The F35 is almost like the bradley fighting vehicle. They loaded it with so much overly complex tech and "stealth" it really can't do anything on its own. They have to pair up old F15's with the F35's to engage anything effectively.
Hospitals have a cafeteria staff that does food and meal prep. And a janitorial staff that does cleaning.
The odds and ends I'm referring to are things that aid in the daily tasks nurses have to do. Reports, paperwork, data entry, preparing beds, sanitizing beds, getting patients to and from their beds, taking vitals, meal delivery, patient checks, and much more. All of these menial tasks will free up the remaining nurses to focus on qualified nurse related things.
I don't know exactly how many NG members have been activated or will be called on. Her wording makes it sound like a 1:1 ratio of fired nurse to guardsmen. In the same EO it allows for and calls on retired health care workers and out of state health care workers to replace nurses as well.
I know she said she was going to do it and even signed an executive order to do it but as of yet I don't think she has activated them. So either it was a bluff or enough of the nurses got the shot or the hospitals weren't really impacted with whatever staff shortages were purported. Downstate (Queens) have called for her to send some National Guard to help out at Rikers prison and she has not sent any National Guard there either.
Don't get any booster shots.
People can survive heavy metals poisoning and cancer. When it comes to the altering of DNA, I'd like to think the human body has enough "good dna" to overtake any "bad dna" so long as people stop being bombarded with "bad dna"
Full disclosure: I am not a doctor. I am not qualified to offer medical advice. Get the experimental shot or don't - I'm not your mother. The whole situation has put many people between a rock and a hard place and has pitted us against eachother like animals. I have not taken it nor do I plan on taking it.
The soldier can't be sued but the hospital probably could still get sued. They aren't going to let National Guardsmen commit medical malpractice.
99.9% of the National Guard requested will end up doing odds and ends around the hospitals. The more overly qualified ones might be let into patient rooms to administer shots and IV's and other general primary care tasks and thats a strong maybe.
At best this will reduce the menial tasks from actual qualified nurses so they can access more patients.
I have no idea. I stopped digging a while back when evidence came out that some election equipment has built-in mobile data capability. If devices are using mobile (cell) connections then routers, logs and network security as a whole means nothing. A mobile connection would circumvent that state network entirely.
Also, if any of the eleciton devices had wifi capability built in(aparently some do) or have USB ports that are not filled with glue, it would be trivial for a person or group of persons with enough credentials to setup all these devices to communicate over wifi to a wireless router of their choosing and then could direct that traffic over a mobile network again circumventing the state network completely. ^could do the same thing with wired connection but it would be harder to hide.
I have no idea what is going on at CISA or what exactly they even do but these election machines are way WAY too easy compromise.
According to CIS (Center for Internet Security - a 501c3 non profit) they, CIS, has intrusion detection monitors (probably the Albert Sensors we heard about at the cyber symposium) on all state networks.
Here is a NBC Nightly News segment that was aired before the election of 2020 and is publicly displayed in the video history on CIS's Youtube page. (youtube link)
When I heard about the "Albert Sensor(s)" after the Mike Lindell's Cyber Symposium, I poked around the internet and it lead me to CIS.
I do not know the relation between CISA and CIS. Allegedly, according to the Wikipedia entry, CIS hosts the Multi-State Information Sharing and Analysis Center (MS-ISAC) and the Elections Infrastructure Information Sharing and Analysis Center (EI-ISAC) ... I would assume there is some level of information sharing considering what they are capable of monitoring.
CIS has one location in upstate NY.
You know its bad in Italy when stuff comes out from there subtitled in Chinese.
The sad thing is people believe this. The government, through their propaganda machine (The Media), have brain washed every one to hate all these big wig CEOs or "Rich People" and that they are the ones that should pay for all of humanities wants and needs. Never once thinking on their own what would happen if the shoe was on the other foot.
