Her family goes back quite a way in New York, originally from Poland (greatgrandfather), whereas Pencil Neck's family (grandfather) reportedly came from the UK.
Note also:
Gavin Newsome Father = William Newsome, sister of William Newsome previous married to Ron Pelosi, Nancy Pelosi's brother-in-law. So not actually "nephew".
This list, while possibly containing some actual facts, starts out with two pieces of disinformation, and seems a lot more like fake disinformation intended to discredit the truth community and undermine the truth.
We know that these families intertwine and interconnect in ways that form rather satanic (cabal and DS) connections, but disinformation is also at work to obscure this truth. Such as the story that a relative of Pencil Neck was married to Soros' son.
Anons should always check and verify if something seems to fit too easily in to our biases. There are always forces attempting to undermine the truth by injecting disinformation that gets too easily swallowed unless we apply critical and skeptical thinking.
We can see that there are some very shady connections, and it appears that the disinformation included in the OP's post may very well have been generated to obscure the actual facts and discourage normies from looking any deeper:
Propaganda websites: "Factcheckers show that George Soros' son is NOT married to Adam' Schiff's sister."
Normie: "Oh, so ALL that stuff is just fake conspiracy theories....."
This highlights something that anons should all be aware of and incorporate into their information war endeavors: disinformation (i.e. black propaganda) is frequently injected in to the information sphere in order to a) discredit people who mistakenly share it as fact and b) discourage normies from giving any credence to unusual or out of the mainstream information they here ('conspiracy theories'.
Anons and Awake Patriots have an inverted bias. Often some people will simply accept the disinformation, because it seems to paint the Cabal in a bad light or appears to expose them. So anons just accept it, and spread it, and unwittingly become the CONDUITS for the disinformation operation. Such disinformation operations target our vulnerabilities, aka biases we might hold but which we don't pay attention to.
How do we counter this sort of attack?
Anons should develop the practice of questioning ALL the information that comes across our bows. When it comes via an established source that we know is legitimate and has been repeatedly verified, then we can usually omit this step. But otherwise, we should always be on the lookout for BOTH disinformation and real information.
Learn to identify and become familiar with red flags. A photo image presenting a list of facts without any identifiable source MIGHT be a great meme that easily spreads powerful information, BUT it could as easily be just a dodgy piece of disinformation. Lack of source. Random image. Appealing to our biases. 'too good to be true'. etc.
Realize that all powerful disinformation mixes Truth and Lies, Fact AND Fiction. Out and out fiction or false information is far less likely to trick or trigger an anon's biases. Blatant lies are often easier to spot than lies mixed in with elements of truth. The nugget of information may be in fused with a mixture of truth and lies in order to get the target (you and I and others) to accept the lies more easily. For this reason, it is important to have a skeptical mind that vets the information that comes in, and to sift truth from the disinformation.
While Qdrop 329 APPEARS to verify that the Schiff married to Soros is in fact related to Pencil neck, it does not actually do this. What it emphasizes is how marital connection are often used to build up the Cabal, and that anons should learn to "follow the wives" in order to track down those bona fide connections.
"Susan" Rice served under 0bama, but is also currently handling Biden too.
Susan Elizabeth Rice (born November 17, 1964) is an American diplomat, policy advisor, and public official. As a member of the Democratic Party, Rice served as the 22nd Director of the United States Domestic Policy Council from 2021 to 2023, as the 27th U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations ...
Given that the first four factoids given in this image are fake, with only ONE having even a very loose semblance of proximity to truth (Newsome's aunt was once married to Pelosi's brother in law, which does NOT even make him a nephew-in-law, but a loosely related extended family member by marriage), one wonders how much of the rest of the image contains actual truth....
We all do this, but the need for vigilance is quite real. You mention TS, but I certainly would not take something being posted on Truth Social as any sort of mark of validity. Social media is social media.
I’d like to know how people interact with posts, sometimes.
You point out in the top comment that only one of these claims may have some validity, followed by several comments that just accepted the meme and kept moving.
