After at least 25 Democrat Senators are convicted of felonies for their corruption and collusion to defraud the U.S., Republicans will have a temporary 2/3rds majority in the Senate.
This week was the one year anniversary of my 35-year-old brother's untimely passing. The person responsible for his death was just sentenced. It's been hard on my whole family.
No I haven't been focusing much on the news or that comet. What's the latest with it?
And probably 3/4 of Republicans too, lest we forget. If it was just dems we wouldn't need a military operation. It would just be "politics".
I'm not attacking your POV, but we both know if only one party is left standing that Americans will never accept it and we'll have to do this thing over again. We've been molded as a nation to want more than one option when we vote.
He's right. Given one party running things the majority of Americans would vote against it just "for the fuck of it". JD Vance is already running as 50% dem 50% Republican and no one likes him.
Note: The expression "Top Secret Plan" is Shadow of Ezra's insertion. It's obviously not 'top secret' inasmuch as Bannon has just revealed that the plan exists. He simply says "At the appropriate time, we'll reveal what the plan is."
Reckon its not the conceptual issue our Mod is referring to. It's like, calling someone stupid and unable to count to two, etc. Kinda unnecessarily antagonistic, if you ask me.
Continuity of Government. "Wartime president." I believe the military has been the de facto president for the last couple terms, due to insurrection and subversion by foreign interests.
Yeah, don’t think that will circumvent The Constitution no matter how you dress it up. He was elected twice and sits in the Oval Office twice. Whatever 2021-1/20/25 was, dies not mitigate the fact he has two terms.
If you're operating under the pretense that everything has been scripted in advance for nigh on 10 years, then it makes all the sense one could need. The constitution has very plain writing in regards to insurrection and invasion. EO13848 is a good place to start. The law of war manual is another.
We already have what happens when the tables turned. Its trump who turned it and used their own evil against them. Being careful got us enslaved. Being careful will kill Maga. Im going to the promised land, you can go back to egypt if you want. God says go, i go.
woah, woah, woah. He simply explained that all will be revealed at the right time.
"At the appropriate time, we'll reveal what the plan is."
He never said 'this is top secret' or even 'secret'.
That was Shadow of Ezra, who is perhaps a less than sterling source of info (add his own interpretations as facts).
What Bannon says in this interview is actually revealing "There is a plan". Hence, its not a secret, at this point. He also emphasizes, people should get used to the idea. Which would exactly be the reason for revealing that there is a plan in place, even though its not time to outline exactly what that is. Timing.
Also, if anyone thinks that Steve Bannon is not fully clued in and part of Trump's operation and Plan, they haven't been paying attention! Bannon has been a core part of the Trump Plan since at least 2015, and has never not been a part since.
He has a mission, a role, just like everyone else in the plan. He's carrying it out. It's why he left the White House early on and created the War Room. 5G warfare requires the broad public support that Bannon has had a core role in promoting.
Think about how much the good ol' overton window has shifted in the last several years. So many Great Awakening themes have become mainstream ideas.
People need to wake up out of the stupor induced by Cabal programming over the last 40 years. Things change. Those creeps have tried to shut the overton window on first-principles goodness, and open it wide like a floodgate on degeneracy and chaos.
btw, did you ever read/hear about Burning Brights concept of the Overton Goalposts? Very good stuff.
this talk about a ‘3rd term for Trump’ is shifting the Overton Window bigly - and I LIKE IT! :-)
There are SO MANY clues in this. Especially when Steve says "We will define all those terms" and "If American people decide they want Trump again would that be against the spirit of the constitution"
Doesn't really do anything to dispel the liberals stance that Trump thinks he's a king...
Can't scream for term limits out of one side of our mouth and then want to reverse term limits out of the other side.
And I suppose everyone will start screaming if this goes through and the next Democrat president uses it in order to stay in office.
Also doesn't look good that we ragged on Biden being too old to be President (and don't try to reinvent history and pretend age alone wasn't something we criticized Biden about), and then support Trump as president, when he would be even older than Biden, going into his next term.
This is one reason why I've tried to get people to step back away from the whole "Only Trump can save us!" type of rhetoric. Because eventually he's going to have to leave office. We need to find ways to strengthen the Republican Party, and start looking for some new blood.
And ffs, I don't mean his kids. Again, we don't need any more fucking presidential dynasties in this country. Just because Trump is a great president doesn't mean his kids will be great presidents. And again, just adds fuel to libbers and their "No Kings" BS. We don't need to hand them ammunition.
