That was a great "B" movie!
Do you need about tree fiddy?
They are, in essence, sovereigns of the country they representing and because of that they are not part of the USA Inc or under its jurisdiction. So they can still be harassed by USA Inc institutions but none of it would stick in court. Their assets are effectively allodial title
So what I'm curious about, if this exists for them what prevents a US citizen from changing their classification to a US sovereign a giving the system the finger. The whole concept is very interesting because their status is very similar to the concept of the national/state sovereign.
Have you seen the Batman Dark Knight movie? It's certainly possible we could see something like what Jim Gordan did to gain necessary optics.
Last time Trump said something like that was before leaving the White House after the stolen 2020 election, something to the effect of you won't be seeing me for a while.
Sure is interesting timing with given that voted fraud is heating up right now...
It's certainly possible that those posts were all for the actual operations which were done mostly in secret while they kept appearances up for the normies. That turned the Biden admin into a giant honeypot which the military needed in order to get admissible evidence on people they already "knew" were criminals.
I'll be willing to bet that most of the operation covered in the posts happened, just not the way or with the timing we thought.
It was, cultured in monkey kidney cells that were affected by it. .Gov tried to fix the problem, realized they couldn't so they just created an industry to profit from it and normalize it.
And this is why they made a big deal out of that kid taking the CEO of United Health out, wanted to gauge public reaction. Many people I know couldn't care less about that guy getting wacked, some celerated it.
Actually, the major cost wasn't so much the pedo stuff, it's all the underground cities they were building to live in after they nuked us all off the face of the planet. That's, to me, is the real anger bringing aspect of these excessive taxes.
The corporate HQ for USA, Inc. doesn't worry about pesky things like "the constitution" when they get in the way.
I guess the WH aren't worried about the Arizona government being a problem in the near future.
Before I start, I appreciate all that you contribute to this forum so please take this as civil discourse since that is how it's intended.
Here's the problem with saying it didn't start that way. That argument as almost as disingenuous the media using HS football pictures of a black kid that got shoot by police instead of the thug pictures from 4 years after he graduated and got into a gang. The 4 years in the gang have significantly more influence over the context of his actions than the prior 18 years did.
There are many organizations that don't start a certain way and get infiltrated but generally do not reach prominence until after they are infiltrated. In other words, someone starts an organization that gains some momentum, bad actors step in and either offer to amplify the message so as long as they get influence it in, or a full blown secret coup occurs which completely takes over and re-directs the message to their own preference.
The powers that be have had pretty solid control over who rises and who falls for centuries. It would seem that it's very rare that someone rises to prominence with their free will completely in tact.
That said, all the aspects of contemporary Freemasonry point to Lucifer worship at the top. The initiation ritual involves pledging one's allegiance to the group and it's continued secrecy upon penalty of death. I don't think a "good" organization would have that type of ritual if they were doing inherently "good" works.
Another thing, Freemason's believe in universal balance hence the black and white checkered pattern floors in the lodges. The acknowledgement of dark and light means the organization must consist of both dark and light paths to create a harmonious balance. That means one cannot exist without the other and still achieve this balance. That in turn means the organization cannot be seen as being dark or light or it would become out of balance. That precludes it from being able to be "good" because the inherent balance structure would be thrown off. The "bad" side, however, has gotten very good about "informing" us of their plans to absolve them of creating a net bad balance, or so they think.
In regards to Q, out of the three Q posts specifically referencing Freemasons, here is #1630
">>1946203 Why are FREEMASONs on the scene of most shooting locations? Openly giving interviews or in background shots? Symbolism will be their downfall. Q"
Symbolism will be THEIR down fall. "They" in this context are the Freemasons, as a whole. He did not delineate between dark or light path, good or bad.
As I stated, you can't have an organization that openly acknowledges a dark/evil path as equally viable to the light/good path guiding the world and expect a net positive result.
Lastly, even if your contention about the Freemasons is true, the dark path ones have soiled the nest far too much for the "good" ones to attempt to distance themselves in the eyes of the public assuming this aspect is part of declass. The Freemasons, as a group, have spent far too long shoving all their symbolism in our faces while they perform terrible acts. It doesn't matter if the good ones didn't like it, they let the bad ones be far too loud for too long to not get thrown out with them.
Great. Just what we need, "good" Satan worshipers pushing us in the "right direction." I thought secret societies were a major part of the problem with this world but we're suppose to buy that "good" secret societies will somehow be great for us?
Another thing, I thought Q ripped on the Freemasons as a group and did not specify the "bad" ones we're responsible.
Translated with Google translate
"This video of Nicolasito, son of dictator Nicolás Maduro, hasn't aged well.
In 2017, he threatened Trump… “If they defile our homeland, our rifles will reach New York and we will take the White House.”
The truth is, only his father made it to New York, in handcuffs like the criminal he is"
Best part is, the DS plan was to cause civil war after nuking us, then bring NATO in to keep the peace. So this troll is even better knowing that little tid bit of information.
Wonder if that is the zero day we're supposed to prepare for in regards to cyber attacks.
Well, if you wanted to nuke the economy into oblivion, ruling those tariffs were not legal would certainly be a way to do that.
From the small dig that I did, she had two kids out of marriage both of which are currently in the custody of her parents. The other kid (the 6 year old the media talks about) she had with her ex-husband (who is no longer with us) was in her custody, living with her and her "wife." Her parents are also trying to gain custody of that kid now since they don't trust her "wife" to be a good guardian.
Just from the bits that I've pieced together, and I'm drawing a bit from creative story telling, she messed around when she was younger, found someone that she finally loved, got married, had a kid with him, then he died, and left her with the kid. A breakdown likely ensued thereafter causing her to lash out at the world.
Not making excuses for her, but for someone who was already unstable enough to have two kids with baby daddies, then have a kid with her husband, and then he passes away, is tough.
Looks like we have Alex Jones Jr. over here. A louder mouth for a louder generation, but it's the same operation.
It's still relevant to use as a relative metric until it's replaced with something better and more accurately representative of the actual situation.
Sadly, I think WD-40 might have better than SV-40. At least people's joints would work better.
The second commandment as part of the original 10 commandments (not the Catholic version where it was removed) have the second commandment as "Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image." The Catholics removed this (for obvious reasons) and just moved up the third one and split the 10th into two different commandments to make up the difference.
We are not supposed to make wooden crosses and wear them around our necks, it's low level idol worship. The power from the belief is real, but the cross is simply a physical conduit to channel the belief system through.
So are we going to see a Bill Clinton arrest since his codename was Eagle and he was just exposed in the recent dump of the Epstein files? I hope so!
Hmmm, sounds like controlled opposition at it's finest. I actually stopped listening to Dan Bongino after the 2020 election for the same reason, his stance of "we just didn't vote hard enough." Granted I don't think Dan was/is controlled opposition but that view point, after everything that went on during and after that election, is ignorant at a minimum.
At this point, with all that's come out officially, anyone on "the right" that is still refuting the obvious fraud is being paid to "look the other way" whether that's a directive or simply an unspoken position that must be maintained. Either way, they are controlled opposition.
In all fairness, I think it's both. The smart meters could have contributed through intentional detonation or through power surges during the fires that ignited them.
Either way, DEW played a part in all three.