LEGO has released countless sets featuring rabbits. Usually as Easter builds, but they just released a Creator set also featuring a rabbit either earlier this year or last year.

Why does no one bother to look this kind of stuff up before posting? It would have taken you 5 minutes to figure this out before hand.

He’s also tweeted that the NRA is responsible for mass shootings.

It’s so weird that he can see through the programming on Covid but can’t see through the same programming on the 2A.

Not presidential or vice presidential material as far as I’m concerned.

After a TB infection, some of the bacteria can become surrounded by immune cells and go dormant. This is how people still test positive for having TB bacteria without manifesting symptoms. It’s called a latent TB infection. If the immune system becomes weakened by other factors (autoimmune disease, fighting other infections, taking clot shots, etc) the TB bacteria can revive and cause another TB episode.

Source: https://www.everydayhealth.com/tuberculosis/guide/latent/

Viruses mutate quite rapidly compared to bacteria. That’s why flu vaccines don’t work terribly well and have to be modified every year. Not only does the prevalence of flu strains change every year, but the strains themselves change and mutate as well.

Multiply that by all the different flavors of rhinoviruses you brought up, and that’s why a pill isn’t going to fix the problem.

Just because those religious texts say they worship the God of Abraham doesn’t mean they do.

Jesus is the Word, who is with God and is God (John 1). Jesus said that those who reject Him reject the Father who sent Him (Luke 10:16).

What Catholics, Jews, and Muslims have all done is rejected the God of Abraham and created a false idol that conforms to their own ideas. Then they insist that Abraham worshipped their false idol masquerading as God. Yet it is not so. If they followed the God of Abraham they would also follow the Messiah whom God sent, and they clearly don’t.

The black stone in Mecca and Saturn cults.

Except none of the religions you mentioned outside of Christianity actually worship the God of Abraham.

People in the Middle East before Islam worshipped a variety of gods: moon gods, sun gods, etc. Then Mohammed came along, claimed to have revelation from one god called Allah, and incorporated the polytheistic rituals of his contemporaries into his new monotheistic death cult. He claimed that this Allah was the same as the God of Abraham, but it’s fairly obvious from Allah’s words and instructions, plus the behavior of their followers, that they are not the same. Just because Mohammed claims that his god is the God of the Bible does not make it so.

The Jews have the same problem. You are correct that Jesus is Jewish, but that doesn’t mean that all Jews worship the God of the Bible. They claim to follow God, but have rejected His Son Jesus Christ. Therefore they do not worship the one true God, but a false idol of their own making that conforms to their own ideas of what their Messiah should be.

Lastly, the Catholics. They too don’t follow either Christ or the God of Abraham. They have invented their own doctrines (or adopted the practices and doctrines of the pagans around them) and set them up as the commandments of God. They preach salvation by works in direct contrast to the Bible, making Christ’s sacrifice of little to no effect. They take a man, call him the pope, then arbitrarily say that his words are God’s words. They encourage prayer and worship toward people. They preach a false gospel. They are Christianity’s version of the Pharisees and Sadducees.

These groups can all claim they worship the one true God all they want, that does not mean they do.

Things that are different cannot be the same.

The regions are ethnically Russian. And those Russian people were being systematically persecuted and exterminated by the neonazi Ukrainian government. And if you lurked here for any amount of time you would know that Ukraine got taken over by a cabal-backed color revolution in 2014.

Imagine if China implemented a color revolution in Canada, started expanding bio labs there, and began systematically exterminating white Canadians only. How do you think America would/should respond to that?

That’s the situation Russia is in.

No.

A casual reading of their various religious texts and a casual observation of their practices should make it abundantly clear that Christians worship a very different God than the other groups you mentioned.

“Abrahamic religions” is a completely fabricated classification system.

Truth and Reconciliation, you say?

Halo theme intensifies

The ruler who came after Jesus destroyed Jerusalem and the temple in 70ad.

