2
LetUsReason 2 points ago +2 / -0

Depends on the state. Some allow it some don't. I don't take enough to 'trip' and a small amount (the amount needed for a single trip) can last months when used for microdosing

4
LetUsReason 4 points ago +4 / -0

I realize this isn't exactly on topic but if anyone here would like to chime in with any links or experience with chlorine dioxide I'd be very interested.

https://drsircus.com/chlorine-dioxide/blood-clot-epidemic-the-kill-mechanism-of-covid-injections-and-infections-chlorine-dioxide-saves-the-day/

I bought a mouthwash with Cloralstan (stabilized chlorine dioxide) some time ago and have been thinking of using a small amount occasionally but I don't have as much info on it as I'd like.

4
LetUsReason 4 points ago +4 / -0

Another good thing to prevent it and other forms of dementia is microdosing psilocybin (not enough to have any sort of psychedelic experience. You would generally need several 3+ grams to 'trip'. To microdose you take something .01 grams tops) along with other non-psychoactive mushroom mycelium (lions mane, chagga etc) along with niacin (which is apparently nicotine salt but people don't like to think of 'nicotine' as having any health benefit).

I know this sounds like new age hippie nonsense, just remember these substances existed long before being co-opted by the so called peace movement of some hippie morons.

Look up Paul Stamets, he was on Joe Rogan twice talking about this. There is a lot of research going on with it now, I believe it's been known for some time but largely suppressed.

5
LetUsReason 5 points ago +5 / -0

Anyone have sauce on how nicotine helps? I remember seeing something similar in the past, early on it was expected France would be hard hit with covid cases since it has a heavy smoking population... Then it was found very few heavy smokers were hospitalized. Huge find if true. Also, any difference between nicotine and e-cigs?

10
LetUsReason 10 points ago +10 / -0

I dunno. That substack is dated Jun 28

1
LetUsReason 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's 230MB and a .mov

QuickTime...

1
LetUsReason 1 point ago +1 / -0

Jeez man, I made a post on an internet forum it's not like I'm writing headlines for the WSJ or NYT. I get your point and even though it seems ridiculously embellished I'll double down - Kanye left the interview abruptly and rudely when he had the absolute perfect opportunity to explain his stance. I was hoping so much he would have clarified with something like:

'Obviously when I talk about "The Jews" that have done damage to my career and myself personally I'm not talking about your jewish baker down the road - I'm talking about an elite cabal of powerful people that are coordinating with one another to deplatform and demonize me. All Tony the Jew baker ever did to me was made a subpar scone. My physical fitness trainer literally tried to make me an invalid with drugs in league with others who have threatened to have my family taken away' etc.

The manner in which he left was terrible for optics. The ONLY good thing that came from the interview was both Milo and Kayne confirmed Trump was unaware who Nick even was and was not informed he would be joining the dinner'.

So far Kanye has pushed all in and is now refusing to play his cards. He rudely brought controversial people to dinner with Trump and caused a major problem for him. He isn't clarifying who 'the jews' are in this case and looks like a ridiculous antisemite that cannot defend his claims. He did in fact storm off a two hour segment before 30 minutes had even passed. He could have been chill for the main segment on YT and absolutely destroyed in the after hours segment on rumble and we would have all been better off for it. Instead he looked like an unhinged fool throwing accusations without providing the evidence to back it up. So yes, he stormed off. If you think I'm a psyop for stating the obvious that's your problem.

47
LetUsReason 47 points ago +47 / -0

Sorry to hear that. You don't have to have any magic words. Just be there and willing to listen when he's ready to talk.

5
LetUsReason 5 points ago +5 / -0

The Lord judges people based upon the light they have received and been convicted by. Our creator is our redeemer.

The holy spirit works upon people differently, where they are at. It's in proportion to the what a person is willing to give up. God is better than any sin, any character defect. That's what God goes after and what the world misses so often -- the outward manifestation isn't the real problem. Whatever vice a person has is just a coping mechanism. Don't attack it. Show them love that surpasses understanding by reflecting it from One other. Not self.