Just pure affirmational surface level acceptance is not what this movement should ever be about.
see meme
accept meme
ignore comments
comment on acceptance of meme
no correction given by meme originator
misinfo spreads
Not sure what to do about that. I’ve been hit by a few misinfo memes from here where nothing made it to the comments.
I’d like to know how people interact with posts, sometimes.
I wonder about this a lot and I suppose I have formulated some ideas (and biases) that may or may not be on target.
My process here was:
I was intrigued by the Subject Line (FYI!!!) and the fact that it was stickied, so I opened the post in a separate tab. I glanced through the meme, recognized a few factoids from previous info (the middle ones: the connections between MSM execs and political spouses) and then looked at the comments. I noticed top comm by Penisse, aka the Q drop, then read on and glanced through the comments (which are mostly reactions, as far as I can see).
I didn't get down to the comments calling out the disinfo/false facts (they are invariably lower on the comment rankings, something I often observe, and I put that up to the notion that most readers are simply reacting to the post, not filtering it. These comments are higher on the rank now, but when I approached the post, they were not).
I got as far as the comment by u/ditzee58/ and read with wry agreement the comment by u/Buttery (you should have checked first before posting). From there I searched up the Qdrop, and thought about the question: Is Melissa Schiff related to Adam Schiff? and then went to the web start to dig. Quickly found a) "fact-checking" sites (which I loathe) debunking these claims (i.e. politifact), and then b) articles, information, genealogy websites that showed the absence of any blood relationship.
I made my comment under Penisse's Qdrop comment about Melissa Schiff, clicked save and then went back to check up on the Newsome thing. Dug a bit, found that this was inaccurate at best and sort of bogus, edited my comment to include that info, and save.
By now my narrative antenna was up, and I dug on Kerry's daughter, then Chelsea Clinton, and recognizing that in only the first four factoids, it was 90% BS, and recognizing that it has the hallmarks of a disinfo meme, I decided to rewrite my whole comment, eventually including commentary and then a remark on the Qdrop itself.
Talking about how people interact with the posts, I note here, such as is frequently the case, there is a HIGH number of upvotes, but relatively FEW comments actually vetting the content, offering counter-arguments, and a majority of the comments are reactions that appear to be completely grounded on a blanket acceptance of what the meme says.
Contrasting the high number of upvotes and the low number of actual content discussion, I conclude that the large majority of people are just reading, accepting, and upvoting because although the meme itself is false disinformation (at least in part) it speaks to a larger truth, that there are very often rather evil and cliquish family connections between members of the swamp.
Sadly, this is how the disinfo works so well, because awake anons recognize that there are very often marital or familial connections between members of the swamp and deep state cabal, so they accept the disinfo in the meme without a second thought. In other words, it conforms very neatly to our biases, especially when those biases are actually grounded in truth.
I loathe the 'fact-checker' network (I did a cursory dig on the 'fact-checker' thing back in 2018), and it frustrates me a bit when disinfo and clickbait is shared in our community (meaning wider Q community, not just GAW) making easy targets for them and essentially aiding their mission objectives, which is to discredit lines of truth and discourage investigation into truth outside of their narratives.
pure affirmational surface level acceptance is not what this movement should ever be about.
Fully agree. And, it used to aggravate more a lot more than it does now. Mostly because I've become acclimatized, and also because I have found good responses when I or someone else takes the effort to dig deeper, vet the info. Without those good responses, it can feel like one is alone and shouting into the wind, but now I recognize that (for me) it is more a situation of working the problem and investing regular effort.
We all walk into a few bear traps. Just a good reminder for due diligence!
What’s better to do, and I’ve done this a few times, is when the dis/misinfo gets noted, especially if it’s verified, make sure to note it in the post with a good retraction and do what you can to clean up the mess.
You're welcome. I remember reading about Melissa and Adam and a possible sibling relationship back on the chans. Someone there found the info originally. My old brain cells kick in occasionally and remind me.
I’ve been trying to find connections between those two, Peter Schiff, Jacob Schiff, and a few others for a while.
