Playing Devil's Advocate here, but the "paper" it's on seems to be sterile packaging for medical suppiles (I work with Durable Medical Equipment, ventilators / CPAP / suction, etc).
Medical biowaste isn't often kept, or even looked at, during surgical procedures so I can't imagine that there would have been a better option for them to use.
Also, they would have been in a hurry for this. The patient is likely still opened up and the surgical team decided that this was strange enough to take a picture but they're in the middle of an operation.
So, they grab something from the trash that is big enough instead of trying to find a clean tray or counter space.
I'm not saying this is legit, I'm just trying to propose a scenario in which in makes sense.
I'm in KS, and one of my local elected officials has been trying to worm her way up the Democratic ranks for the last decade. I would get an inappropriate amount of satisfaction seeing her name publicly connected to election interference.
I can't tell if you're being sarcastic, but I'm gonna guess that you haven't seen the video... which I have provided below. Definitely a cop, and definitely doing the Lord's work. =)
Isn't this the preferred situation? Parents talking to their children about sex and everything that goes along with it? Because the other option is mentioned in the article... that's the one where kids learn about anal at school.
Bitcoin was never supposed to be untraceable. Here are a few of the main attributes of Bitcoin:
1. Decentralized - cannot be directly manipulated by any group or person. The Bitcoin code is unchangeable.
2. Blockchain - a permanent record of all transactions. No double-spending. No way to "fudge" the numbers.
3. Deflationary - there is a fixed supply, and a known rate of distribution.
Bitcoin, cryptocurrency, digital currency, blockchain... these are all different terms with different meanings. It's easy to get lost in the propaganda surrounding all of it (from both supporters and detractors).
Edit - OP is correct, while BTC is not strong on anonymity there are good options out there. XMR and ARRR are solid choices.
Prepping the narrative for a Red Tsunami in November. They'll shut down comms to prevent people from learning the truth, but the truth will get out. Regime-controlled media will claim (without evidence) that "Trump his Allies" are interfering in the election process to regain political control. Then comes the decisive and overwhelming defeat of Dems and RINOs and the parroted talking points claiming "dRuMpF cHeAtEd, hE's A tYrAnT. mUh dEmOcRaCy iS iN dAnGeR!"
I have a theory about celebrities and wealth: they don't actually own anything. They just get to use the houses and jets and bank accounts while they tow the line.
Edit: I have nothing to back this up, and I'm too lazy to look into it any further.
I would like to make one distinction, just that this accurately describes the populations of these countries, not necessarily the current leadership. For example, the Chinese people want to maintain peace and sovereignty while the CCP is maneuvering for world dominance (military and financial).
But yes, great analysis!
Keep in mind the real goal: to expose the entire corrupt system. FEC fines some randos, whatever. While paying the fine isn't exactly an admission of guilt, it IS a public acknowledgement. Just another stick on the pyre of retribution. And when the spark ignites everything, NO ONE will be able to argue against it.
Yes. The people of Portland should stop having kids. And anyone who sees this and agrees with it, should also stop having kids.
Edit - I would love to see a demographic breakdown of the neighborhood this billboard was posted on.
"In what turned out to be a late-night marathon, the Kansas Senate barely passed, 21 to 16, a bill known as the Off-Label Drug Bill just before 1:30 am."
... barely passed... 21 to 16... that's 56% to 43%...
Anyhow, as a KS resident I hope this passes. Not sure how Gov. Kelly will respond, but she seems to be fairly moderate.
Musk has it right. A degree of anonymity is vital to the Twitter ecosystem (satire accounts, for one example). However, each user must be verified as an actual person, of legal age to use the platform (as defined by law or TOS).
Idgaf if Romney wants to run around wearing a hat pretending to be Pierre Delecto, but he's got to be the one posting under that account.