Why does that dude bear strong resemblance to a Podesta?
Ugh. If she didn’t have a court hearing tomorrow morning, I’m all for saying this sort of thing. But there’s a judge that is deciding whether to punt you or not tomorrow…
How about Lin Wood being the family lawyer?
Puta barata. $7.8 mil is it?? I wouldn’t ever sell my soul at any price. But how could you entertain doing it for less than billions??
This larp technique needs to be widely exposed.
Ya similar technique. I think from this point forward, it should be called “Deep State Circle Jerk” officially. Because it basically is. Circular and gay af.
That’s pretty low, even for commiefornia.
I’ve not spent any time on the California constitution. But I have read the Texas constitution quite a few times. I also researched case law in Texas for standing. They go through the same analysis for standing as the feds.
For this reason, I do not think the Texas law is constitutional. And if Commiefornia does standing like the feds, neither is theirs. There is no injury. Just because you write a statute giving a cause of action doesn’t mean you create an injury. And without an injury in fact, you do not have standing to sue in court.
We do have litigation for third parties to sue. Like next of kin, or executor of an estate. There’s also advocacy group standing - if members of their group individually would have standing and the cause is germane to the group’s purpose. But this other trash just doesn’t fly to me. I think they are bunk laws all around. And we should NOT be getting into the private prosecution business. Talk about a way for tyrants to ruin private lives.
Elon can stay here. And my 2 taxidermy Belgian Malinois stuffed with a few pounds of tannerite each will stand glowie watch at the entry points for us.
Oh they decided it. But at this point what kind of reaction would a move like you are concerned with cause? damned if you do damned if you don’t
I don’t know if you noticed this and didn’t remark on it, but the classic larp trick of circular reporting is in here.
“11.This exchange is odd among other things because some of the “bibliography” materials cited by the FITF are sourced to intelligence officials, who in turn cited the public sources.”
Where have we seen this before? 🤔
Oh ya…intel community leaks WMD in Iraq story to NYT. NYT then writes article. Bush admin cites NYT article as corroboration of the allegation.
Intel community leaks Russia collusion hoax to NYT. NYT then writes article. FBI then cites NYT article as corroboration in FISA warrants.
This is classic deep state bullshit.
Count me out of wanting to be in the chip making business. The amount of worthless garbage you have to sort through before finding one that actually works as intended is crazy.
If you switch to the 18th (which you can click on there) its not the same. But the last link has it as the picture.
“We got the goods on Trump. Just you wait. 2 more weeks!” - Adam Schiff
Pure copium from these clowns. I don’t know wtf the point is honestly. Hard to imagine a more pointless endeavor.
Jack Ruby (FBI) bizarrely assassinating Lee Harvey Oswald should have been all the evidence required to solve the riddle.
Edit: either this guy’s history was white washed or I am retarded. Ruby was not FBI. Not sure why I have thought this for decades…But apparently a night club owner in Dallas with a “troubled past” in Chicago…Sounds like gangster to me.
Edit 2: Um wow check this out and tell me what this sounds like…
“At his high-profile trial, Jack Ruby was defended pro bono by prominent California attorney Melvin Belli (1907-1996), who argued that psychomotor epilepsy had caused Ruby to mentally black out and subconsciously shoot Oswald, and that due to this condition he should be treated with leniency. However, on March 14, 1964, after deliberating for just over two hours, a jury found Ruby guilty of murder with malice and sentenced him to death by the electric chair. Belli expressed outrage at the verdict and claimed that Ruby, a Jew, was a victim of discrimination.In October 1966, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals reversed the conviction on the grounds of improper admission of testimony and the fact that Ruby could not have received a fair trial in Dallas at the time due to excessive publicity. A new trial was scheduled to take place in Wichita Falls, Texas, in February 1967. However, on December 9, 1966, Ruby was admitted to Parkland Hospital (the same place where Kennedy and Oswald had died) with pneumonia. Soon after, he was diagnosed with lung cancer. On January 3, 1967, he died at age 55 from a blood clot in his lung.”
Not sure why Fauci is leaving. Because he will have to make the same appearances in front of Congress either way. And why should we believe his replacement won’t be a carbon copy clone of the master?
Some bogus referral from Congress is pointless though. It isn’t like she has to persuade a maga DOJ to indict him. She has Stalin’s DOJ. They need no “persuasion” from her to do it. They’d just have a show trial on their own.
Yep, referral incoming they say. Or at least, a vote on it.
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/12/16/jan-6-committee-trump-criminal-referral-00074411
I’m in no position to dispute this. I do not and would not subscribe to the NYT. But look at this:
https://www.seattletimes.com/games-nytimes-crossword/
That ain’t the same as the picture.
https://nationalpost.com/nyt-puzzle/
Nor this
https://crosswordfiend.com/2022/12/17/sunday-december-18-2022/
But this one has it…I am confused.
Isn’t that the same chip as the prior model, but with the extra cores actually turned on? My understanding was that was the only difference, software disabled 2 cores and they magically enable them on the new one. Yet they don’t use the same software to turn on the cores on the old model. That routine sounds like con to me.
He couldn’t ask her about the others. That would considered not relevant to her testimony. And likely speculative too. As if she is privy to all the details about the others. What others on the board did before being on it or how much they got paid is of no consequence to why she is being questioned.
This is the textbook example of why a defense lawyer tells you not to talk to the police, even if you have nothing to hide. It is also a textbook example of whoever the other side’s lawyer is (says this is cross exam) not preparing their witness. A lawyer doing his/her job properly tells that witness that their job on cross exam is to answer the question asked and nothing more. Her response just made that lawyer’s point so much more potent than without her excessive ramblings.
I’m also surprised nobody objected to the question as to why Pfizer doesn’t just use employees. Bad lawyering. That calls for speculation. She isn’t a Pfizer manager or executive and the only thing she could offer would be purely speculative or conjecture.
Public defenders are mostly in private practice. Even though there is an official public defender’s office. They don’t have a lot of lawyers. Plus the public defender’s office only participates in criminal cases. And never represents the municipality.
Ya it doesn’t matter. City and county attorneys’ entire job is to represent these municipalities in court. State Attorneys General represent states in court rooms. Whether it is a criminal prosecution or a civil suit.
If your city or county sues you, I guarantee it will never be with a private firm. It will always be by the city/county attorney’s office
There needs to be some sniping at the outside perimeter of the deep state. If we have it all as constantly stated, then start using some of that to pick some of these guys off to soften up the belly. Their typical strategy is to burn who they cannot save.
Larp larp larp all day long larp larp larp while I sing this song