Take this with a HUGE pinch of salt. But indeed interesting point ...
(media.greatawakening.win)
💊 RAW UNCUT HOPIUM 💊
Comments (98)
sorted by:
Why indeed. What things can not happen if Congress is out of session or not even sworn in?
The are only two "official" branches of government right now.
Incoming House members who have not taken the oath cannot vote, engage in floor proceedings, introduce new legislation or conduct other official House business until a speaker is chosen.
What opportunities does this present? Arrests?
Article I, Section 6, Clause 1:
The Senators and Representatives shall receive a Compensation for their Services, to be ascertained by Law, and paid out of the Treasury of the United States. They shall in all Cases, except Treason, Felony and Breach of the Peace, be privileged from Arrest during their Attendance at the Session of their respective Houses, and in going to and returning from the same; and for any Speech or Debate in either House, they shall not be questioned in any other Place.
When is the House in session?
A new Congress begins at noon January 3 of each odd-numbered year following a general election, unless it designates a different day by law. A Congress lasts for two years, with each year constituting a separate session. The Legislative Reorganization Act of 1970 requires Congress to adjourn sine die no later than July 31 of each year unless there is a declared war, or unless Congress otherwise provides.
Sine die --> Latin for "indefinite"
What actions might the Executive or Judicial branches take at this time that would be prevented if the House were in session?
Goddamn it, guess I'm riding the Hopium Express one more time. Nice post, fren.
Thank you. I'm working on an answer to the last question. Almost seems like the three branches are supposed to be independent of each other. Making one disappear might not make much of an impact on the other two, in the short run. This line of thought could be a dead end.
Agreed. Very nice catch on the speaker vote thing. I just thought it was cool that a group of MAGA republicans was actually trying to elect a speaker that was not a slimy swamp creature... but I now believe it may have an even bigger purpose. Hello, Brunson SC case... I'm looking at yooooo.
Hopium Express... I like that.
I have been trying hard to not overdose on hopium any more... but that plan has now been shot full of holes. One more time riding the Hopium Express it is then.
One more piece of hopium. President Trump promised us a "Merry Christmas" - Well today is Christmas on Julian calendar
As you point out, Uncle_Fester's post was a good one. I, like you I think, am getting very tired of having hope and seeing it dashed. But if there really is no plan then it will truly be up to us and that means a revolution--which I think most people don't want, until we are pressed into it.
Alll aboard!!!!!
GIDDIUP, COWBOY...the ponies are needin' a bit of riden' is say!!!!!!!
Totally AGREE...TIME TO RIDE THIS ALL THE WAY INTO THE GROUND!!!!!!!!
Horse might be slathering but it was a damn good ride...NOW, let's see if this holds water in the coming days...
"SUPPOSEDLY" there is a deal by McCarthy & Friends that is to be brought out...
In the minimal datefagging way possible, I've thought for some time that when the first tripcode from Q "leaked", it was something like 'now comes the p@in --23', I dreaded at the time (2019 when I first conceived) that it meant that we would be waiting until 2023 before things started to turn and that the offensive against the DS would start coming to the fore.
TO think we're not even a week into the year and things are looking up.
So if the incoming House members can't be sworn in until a Speaker is appointed, then what happens to the House members that have to vacate their spots for the new incoming members? Do they stay until the new members are sworn in or did they have to leave their seats on January 3rd?
Whatever is going on now has nothing to do with members who's terms have expired. Their term is over they are just private citizens again.
Thank you, learning new things every day.
Arrests of Representatives and/or Representative-elects. Government shutdown due to lack of budget. Inability to impeach.
This is what can happen when the House is not in session. Recess appointments are not on the table, because that's when the Senate is in recess, not the House.
Looks like the senate just voted to be in recess "vacation" until Jan 23rd. Nearly 3 weeks.
EDIT: Senate calendar PDF says they are are off for 3 weeks, but under "Executive business" Upchuck Schumer has the senate in recess until exactly 1:05 today (Jan 6th). Why so specific?
This is the bullshit that the Senate does to prevent recess appointments. They all leave town except 1, and then every day or so the 1 person opens the session and then immediately closes it.
The Senate does it just because they can, and they don't want the President appointing people without their approval.
In this case, I don't really care because Brandon is bad dude. But it was super shitty when they did this to Trump in a GOP-controlled Senate.
Correction, Corn Pop is the bad dude.
Get your facts straight Fren!
Hmmm.
u/#processing
That Q clock is just ticking on down....
Maybe they are a little nervous about more than just McCarthy not being the guy....
They are like a turtle with no shell while they wait to be sworn in. Those precious protections, immunity....
Should be interesting to see if they start attacking McCarthy if he won't step aside and some unforseen Boulder starts rolling down the hill towards them.
