1
427windsorman 1 point ago +1 / -0

To certify is to approve of, or agree. It is actually their duty, as stewards of a Constitutional office where public trust is required, to not certify election results that may be tainted. That is literally what they are there to decide.

1
427windsorman 1 point ago +1 / -0

No law can force anyone to certify anything where cheating or dishonesty is suspected. That law doesn't pass Constitutional muster. So it is null and void.

"No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law, and no courts are bound to enforce it." - Quote by: American Jurisprudence, 2nd Edition Source: 16 Am Jur 2d, Sec 177, late 2d, Sec 256

"All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void." - Quote by: Marbury vs. Madison Source: 5 US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176 (1803)

"Any single man must judge for himself whether circumstances warrant obedience or resistance to the commands of the civil magistrate; we are all qualified, entitled, and morally obliged to evaluate the conduct of our rulers. This political judgment, moreover, is not simply or primarily a right, but like self-preservation, a duty to God. As such it is a judgment that men cannot part with according to the God of Nature. It is the first and foremost of our inalienable rights without which we can preserve no other." - Quote by: John Locke (1632-1704) English philosopher and political theorist. Considered the ideological progenitor of the American Revolution and who, by far, was the most often non-biblical writer quoted by the Founding Fathers of the USA.

2
427windsorman 2 points ago +2 / -0

There are enough prayers and faith to go around Fren.

6
427windsorman 6 points ago +6 / -0

That is legislating from the bench, and should not stand if reviewed by a higher court. Too many judges are doing this today, and it needs to be stopped. Removing those guilty of this practice would be a good start.

3
427windsorman 3 points ago +3 / -0

You do realize that most counties in Oregon have been trying to be annexed by Idaho, right? This has been going on for over 3 years now. Only one small part of Orgon is blue, just like in Colorado, with Denver.

5
427windsorman 5 points ago +5 / -0

Bill Clinton is / was every bit as evil and nasty as his wife. His policies and his actions showed that to be 100% accurate. Just because you his wife is outwardly more reprehensible doesn't mean he is any less evil or despicable. He just hides it better.

4
427windsorman 4 points ago +4 / -0

If the right to bear arms is an absolute, unalienable right conferred by our Creator, then how is he wrong? It is either a right, or it is not. There is nothing in between.

The 2nd A is not for us, it is meant to put government on notice that they have 0 power / authority over the right to bear arms.

There is no degree of right or wrong, it is either 100%, or it is 0.

2
427windsorman 2 points ago +2 / -0

They have been doing that since the 1980's, at least. There used to be several real militia's, but they were demonized by government and the MSM, and were disbanded, imprisoned, or killed.

2
427windsorman 2 points ago +2 / -0

I had a pericardiectomy on 08/22/2024. I had chronic constrictive pericarditis that they believe was caused by an unknown auto-immune issue. It caused me to have severe congestive heart failure symptoms, and fluid build up around my heart and lungs. I was, quite literally, at deaths door when they performed the pericardiectomy. They had to remove my the entire protective sac, or lining, of my heart.

My blood pressure was extremely high before surgery, even hitting 190/110, at one point. I had severe edema of my legs and abdomen, causing pressure on my lungs and heart.

Since the surgery, I had low blood pressure, until they took me off all pain meds about 5 days after the surgery. It then was pretty steady around 120/65-ish.

While they were trying to diagnose what was wrong, they discovered a 70% blockage of my LAD. Due to the complications of the surgery, they opted not to deal with it during the pericardiectomy procedure. Since then, the decision was made to treat it with medication.

Well, after everything I have been through, I am not wanting a stent, not wanting an additional surgery to by-pass the blockage, and do not want to be on any medications long-term. When I saw this post regarding this protocol, I decided to start it for myself. I started on 09/23/2024 and have been doing it since.