I agree with you. I'd go even further and claim the NDAA is unconstitutional. But unfortunately over the years democrats and replublicants alike have crafted an evil web of lies and have inextricably linked the military to this ndaa bill.
If the ndaa were to ever not pass it would cripple the military and make all military life complicated (for the children and spouses of service members also). Republican leaning military voters might even be hesitant to vote republican in the future.
Yes this has been on ongoing thing since at least last night. You'll see posts here and on other .win sites that are slamming popular MAGA Republicans that seemingly voted Anti- 2A.
It's sort of doublespeak. Yes, technically they did vote for red flag laws and female draft and all sorts of other things. But that was because they voted to pass the NDAA bill so the military can get funding. There was no option to vote 'no' on red flag laws at this juncture. The Democrats have control of the House and they have the most votes to get whatever junk they wanted into the NDAA.
Red flag gun laws (and other garbage) were attached to the Fiscal Year 2022 NDAA spending. He, and others, voted to pass the NDAA in the House of representatives ... the NDAA passes every year to keep the military funded.
Its a nice trick the Democrats use. They know the Republicans will never vote No on military spending.
This was attached to the NDAA (National Defense Authorization Act) (link)
They [the republicans above] didn't vote specifically for the red flag part; it wasn't an option at this point. They voted to advance the NDAA so the military can get funding for another year.
The democrats put in all sorts of crap into the NDAA every single year for decades because they know the Republicants will vote for it (Military spending). It's a nice trick that every one keeps falling for.
So whatever is in the NDAA that the House just recently passed is going to the Senate and will likely be passed. (female draft is another hot button issue in there)
It was stuffed into the NDAA, with 24 Bln defense spending to keep Republicants happy. The NDAA has been passed (Trump vetoed one but it was overridden) every year in the past 60 some years.
Although, since we are no longer at war, there is a good excuse not to pass it now.
It's up to the Senate now.
China copies everything. They probably have their own version of soros.
Unfortunately this will splash over into other states even if those other states don't pass insane laws like this. California (and NY) set the standard that industry bends the knee to. So if this does actually make it to law in CA, we can all look forward to an even bigger push by our favorite tool manufacturers to buy proprietary battery powered plastic junk. Meanwhile as the gas powered tool supply goes down their prices will go up.
But there is a plus side to this if it does pass. The democrats in their blind rage are handing out wins without realizing it. Small engine repair business will boom.
There is probably a loophole that migrants can choose to be detained (in the USA) or be sent back to country of origin to wait for asylum.
Unfortunately, the longer they stay in the USA the harder it gets to return them to their home.(see: DACA Kids , Anchor Babies)
Amero put the lawsuit on hold for 20 days to give the secretary of state’s office and GBI time to respond. -The Atlanta Journal Constitution
But then on Steve Bannons War Room show this morning it was reported this will not be back in court again until November.
Depending on the skill of the person doing the changing and the degree of the operation they would be pulling off of course it would be possible. Sometimes things don't need to be hacked to get changed nor does it necessarily need to be malicious in nature. For example, an IT guy could get a work order to change a config or run some commands or upgrade the firmware, heck even swap a device out.
You can have threat scenarios from in person infiltration all the way up to remote execution, it all depends on the amount of resources you want to throw at one network closet in Arizona.
That's why its good to have good backups, monitoring and logging (and understand how to read them) of all network infrastructure regardless if its a small home business or a large government agency.
Yep routers can store logs. There are many types of logs and log levels. One type of log is the command log. If any one is familiar with a command line it is the same concept (you can press the up arrow to call back issued commands).
In more advanced routers a command can be issued to see that command buffer. That buffer itself usually has a default number of "history" and in some cases can be configured to "remember" more or less commands. I know with cisco routers there are a few ways to clear/purge/delete/reset the command history.