Roger stone for the speaker of the house? Just trying to roll that stone hehe
Technically congress is in session right now. Began Jan 3. First act in session is to elect a speaker. They are unable to do anything, but in session.
The military can move on them at any time regardless... treason overrides.
Let's FUCKING GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
The exceptions are Treason, Felony and Breach of the Peace. Do the normies believe that they're impervious to anything and everything while in office, including while they're "home?"
To answer the why, is because they need to shut out the Hawks who are drumming for WW3, that include the likes of Sen. Graham, and a rabid Ukraine contingent. There are not enough reasonable voices to cancel them out. I'm pretty sure that the MIC realizes they are totally on the back foot, with low enlistment, and dwindling stocks due to the furnace that is in Ukraine. You can see evidence of that, in the latest Ukraine package, which is not enough to 'win' anything, but is just only enough to mollify congress appetites. The Pentagon was putting on the brakes, IMO.
It is in effect, a "military is the only way situation".
Good analysis!
Brunson Case. Swift and Clean removal of criminal Congress. There would be no better time than now to do so during the distraction. It is a mathematically proven Biblical Case that fits all the pieces. My faith is in God that what ever needs to happen will happen.
God always wins. Amen.
And here we are.
I messaged back and forth with my newly elected rep to congress yesterday…here is the conversation:
Me: McCarthy is not our guy. Please do not vote for him again.
Rep: Who is then?
Rep: If you think Goetz is doing this for anything other than money, power, and fame, you are mistaken
Me: I would appreciate very much, a vote for the guy that endorsed you and the reason we supported you. Donald J. Trump.
Me: And if you think Goetz is doing this for money, power and fame,can you please tell me what you think McCarthy’s intentions are? Without meaningful change, we get more of the same, and we strongly disapprove of more of the same.
Rep: I personally spoke to Donald Trump last night and he is strongly encouraging support of Kevin McCarthy for speaker of the house. What else do you want me to do?
Me: If that’s true, I will stand down. God’s got a better plan than I, and I will trust that this is part of His plan. Thanks for the response!😊
Rep: I have no reason to lie to you
Interesting, right?
I wonder if your rep is lying. I don't trust any of them.
I told him I would be praying for him and for our country today, and I will.
I don’t trust any of them either, but I do appreciate the dialogue. He knows our Patriot group is watching him closely.
👍
How in the world did you get a one on one text style conversation with one of your reps?
I have one on one text conversations with most of my reps 😂 I have a really loud mouth, a big opinion and a fairly large Patriots group. They’re scared NOT to answer me, because if they don’t, I go public!
How’d you get their personal phone numbers to text in the first place? If I was able to do that I would have been doing it for years. You get those cookie cutter responses in an email like I just got from my rep yesterday about her voting for the omnicrap bill.
Spend half your life encountering them in person. I work a full time job and attend meetings where they will be most nights. It’s rough, and I don’t get the results I want from them, but they definitely know how I feel on the issues.
I smell bullshit
What is the likelihood you're just chatting with an intern?
Zero
How do you figure?
I know.
How do you know?
Can I have his number? Your are so lucky!!!!
This particular chat is happening on Facebook Messenger…
ROFLMAO
me sides...where've me sides gone
I’m not laughing. I am testing. He has not lied to me in the past, so I will give him enough rope.
Indeed, very interesting.
Did I miss something on why the USMC/USAF is busier than ever?
I think Trump's threat against drug cartels and governments was actually a threat against big pharma, and our own government. Something big is about to hit.
The cartels in South America and Mexico are one of the last assets the Cabal has. They will be taken out before the hammer can drop.
I read somewhere that S. America was rounding up gang members like MS13 & other gangs & sending them to prison. Had them stripped down to their white boxers. Looking at tattoos.
Yeah, some of the countries already doing it. A whole bunch of them started moving to Mexico for that reason. I think cleaning up these cartels in Mexico will be needed.
Agreed. I think that went WAY under the radar to most of the normie public and the media was happy to distract.
They are VERY SERIOUS about reprisal against those who threaten to go after the cartel though. Before the Midterm, I speculated that would be the MAIN REASON they'd shut down Kari Lake and steal it from her, no matter how dirty their hands had to get to do it.
AZ is the source point for the introduction of most of the fent and a great deal of the human trafficking operations coming across the border too. They absolutely couldn't risk any shutdowns or meddling with the border from someone serious. She would not only disrupt the cashflow but could risk uncovering the entire Iran-Contra style operation.
Think about it: Kari Lake may actually be vindicated when this whole court proceeding is done. Why risk showing your hand, all those ways you manipulate votes, especially with the machines in widespread use?
Why risk making Kari a national threat by giving her the ability to potentially jump on the Trump train, if you shut her out of the AZ job?
