Help me understand, someone. Because this is money-related, and the House controls the Purse, does this mean it doesn't matter how the Senate votes on it? Or does the Senate even get a say? I imagine the bill must go through due process either way, but I'm not an expert at this. I appreciate any schooling. ๐
FLCCC Alliance is an excellent source and they have dosage charts based on weight.
I like to compare the dichotomy of "The Awake" vs. "The Asleep" as similar to an "Ex-Smoker" vs a "Smoker". Those ex-smokers are the least tolerant of other smokers, and they just won't shut up about the dangers of smoking. And rightly so!
This is how I feel we should be as red-pillers: we just don't shut up about it.
Here you go. Enjoy!
Thank you to everyone who posted links here. They're all going on file. I'd heard about this a while back (years), but I never took action. Things are very different now, and this is extremely welcome information! ๐
Interesting! A clear reference to some of the other social media corporations colluding with the FBI/CIA in addition to Twitter:
I spent much of today looking at exactly similar documents, seemingly written by the same people, except the โofficesโ copied at the top of their reports werenโt other agency stations, but Twitterโs Silicon Valley colleagues: Apple, Facebook, Microsoft, LinkedIn, even Wikipedia.
For some reason, I did not initially consider LinkedIn as a likely member, but then again, why not? They're Facebook for Business.
Interesting that Dr. Malone stated the mRNA in a jab degrades after ~60 days, ending further production of spike proteins. Hence Pharma's big push for booster shots.
I wonder how that will affect anyone who took the jab, but rejected the boosters? Has a certain amount of damage been done (possibly to surface later), but no additional damage? Or if you get past the 60 days without negative effects, you're in the clear? So many questions.
Nope. We can certainly spread information and distribute red pills from our keyboards, which is necessary for an Awakening. But public joint action still has a major impact on normie perception. Especially the age groups that never really got into social media. We need to reach everyone who can still be reached.
"Cheerleading" is meant to be a demeaning term and weakens your argument. We are making our presence known with public demands. There's great strength in that.