Don't worry fren. Their ammunition and arsenal is full to the brim in that land called psychotic collectivism. They don't NEED real fuel. They burn on hellish fires.
Did Trump give them ANY justification for 9+ years of virulent hatred and attack? I don't see it (Of course, I'm biased).
They conjured the 'no kings' thing up out of thin air. They are going to throw up whatever they can, whenever they can. Conclusion: Ignore them, & do what has to be done.
Does America and the World need Trump be that President for another term? Bannon seems to think so. And I agree with him. And, he's no baka, either.
I suppose everyone will start screaming if this goes through and the next Democrat president uses it in order to stay in office.
here is the thing. Unless God is victorious, and MAGA succeeds, and America is irreversibly changed/restored to a place where the corrupt infiltration is utterly wiped out, it won't matter. It's life or death. It CANNOT be business as usual after Trump.
'next democratic president' uses it?
As Bannon hints, it HAS to be done by the will of the American people. Do you thinnk that if they do this, then a few years, or decade later, the whole country will just backflip? "Oh, give us all that hedonistic and satanic drugs and child trafficking and transgender and materialistic socialism back again, please!"
This is a war to the finish. The war has been waged for a long, long time (decades, centuries), and now it has come to the deciding point. One side will win. When it does, the other side will not have a foot to stand on.
...... or you can just take the blue pill and go back to the Matrix, and pretend this Awakening never happened.
btw, did you listen to the whole interview? Even the shortened version on Youtube is pretty explosive. I strongly recommend. For context. Fwiw, I think Bannon is 100% on target.
Knowing everything i know im still not warming up to this idea. The ONLY way i would even consider it is if there was stil work to be done but even then my approval would drop because of perceived foot dragging
Why would he want to be? He’s been on the literal hot seat for so many years. I just can’t imagine. The only way in my mind is if all the difficult work was done during this term and the next is just for smoothing out the details. I love him but he’s done so much already.
Firstly, no genuine person runs for president because he wants to. Rather, because he feels called to, or needs to, or has to.
Secondly, as Bannon says, 'We need to finish what we started' and 'Trump is the instrument of divine providence'. (I believe these both very firmly).
I don't know if you've ever held a position of public responsibility (being responsible for thousands or millions of people's lives), but Sometimes things are a whole lot bigger than one individual, one family, or one group. I'm pretty sure that DJT knows and feels this.
It all comes down to which is greater: love of country and one's people, or the instinct for comfort, ease and/or self-preservation. I think Trump has already shown in spades which is the greater of these, for him. God bless him.
I say this as a strict Constitutionalist: I will happily bend on my ethics just to see every commie fucktard imbecile lose their shit during a 3rd Trump term.
Apparently I now hate these people more than I love my Constitution.
There is so much noise, spin, opinion, and random ideas out there, all presented in the language of statement and fact, that one cannot afford to simply take things at face value, especially a post on social media or a forum board.
Yes, you have it my fren. It wasn't an attack on Bannon. Thank you for pursuing clarity and understanding.
I am a person who reads and listens carefully. Words do have meaning. And yes, language is not always is the best medium of communication sometimes - in all its forms. At least not in the way it has become in these days of fake news and outright mistruths spoken or written with the intention to mislead. Too many just give lip service and are never held accountable. Media even encourages misleading titles and content for the purposes of exposure and content creators simply cave to the new "normal."
I was not raised that way, and I have no doubt that many on this forum can say the same thing. We must reclaim language and be people of our words. Thank you again.
I love the idea, and I love Bannon's conviction when he says this. I think the board is split on Bannon, generally speaking, but hear me out.
What about succession?
22nd - Section 1. No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once.
Okay, suppose Trump ran as VP and the Presidential candidate ran with the intention to step aside?
What about the 12th amendment? I don't really know, but it the 12th prohibited it, Trump could still be Speaker of the House and be 2nd in line to be President through succession. How would that work? Well, there are few ways that could play out: death, resignation, or removal. I hope we don't have another "stolen election" where it is made clear and the President and V.P. are both "removed". I don't think white hats would plan for succession through "death". "Resignation" could have a few different connotations.
No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice - sure, but what about someone who is appointed - no election. If it could be argued that he won 2020, but never entered the office, could that mean he gets that stolen term to serve after this one?