And the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary. Daniel 9:26

Here we see that a group of people shall destroy the city, with a prince coming afterwards from the same people. Who destroyed the Temple in 70 AD? They were led by a Roman general, but the soldiers were primarily Syrians or Turks. This indicates that Antichrist might be from one of those two groups.

And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week...

From Hebrews and Paul we know that a testament is of no effect until the death of the testator. Ergo by your reckoning the 7 year final week wouldn't even start until the crucifixion. Either way the Temple was not eradicated either 3.5 or 7 years after the crucifixion. Having the crucifixion as either the start or the middle of the final week doesn't match Daniel at all.

The clearest interpretation is that Christ came at the end of the 69th week, with the church age being a "pause button" of sorts before the final week. Keep in mind OT prophecy completely overlooks the church age, as that is the time of the Gentiles and thus not relevant to the Jews.

There is no where is scripture where it says that anyone other than God confirms a covenant.

Incorrect. Israel made a covenant with the Gibeonites (Joshua 9). David made a covenant with Jonathan (1 Samuel 18). In Exodus 23 God commands Israel to not make covenants with other gods, implying that they have the physical capability to do so (there wouldn't be a point to God telling you not to sin if you couldn't commit the sin in the first place). In 2 Kings 23:3 King Josiah made a covenant before the Lord. People make covenants in the Bible all the time. There's no reason to believe that the Antichrist is incapable of making a covenant, even if purely out of wicked mockery of God's covenant with Israel.

The age to come is used almost exclusively to refer to eternity, after sin is finally defeated and we live forever with Christ. Compare Mat. 12:32, Mark 3:28-30, Mark 10:30, Luke 20:34-36, Mat. 12:24-43, Eph. 1:21, and Col. 2:14. None of these passages make sense if "this age" means pre church age and "the age to come" means the church age.

The first century Christians were still partially holding on to the law.

Only some did, the Judaizers and those who fell prey to their false doctrine. This error was corrected by the Council of Jerusalem well before 70 AD. It was never a majority position or one held to by the Apostles.

I was more wrong about the cabal. I figured there was an elite political class, but before 2016 I had bought the Dem vs Republican theater. It wasn’t until mid-late 2017 that I realized how the Uniparty actually worked, and it wasn’t until I discovered Q in 2021 that I realized how depraved and traitorous the Cabal truly was. The child trafficking revelations were a particularly nasty gut punch.

People with Bachelors degrees were most likely to accept the Covid propaganda, though both PhD’s and people with Associates degrees or less education were equally skeptical of the vaccines and mask mandates. It was pretty much a Bell curve.

Yet from Job we see that Satan comes before the throne of God just as the other non fallen angels do. God strikes up conversation with him as if it’s not a rare occurrence. Satan was clearly allowed some level of access into heaven after his rebellion, possibly even on a regular basis.

Revelation 12 speaks of the war in heaven in which Satan is cast down to the earth, and this chapter lies squarely in the middle of the Tribulation period, after the seven trumpets, after the two witnesses, and before the Mark of the Beast is introduced.

To be fair, this is pretty much the one thing the chart gets right. Everything else makes no sense under a literal, chronological reading of Revelation and Daniel.

The kingdom of God and the kingdom of heaven are not the same thing.

The kingdom of God is a spiritual kingdom, namely the church. That kingdom is in effect now.

But there will be a future kingdom of heaven where Christ reigns physically on earth, which will be fulfilled during the millennium after the Tribulation.

OT prophecy focuses on this millennial reign and overlooks the church age, because the church age is coincident with the times of the gentiles.

Regarding the antichrist deceiving people during the millennium, this is impossible as he will be in the lake of fire and Satan will be bound after the Tribulation. Revelations indicates that the millennium is after the Tribulation, so these two players will be out of commission. Satan is only briefly released toward the end of this period, and the Antichrist is not released from the lake of fire at all.

The Abomination of Desolation does not refer to Jews continuing to make sacrifices after the crucifixion.

Daniel makes it clear that the Antichrist, who sets up the abomination, is not himself an Israelite, but a foreigner (possibly Syrian or Turkish) who makes a deal with Israel for 7 years. He betrays Israel halfway through and sets up the abomination for 3.5 years, after which Christ returns and judges the nations. Then the millennial kingdom, then eternity.

