Source, guy on X 👍
You see the issue? You are tied emotionally to the group.
You should be just as willing to criticize post as I am, if you're motive really is truth.
These type of posts are everyday, you can go through my history and see a few other examples where I've attempted to engage intelligence, and been met with nothing.
Once you see something as a part of you, when you become emotionally attached to it, you lose a part of the ability to think critically or logically about it.
Be aware of this, there's no need to criticize someone just because they point out something obvious.
Thanks for the well wishes, and enjoy your new Fox News!
May God shine his light on you, my friend.
That's what I found as the translation as well
Yeah, I'll be out of here. This is standard Facebook level posting, and interaction.
Thanks for the help
Then I guess that's that, I will move on from here. I just feel that this place should be elevated above what you would find on Facebook is all
That logic goes for CNN as well.
They post whatever, it's your decision to believe it or not.
You are avoiding responsibility.
Posting clickbait emotional appeals doesn't make you a digital soldier.
Posting truth would make you a digital soldier.
That's a very intelligent, and edgy response.
It's disappointing, to be here, and see the unwillingness to spread legitimate information.
I've been here for quite some time, I was in DC on J 6th, and it's sad to see this site become less and less of a resource to the cause.
But yeah, troll away pede, I'm sure your comrades are proud.
That's cool, but when you look at the video can't you see that it doesn't jive with what is in the headline?
I've been waiting for the residents of Dearborn to stand up for quite some time, but this looks like somebody who traveled there to do a story on the calls to prayer.
Do you agree with that?
Do you think that it does a service to the cause, to pretend that action is happening when it isn't?
Wouldn't that risk placation?
Can you reply with any sort of confirmation with what you said?
I've looked into this and don't see what you are saying.
Don't tell me to do my own research. It's your claim. I did, but couldn't find what you are saying.
Where's the part where residents are pleading? This woman appears to not be from there.
Why does this site allow disengenious headlines?
It's like y'all would rather have cool headlines to believe than actual truth.
Is it just for engagement?
I havent seen deerborne stand up on any mainstream platforms at all. I'm not exactly looking, but still
Somebody get this fucking guy out of here PermaBan
Oh that's cool, and the white hats killed Charlie or?
Is it a movie or is he really dead?
Any clue?
What part of the plan was Charlie Kirk getting killed?
Seems like a waste to me
The fact that this is from 2015, and there's no top comment specifying this, is one of the reasons I don't think the Great Awakening is the forefront of digital soldiers that it claims to be.
Seems that half ass shit just gets posted here all the time, and then the comment sections are half-witted, almost like the comment sections on a Fox News story or something.
Instead of any insight, or fact checking on the stories, people just post their emotional feelings.
What the hell?
Check em out here!
https://survivingbabylon.etsy.com/listing/4358356309
The rules page is down so I wasn't able to check if this is allowed, but I am a member here and I've been here for some years now watching the movie play out ⛈️
Everything that is turning "gay" isn't yours. You don't need it. TV shows are gay, movies are gay, skittles and Nabisco shredded wheat are gay.
What's new? These are the brands for fat faggots and men who want to fantasize..
Let them take this shit
So is covid dangerous or not?
Can we please stop using Hollywood celebrities for the face of "based" memes? Unless the celebrity is known to be based like Ted Nugent or Hercules.
All of the recent posts that reference this meeting should clarify that although the meeting was hosted by the FDA this was an open meeting, and anyone could present information. Presenting this, or any other conclusions presented in this meeting, as FDA statements is disingenuous and in negative to goal of spreading truth. There are those who would stir the pot, don't let them. Just rely on truth, without spin. This is fine information, but FDA did not make this statement.
I don't consder this winning. They are relaxing the rules because people are getting the shot. The plan to get people to get the shot in order to get "back to normal" is working. It's sad.
Can you elaborate on this?
Where did he say this?
I am new to really looking at Q. Did Q predict the fall of these governments?
This is a universal law, not "dem programming"