Or argue the other direction. He was elected three times already, but only entered the office twice, not very fair, should get the office for another term - that was what people voted for three times in a row.
Yeah, that ideas been out there. Elected been the key word. And, yeah, the Pres running as VP, with Vance, for example, and then the elected person stepping down.
I don't know what the plan is, or how it will unfold, but I take Steve Bannon VERY seriously when he says this. Bannon knows what he's talking about, I reckon.
I agree. I don't know "the plan" but l think Bannon is on a mission and seems to have high confidence, like prophetic confidence. Either he knows beyond doubt or he has a great poker face.
I actually think that there is a path for Trump to win again in 2028. And Bannon is scaring the democrats into doing and saying even crazier stuff. But will Trump actually do it? Probably not, but yes is still a significant probability.
After at least 25 Democrat Senators are convicted of felonies for their corruption and collusion to defraud the U.S., Republicans will have a temporary 2/3rds majority in the Senate.
Now... vote on changing the 22nd ammendment.
The pendulum always swings back the other way.
Not if you stop it from swinging and make sure nobody ever gives it a push again. Dont accept their programming so easily.
This is a universal law, not "dem programming"
Now I wonder if the predictions we try to find from proofs are another election cycle away.
If the Sky Event doesn't happen while the Sun is (actually*) in Scorpio, then it will not be this year.
You good, fren?
Hey yes I'm good. Some personal things going on right now.
Thanks fren.
Geez dude! Glad you’re okay. I have questions about this crazy 3I/Atlas comet. Are you following its movements?
This week was the one year anniversary of my 35-year-old brother's untimely passing. The person responsible for his death was just sentenced. It's been hard on my whole family.
No I haven't been focusing much on the news or that comet. What's the latest with it?
<Names self after time traveler>
“I’m expecting the sky event in the next two weeks.”
<Disappears for two weeks>
Kek
Nooooo, we have to wait 1 year PLUS two weeks?
Ikr. It’s killing me.
While true, with 3/4 of the dems convicted and executed for treason, they won't have much of an impact.
And probably 3/4 of Republicans too, lest we forget. If it was just dems we wouldn't need a military operation. It would just be "politics".
I'm not attacking your POV, but we both know if only one party is left standing that Americans will never accept it and we'll have to do this thing over again. We've been molded as a nation to want more than one option when we vote.
He's right. Given one party running things the majority of Americans would vote against it just "for the fuck of it". JD Vance is already running as 50% dem 50% Republican and no one likes him.
No one likes J.D. Vance? Is that like saying nobody goes to some restaurant because it's too crowded?
Post -
Steve Bannon claims President Trump has a top-secret plan that will guarantee he becomes president again in 2028.
He says the details of “the plan” will be revealed at the right time and that Americans should start getting used to the idea now.
Bannon insists Trump needs another term to finish what he started and hints they’ll find a way around the 22nd Amendment.
“There’s a plan.”
https://x.com/ShadowofEzra/status/1981471092159242696
Oh yeah baby! I'm ready! 🎉
Me too J1D!
I'm tellin' ya frens... "All nations...Rod. of. Iron." 😂
"Biblical."
FYI: Here's the soss (sauce; source).
Sauce: Inside the mind of MAGA: a conversation with Steve Bannon
https://www.economist.com/insider/the-insider/inside-the-mind-of-maga-a-conversation-with-steve-bannon
Full interview:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ijf7K_08YWk
Note: The expression "Top Secret Plan" is Shadow of Ezra's insertion. It's obviously not 'top secret' inasmuch as Bannon has just revealed that the plan exists. He simply says "At the appropriate time, we'll reveal what the plan is."
Im all on board with this.
I'm with the plan, just need to see it through. With the super majority MAGA will have soon, it shouldn't be a problem.
Unless the 22nd Amendment of The Constitution is changed, There will be no third term.
Who says he's even had two? Pretty sure the whole Biden and this presidency is a military op.
Yes, we could have been in continuity of government since January 6, 2020 when our government was taken over. I was never sure if it ended or not.
You see more than most. Thos electuon was a milop.
Hell, I didn't realize I was dealing with the same boomer. I don't even look at user names, I just respond.
Weird how I have 5 up votes on my ignorance.
I apologize sir.
Warning, let’s be respectful Anon. No need to strike out so harshly at someone on the fly.
