kirk was or is...
As for Woods, if people cannot see what he is, well, good luck to them, I say. So, trust a <corrupt> asset to do what a <corrupt> asset would do.
Hopefully, I have clarified my stance. Certainly over-clarified, in far too many words, but whatcha gonna do? Being verbose IS my super-power.
Eye-rollingly yours,
FI.
(PS. If you want to tag a user, you need to use the whole user name, like this:
[u/weholdthesetruths](/u/weholdthesetruths) as opposed to u/wehold, etc.
And if you fractured my fractal handle on purpose, well, don't I feel a fool for attempting to help a fellow frog when they don't need it... ?)
But.... thanks for responding, anyway!
So you are saying Valhalla is a Resort in the South Pacific ?
I shared a similar reaction. "holy shit, it's Lin Wood.
Didn't miss them.
Woods was the premier controlled op. We've had plenty of upgrades since then, but if he's telling you this, its for a reason... (psyops are real, folks).
Lin wood always seemed about as real to me as Kenneth Copeland when he was asking for donations for fuel for his private jet.
He was so early on in the maelstrom of gormless and insipid mouthpieces he was like a prototype sketched onto a napkin with lipstick.
So Lady Lindsey without the lady bugs ?
Less faggoty for sure.
Two days ago on this sub, I said that I don’t trust Lin Wood. So I am on the record.
I don’t trust Lin Wood and have always thought that he glows. He is just trying to cause trouble.
Edit*** That doesn’t mean that I disregard the Valhalla thing. I just don’t trust Wood and whatever he is pushing.
oh yeah I know what you mean.. but it doesn't mean the Valhalla thing isn't true either.
100%
Actually, you can trust Lin Wood pretty well, I would say. Once you recognize and realize what his mission and function is (disinformation, controlled opposition, distortion and distraction of people who might, on some level, have a chance of escaping the MSM matrix) then you can know how to interpret him. Therefore trust him.
You can trust poison, if you know what it does. Trust it to kill or damage you, so you stay away.
Wood is an old asset from the earlier days of the Great Awakening. Trust him to be manipulative and involved in some sort of psyop. Even if he tells you true things, its in order to manipulate you. That's his mission.
And if Charlie was there, one would not expect Trump to do or say anything to jeopardize that. Maybe Candace should consider this and stop bitching about what Trump isn't doing about Charlie's murder. As you can tell, I am annoyed with her about this point.
You’re annoyed with one of the loudest voices pushing back against the obvious fedshit we’re being fed?
I can think of 1000 things to be annoyed about before I would worry about Candace.
Well it is not on any map or knowledge of it has been made public other than Wood's statement. Of course Area 51 wasn't either for a long time!
Steward Island off the south coast of the south Island of New Zealand?
Had a Navy Seal confirm this to me. He was surprised it was news to me.
Did he just out himself as a black hat? Shouldn't this remain top secret? Why would a white hat want to put this out there?
I don’t know.. it’s all so confusing I don’t even know what to think anymore 🫤
That same logic would imply that Q and Q should never have posted anything, and we would never have any Deltas on Twitter or elsewhere from President Trump or others that cause us to dig and do our research.
As an Anon, I consider that Lin might be a White Hat and that this is a signal to Anons to dig and do our research.
Anons have already said that they think his death was staged, people can dig all they want. Lin just gave out the exact location to anyone watching (that means deep state). Q never did anything like that at all.
Q has revealed a ton of exact location information, and in some cases exact GPS coordinates. Q also named names, revealed screenshots of documents, etc.
Security through obscurity is no security at all. Deep State operators are perfectly capable of interpreting and researching the Q drops as much as Anons are capable of it. Q knows this. Instead of hiding things, Q skillfully used, among other tactics, an MSM campaign to paint "QAnon" as a "conspiracy theory" so that most people, including the Deep State, would dismiss it.
Clearly we are in the Disclosure phase of the Q operation, and if Lin is a White Hat, it doesn't surprise me nor concern me that he would reveal this information.
Alternatively, Lin may just be an Anon and is connecting the dots and sharing that for other Anons, which has been done by plenty of other Anons over the years, so I don't fault him for it.
Q never leaked classified info. This post by lin Wood could potentially be treason. Very high crime potentially. Maybe the bigger question tho, is 'how does AI know about this??
Pretty sure that piece of info was out there well before Lin said anything about it. Like 2 days after Kash said that we were discussing it on here.
Interesting, I must have missed that discussion. Well, my preference is that Lin Wood is a good guy. I don't want him to be a bad guy.
GPT-4o Mini is highly prone to hallucination. Other AI's will discount this.
So thats where Charlie Kirk is. I totally believe this.
This is NOT how you chat with an AI. He literally fed the AI the answer he expected it to give. Ai generates the most likely response, so when you ask a leading question its impossible to trust what it says back!