It’s strange how they’re all in these high level spots, heavily involved with banking. It wouldn’t exactly be difficult for them to strike the records from the books, but I’ve never found any connection either.
Peter at least seems trustworthy, and says the right things, and they’ve gone after him before, so there’s that.
As far as I know, he is... Cheers fren... ☕️☕️☕️ Gavin Newsom, the current Governor of California, and Nancy Pelosi, the Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, are related through marriage. Belinda Barbara Newsom, Gavin’s paternal aunt, was married to Ron Pelosi, Nancy’s brother-in-law. This marriage created a familial connection between the two families, making Gavin Newsom Nancy Pelosi’s former nephew-in-law.
However, it’s essential to note that the marriage between Belinda Barbara Newsom and Ron Pelosi ended in divorce in 1977, when Gavin Newsom was just 10 years old. This means that the familial connection between the two families is no longer direct.
In summary, Gavin Newsom and Nancy Pelosi are related through a marriage that ended decades ago, making Gavin Newsom Nancy Pelosi’s former nephew-in-law.
My point, exactly. He is not her nephew. Read what you wrote. Gavin's dad's sister was married to Nancy's brother in law. How does one have a brother in law? Well, it could be your sister's husband or it could be your spouse's brother. In this case it appears that Nancy's husband's brother was married to Gavin's dad's sister.
So in no way was he ever Nancy's nephew in law. And a 'nephew in law' is far from a nephew. No biological relation.
Just got the "this is fake information" notice from FB after I posted it. Does anyone know which of the items is not true? It only takes one for FB to be able to claim it is fake info.
Ok, thanks. I wish people wouldn't post stuff that is mostly true; they should just still to all true. I didn't get any comments to the post, probably because it got tagged by FB.
u/#q329
What's curious is that there appears to be no actual blood relation between Adam Schiff (old pencil neck) and this Melissa Schiff....
https://www.geni.com/people/Adam-Schiff-U-S-Congress/6000000036692591909
https://www.geni.com/people/Melissa-Robin-Schiff/6000000000760694493
Her family goes back quite a way in New York, originally from Poland (greatgrandfather), whereas Pencil Neck's family (grandfather) reportedly came from the UK.
Note also:
Gavin Newsome Father = William Newsome, sister of William Newsome previous married to Ron Pelosi, Nancy Pelosi's brother-in-law. So not actually "nephew".
This list, while possibly containing some actual facts, starts out with two pieces of disinformation, and seems a lot more like fake disinformation intended to discredit the truth community and undermine the truth.
We know that these families intertwine and interconnect in ways that form rather satanic (cabal and DS) connections, but disinformation is also at work to obscure this truth. Such as the story that a relative of Pencil Neck was married to Soros' son.
Anons should always check and verify if something seems to fit too easily in to our biases. There are always forces attempting to undermine the truth by injecting disinformation that gets too easily swallowed unless we apply critical and skeptical thinking.
MORE:
https://en.mehrnews.com/news/54053/Who-is-Iranian-son-in-law-of-US-Secretary-of-State
Kerry's daughter was married to a doctor of Iranian ancestry, but HIS parents appear to be Americans or Iranians living in America.
https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/250078-iran-forced-to-deny-wedding-link-with-kerry/
We can see that there are some very shady connections, and it appears that the disinformation included in the OP's post may very well have been generated to obscure the actual facts and discourage normies from looking any deeper:
Propaganda websites: "Factcheckers show that George Soros' son is NOT married to Adam' Schiff's sister."
Normie: "Oh, so ALL that stuff is just fake conspiracy theories....."
This highlights something that anons should all be aware of and incorporate into their information war endeavors: disinformation (i.e. black propaganda) is frequently injected in to the information sphere in order to a) discredit people who mistakenly share it as fact and b) discourage normies from giving any credence to unusual or out of the mainstream information they here ('conspiracy theories'.
Anons and Awake Patriots have an inverted bias. Often some people will simply accept the disinformation, because it seems to paint the Cabal in a bad light or appears to expose them. So anons just accept it, and spread it, and unwittingly become the CONDUITS for the disinformation operation. Such disinformation operations target our vulnerabilities, aka biases we might hold but which we don't pay attention to.