By your timeline we should already be in eternity with no sin.

If your interpretation were correct, which historical figure made a 7 year deal with Israel during Jesus ministry? Why did Jewish sacrifices continue for nearly 30 years after the crucifixion, rather than the 3.5 years given by Daniel?

Because multiple OT prophecies talk about the millennial reign, with proclamations that Jesus will reign from Jerusalem and that the lion will lie with the lamb.

As far as I’m aware, neither of those things has occurred yet. Satan should be bound for the entire time period of 1,000 years and unable to deceive the nations, but it seems clear to me that he has had free rein to do so for all of recorded history.

Lastly, the specific events surrounding the Tribulation have not been precisely replicated by historical events. Some people try to make Antiochus IV the Antichrist because he desecrated the Temple, but the duration of his desecration does not match the time period given in Daniel for the Abomination of Desolation.

I don’t think any of the events in Revelation after the letters to the 7 churches has happened yet. We’re still waiting for the trumpet.

Moons and planets do not affect people’s behavior just because they don’t worship God (or subscribe to any religion).

People who think that astrology actually works only demonstrate the placebo affect and human capacity to uncritically believe snake oil salesmen.

Muslims, Freemasons, luciferians, Jesuits, Talmudic Kabbalah…

Are all different heads of the same Hydra.

much like Covid-19 and the vaccines were neutralized

So it will be allowed to happen anyway and still cause untold damage. That’s helpful.

The old fundamentalists generally subscribed to the pre tribulation pre millennial position. Including some of the oldest church fathers like Iraneus.

Mid Trib, post Trib, a millennial, and post millenial are all positions invented later and/or adopted by denominations with other doctrinal problems (Catholics, Anglicans, LDS, etc).

In either case, none of the alternate views of eschatology constitute another gospel in and of themselves. A post Tribulation a millennial can preach the gospel just as accurately as a premillennial pre Trib preacher. Salvation is still by grace through faith in Jesus Christ no matter how future events shake out.

Tribulation is sometimes used in scripture to refer to general persecution, but in modern vernacular the word tribulation is almost always associated with the 7 year period dominated by the Antichrist. Furthermore the Bible itself makes a distinction between general persecution and the Tribulation. Revelation says that this period will be worse than any other period or any other type of persecution in history, and as you have rightly pointed out, it will be so bad that if allowed to continue it would wipe out all life on earth.

When I remember to do so I’ll capitalize Tribulation to refer to the 7 years before the Day of the Lord, and persecution to refer to, well, the persecution that Christians encounter during the church age. That should eliminate any confusion.

Acts 2:20 mentions the sun going dark and the moon turning to blood before the Day of the Lord, but that is not the Rapture. The Day of the Lord is when Christ comes back at the end of the Tribulation, which logically requires the Rapture to happen first. References in the gospels and Revelation to the sun going dark place it during the Tribulation, and don’t give a direct time frame between this event and the Rapture. They don’t even definitely say that the Sun going dark comes first. Of course in my view the Rapture happens first; a full list of arguments can be found in the links that I provided earlier.

I also still can’t find your 75 days. Daniel 12:11-12 gives the closest number, but it’s still not 75. It gives 1,290 days between the Abomination being set up and the Temple being cleanses, then says that those who make it to 1,335 days after the Abomination are blessed. I’m my view the 1,335 day is the Day of the Lord, when AntiChrist is defeated and the Millennial Kingdom is established. It’s still a difference of 45 days, not 75. And since Daniel uses days instead of years or months in its calculations, these numbers don’t change depending on what calendar you use.

Have never used it and don't plan to. Seems to me to be much ado about nothing. I'm of the position that it will never replicate or replace humans.

Why is a kid telling an AI that it's being groomed instead of some human authority figure? Parents, police,...anyone?

This seems more indicative of the child overly depending on AI (or other online resources) due a lack of human care and attention rather than any fault in the AI itself.