I haven't been able to get a medical verification through my cardiologist or the heart surgeon that performed my pericardiectomy, in regards to this protocol reducing the 70% blockage of my LAD, but my blood pressure has been steady, I feel a lot better, I am able to walk without feeling like I am dying from lack of oxygen. I can breathe normally now, and am getting stronger every day.

I do feel the protocol is working, and hope to get a medical verification when they next decide to check on my blockage.

I am very grateful to @JohnTitor17 for posting this protocol. I feel it has been a blessing to my recovery, and my health.

2
427windsorman 2 points ago +2 / -0

The whole concept of voting in our election system, according to the founding principles of our Constitutional Republic, was 1 vote for one individual candidate. Ranked voting is a scheme that is not in accordance with a Republic government.

Ranked-choice voting is inherently unfair. Voters who select unpopular candidates as their first preference effectively vote again, sometimes multiple times. Why should some voters get numerous votes just because their first preference is unpopular?

With ranked voting, not all votes count. This goes against the principle that every vote counts. Ranked voting also makes cheating even easier, and counting even more complex.

In reality, ranked-choice voting is a scheme that makes it harder for independent candidates to win and is regularly being used by left-wing groups to undermine conservative candidates.

Sadly, many Americans lack confidence in the election process. While progressives offer RCV as a solution to this problem, such a needlessly complicated voting system leads to voter confusion, lower turnout, and slower election results. Strengthening the trust that the American people have in the election process should not be a partisan issue. Banning ranked-choice voting is a measure that everyone ought to support to protect election integrity.

It should also raise alarms that the 3 biggest financial backers of ranked voting are the George Soros-funded Open Society Foundations, Jennifer and Jonathan Allan Soros Foundation, and Soros Fund Charitable Foundation.

As our founders knew, one person, one vote is the best, and most fair method to decide elections. It’s worked for Americans for generations. There’s no good reason to change things now.

2
427windsorman 2 points ago +2 / -0

Actually, it was George Bush Sr's term that started it. He was a RINO, before RINO was even a thing. He even called out the start of the New World Order.

2
427windsorman 2 points ago +2 / -0

Our military needs to protect our borders, and fire upon any foreign force crossing our borders, or aiding and abetting the crossing of our borders. Keep the Border Patrol to work with the military to apprehend anyone that makes it across, but the military has the weapons and equipment to truly secure our borders.

1
427windsorman 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, it is not okay to use the military to take civilian criminals into custody. If you support this you do not understand the principles our Constitutional Republic was founded upon. You also do not understand out founders intent when it came to the military and a standing army.

We, the People of These United States, have all the authority and power to change our government, and punish those who have betrayed their oath and committed these heinous acts of treason and depravity.

We also do not need to resort tot he tools of evil to accomplish what needs to be done. Torture is not the American way.

All of our rights come from our Creator, and all the limited power granted to government flows from us, through the Constitution, to the government. Therefore, it is our responsibility and duty to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

We should never abdicate or delegate any of our responsibilities or duties to the very institutions formed to serve us, and protect our preexisting and unalienable rights.

We can appoint tribunals, new judges, courts, juries, etc.

All of the accused found guilty would have their capital sentences carried out quickly. No dragged out multiple appeals from our corrupted system of "justice".

5
427windsorman 5 points ago +5 / -0

The 2nd Amendment is just words on a document. Similar to how a weapon is an inert tool when left sitting on a table.

1
427windsorman 1 point ago +1 / -0

I wonder why no impeachment for illegally redirecting funds already allocated by Congress for FEMA to be used to fund the illegal alien invasion?

3
427windsorman 3 points ago +3 / -0

The judge needs to be removed from the bench. The jury will be judged by our Creator. They failed to do their duty.

1
427windsorman 1 point ago +1 / -0

$175 billion to support the Ukrainian during Biden's tenure. $20 billion weapons package sale to Israel $50 billion in Foreign Aide to other countries.... $150.7 billion just for the last year to illegal immigrants

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›