I'm only arguing that it's dumb for a 17 year old do so. I firmly believe that the fucking police, national guard, even a private Kenosha militia should have been formed >by adults<, and squashed these roaches into the pavement.
Having 17 year olds fighting such battles borders on child soldiers in my opinion. That's not a look we want associated with us.
Let me ask this, would you want your 17 year old out there with an ar against a mob of blm?
Also because I've said 17 now so many times, I'll joking connect him to Q now.
So in one hand we acknowledge that at that point in time it was common knowledge that burn loot murder does exactly that. Yet on the other hand we think it's totally appropriate for a mother to drop her 17 year old off to partake in such festivities?
I mean come on. Legally the kid is fine, but it was totally fucking retarded to stick around for the BLM shit at night. Next morning? Sure come back out and clean up.
And what I go back to is, this isn't the final war. This isn't a must win for Kenosha.
Had he not been there, it would have just been another BLM rally with lots of destruction, which absolutely destroys their own cause. Instead what we get is a media spectacle for a year about white supremacists shooting up BLM rallies.
Stupid fucking decision all around, his only saving grace is he was legally justified to kill a pedo and a wife beater, and injure a thief.
Not a lot was gained by Kyle, and to be critical. He risked his life to put out a fucking burning dumpster. Which is why kids shouldn't be in those positions in the first place. It's purely an act of god he had the trigger discipline and wherewithall to only act in blatant, as legally defined, self defense.
He's one judge/jury away from spending his life behind bars, even though it's all on video, and for what?
Again, I absolutely believe anyone is entitled to defend their own shit or even their neighbors. However when it's getting late and you find yourself outnumbered by what I imagine has to be close to at least 100 to 1. You need to make better decisions to protect your own life.
He's lucky he didn't die, and he will be lucky (in today's legal climate) to get off with no charges. If this were a grown man, I would be a little less judgemental because yes that man is totally responsible for his actions. However this is a 17 year old kid. If we are relying on 17 year olds to protect our communities in the way he did, we have failed as the older generation of men. Not to mention the optics help no one, and bitch as we may about optics, they are important to some degree.
Afaik nothing he did was illegal and he should be in the clear. However both him and his mom are fucking retarded. He obviously expected the threat of violence, which if my kid is 17 dear God I hope I've taught them that this isn't a battle worth fighting at the moment. And it damn sure isn't worth risking your own life for. Then, his fucking mom drove him to a BLM protest after a year of watching them burn loot murder.
Him being there at all while totally legal, is 100% retarded.
"I got the vaccine because why not"
Sound logic there.
If that's a good representation of our military, our enemies have crippled us.
To early to tell how covid will last, but not to early to tell how we react to vaccines that are supposedly newer then covid itself?
These people are fucking stupid and are incapable of any thought key alone critical thought.
It's really fucking simple. Propoganda. The same as white liberals vote for people who hate white people. Propoganda. It's really not fucking hard to wrap your head around.
The vax is supposed to tell your body to produce antibodies. If after having the vax you have no antibodies, did the vax really work is the question being asked.
Couple that with the tweet in op, and it appears that the vax just wipes out all antibodies. However people say anything nowadays, gotta see what's up when the dust settles, and that takes awhile.
Yeah so that stat will be largely irrelevant or show some miniscule number indicating no relevance.
More interesting is how many tragic events like this have happened at shows put on by groups other then live nation.
It's the Dems plan laid out bare. Federalization and consolidation of everything at the highest federal level. Those at the top of this monstrosity are the winners and everyone else is a serf.
They can't win on a small scale local level, which means no funding. So their only play is to continue to steal big ticket election "wins" while consolidating power and more importantly money at the top.
What federalization means is more of your tax dollars go to Washington and less stays in the local economy.
What about them?
An example to start what with?
Glowing faggot. Do something first pussy otherwise you're all good air
You've nailed it. Some here are too focused on Travis Scott as if he is at all important.
This shit isn't a big deal for a few reasons, number one is can anyone find videos of people stampeding or shoving or any such thing?
Every video I've seen the person is on the ground with ample space.
That leads me to believe one of two things is happening.
Most importantly. People OD on drugs at every concert and festival you go to. Citi s always want to downplay that for obvious reasons.
Now if it's not OD, my guess would be heart attack from shot.
Nothing else really makes sense, we have one report of being injected, but as I saw someone else point out, the guy could have very well ODd on his own supply, and told his boss he was injected as cover after he was found passed out in the bathroom.
In either event media will want to get out ahead of any autopsy to create the narrative. The story will be created sold bought and forgotten before we find out how these people really died.
No more if this. They work for us. This is not what we want. This time it works for us, but next time it will be us.
Slippery slope and not a game we want to playing to begin with.
Enforce the laws already set in place and be done with it.
Acb mcconnel likely this guy. Trump's not perfect nor infallible. Don't turn following trump or Q into a religion please. Use your fucking head.
Contact a lawyer, have them send any official documents to him first. They will cease immediately. Play hardball. Fuck them.
Oh they will gladly write you up. Cops get a fucking hard on for commercial trucks.
IMO Q will never be proven true beyond certain events happening or not. What's the point?
Literally peak feminism.
Someone explain the fucking science between mixing a Johnson and Johnson which isn't MRNA vaccine, with mrna boosters.
I won't hold my breath.
Have they done trials on that or is this a rhetorical question?
Guys we just witnessed a man's balls drop in real time. Take it easy.
I don't understand your argument, or you haven't articulated it clearly.
You disagree with the verses in which God is said to have created Lucifer and evil?
Or you disagree not that he CREATED evil, but that he STILL controls the evil in the world?
In either event rationalizing beliefs isn't hard.
First, you can think that God created everyone with free will including Lucifer, and he chose to go off and run the dark world if you will.
Or that if you believe God to be omnipotent, how could you NOT believe he had control over evil?
Then lastly, if you take Jesus dying and the new testament as a new covenant that was made between man and God through Jesus as the vessel, you can all but throw out everything from the old testament, or at least understand that by Jesus coming, a fundamental change in the way God deals with man occurred. Namely being Jesus taking responsibility for our sins as long as we .... Live Christlike lives, or accept Jesus into your soul .... Or whatever you believe it means to you and whatever boxes you need to check to visit st. Peter.
For reference. I am not religious, grew up catholic/christian, depending on where we lived went to public school or some Christian school.
That being said, I think "you christians" and I'm sure it's applicable to other religions as well, get too hung up on individual words and specific verses. The reason I point this out is, it's been translated who knows how many times, and likely most recently from a king James version. How accurate do you think every single word is going to be? Accurate enough to get the big picture? I would agree with that. Accurate enough to perfectly describe everything in English? Extremely doubtful.
Yeah looks like it's passed both house and Senate, however I think the house voted in some changes.
Would that kick it back to the senate? Or a general delay to hammer out the changes?