How do we counter this sort of attack?
Anons should develop the practice of questioning ALL the information that comes across our bows. When it comes via an established source that we know is legitimate and has been repeatedly verified, then we can usually omit this step. But otherwise, we should always be on the lookout for BOTH disinformation and real information.
Learn to identify and become familiar with red flags. A photo image presenting a list of facts without any identifiable source MIGHT be a great meme that easily spreads powerful information, BUT it could as easily be just a dodgy piece of disinformation. Lack of source. Random image. Appealing to our biases. 'too good to be true'. etc.
Realize that all powerful disinformation mixes Truth and Lies, Fact AND Fiction. Out and out fiction or false information is far less likely to trick or trigger an anon's biases. Blatant lies are often easier to spot than lies mixed in with elements of truth. The nugget of information may be in fused with a mixture of truth and lies in order to get the target (you and I and others) to accept the lies more easily. For this reason, it is important to have a skeptical mind that vets the information that comes in, and to sift truth from the disinformation.
While Qdrop 329 APPEARS to verify that the Schiff married to Soros is in fact related to Pencil neck, it does not actually do this. What it emphasizes is how marital connection are often used to build up the Cabal, and that anons should learn to "follow the wives" in order to track down those bona fide connections.
When I clicked on this, I was hoping to find a post from you on this. Thanks.
It's inspired me to do a full post, which I hope to write up a bit later. A good learning opportunity, imo.
Thank you fren... Cheers... ☕☕☕
"Susan" Rice served under 0bama, but is also currently handling Biden too.
It would seem so... Cheers fren... ☕️☕️☕️
Given that the first four factoids given in this image are fake, with only ONE having even a very loose semblance of proximity to truth (Newsome's aunt was once married to Pelosi's brother in law, which does NOT even make him a nephew-in-law, but a loosely related extended family member by marriage), one wonders how much of the rest of the image contains actual truth....
I'll grant you that... I stole the meme from TS... Cheers fren... ☕☕☕
We all do this, but the need for vigilance is quite real. You mention TS, but I certainly would not take something being posted on Truth Social as any sort of mark of validity. Social media is social media.
I’d like to know how people interact with posts, sometimes.
You point out in the top comment that only one of these claims may have some validity, followed by several comments that just accepted the meme and kept moving.
Just pure affirmational surface level acceptance is not what this movement should ever be about.
Not sure what to do about that. I’ve been hit by a few misinfo memes from here where nothing made it to the comments.
I wonder about this a lot and I suppose I have formulated some ideas (and biases) that may or may not be on target.
My process here was:
I was intrigued by the Subject Line (FYI!!!) and the fact that it was stickied, so I opened the post in a separate tab. I glanced through the meme, recognized a few factoids from previous info (the middle ones: the connections between MSM execs and political spouses) and then looked at the comments. I noticed top comm by Penisse, aka the Q drop, then read on and glanced through the comments (which are mostly reactions, as far as I can see).
I didn't get down to the comments calling out the disinfo/false facts (they are invariably lower on the comment rankings, something I often observe, and I put that up to the notion that most readers are simply reacting to the post, not filtering it. These comments are higher on the rank now, but when I approached the post, they were not).
I got as far as the comment by u/ditzee58/ and read with wry agreement the comment by u/Buttery (you should have checked first before posting). From there I searched up the Qdrop, and thought about the question: Is Melissa Schiff related to Adam Schiff? and then went to the web start to dig. Quickly found a) "fact-checking" sites (which I loathe) debunking these claims (i.e. politifact), and then b) articles, information, genealogy websites that showed the absence of any blood relationship.
I made my comment under Penisse's Qdrop comment about Melissa Schiff, clicked save and then went back to check up on the Newsome thing. Dug a bit, found that this was inaccurate at best and sort of bogus, edited my comment to include that info, and save.
By now my narrative antenna was up, and I dug on Kerry's daughter, then Chelsea Clinton, and recognizing that in only the first four factoids, it was 90% BS, and recognizing that it has the hallmarks of a disinfo meme, I decided to rewrite my whole comment, eventually including commentary and then a remark on the Qdrop itself.