To be fair, this is a Q board. These aren't new concepts. Devolution has been talked about for a long time.
Reckon its not the conceptual issue our Mod is referring to. It's like, calling someone stupid and unable to count to two, etc. Kinda unnecessarily antagonistic, if you ask me.
Thanks for trying to teach some of the children some much-needed manners.
:-)
kEk
Youll have to accept it eventually doug. Things arent as simple as 1956.
Continuity of Government. "Wartime president." I believe the military has been the de facto president for the last couple terms, due to insurrection and subversion by foreign interests.
Yeah, don’t think that will circumvent The Constitution no matter how you dress it up. He was elected twice and sits in the Oval Office twice. Whatever 2021-1/20/25 was, dies not mitigate the fact he has two terms.
If you're operating under the pretense that everything has been scripted in advance for nigh on 10 years, then it makes all the sense one could need. The constitution has very plain writing in regards to insurrection and invasion. EO13848 is a good place to start. The law of war manual is another.
Doug, I think we all hear you.
Consider that the constitutional terms don't apply if Trump hasn't been our president. He's given us this hint a few times via "this invisible war"
u/#trump4eva
"Trust The Plan!" 🤠
Be careful what you wish for when the tables are turned. Could have had Obummer X3 or more
Agree.
I think Trump will be the last president of the U.S. as we know it.
I sure hope so. Because what we are about to become is great again.
We already have what happens when the tables turned. Its trump who turned it and used their own evil against them. Being careful got us enslaved. Being careful will kill Maga. Im going to the promised land, you can go back to egypt if you want. God says go, i go.
As long as we're talking about a Constitutional amendment, we could make it apply to Trump only. Why not?
Yes, forcing us to pick a new president every 8 years even with 100% control is IMPORTANT.
I love him, but he'd be like 86 when leaving office then?
I don't know if age matters to time travelers...🤔🥳😎
Yes, he might serve until 120 years old.
Gen 6:3
Maybe more truth in this than people realize sue..🌌
If anyone can do it, it's Donald Trump.
So then he can 86 his presidency
I'm okay with it. President Trump is the best president of my lifetime. As far as I'm concerned he can have the job as long as he wants!
Makes the UK chick head explode.
If it’s top secret he should keep that secret. If this were true Trump would be pissed at the leak
woah, woah, woah. He simply explained that all will be revealed at the right time.
He never said 'this is top secret' or even 'secret'.
That was Shadow of Ezra, who is perhaps a less than sterling source of info (add his own interpretations as facts).
What Bannon says in this interview is actually revealing "There is a plan". Hence, its not a secret, at this point. He also emphasizes, people should get used to the idea. Which would exactly be the reason for revealing that there is a plan in place, even though its not time to outline exactly what that is. Timing.
Also, if anyone thinks that Steve Bannon is not fully clued in and part of Trump's operation and Plan, they haven't been paying attention! Bannon has been a core part of the Trump Plan since at least 2015, and has never not been a part since.
He has a mission, a role, just like everyone else in the plan. He's carrying it out. It's why he left the White House early on and created the War Room. 5G warfare requires the broad public support that Bannon has had a core role in promoting.
I think all this talk about a ‘3rd term for Trump’ is shifting the Overton Window bigly - and I LIKE IT! :-)
Think about how much the good ol' overton window has shifted in the last several years. So many Great Awakening themes have become mainstream ideas.
People need to wake up out of the stupor induced by Cabal programming over the last 40 years. Things change. Those creeps have tried to shut the overton window on first-principles goodness, and open it wide like a floodgate on degeneracy and chaos.
btw, did you ever read/hear about Burning Brights concept of the Overton Goalposts? Very good stuff.
Yeah, me too.
Good stuff - thank you!
The leak is probably part of The Plan...
Well, it's not top secret anymore . . .
Very well could be. It would explain why he's "jokingly" said it several times. Perhaps planting the seed. I could definitely see it happening.
100%
The brunson brothers suit. Fraud invalidates everything
There are SO MANY clues in this. Especially when Steve says "We will define all those terms" and "If American people decide they want Trump again would that be against the spirit of the constitution"
100%
Sounds like he is referring to the Constitutional Crisis angle
Long shot but it has potential
Doesn't really do anything to dispel the liberals stance that Trump thinks he's a king...
Can't scream for term limits out of one side of our mouth and then want to reverse term limits out of the other side.
