In a similar vein if you bring up on this board how people like Elon Musk and Howard Nutlick actually had vast more contact with Epstein and Maxwell, and actually did travel to the island despite their pre-file assertions that had little to no contact and never went to island everyone here goes into similar denial-mode. Interesting that....
The US government has betrayed the Kurdish people approximately 4 to 7 times over the last century, consistently leveraging Kurdish forces for strategic goals before abandoning them when political interests shifted. These incidents span from post-WWI diplomatic failures to recent military withdrawals in Syria, creating a pattern historians describe as "cynical enterprises" where Kurdish aspirations for statehood are sacrificed for regional stability or alliances with Turkey, Iran, and Iraq.
Post-WWI Diplomatic Abandonment (1920s): The US and Western powers initially backed the Treaty of Sèvres (1920), which envisaged a possible Kurdish state, but shifted support to the new Turkish Republic under the Treaty of Lausanne (1923). This reversal left Kurds stateless and divided among Turkey, Syria, Iraq, and Iran, marking the first major diplomatic betrayal.
Cold War Instrumentalism (1972–1975): The Nixon administration and Henry Kissinger armed Iraqi Kurds to pressure Baghdad and weaken Soviet influence, only to abruptly cut support after the 1975 Algiers Accord between Iran and Iraq. Kissinger famously stated that "covert action should not be confused with missionary work," leaving Kurds exposed to brutal Iraqi reprisals without humanitarian aid or asylum.
Gulf War and Post-2003 Limitations: In 1991, President George H.W. Bush urged Iraqis to rise up against Saddam Hussein, but the US allowed Iraqi forces to crush the Kurdish uprising before later imposing a no-fly zone. Decades later, despite close cooperation against ISIS, the US opposed the 2017 KRG independence referendum and failed to prevent Baghdad from retaking disputed territories like Kirkuk.
Syria Withdrawals (2019 and 2025–2026): The most recent betrayals occurred when President Trump withdrew troops in October 2019, clearing the way for a Turkish offensive against Syrian Kurdish allies (YPG/SDF). By January 2026, US envoy Tom Barrack pressured Kurds into a flawed integration agreement with the Syrian Transitional Government to appease former adversaries, forcing them to choose between "survival over illusion" as US credibility in the region eroded.
Well if this goes like just about everything else we can easily predict that every few days he is going to make a truth social post about the election fraud and how SOMEBODY SHOULD DO SOMETHING, while completely ignoring that he sits in the highest office in the land and we all elected him to be the man TO DO SOMETHING.
The United States, primarily through President Donald Trump, has claimed victory in the 2026 Iran war multiple times with contradictory statements made throughout the conflict. Trump declared "total" or "complete" victory on several occasions, including March 7, March 9, March 15, March 24, and April 8, despite ongoing Iranian military capabilities and attacks.
Conflicting Victory Claims:
On March 7, Trump stated, "We're winning the war by a lot," and later claimed on Truth Social that victory had already occurred. On March 9 and March 24, he falsely claimed the Iranian military had been destroyed and that the U.S. and Israel had "won" the war, even as Iran continued missile strikes. On April 8, Defense Secretary Hegseth described Operation Epic Fury as a "historic and overwhelming victory" and a "capital-V military victory." Despite these declarations, officials acknowledged that objectives were not fully met, as the Islamic Republic remains in power, the Strait of Hormuz remained closed by Iran for an extended period, and Iran retained control of its highly enriched uranium stocks. Critics and analysts have described these claims as false or premature, noting that Iran continued to launch attacks and reconstitute its military capabilities during ceasefire periods.
AwakenWithJP got you covered.
Meet Jared Kushner! (The New Jeffery Epstein) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A8dWuV0V86o
But there has already been an avalanche of testimony and evidence about the systematic use of sexual violence by Israel throughout the genocide - and indeed long before October 2023. It has taken all this time for such allegations to appear in the New York Times at all. And even now, they are not on the front page, but tucked away in the opinion section.
The article concerns the use of sexual violence by the United States’ key ally in the Middle East: a state armed to the teeth by Washington and given more US military aid than any other country on Earth. It plainly deserves vastly greater prominence. That it does not receive it tells you, yet again, everything about the value attached to Palestinian lives, wellbeing and suffering.
The piece notes that Israel has, in recent years, “built a security apparatus where sexual violence has become,” as a United Nations report put it last year, one of Israel’s “standard operating procedures” and “a major element in the ill treatment of Palestinians.”
It cites testimonies from Palestinians who say they were raped with rubber batons, metal rods and other objects, including carrots. They describe extreme pain, bleeding and fainting..
Others recount different forms of sexual abuse. One testimony describes a female guard squeezing a detainee’s penis and testicles until he screamed in agony.
They quote from the NGO Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor:
a 42-year-old woman who said she had been shackled naked to a metal table as Israeli soldiers forcibly had sex with her over two days while other soldiers filmed the attacks. Afterward, she said, she was shown photos of her being raped and told they would be published if she did not cooperate with Israeli intelligence.
The piece also documents the sexual abuse of children.
And it includes testimony about the use of dogs to rape Palestinian detainees. One Palestinian recalled:
“No one escaped sexual assaults,” he said. “Not all were raped, I would say, but everyone went through humiliating, filthy sexual assaults.” On one occasion, he said, the guards zip-tied his testicles and penis for hours while beating his genitals. For days afterward, he said, he urinated blood.