MAGA didn't win a single Secretary of State race and just one of the governor races (although NV and that person is questionable in terms of their ties to the establishment because of the Vegas shooting) and there are bigtime reasons for that. They blocked off the pressure points for fear of something EXACTLY LIKE this McCarthy thing happening and causing further exposure, obstruction and humiliation.
But I digress. Does anyone know how we did with State AG races by the way? It seems like we lost ALL of those, too.
u/#hopium
We’ll see what happens today with the Brunson case and the Speaker votes.
Sure seems like interesting timing for the Supreme Court to schedule Jan 6 as the date to decide if they’re accepting the case (who knows, maybe they already did in secret for National Security reasons).
It can also seem like the group of 20 is stalling the selection of the Speaker for some reason.
Brunson case is DOA. This system is too corrupt to be fixed in SCOTUS.
The 20 will get their concessions will vote in dipshit McCarthy.
This isn’t dooming, this is putting the glasses on and seeing reality.
Could democrats vote for McCarthy to get him the votes he needs? I don't know if that's allowed but since he wallows in the same shit pool with the Dems, he's "one of them."
Lots of us believe this is why Trump backed MxCarthy, so the Dems wouldn't consider crossing party lines. Optics, stalemates, the people crying out, and I'm loving every minute of it.
How dirty would a dem feel for voting for a Trump "endorsed" pick?
Another thread on here (stickied as of now) has Roger Stone explaining this move as follows: Dems could vote "present", in effect abstaining. This would lower the threshold of 218 to something less, giving McCave-in the votes.
However, Roger thinks this is unlikely because once Dems started doing this, other R's would see that a deal was made w/Dems and would not vote for McCave, so it would be interesting to see if he would go that far.
I think it could happen because the DS Cabal can team up to get him in... they already proved they don't care about our opinions. Hannity and that (traitorous) crowd would just continue to demonize the 20 patriots and gloss over the D/R uniparty move. IMHO
Of course it’s allowed, it’s a floor election in which every congressperson votes - but the Democrats have been voting as a bloc for Jeffries so the only thing that’s mattered so far is the divided Republican vote.
But in practice there is no way that any of them will flip to McCarthy. There is exactly one thing that the Democrats and the rebels agree about - and that is Kevin McCarthy’s unsuitability for the job.
Less unlikely is that a half-dozen Republicans will cross the aisle to support a Democrat - Jeffries would step aside for that.
Your trio of downvoters should at the very least read this -
https://www.uncoverdc.com/2022/12/30/the-truth-about-the-brunson-case/
I don't disagree. We'll see what happens today. As usual, I'm not getting my hopes up.
like like maybe it's something they planed out beforehand? Like maybe that's why Q didn't bother to correct all of the elections - just the few it did?
I hope anons will not be too hard hit by the disappointment they've set themselves up for, when Trump is not elected Speaker (which he doesn't even want), and the Supreme Court does nothing whatsoever about the stolen 2020 election.
Why not?
They can vote everyday,for the next two years....
Simple work around for DS would be to tell their Ds to vote for McCarthy to keep their boy in power.
Then they'll be seen agreeing with Trump on something, and that's forbidden.
Exactly why he endorsed coke head McCarthy.
(Posted this above)
Another thread on here (stickied as of now) has Roger Stone explaining this move as follows: Dems could vote "present", in effect abstaining. This would lower the threshold of 218 to something less, giving McCave-in the votes.
However, Roger thinks this is unlikely because once Dems started doing this, other R's would see that a deal was made w/Dems and would not vote for McCave, so it would be interesting to see if he would go that far.
I think it could happen because the DS Cabal can team up to get him in... they already proved they don't care about our opinions. Hannity and that (traitorous) crowd would just continue to demonize the 20 patriots and gloss over the D/R uniparty move. IMHO
Pinch me, I'm salty...
Name checks out.
J6 2.0
Love and Light Yall 💕
Wow I remember Zeta talk. Planet X incoming. Sure hope not.
Well if so... nothing can stop it. :0
Maybe to force congress to be stuck in DC? I say keep those bastards there for as long as the J6 patriots are in prison.
The CIA is still very active in the so called pandemic with all their plants. What about that?
trust me bro
Very interesting
It's pretty brilliant I think. Congress has been legally neutered and the optics on it are fantastic.
I bet they thought McCarthy would be a lock with the Trump endorsement. lmao
Very interesting. What happens if the House suddenly votes McCarthy as speaker today? Does that mean we no longer need the Congress shut down? I am hoping that Clorox and Gin with Zeta Talk Followers is right for the reasons stated, but...
We can only theorize and correct our theories based on observations.
Hmmmmmmm...Indeed, what could occur during a time of Congress in limbo?
McCarthy will win today.
Heard #GITMOHospitality Has Been Working Very Diligently
Have we hit the mathematically impossible to be a coincidence point yet?
regarding what
The original post, did you not read it?
Of course I did; your remark didn't make clear which coincidence you were referring to, that's all