And I suppose everyone will start screaming if this goes through and the next Democrat president uses it in order to stay in office.
Also doesn't look good that we ragged on Biden being too old to be President (and don't try to reinvent history and pretend age alone wasn't something we criticized Biden about), and then support Trump as president, when he would be even older than Biden, going into his next term.
This is one reason why I've tried to get people to step back away from the whole "Only Trump can save us!" type of rhetoric. Because eventually he's going to have to leave office. We need to find ways to strengthen the Republican Party, and start looking for some new blood.
And ffs, I don't mean his kids. Again, we don't need any more fucking presidential dynasties in this country. Just because Trump is a great president doesn't mean his kids will be great presidents. And again, just adds fuel to libbers and their "No Kings" BS. We don't need to hand them ammunition.
Define term.
term
/təːm/
noun
noun: term; plural noun: terms
a word or phrase used to describe a thing or to express a concept, especially in a particular kind of language or branch of study.
a fixed or limited period for which something, for example office, imprisonment, or investment, lasts or is intended to last.
hey, you asked!
Don't worry fren. Their ammunition and arsenal is full to the brim in that land called psychotic collectivism. They don't NEED real fuel. They burn on hellish fires.
Did Trump give them ANY justification for 9+ years of virulent hatred and attack? I don't see it (Of course, I'm biased).
They conjured the 'no kings' thing up out of thin air. They are going to throw up whatever they can, whenever they can. Conclusion: Ignore them, & do what has to be done.
Does America and the World need Trump be that President for another term? Bannon seems to think so. And I agree with him. And, he's no baka, either.
here is the thing. Unless God is victorious, and MAGA succeeds, and America is irreversibly changed/restored to a place where the corrupt infiltration is utterly wiped out, it won't matter. It's life or death. It CANNOT be business as usual after Trump.
'next democratic president' uses it?
As Bannon hints, it HAS to be done by the will of the American people. Do you thinnk that if they do this, then a few years, or decade later, the whole country will just backflip? "Oh, give us all that hedonistic and satanic drugs and child trafficking and transgender and materialistic socialism back again, please!"
This is a war to the finish. The war has been waged for a long, long time (decades, centuries), and now it has come to the deciding point. One side will win. When it does, the other side will not have a foot to stand on.
...... or you can just take the blue pill and go back to the Matrix, and pretend this Awakening never happened.
btw, did you listen to the whole interview? Even the shortened version on Youtube is pretty explosive. I strongly recommend. For context. Fwiw, I think Bannon is 100% on target.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ijf7K_08YWk
(Shortened version 13 minutes)
I think this is an AI video. Or reveal the actual source video.
Easy to track down. Look at the watermark in the top right.
Do a screen shot of the video at any point, run it through image recognition search engine.
Alternative: search "Steve Bannon Interview" into google, and bingo: Sauce
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ijf7K_08YWk
https://www.economist.com/insider/the-insider/inside-the-mind-of-maga-a-conversation-with-steve-bannon
With the Economist
He is trolling them and it is working.
Knowing everything i know im still not warming up to this idea. The ONLY way i would even consider it is if there was stil work to be done but even then my approval would drop because of perceived foot dragging
Foot dragging? He is the only President that only drags he feet to draw a line in the sand!
Ita future tense. "Vote for me so i can finish the job," would iritate me.
Why would he want to be? He’s been on the literal hot seat for so many years. I just can’t imagine. The only way in my mind is if all the difficult work was done during this term and the next is just for smoothing out the details. I love him but he’s done so much already.
Firstly, no genuine person runs for president because he wants to. Rather, because he feels called to, or needs to, or has to.
Secondly, as Bannon says, 'We need to finish what we started' and 'Trump is the instrument of divine providence'. (I believe these both very firmly).
I don't know if you've ever held a position of public responsibility (being responsible for thousands or millions of people's lives), but Sometimes things are a whole lot bigger than one individual, one family, or one group. I'm pretty sure that DJT knows and feels this.
It all comes down to which is greater: love of country and one's people, or the instinct for comfort, ease and/or self-preservation. I think Trump has already shown in spades which is the greater of these, for him. God bless him.
Well, this should make the leftist demonstrators flip out.
Random thought ...
This makes the "No Kings" make sense.
It makes no sense in the current context of what is happening in the US, but it's planting a seed that they can expand on if Trump gets a 3rd term.
