1
Iwasnevergivenaname 1 point ago +1 / -0

The answer is quite simple (the execution of which is rather difficult, but thankfully, is part of the plan by default.) We harp on taxes, but the actual taxes aren’t the problem. Taxes are only necessary for government expenditure. I remember back in the early days of my awakening (Ron Paul was instrumental, but back then I hadn’t realized just how deep the rabbit hole went), I did a lot of digging into the government’s corruption and waste.

The results were stunning. The best financially managed government programs saw inflows of 2-3 times the money that came out of said programs while the worst saw 5-10 times. Remember, this is back when I thought that government:bad just meant they were greedy and took some money off the top. So imagine the numbers when you add in all the cabal expenses. We are essentially looking at a beast that can’t stop gorging on the wallets of the American people (and that’s one of the least problematic things with the beast)

TLDR: the amount of money the cabal/deep state/whatever you’d like to call them, steals from the American people is so extreme that getting rid of said cabal would fix all of our taxation problems

11
Iwasnevergivenaname 11 points ago +12 / -1

Great awakening 5 year delta on Monday, suicide weekend delta for a week from now, we might actually be seeing some real big fireworks this week.

1
Iwasnevergivenaname 1 point ago +1 / -0

The fact that this is MSN makes me wonder if this dude isn’t going to have a complete break down so that the cabal and co can be like “see, only crazies think Hollywood is taking part in these messed up rituals”

Don’t get me wrong, I fully believe this sort of thing (and much worse) happens, but this just seems too convenient not to be a trick or trap of some sort. I hope I’m wrong and we are finally seeing it all exposed.

2
Iwasnevergivenaname 2 points ago +2 / -0

late reply, but it looks to be from a five day conference back in 2013. Several former politicians (small names) were paid to respond to some petition that was sent to the white house. The donor was anonymous.

4
Iwasnevergivenaname 4 points ago +4 / -0

I can see a couple options here that aren’t super problematic.

  1. Carlos Slim just hates pedos
  2. Tax write offs
  3. Carlos Slim wanted to paint his rivals in a worse light by shining a light on their darker deeds
  4. Carlos Slim is more of a gray hat
  5. Carlos Slim was a black hat and the white hats either took him down and used his money or he flipped and gave his money

Alternatively, the bad guys are pushing forth a false narrative (let’s imagine adrenochrome is fake, but they still use child sacrifices for horrific things, wouldn’t they want to prop up the adrenochrome message via Jim and Tim?). Again, I’m not saying this is 100% the way it is, nor is the above imagining necessarily the way they would be playing it if the sound of freedom has been hijacked, but it is something we should be wary of.

3
Iwasnevergivenaname 3 points ago +3 / -0

I mean, they’re being honest about swamp Republicans wanting in voter’s bedroom, they just left out that it is the kid’s bedroom and they’ve got Creepy Joe with them.

Seriously though, the actual the add is talking about is changing the voter approval threshold for changing the Ohio state constitution. Current threshold is 50% plus 1 vote, they want it to be 60% plus 1 vote. It has absolutely nothing to do with any one specific political issue. They’re being about as honest as our currency White House press secretary.

1
Iwasnevergivenaname 1 point ago +1 / -0

According to several female relatives, near beer is good for increasing breast milk production.

5
Iwasnevergivenaname 5 points ago +5 / -0

This sort of review is far more insidious than the others. The best way to stop a movement like this in its tracks is to push lukewarmth over those who are on the fence about seeing the movie. Calling child/human/sex trafficking a conspiracy isn't going to keep people off the fence, but making it seem like a low-budget poorly made film just might do the trick.

2
Iwasnevergivenaname 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't disagree, just pointing out that they tend to suppress the conversation of reparations if it begins to discuss how the elites should pay their fair share.

3
Iwasnevergivenaname 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is likely the real reason why they never include “provable descendants of slave owners” as the payer of and reparations. They’d be the ones who are on the hook for the lion’s share of the reparations.

4
Iwasnevergivenaname 4 points ago +4 / -0

While I agree that we haven’t hit the bottom yet, I think a lot of normies see the paid shills/trolls/glowies think they’re still the majority. Lots of people are too weak/afraid to rock the boat. Once the well runs dry and people figure out how much of our political and social discourse is a psyop for the Cabal and their intelligence apparatuses, I think that’s when we’ll see the awakening take on warp speed.

2
Iwasnevergivenaname 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm sure he started crying when he saw other people on the plane not wearing masks.

3
Iwasnevergivenaname 3 points ago +3 / -0

Just to reinforce this post: Icebreakers hit ice fields (not icebergs, more on that later) head-on, the Titanic hit the iceberg from the side/diagonally (think of an empty soda/beer can, is it easier to crush from the sides or the top/bottom?)