4
LetUsReason 4 points ago +4 / -0

Opposite of up? Down Opposite of white? Black Opposite of love? Not hate. Self. Love is a principle that works outward. Self is lost in love. I've spat in the face of God. I've trampled underfoot the precepts of true love, honor, faith. My sins put Christ on the cross.

These compliance addicts that lined up for the jab and wanted to force everyone else to will never see their ignorant selfish control freak character flaws with us using the same weapons of hate against them. They will only see the stark contrast of their utter defilement when held up to the light we as flawed sinners ourselves can reflect from the only source of light and love. In the perfect character of Jesus all of these other insults against us vanish. What is a soul worth, to God? If it isn't worth us being abused and humiliated then Jesus had the full wrath of God poured on Him for nothing.

I understand fully the hatred we feel justified having against these backwards people who have been completely deluded by the adversary. They've been conned into considering us their enemies, but they aren't the enemy. They are all of us. We are all in the same boat. I've failed everyone that ever loved me, I've let so many people down, I've been one of the worst people who has ever lived in that I knew the truth and turned my back on it to live a lie so long I don't know if I can find my way back. Holding onto hate is the road I walked. You can end up over here with me on this road but it's nowhere to end up. I got here looking at my feet, the firey serpents, instead of looking up in faith to the only solution - losing sight of self and seeing the one that created us, found us when we lost ourselves, redeemed us at the cost of an infinite price.

God is faithful. With His help one day I may be, too. I'm far from it. As far as all these complicity addict vaxxers.

1
LetUsReason 1 point ago +1 / -0

They will own the private keys. This is effectively no difference. You are already using encryption sending the messages when browsing Tw@ter over https. Any messages sent are stored on their servers. They own the data and the private keypair used to encrypt the messages. This is 100% a false sense of security, smoke and mirrors. Fuck Elon fuck Tw@ter fuck WEF. Get ready people, this motherfucker is about to kick off hard. Stay up pray up load up.

3
LetUsReason 3 points ago +3 / -0

A lot of people hate on tim pool for not being pro trump enough. That's a dumb mistake. I've been watching him for a while now. I don't care about him personally, or his music, he's seems like an asshole who wants to be seen as the smartest person in the room.

But his show is stellar. He has anyone on that is willing to engage in honest conversation. He came from the left, became more libertarian, gives props to trump where trump deserves props. Calls him out for dumb shit like bringing people like John Bolton into his fold. He's stated time and time again he would vote for trump, what the fuck else do you people want? Does he have to agree every MAGA tenant or be excommunicated?

Don't become like these asshole leftists that insist you must agree to all doctrines or you aren't part of the club. Whoever isn't our enemy is our friend. He has been at the forefront of questioning the mainstream narrative for some time. He actually goes out and does shit, goes to protests, documents the scene, does real journalism.

Sure, I don't like him personally. He's a dick, he cuts people off when they are working up to a point and then insists on reiterating his same points over and over in different words and it's annoying. Ian is interesting but a fucking looney bin sometimes, probably smokes the rocks he keeps in front of him. Shamus is a papist who has probably defend kid diddling or at least minimized it at some point. Luke uhhh, well. To be honest I have zero problems with luke he's certainly the most informed regular on the show.

But I don't care about any of that. So what if I find their personalities sometimes needlessly abrasive. I don't watch the show because I'm a fanboy cheerleader for any of these people. He has a large platform. He puts a ton of content out. He talks to people from all sides, including super controversial ones. He has mentioned patriots.win numerous times. Hell, I'd work for him but there's no way they'd need a network engineer.

I'd be willing to bet the farm the vast majority of people that shittalk his beanie wearing ass haven't done 0.01% the amount he has for the cause of truth. Stop the cult bullshit, stop shitting on the people that are actually doing something to fight for the truth. Instead of shittalking him start putting out your own content that's better than his.

2
LetUsReason 2 points ago +2 / -0

So in other words he was awarded with room and board? Nice to see the states solution for a mass murdering psychopath is to reward him with reparations from all of the families of the people who died at his hands. At least the private prison industry will get it's cut. So everyone is happy, right? right?