Then the "No Kings" looks more plausible, "Trump can't have a 3rd term because then he'd be like a forever-ruling king."
This is freaking people out on X. Hilarious!I don’t think DJT is wanting to do this, but it is so much fun watching the trolling.
He didn’t say Donald Trump would be president, he said Trump would be president. You got two sons and a daughter that could run, possibly?
Whohoo.........
This video looks fake. Look close at the voice - it's not totally matching.
might be your eyes and might be your hardware..... kek
I don't believe this. It's top secret, but here is the plan... It's just to get the left all in a tizzy.
Interesting, if only to see the Libs’ heads explode. This could really drive them past the edge.
Now I have to buy a Trump 2028 hat ?
Why is Steve broadcasting the game plan?
Maybe it's because it's not the game plan
I am so happy.
Hoping his jabs don't do their thing
I say this as a strict Constitutionalist: I will happily bend on my ethics just to see every commie fucktard imbecile lose their shit during a 3rd Trump term.
Apparently I now hate these people more than I love my Constitution.
For right now, I'm okay with that.
If it is a top secret plan, why is Bannon talking about it?
Who said it was top secret?
The title of the post says that Bannon claims there is.
Some inflooencer (albeit anonish) on X, aka the interwebs. Aka Shadow of Ezra.
Not stevie boy.
u/mac1221
Cos its not 'top secret'.
Just going by what was in the title of the OP that says that Bannon claims there is. That's all.
In 2025, that's a risky thing to do.
There is so much noise, spin, opinion, and random ideas out there, all presented in the language of statement and fact, that one cannot afford to simply take things at face value, especially a post on social media or a forum board.
Exactly. I was just curious if anyone else noticed it. Words have meaning.
Aha! Now I get it. Ok, dang, you know. Text is not the best medium fr meaning sometimes.
I interpreted your comment to be "What's wrong with Steve Bannon!?? Why on earth is he sharing top secret information?"
But I guess now I can interpret it as "It cannot be such a big 'top secret' plan if bannon is talking about in an interview with a media newspaper"
Do you think I've more correctly understood your comment, with that 2nd interpretation? (just trying to refine the signal here... )
Yes, you have it my fren. It wasn't an attack on Bannon. Thank you for pursuing clarity and understanding.
I am a person who reads and listens carefully. Words do have meaning. And yes, language is not always is the best medium of communication sometimes - in all its forms. At least not in the way it has become in these days of fake news and outright mistruths spoken or written with the intention to mislead. Too many just give lip service and are never held accountable. Media even encourages misleading titles and content for the purposes of exposure and content creators simply cave to the new "normal."
I was not raised that way, and I have no doubt that many on this forum can say the same thing. We must reclaim language and be people of our words. Thank you again.
I love the idea, and I love Bannon's conviction when he says this. I think the board is split on Bannon, generally speaking, but hear me out.
What about succession?
22nd - Section 1. No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once.
Okay, suppose Trump ran as VP and the Presidential candidate ran with the intention to step aside?
What about the 12th amendment? I don't really know, but it the 12th prohibited it, Trump could still be Speaker of the House and be 2nd in line to be President through succession. How would that work? Well, there are few ways that could play out: death, resignation, or removal. I hope we don't have another "stolen election" where it is made clear and the President and V.P. are both "removed". I don't think white hats would plan for succession through "death". "Resignation" could have a few different connotations.
No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice - sure, but what about someone who is appointed - no election. If it could be argued that he won 2020, but never entered the office, could that mean he gets that stolen term to serve after this one? Or argue the other direction. He was elected three times already, but only entered the office twice, not very fair, should get the office for another term - that was what people voted for three times in a row.
I think we agree on the definition of elected being important. My questions are meant to show that he could get there without being elected.
Yeah, that ideas been out there. Elected been the key word. And, yeah, the Pres running as VP, with Vance, for example, and then the elected person stepping down.
I don't know what the plan is, or how it will unfold, but I take Steve Bannon VERY seriously when he says this. Bannon knows what he's talking about, I reckon.
I agree. I don't know "the plan" but l think Bannon is on a mission and seems to have high confidence, like prophetic confidence. Either he knows beyond doubt or he has a great poker face.
Looks fake
I actually think that there is a path for Trump to win again in 2028. And Bannon is scaring the democrats into doing and saying even crazier stuff. But will Trump actually do it? Probably not, but yes is still a significant probability.