Network traffic logs, over time, take up a considerable amount of space - obviously the more traffic there is the more logs are generated. Routers don't typically have a large storage space for logs (they certainly can store network traffic logs if configured to do so). Also having one router handle all logging is bad practice as it is a single point of failure. It is better to configure the router to send all logs to a log server that can easily be mirrored/replicated and backed up on a regular basis.
I doubt that the router was specifically deployed for the election. The router(s) in question I believe are for the local county government. So it is just part of the normal local government network that runs all the day to day things county wide. From the tax assessor to the sheriff etc.
When the election happened allegedly election equipment was connected to the LAN (Local Area Network) of whatever building they held the election equipment in. That LAN would have been connected to the county wide network and could potentially have access to the outside world. Once they have some one look at the router(s), they would be able to see how they were configured and be able to determine if network traffic would have been able to flow from election equipment to the outside world. (if there was mobile data involved that is a whole 'nother can of worms)
The legal angle sounds logical. As this was a forensic audit afterall. If the machines were connected to the local network LAN (also maybe mobile WAN but thats another issue) then if you want to forensically trace all aspects of the election the network equipment used needs to be inspected. Wires, routers, switches, wireless repeaters, firewalls.
Anything and everything to see if there was an intrusion of any kind that would affect that network the machines were connected to.
The routers can reveal how the network in that building was configured. They can also keep a history of commands and changes that were done on the physical router.
It would show if there was VLANs or firewalls that were properly or improperly setup to prevent or allow network traffic from coming in or going out from specific internal subnetworks that all the election stuff was allegedly connected to. I think they know the election stuff was connected to the LAN, they just need proof that stuff on that LAN could potentially access the outside world
However, logwise the physical routers alone probably would not have any usable logs as too much time has elapsed - routers don't tend to be setup to store logs (they don't have massive storage space). Logs are usually setup to goto a syslog server and I am unsure if that was also in the scope of the subpoena.
The other stuff they had asked for in the subpoena like splunk logs and etc I can't speak on.
The media is trying so hard to hang President Trump in the court of public opinion. Painting him as a reckless loon off his rocker. As a result, the media is blinded by their rage. They are figuratively digging their own grave and the graves of others.
Boy oh boy if that call leaks in audio format (right now it is technically hearsay) ... lots of people will shit their pants. There's no way that was a 2 person only call.
The question is though, are all of our representatives in on it (the treason) or will they actually grow a pair of balls and fight for us?
I'm rooting for Mr. Elder, but I just don't see how he (or any one else) would be able to win with the amount of fraud and errors and the unfortunate luck of being multiple pages deep on the list of candidates.
I'm expecting something funky to happen. For example, not enough votes for the recall to pass but an abnormally high number of votes for a candidate.
I found this on patriot edition news
The Senate this week shot down a measure put forward by Ranking Finance Committee Member Mike Crapo that would have stopped the IRS from gaining access to Americans’ private financial records. -patriotedition.com
The rule, which Crapo made as an amendment to Democrats’ $3.5 trillion program, was narrowly beaten 50-49. It would have stopped President Biden’s team from requiring banking institutions to report all transactions of people with over $600 in their accounts. -patriotedition.com
Crapo tried to make an amendement to the massive bill to block the IRS from peering into your finances for money amounts all the way down to 600 bucks. It was defeated. Unless some one comes up with another way to derail this new IRS thing then its still on track becoming a thing. The "IRS thing" is in Biden's budget proposal
The Biden Administration’s 2022 budget proposal — which claims to advance “equity across government” — included a provision that generally slipped under the radar, but would impose onerous new reporting requirements on community banks and raises privacy questions. - sentinelksmo.org
This is actually the first I've heard of it not sure why this doesn't have more attention unless I'm missing something. Letting the IRS see into financial transactions down to 600 bucks is in range of pretty much every ones mortgage payments and many peoples car payments.
Seeing a chinese military plane on adsb is like seeing a unicorn. Pretty smart not showing the world where all your military planes are, or allowing nerds to create an icao database of known craft.