3
LetUsReason 3 points ago +3 / -0

Not to disparage you or OP, you both have good insight. I will push back a little on your 'no cheat would be enough' though.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=XyS01Twlcbc

If history shows us anything we know people will accept a huge lie when it's said often enough. We are seeing the culmination of the Earth's history today when we look at advanced propaganda techniques. The rabid TDS leftists are using the V.I. Lenin tactics daily - 'call your enemies what you are and tell the exact opposite of the truth' -- and it's working. Just the other night I was at a friend's discussing the FTX scam and mentioned how it was being used to launder money for Biden. She got super uneasy and started stammering about how trump did the same thing with Russia. No basis in reality. Her comment was like an amalgamation of 8 different fake news stories regarding trump and Russia.

These people are threatened their world view is collapsing but to them any amount of democrat lies and cheating is acceptable because it's been hammered into their head that Trump is an existential threat to humanity itself.

1
LetUsReason 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ok I'll admit this is interesting. I usually lol at q stuff because it's so vague. This one has me interested for the first time ever.

I just want to point out trump didn't truth this himself. He just brought more exposure to the post someone else made. It's possible he's not even aware the text that he retruthed was a q post at all?

So pardon my ignorance these are genuine questions - I'm pretty much ignorant about all things Q. This site you linked with q posts, can it be easily archived? Do they allow you to download the entire history so you have a solid record of what this post said or even it's existence around the time that it shows it was posted? Can they be edited retroactively (with direct access to the db like the reddit mods got caught doing)? Does the site allow archiving via the wayback machine?

That's be wiiiiiiiiild if trump comes out today and says he is or is part of Q. Anyway, definitely interested in this stuff now. If I've been too crass to anyone that has tried to point these out before, my apologies, it does appear to be worth digging into.

2
LetUsReason 2 points ago +2 / -0

Just came here to say this. What the website says doesn't matter, these mouseover elements are bugged.. it's shitty coding meant to display the stats. Check a different site.

7
LetUsReason 7 points ago +7 / -0

I'd like to know more about this. This is the topic that brought a lot of heat onto Kary Mullis. The long story short is he needed to find a peer reviewed source for the claim that HIV caused AIDS and no one, not even the top experts in the field could provide one at the time. He was ostracized and derided for having the audacity to even ask. At the time he wasn't on some sort of mission to disprove it, he just need to provide the source footnotes for claims made in some academic paper on the topic. That's what ended up getting him labeled an 'AIDS denialist'.

He was very outspoken against Fauci, tried to debate him several times Fauci always refused. He always said his PCR method should not be used to diagnose any disease. He died not very long before the whole covid-geddon nonsense.

1
LetUsReason 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm with this guy. I just don't get it. I do talk shit about it because often the posts 'evidence' claiming links and associations between circumstantial metadata like timestamps seems to be a satire parody of itself. I'm open to listening and trying to understand. I read the creature from Jekyll island before I was 17. I have been looking into things like this deeply since the 90s. This stuff is usually a silly joke. But again I am willing. If anyone knows of link to show me with some of the most convincing Q posts that have uh, come true? Please link it and I will check it out.

Or at least tell me if I have this right- are people now suggesting Elon Musk himself is Q and the origin of the Q posts?

2
LetUsReason 2 points ago +2 / -0

If you sign up for any VPN service you are wasting your money and creating a false sense of protection. Make one. You can get a VPS for under 20 bucks for the entire year. Build a VPN tunnel to it, adjust routing so all your traffic traverses the tunnel. In my case I have a specific vlan and wifi SSID that only go over the tunnel, anything on the other networks just goes straight from my internet.

2
LetUsReason 2 points ago +2 / -0

This comment may have given me a stroke. Maybe that was Qs plan all along huh?

3
LetUsReason 3 points ago +3 / -0

Top notch post with some amazing info from other posters also. Great work. A quick perusing though I didn't see anyone mention grapefruit seed extract. I seem to remember seeing someone years ago claim you could use it topically to literally pull some types of cancerous cells out of your body. These weren't charlatan salesmen peddling snake oil. They don't sell anything they just do health talks at random places.

They also said bleached flour and the type of what used in the USA were incredibly bad for your body. Don't remember the specifics. Thanks again for the great post, take my upvote and go in peace.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›