Talking about how people interact with the posts, I note here, such as is frequently the case, there is a HIGH number of upvotes, but relatively FEW comments actually vetting the content, offering counter-arguments, and a majority of the comments are reactions that appear to be completely grounded on a blanket acceptance of what the meme says.
Contrasting the high number of upvotes and the low number of actual content discussion, I conclude that the large majority of people are just reading, accepting, and upvoting because although the meme itself is false disinformation (at least in part) it speaks to a larger truth, that there are very often rather evil and cliquish family connections between members of the swamp.
Sadly, this is how the disinfo works so well, because awake anons recognize that there are very often marital or familial connections between members of the swamp and deep state cabal, so they accept the disinfo in the meme without a second thought. In other words, it conforms very neatly to our biases, especially when those biases are actually grounded in truth.
I loathe the 'fact-checker' network (I did a cursory dig on the 'fact-checker' thing back in 2018), and it frustrates me a bit when disinfo and clickbait is shared in our community (meaning wider Q community, not just GAW) making easy targets for them and essentially aiding their mission objectives, which is to discredit lines of truth and discourage investigation into truth outside of their narratives.
Fully agree. And, it used to aggravate more a lot more than it does now. Mostly because I've become acclimatized, and also because I have found good responses when I or someone else takes the effort to dig deeper, vet the info. Without those good responses, it can feel like one is alone and shouting into the wind, but now I recognize that (for me) it is more a situation of working the problem and investing regular effort.
Step by step.
Always appreciate your intense effort and thorough analysis.
I was going to leave my upvote and move on but thought I'd leave you a note that at least one person has read it (.. it helps that I was tagged)
Fair enough...
Suspiciously high levels of heterosexual marriages between these liberals.
It seems they're not drinking their own Kool-Aid.
It would seem so... Cheers fren... ☕️☕️☕️
Just like the mafia...
Pretty much fren... Cheers... ☕️☕️☕️
one big sick perverted family....need you say more
I completely agree... Cheers fren... ☕️☕️☕️
Incestual. Same as the Europeans over the centuries…making for retarded and semiretared nephews and international marriage agreements.
Agreed... Cheers fren... ☕️☕️☕️
Now do the judicial/court system!
Kekekekek... Cheers fren... ☕️☕️☕️
Pencil neck Schiff doesn't have a sister. His parents are Edward and Sherrill Ann ( Glovsky Schiff. He has a brother, Daniel.
Melissa Schiff Soros's parents are Marlene Sandler Schiff of New York and the late Dr. Haskel Schiff.
I'll have to look into that... Cheers fren and thank you for the info... ☕️☕️☕️
You really should be looking into these things before posting them
I stole it from TS but thank you...
We all walk into a few bear traps. Just a good reminder for due diligence!
What’s better to do, and I’ve done this a few times, is when the dis/misinfo gets noted, especially if it’s verified, make sure to note it in the post with a good retraction and do what you can to clean up the mess.
It happens.
👍👍👍 Cheers fren... ☕️☕️☕️
Yes. Most definitely.
You're welcome. I remember reading about Melissa and Adam and a possible sibling relationship back on the chans. Someone there found the info originally. My old brain cells kick in occasionally and remind me.
I miss 8chan so damned much...
So do I - could never get used to 8kun. 4 chan and 8 chan were the best!
I completely agree with you...
I’ve been trying to find connections between those two, Peter Schiff, Jacob Schiff, and a few others for a while.
It’s strange how they’re all in these high level spots, heavily involved with banking. It wouldn’t exactly be difficult for them to strike the records from the books, but I’ve never found any connection either.
Peter at least seems trustworthy, and says the right things, and they’ve gone after him before, so there’s that.
Newsome is not Pelosi's nephew.
