3
Lupinate 3 points ago +3 / -0

Also line 7 "SAME embed across multiple platforms" has grammatical issues, and changing Who to WHO between line 3 and line 4 to 6.

This drop has a lot of "hidden data"

What I say a class action lawsuit >> this is something I kept reading as what is a class action lawsuit (because the brain is funny that way), so the space and the ay are extraneous.

Why has nk out of the news cycle >> should have the word fallen before out.

Same embed across multiple platforms >> I expected an Ed at the end of embed.

So we have " ay" "fallen" and "ed". Threw that into an anagram solver, 2 word limit. The one that grabbed my attention was "deafen ally".

Edit: also SAME >> https://www.acronymfinder.com/SAME.html

Potentially referencing one of the following:

  • Society of American Military Engineers (probably not but possible?)
  • SQL Ada Module Extensions (contextually makes the most sense to me for "embed" but still feels off with the context of Q)
  • Specific Area Message Encoding - highly plausible as this relates to emergency broadcast systems, which were embedded in multiple platforms.
1
Lupinate 1 point ago +1 / -0

Anyone notice how Q changed from 'who' to 'WHO' in the drop?

3
Lupinate 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ft Belvoir is basically my old backyard. It is smack bang among residential areas in NOVA, with all sorts of darpa stuff going on there. Was a black zone for cellphone signals for most of my life. It also is basically inside those busy flightpaths from Reagan.

Still think this is sketchy AF but we need more data

2
Lupinate 2 points ago +2 / -0

Fyi:

Starring Golden Globe-nominated actor Hugh Grant and based on a true story, "A Very English Scandal" tells the story of Jeremy Thorpe, a member of Parliament who, in 1979, was tried and later acquitted of conspiring to murder his ex-lover, Norman Scott. Beginning in the 1960s, Thorpe is the leader of the Liberal Party, the youngest head of a political party in 100 years. But he is hiding an affair with a man at a time when homosexuality is still illegal. When Scott threatens to reveal the affair, Thorpe decides upon a plan of action that eventually exposes the scandal and leads to a watershed moment in British social and political life, illuminating the level of dark secrets and cover-ups in the British establishment.

1
Lupinate 1 point ago +1 / -0

Everything in that bio screams at least ex cabal, if not obvious sleeper agent for them. I'm wondering if this bloke will last in this position for long, or if he will be used as a patsy to collapse Central banking globally.

1
Lupinate 1 point ago +1 / -0

The episcopalians need to round up these troublesome bishops and defrock them post haste. Clean up on aisle 3 ordered and demanded by God and his righteous followers.

1
Lupinate 1 point ago +1 / -0

Do you want the king of England as the head of the church?

1
Lupinate 1 point ago +1 / -0

This amendment is worded in a way that screams preparation for revealing the 2020 steal to everyone as real.

1
Lupinate 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm gonna guess it will be cia, cia, and cia respectively.

As for the order, a plan to release jfk in 15 days will appear, which I predict will be rejected due to it being an incomplete release, or on a time frame that exceeds the desired date that trump would expect.

That will then get a fire under the other two plans to be quicker as well, and we will probably get all 3 finalised in 45 days.

3
Lupinate 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm so confused now. Is he an ai like his waifu claims and the last msg pinned to his x profile says? Is he alive and dodged his own death?

What is real anymore frens? This movie has more twists than m night shaymalan in a tornado

4
Lupinate 4 points ago +4 / -0

Barron had a face of thunder during every shot I saw of him in the election. That boy looked ready to crack skulls

5
Lupinate 5 points ago +7 / -2

It certainly would infer such a conclusion.

3
Lupinate 3 points ago +3 / -0

A blanket pardon with zero investigations having been performed? This sounds like something that isn't just pre-emptive, but unprecedented. I wouldn't be surprised if the 2020 election has a formal investigation to invalidate Biden's Pardons, followed by all the targets being put back in the crosshairs.

6
Lupinate 6 points ago +6 / -0

For did that for nixon, just FYI.

That said a blanket pardon with no crimes mentioned? Odd that.

view more: Next ›