1
427windsorman 1 point ago +1 / -0

There is no issue deploying the military to our borders to enforce them. The problem will be deploying our military internally to be used against American citizens.

There will need to be tight coordination and clear mission parameters if the military is used internally to deal with foreign invaders already entrenched internally.

2
427windsorman 2 points ago +2 / -0

American citizens have the right to vote. No one else does, period. That is common law, and basic common sense.

1
427windsorman 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you remember the original Batman movie in 1989, it foreshadowed todays reality with many common products, by themselves, being fine, but certain combinations were deadly.

I believe we are seeing it come to life in this day and age.

2
427windsorman 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why can we, regular Americans, start our own grassroots PAC to formally question the results of the election if they appear to be suspect? We, The People, have that power and that right. Screw Obama and his anti-American PAC.

4
427windsorman 4 points ago +4 / -0

Both should be eliminated. They are socialist programs, and not constitutional.

1
427windsorman 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Constitution does not grant government the ability to suspend elections, enact Marshal Law, or suspend the Habeous Corpus.

“Emergency does not create power. Emergency does not increase granted power or remove or diminish the restrictions imposed upon power granted or reserved. The Constitution was adopted in a period of grave emergency. Its grants of power to the federal government and its limitations of the power of the States were determined in the light of emergency, and they are not altered by emergency.” ~ Justice Charles Evans Hughes (1862-1948) Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court Home Building & Loan Assn v. Blairsdell, 1934

7
427windsorman 7 points ago +7 / -0

It is conceivable that after importing armies of our enemies and armies of criminals that they have a plan to take over large swathes of land and even entire communities, towns, or cities. It is the ultimate form of warfare, taking over from within. It could only happen by enemies enabling this to happen, from within.

2
427windsorman 2 points ago +2 / -0

It is conceivable that after importing armies of our enemies and armies of criminals that they have a plan to take over large swathes of land and even entire communities, towns, or cities. It is the ultimate form of warfare, taking over from within. It could only happen by enemies enabling this to happen, from within.

14
427windsorman 14 points ago +14 / -0

It is conceivable that after importing armies of our enemies and armies of criminals that they have a plan to take over large swathes of land and even entire communities, towns, or cities. It is the ultimate form of warfare, taking over from within. It could only happen by enemies enabling this to happen, from within.

4
427windsorman 4 points ago +4 / -0

It is conceivable that after importing armies of our enemies and armies of criminals that they have a plan to take over large swathes of land and even entire communities, towns, or cities. It is the ultimate form of warfare, taking over from within. It could only happen by enemies enabling this to happen, from within.

1
427windsorman 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well, in cases like that, capital punishment fits the crime of stealing the liberty and lives of those she had a duty to insure a fair trial.

1
427windsorman 1 point ago +1 / -0

By what authority does the communist regime occupying the WH have to seize anything from foreign sovereign countries?

2
427windsorman 2 points ago +2 / -0

By what authority does the communist regime occupying the WH have to seize anything from foreign sovereign counties?

6
427windsorman 6 points ago +6 / -0

Communism, Socialism, Fascism, Sharia Law, etc. are all abhorrent to anyone who understands the U.S. Constitution. They are in no way compatible, and in all ways at odds with it.

By allowing the communists to gain the WH illegally, we have given them the ability to attack the very foundation of our Republic as they work to overthrow those sacred principles, and topple our Republic for good.

I pray to see 1,000,000+ Patriotic, Constitution loving, God-fearing Americans march on the U.S. Capital to show we are done, and shutting them down for good.

It will not happen since they have done such a good job of dividing us and putting the fear of government into the vast majority.

Maybe it will be the White Hat's, but they have not acted so far, and a legitimate election was stolen right in front of them.

I hope Trump wins, like he did last time, but this time we do not allow a steal.

4
427windsorman 4 points ago +4 / -0

They were born with the same rights the rest of us were born with. The 2nd Amendment doesn't give us the right to bear arms, either.

The difference is that the U.S. Constitution is a protection for the preexisting rights of Americans, and not those here illegally. Federal Government has been granted certain limited powers to protect our borders, and Americans from foreign criminals illegally crossing our borders.

4
427windsorman 4 points ago +4 / -0

For sure, when our Messiah returns. Maybe a bit sooner, if enough Americans decide that the communist's have gone far enough with destroying our Western Civilization, our Constitutional Republic, and our freedom to practice our Christian religion.

8
427windsorman 8 points ago +8 / -0

We need just the opposite. We need them serving the sentences of anyone they wrongly convict. I guess most Americans need a reminder of the original intent of prosecutors', and indictments.

“The function of the prosecutor under the federal Constitution is not to tack as many skins of victims as possible against the wall. His function is to vindicate the rights of the people as expressed in the laws and give those accused of crime a fair trial.” ~ Justice William O. Douglas (1898-1980), U. S. Supreme Court Justice

“If the prosecutor is obliged to choose his case, it follows that he can choose his defendants. Therein is the most dangerous power of the prosecutor: that he will pick people he thinks he should get, rather than cases that need to be prosecuted. With the law books filled with a great assortment of crimes, a prosecutor stands a fair chance of finding at least a technical violation of some act on the part of almost anyone. In such a case, it is not a question of discovering the commission of a crime and then looking for the man who has committed it, it is a question of picking the man and then searching the law books, or putting investigators to work, to pin some offense on him. It is in this realm -- in which the prosecutor picks some person whom he dislikes or desires to embarrass, or selects some group of unpopular persons and then looks for an offense, that the greatest danger of abuse of prosecuting power lies. It is here that law enforcement becomes personal, and the real crime becomes that of being unpopular with the predominant or governing group, being attached to the wrong political views, or being personally obnoxious to or in the way of the prosecutor himself.” ~ Justice Robert H. Jackson (1892-1954), U. S. Supreme Court Justice

“Today the grand jury is the total captive of the prosecutor who, if he is candid, will concede that he can indict anybody, at any time, for almost anything, before any grand jury.” ~ William J. Campbell (1905-1988) United States federal judge, longest serving Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Newsweek, 22 August 1977

“[The] purpose of a jury is to . . . make available the common sense judgment of the community as a hedge against the overzealous or mistaken prosecutor and in preference to the professional or perhaps over conditioned or biased response of a judge.” ~ U.S. Supreme Court Taylor v. Louisiana, 419 U.S. 522, 530 (1975)

8
427windsorman 8 points ago +8 / -0

By what authority does the communist regime occupying the WH have to seize anything from foreign sovereign countries?

3
427windsorman 3 points ago +3 / -0

They can't "overthrow" the Constitution because then they would cease to exist, or to have any granted powers. It would mean the deputy is over the master.

In a word, this would start another Revolutionary War to remove the old dysfunctional government to replace it with a new one that honors and obeys the Constitution. If you need proof, just read the Declaration of Independence.

10
427windsorman 10 points ago +10 / -0

Get government out of Education, Health Care, Weapons Control, Almost all Law Enforcement (other than the US Marshall's Service), and every other area they don't have granted power.

9
427windsorman 9 points ago +9 / -0

The U.S Constitution cannot be "enforced" on American Citizens. It is enforced upon our government. It's the contract or license granting certain specific powers to government. Anything beyond those limits is usurped or stolen powers.

The military option is something our founding fathers warned us about. A standing army is a bane to Liberty.

I believe that we should form local community militias and form regional militia networks in each state. These militias would train together on a regular basis. They would support each other to protect their communities and citizens from government tyranny, invasions, etc.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›