As far as I know, he is... Cheers fren... ☕️☕️☕️ Gavin Newsom, the current Governor of California, and Nancy Pelosi, the Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, are related through marriage. Belinda Barbara Newsom, Gavin’s paternal aunt, was married to Ron Pelosi, Nancy’s brother-in-law. This marriage created a familial connection between the two families, making Gavin Newsom Nancy Pelosi’s former nephew-in-law.
However, it’s essential to note that the marriage between Belinda Barbara Newsom and Ron Pelosi ended in divorce in 1977, when Gavin Newsom was just 10 years old. This means that the familial connection between the two families is no longer direct.
In summary, Gavin Newsom and Nancy Pelosi are related through a marriage that ended decades ago, making Gavin Newsom Nancy Pelosi’s former nephew-in-law.
My point, exactly. He is not her nephew. Read what you wrote. Gavin's dad's sister was married to Nancy's brother in law. How does one have a brother in law? Well, it could be your sister's husband or it could be your spouse's brother. In this case it appears that Nancy's husband's brother was married to Gavin's dad's sister. So in no way was he ever Nancy's nephew in law. And a 'nephew in law' is far from a nephew. No biological relation.
I read it kek... He was through marriage but even so, he's part of the piglosi crime syndicate... Cheers...
But he is the Getty Family's Bitch. As were Pat & Moonbeam Brown.
wrong
Actually, he's right. Facts matter.
Note: "Facts matter" Q3628
u/#q3628
The only way to make this effective is to lead with
TL;DR You are, in fact, a moron
Why thank you for your critique kekekekek... Opinions are like assholes... Everyone has one and they all stink... Peace out anon... 🤣🤣🤣
It wasn't directed at you.
I'm saying put tl;Dr ...ahead of the rest of the list.
It's about the reader.
Got ya...
It must be a spectacular coincidence.
Q said there are no such things as coincidences... Cheers fren... ☕️☕️☕️
Indeed. I was never a huge coincidence theorist.
Me either fren... How many coincidences before it's mathematically impossible is what Q said if irc...
For me three times a charm so I'm more than happy.
Kekekekek... Have an amazing rest of your weekend fren...
I hope this has all been vetted, because I just posted to FB. I hate when I post something and later find out it is not true, or only partially true.
I got vetted on the Joe Biden being buried in Guantanamo Bay claim a few days ago when the findagrave link I didn’t see on it turned out to be broken.
Allegedly, it did work at one point, but I don’t have any interest in digging on that.
Not the first time this stuff has been posted here: https://greatawakening.win/p/17r9IRUekk/keeping-it-all-in-the-family/
Just embarrassing that it keeps coming back, and even stickied this time,
Mistakes happen fren... We're human, not machines... Enjoy the rest of your weekend... Cheers... ☕️☕️☕️
Lots of incest! You left out the heavy CIA involvement.
I stole the meme from TS... Cheers fren... cheers ☕☕☕
Just got the "this is fake information" notice from FB after I posted it. Does anyone know which of the items is not true? It only takes one for FB to be able to claim it is fake info.
*it only takes “I don’t like that” for FB to be able to claim it is fake info.
;-)
Apparently the schiff one isn't real and the Newsom one is imonly partly true... Cheers fren... ☕️☕️☕️
Ok, thanks. I wish people wouldn't post stuff that is mostly true; they should just still to all true. I didn't get any comments to the post, probably because it got tagged by FB.
I do apologize fren...
No problem; I've been guilty of it before :)
No worries fren...
I would say Trump is such an outsider, I've never heard of anyone else with that last name that wasn't related to Trump.
I would tend to agree with you... Cheers fren... ☕️☕️☕️
Thank you.
The Intelligemce Community is married into the MSM as well. Lots of incest among CNN/CIA//NYT/FBI/WaPo/DOJ, etc.
Very much agree with you... Cheers fren... ☕️☕️☕️
Cheers fren! u/#trumpflag
I love that gif...
I heard that Huma is now with the Soros boy.
Could very well be... Cheers fren... ☕️☕️☕️
Nothing has changed since medieval times for the elites. They all marry into positions of power and leverage.
Agreed fren... Cheers... ☕️☕️☕️
Kekekekek... Cheers fren... ☕️☕️☕️