Secondly, as I said before, icebreakers are meant for ice fields, not icebergs. What is the difference, you might ask? Ice fields are less compact, which means that the icebreaker can push the ice around without as much pressure being applied to the hull (think of a full soda/beer can, it is much harder to crush than an empty one. The ice field has room to buckle, much like an empty can, where as the iceberg has no room to buckle, much like a full soda/beer can). If an icebreaker were to take on an iceberg, the icebreaker would be damaged. The extent of the damage depends on the size of the iceberg.

9
Iwasnevergivenaname 9 points ago +9 / -0

Let me get this straight: they lose contact 2 hours after it leaves, but they don’t contact the Navy until some 7+ hours later when it fails to rendezvous. However, it miraculously implodes not long after the Navy is contacted?

Second question: if the ship can’t steer itself(the support ship controls after receiving text messages from the sub), why did they expect it to re-emerge Sunday night despite having no communication with it?

Lastly, 17 bolts, Simpson a predicted titanic sub loss 17 years ago, support ship had crew of 17.

6
Iwasnevergivenaname 6 points ago +6 / -0

LOL "flattering khaki jumpsuit"

3
Iwasnevergivenaname 3 points ago +3 / -0

Some 5 or so years ago, there were several news articles about how it wasn't that strange that the US Marshals were providing security for Secretary of Education DeVos. I found it a little weird at the time because, despite the media claiming that the Marshals essentially have whatever jurisdiction they need, I couldn't find any examples of times when the Marshals were used for security of somebody other than judges, criminals, witnesses, and the like.

I've seen a few videos showing various politicians having Marshals for escorts and, again, no evidence pointing toward this being a normal thing. I haven't really been able to connect the dots between 1. Why DeVos got US Marshal security. 2. Why others have gotten US Marshal security (Harris and Pelosi are the only two I can think of off the top of my head.) 3. Why the media reported about DeVos having US Marshals, but not Harris or Pelosi.

Like much of the Q plan, there are a lot of puzzle pieces and they don't make a whole lot of sense until more pieces come together. Something tells me that we will soon be seeing why the Marshals are popping up periodically around various political entities.

2
Iwasnevergivenaname 2 points ago +2 / -0

It is far better to post and hope for discussion than not to. I posted why I doubt that the twitter guys is correct, but it'd be foolish to assume that we know for certain that Gibson and Caveizel are on our side. As always, time will tell. Their actions will put them in one camp or another.

5
Iwasnevergivenaname 5 points ago +5 / -0

Couple things that stand out to me:

  1. Mel Gibson does not seem to be the man he was many years ago. I can see a situation where he either was one of them and flipped or he played along for the sake of fame/fortune/power.

  2. Jim Caviezel, the evidence here is even weaker, IMO. His wife may look manly in the face, but she doesn't have the Obama linebacker shoulders and the like. That "freemason Illuminati necklace" doesn't look like either to me, looks more like a movie prop or something.

  3. This dude also claims Trump is bad, which would mean Q isn't correct. If Q isn't correct, then the black hats are morons that awoke an army of anons who will dig and find the dirt until every last cabal freak is exposed.

In conclusion, I'm not 100% convinced Gibson and Caviezel will follow through with the home run they claim is coming, but I'm willing to hope. As for Trump and Q, well, I wouldn't be here if I thought they were part of some psyop.

Sidenote: Both Trump and Q love the fog of war, helps them hide their Trump cards. One never knows what might be misinfo/disinfo/lies/etc.

The final word: Jesus is in charge in the end. We can trust God. Even if this dude is right and the world is the devil's playground, they're playing on borrowed time.

1
Iwasnevergivenaname 1 point ago +2 / -1

All I can come up with so far is that the video is definitely from an event at the Bedminster Golf Club. Aside from that, I've not been able to narrow it down.

by chachi
4
Iwasnevergivenaname 4 points ago +4 / -0

CNN is making the claim as well

2
Iwasnevergivenaname 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lol, pretty sure that would be alien crop dusting

2
Iwasnevergivenaname 2 points ago +2 / -0

It certainly wouldn't surprise me if it were all true, but what better way to hide kill teams and other shady/clandestine operations than to use UFO retrieval as the official claim?

Heck, it could be both. Perhaps they have an entire web of hidden operations and teams that are operating outside the confines of the government (as the normies see it). No matter how hidden something is, there is always a paper trail and I'd wager they aren't so dumb as to not have dummy ops to hide their real ops in the paper trails.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›