1
ChessNotCheckers 1 point ago +1 / -0

Moonlanding date was 7/20 not 7/21 as stated in this article. (Even if you don't believe in the landing, they never claimed to have landed on the 21st)

2
ChessNotCheckers 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think we should avoid speculation until we hear what the brain worm has to say.

7
ChessNotCheckers 7 points ago +7 / -0

Reminds me of how AI likes to mess up on teeth and fingers, often adding too many. Makes me think this is AI generated, rather than a guy in a mask. Either that or super-hearing.

5
ChessNotCheckers 5 points ago +5 / -0

Actually, there are at least two that we know about. There was the missile launch from the sub at AF1, and this rally thing.

5
ChessNotCheckers 5 points ago +5 / -0

I've posted this in other threads, but my prediction is that Hillary comes in, challenges Kamala on eligibility, Supreme Court rules her ineligible, giving us clarification on "natural born" provision & another MAGA win. Kamala then replaced with Hillary at last minute, leaving dem nominee off even more state ballots due to last-minute timing and Trump smacks down Hillary (or the Hillary double) again.

2
ChessNotCheckers 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes. But also parts of the military that probably don't even realize they're being activated for portions of the Q plan.

2
ChessNotCheckers 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think it's "spirit cooking dirty-whore", but I knew who you meant.

2
ChessNotCheckers 2 points ago +2 / -0

The Supreme Court decision that is always refenced doesn't actually address this question. That decision answers whether a child born to two US citizens overseas is considered "natural born", they are. The question of whether someone born on US soil to foreign parents is "natural born" for purposes of holding office has to my knowledge never been directly addressed.

I think the way this goes is that Hillary goes after Kamala on eligibility and the Supreme Court finally addresses this EXACT specific question and finds Kamala ineligible. I think that the fight itself is dirty, nasty, offensive and Trump never has to tarnish himself by being involved. Once the Supremes rule in our favor (we've been winning basically every decision) there is a hilarious Trump/Hillary rematch and dems are even more disgusted with Hillary as their candidate than they are now with Kamala which further depresses dem turnout.

2
ChessNotCheckers 2 points ago +2 / -0

We could tell we were under constant surveillance, I can't wait until the footage of me is released and my friends/family can finally see me peacefully eating Oreos on the capital steps with 10,000 of my closest friends until the government started hitting us with teargas and flashbangs. Good times.

4
ChessNotCheckers 4 points ago +4 / -0

I think they're doing this so that HILLARY hammers her for being ineligible. That way Trump isn't the bad guy and everyone already knows Hilldawg is a c*nt. Then the Supreme Court declares her ineligible and Trump/Clinton is the main event!

1
ChessNotCheckers 1 point ago +1 / -0

Have a libtard in my office that still says he will take any additional covid boosters that become available.

2
ChessNotCheckers 2 points ago +2 / -0

I believe that AOC is a secret white hat tasked with leading the dumber leftists into the light.

1
ChessNotCheckers 1 point ago +1 / -0

There's a saying: "The best way to predict the future is to create it." What's more likely, that they have a magical device that predicts the future, or that they wrote a script and they're following that script? Q literally says: "You're watching a 'scripted' MOVIE."

2
ChessNotCheckers 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think yes, to bid us farewell and remind us to be vigilant and to thank us for our service.

35
ChessNotCheckers 35 points ago +36 / -1

Are you talking about the same public that blindly accepted that masks that say right on the box "Does not protect against viruses" would magically protect against viruses if Fauci said so?

2
ChessNotCheckers 2 points ago +2 / -0

I am the OP and I assure you that my post is sincere. Iron Eagle is the only Q referenced movie that doesn't seem to have obvious connections like the others, but looking at it from this angle it fits and fits well.

5
ChessNotCheckers 5 points ago +5 / -0

In the Q+ quote, what's a "BO"? And is there anything linking this to now apart from it finally seeming like we've turned a corner?

3
ChessNotCheckers 3 points ago +4 / -1

That's to ensure that no bullet fragment or anything else go into his head undetected. You'd be surprised how often this can happen, years ago a guy had a piece of a turn signal stalk emerge from his arm from a car accident 20 or 30yrs prior that had healed over it.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›