2
JimEagle76 2 points ago +3 / -1

What attorneys? Thought Brunson was PRO SE?

2
JimEagle76 2 points ago +3 / -1

It doesn't matter what they say, they don't have the authority to grant the remedy. It can't happen. The case is dead. Period.

2
JimEagle76 2 points ago +3 / -1

They should hear a case on its merits. The problem with this case is the remedy, which to remove politicians from office. SCOTUS does not have the power, the constitution grants impeachment power to Congress, and it's the only way to remove them. SCOTUS will not take the case because they are powerless to remedy it. Time to put away childish things.

6
JimEagle76 6 points ago +8 / -2

I wouldn't want a SCOTUS that is swayed by public opinion, I hope they are not.

5
JimEagle76 5 points ago +5 / -0

I think it started in 1913 with the federal reserve.

7
JimEagle76 7 points ago +7 / -0

It became the land of the fee and the home of the slave.

1
JimEagle76 1 point ago +1 / -0

He may have nominated, I mean Trump won't be speaker.

2
JimEagle76 2 points ago +2 / -0

Isn't Fang Fang dead from a plane crash?

6
JimEagle76 6 points ago +6 / -0

Here's Sinema's voting record. She voted with conservatives 5% of the time. Don't expect much from her. https://heritageaction.com/scorecard/members/S001191/117

2
JimEagle76 2 points ago +2 / -0

No. It's a personal power play for herself. She voted with, and will continue to, the left over 95% of the time. https://media.patriots.win/post/wkpKuq8AWa3w.png

2
JimEagle76 2 points ago +2 / -0

Glad you said this, you beat me to it.

1
JimEagle76 1 point ago +1 / -0

The entire house votes for speaker, both parties. It takes 218 to win. With a massive midterm victory there was a chance to get Trump. But now with the small majority the fear is a few RINOS could join the Dems to install someone like Liz Cheney.

view more: Next ›