Laws? Gee Weez, the left loves 'Hate speech laws.' What does "From the river to the sea" mean? DHU!
Laws? Illegally occupying private property to start with, destroying property seems probable. Why would anyone think that might happen? DUH!
Anything that brings more attention to Tucker and Elon's work is a good thing.
Tucker's
Interview with Steve Kirsch on Vaccines Covid and Autism
Interview with Mike Benz on the National Security State and censorship
Amazing eye-opening interviews. Must see information.
Interesting..... with the title "Controlled Opposition," THE ONLY NAMES YOU MENTION are..... wait for it... Tucker and Elon.
THIS AGAIN! I wonder why? Who would want to spread that idea? As they say, who benefits? Who wants to discredit these two men? Take a guess.
ANYONE who has followed Tucker's work and Elon's AMAZING life story and how they have gotten to where they are today knows how absurd the "speculation" is that either one is CONTROLLED. LOL! LOL!
THEN.... the talk of treason convictions... then punishments for elites that sacrifice pawns to protect themselves... Hmmm, implying Tucker and Elon could be "controlled" by elites. It sounds to me like you, TagoTaov, are the shill working for the elites.
My opinion.
The first sentence: "Tucker Carlson is controlled opposition."
WOW, No shit?? There is even a meme at the end depicting Tucker as a rodeo clown protecting the elite for the American people.
If you follow Tucker's work you know this is just stupid. An obvious hit piece. I have heard Tucker say several times, quoting scripture, "By their fruits, you shall know them." He is talking about others and by inference inviting you to apply that to him. He often speaks of his faith and the value of family.
Tucker's interview with Trump. Over 2 million views on X Tucker's interview with Putin. Over 2 million views on X Thank God there are still real journalists in this nation.
As usual, they accuse others of what they are guilty of. Who is the "controlled opposition" MSM or Tucker?
From Just the News:
Iowa GOP Sen. Chuck Grassley and Wisconsin GOP Sen. Ron Johnson on Monday asked that Attorney General Merrick Garland account for special counsel Robert Hur's report on President Joe Biden's handling of classified materials making no mention of a batch of materials the National Archives recovered from the president's attorney's office in Boston. Hur's report became public last week and stated that "[o]ur investigation uncovered evidence that President Biden willfully retained and disclosed classified materials after his vice presidency when he was a private citizen." It further declined to bring charges against the president, in part, on the basis of his poor memory. Writing to Attorney General Merrick Garland, FBI Director Christopher Wray, and Hur, the GOP lawmakers asserted that "[t]here appears to be a significant factual omission in Special Counsel Hur’s report on his office’s investigation into President Biden’s mishandling of classified documents." File Grassley, Johnson letter on special counsel report In March of 2023, the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) confirmed that it had retrieved nine boxes from the office of Biden attorney Patrick Moore that had been taken from the Penn Biden Center in Washington. Those materials were then transferred to the John F. Kennedy Presidential Library. At the time, NARA had not reviewed the materials. "Oddly, Special Counsel Hur’s report did not mention NARA's retrieval of the nine boxes from Mr. Moore's office," the pair wrote. "This apparent omission is significant given that, according to NARA, the Department of Justice requested that NARA recover the boxes. In fact, in March 2023, NARA informed our offices that 'while NARA has not yet reviewed the contents of the nine boxes, the FBI has.'" "If the FBI did review the contents of the boxes, it is unclear what was found, to include any classified information, and whether the FBI informed Special Counsel Hur’s office of its findings," they went on. "Further, it is unclear if Special Counsel Hur had any awareness of or reviewed the information contained in these nine boxes. It would be extremely troubling if Special Counsel Hur failed to investigate the contents of these nine boxes particularly given that we first publicly revealed the existence of these specific boxes on March 27, 2023—nearly one year ago." The Republicans set a deadline of Feb. 23 for the DOJ to answer whether Hur reviewed the nine boxes in question and to document their contents. Ben Whedon is an editor and reporter for Just the News. Follow him on X, formerly Twitter.
I'm 72, I've had diabetes since I was 58. Soda did it to me, 6 a day, 32 grams of sugar in EACH can. I was educated about this AFTER my diagnosis. Of course
I stopped eating anything with sugar, went on a diet, lost 80 lbs. But for me, (EVERYONE is different, no truer words) I was too far gone for that to bring me back to normal. I am on only 2 drugs for this, insulin, Lantus time release pen, one shot a day. Ozempic pen, one shot a week.
I started Ozempic when it first came out. My insulin went from 44 units a day to 10 units a day, so it has worked great for me.
(Side note... Yes, I lost 14 lbs when I started Ozempic, better still I lost my desire to snake on something crunchy! *After about a year both of those benefits were gone, but it still works for insulin reduction.)
Great interview, Tucker was good as always. HE DID THE INTERVIEW NO OTHER U.S. NEWSMAN HAS SINCE UKRAINE STARTED. "Roasted Tucker" In what way? Right off the bat YOU obviously have a problem with Tucker. That tells me all I need to know about you!
MSM lover. Democrat NO doubt! Posting on Q no less!
Tucker did a video with Assange's wife on a bus to and from her visit with her husband. Did you see that? I expect Cates has not. Tucker said he did not even see Assange. His wife was the only visitor allowed. Assange is held in maximum security, they don't let him talk to ANYONE but his family. Tucker's words, not mine. So... there can not be an interview of Assange in Tucker's back pocket.
What is weird about this video? Anyone? He is speaking Spanish, Milei does NOT speak English. I watched the actual speech. An interpreter does a great job! I'm not saying any of the words have been changed, I did not watch all 19 minutes of this clip. It's just damn odd how they make it look like he is speaking English!
- Vivek is saying a lot of great stuff, like a HUGE reduction of the federal workforce and even the elimination of agencies. Very Ronald Reagan-like.
- Vivek has NO chance of winning. So... IMO he is getting attention and bringing THE MESSAGE of limited government to the forefront. That is a net good.
My wife has been on hospice for 7 months. Their mission statement says their goal is not to prolong life!... but to make what life you have left as comfortable as possible. BUT you can still see regular doctors who try and keep you alive. In our case so far so good. She has improved a lot so far, much of it due to hospice. Hospice provides regular nurse visits, and caregivers if needed. They provide and dispense medication.
Of course, every case is different. ....mileage may vary.
One of the most moronic assumptions (imo) is that the weather should not change and if it does it's bad. It ignores all of the historical data. Just in my time in California, 50 years I have lived through Santa Ana's (high hot winds out of the deserts), and El Nino's "climatic changes affecting the equatorial Pacific regions every few years" that bring cooler weather and rain to Cal. This winter and spring it seemed like that. Record snowfalls for example. I could go on and on but you get the idea. If you really want some food for thought read Graham Hancock's 'America Before' on the deep history of this continent.
Rather misleading title to this post...