12
MacXimus 12 points ago +15 / -3

Who gets shot in the neck at point-blank range with a .40 caliber (9mm or 10mm if not) and doesn’t present massive carnage on film at time of shooting and following? The video shows NO exit “spew” from her body, let alone her neck…

6
MacXimus 6 points ago +6 / -0

Perhaps it’s a way of weeding the garden bed. “Promote” to a new position, his slot as senator that won’t be available again for years goes to Matt G and then you fire his ass. Same thing with Noem at DHS. Just a thought Frens!

3
MacXimus 3 points ago +3 / -0

Fake, phony, and false lol

1
MacXimus 1 point ago +1 / -0

.223 rounds have a lead core, yes. Every one of them I’ve ever shot or seen is fully jacketed. I’ve shot .223 through 1/4” steel plates at the range. Close range I confess. But a small round, jacketed, with a high velocity can penetrate steel. I guess it just depends on thickness etc etc.

5
MacXimus 5 points ago +6 / -1

No grinding. Click bait article.

4
MacXimus 4 points ago +4 / -0

You used up all the glueeeee…. On Purpose! Not a finger!

1
MacXimus 1 point ago +1 / -0

To be fair to OP, that is still theoretical science. Einstein never quite nailed down his theories on “why” gravity exists, but it does, and he nailed that down, and its measurable, testable, reproducible, and if you want to flex on gravity, gravity wins lol

7
MacXimus 7 points ago +7 / -0

The moon does rotate. It’s phase locked because the time it takes to rotate one time on its own axis is almost perfectly equivalent to the time it takes to orbit the earth one time.

3
MacXimus 3 points ago +3 / -0

Does anyone else think this dude could be Bill Hemmer’s Dad? So many spooks in the media

1
MacXimus 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sincere question: why did the section on the far right dislodge from its Landward side when it fell? It had its ow. Support column still intact. And it wasn’t dragged toward the rest of the bridge as it collapsed. It sheared off of the main structure (to be expected) and then the landward side (which is typically tied in with extreme hardware) sheared off as well…. But nowhere near the forces acting on the bridge. I built a few truss bridges (on a computer) and none of my failed attempts looked like that. I thought about electrical arcs too, but please explain that further Fren. I’d like to know more .

1
MacXimus 1 point ago +1 / -0

Joe has entered the chat. “Did someone say ‘shower?’”

4
MacXimus 4 points ago +5 / -1

Two years after 9/11 I went to college as a freshman in civil engineering and my first building class (statics) blew the 9/11 Commission Report into tiny pieces. It’s perfectly impossible that those buildings weren’t brought down intentionally.

1
MacXimus 1 point ago +1 / -0

No one wears cups; too much running. Most dudes protect the goods if they’re in the wall

1
MacXimus 1 point ago +3 / -2

I like every word, save “our final battle.” There is never a final battle. It goes on because this world is ruled by the fallen. 2024 is key though! I liken it to Patton’s North African campaign. And our enemy, like Rommel, is both cunning and capable, but disaffected and in awe of the volume that is the counterattack.

view more: Next ›