On one occasion, he said, he was held down, stripped naked, and as he was blindfolded and handcuffed, a dog was summoned. With encouragement from a handler in Hebrew, he said, the dog mounted him.”
“They were using cameras to take photos, and I heard their laughs and giggles,” he said. He tried to dislodge the dog, he said, but it penetrated him.
This builds on other such testimonies which I previously reported on.
Pro-Israel apologists are now flooding social media insisting that testimonies about dogs being used to rape Palestinians must be false because such acts are supposedly biologically impossible.
That is simply untrue.
There are Holocaust testimonies describing how the Nazi war criminal Klaus Barbie trained dogs to rape women.
In Augusto Pinochet’s Chile, a German shepherd dog named Volodia was trained to rape prisoners by Ingrid Olderock, a Chilean-German torture official known as “The Dog Lady”.
The Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Lawrence Wright has also written about evidence that Egypt’s Hosni Mubarak regime trained dogs to rape detainees.
There is already overwhelming evidence that Israel uses dogs to attack Palestinians. The Israeli army itself accepted responsibility in the case of Muhammad Bhar, a 24-year-old Palestinian man with Down’s syndrome who died after being attacked by an Israeli military dog.
There are, in addition, extensive testimonies from Palestinian detainees describing attacks by Israeli dogs.
We also know about the case of a Palestinian detainee allegedly gang raped by Israeli soldiers on camera - an incident that triggered pro-rape riots in support of the accused soldiers, attended by Israeli politicians. Reports at the time said footage was leaked by a senior Israeli military lawyer, who later resigned and reportedly attempted suicide.
All charges were dropped against the soldiers. They were transformed into national heroes. Netanyahu referred to them as “heroic warriors”.
It is also worth noting that the New York Times piece quotes Ehud Olmert, Israeli prime minister from 2006 to 2009 and a longtime former member of Netanyahu’s Likud party:
“Olmert told me he didn’t know much about sexual violence against Palestinians but was not surprised by the accounts I had heard.
“Do I believe it happens?” he asked. “Definitely.”
“There are war crimes committed every day in the territories,” he added.”
There is now overwhelming evidence that the Israeli state is systematically using sexual violence against Palestinians.
The silence surrounding these crimes once again underlines the extent to which Israel’s actions are whitewashed - and the extent to which Palestinian suffering is treated as though it simply does not matter.
He is also a registered Libertarian, and Thomas Massie is a libertarian Republican.
Does your curiosity about Israeli and AIPAC donations extend to his opponent in that primary Ed Gallrein or is that curiosity only limited to Massie?
"Pro-Israel groups and donors contributed approximately $9 million to support Ed Gallrein and oppose Thomas Massie in the 2026 Kentucky Republican primary. This funding was a decisive factor in the most expensive House primary in U.S. history. "
Also it's really easy to verify that by going to https://www.justice.gov/epstein/search and doing a search for "Donald Trump".
You can easily see there IS NOT 1819 entries in the Epstein files for "Donald Trump"
If you search for "Donald J. Trump" you can easily see there IS NOT 127 results.
If you search "Trump" you can obviously see that there IS NOT 5363 entries.
If you search "Mar-a-Lago" you will clearly see there IS NOT 617 results.
Finally if you search "Melania" you will see there IS NOT 124 results.
It's super easy to verify all this for yourselves. https://www.justice.gov/epstein/search
Thomas Massie is in the current release of files with 11 entries, all related to his efforts to release all the files and prosecute the perpetrators and coconspirators in the Epstein/Maxwell operation.
womp womp
Pro-Israel groups and AIPAC spent between $9 million and over $15.5 million in the 2026 Kentucky Republican primary, with varying totals depending on reporting sources and whether affiliated groups and donors are included.
AIPAC’s super PAC, United Democracy Project (UDP), spent between $2.6 million and $4.1 million, while the Republican Jewish Coalition Victory Fund spent approximately $3.9 million to $4.0 million, according to AdImpact and major news outlets. However, broader totals that include affiliated groups and donors show significantly higher spending:
Three pro-Israel-linked PACs together spent over $15.5 million, with UDP exceeding $4.1 million and the RJC Victory Fund around $3.9 million. MAGA KY, a pro-Trump super PAC heavily funded by pro-Israel billionaires like Paul Singer ($1 million) and Miriam Adelson ($750,000 via Preserve America PAC), spent $7.5 million, further amplifying pro-Israel financial influence. The New York Times and Politico reported that pro-Israel groups collectively spent more than $9 million, a figure widely cited in post-election analyses. Overall, outside spending in the race exceeded $32 million, making it the most expensive House primary in U.S. history, with pro-Israel interests playing a dominant role.
So are the ziocucks going to just keep spinning this as much as they possibly can for the next few weeks/months so we can deny our lying eyes?
Everyone knows what happened here and people are cope spinning with "UH BUT AKSHUALLY TERM LIMITS, so its ok", "UH BUT AKSHUALLY LIBERTARIANS SUCK, so its ok".
He got booted because he wasn't letting up on the Epstein files.
I mean they systematically rape and murder kids as part of their war doctrine so if they have the capability to nuke a few major cities they are definitely not going to hesitate if they feel like they have no other option.
It wasn't the decade long friendship with the serial rapists and pedophiles and very likely serial murderers and cannibals Jeffery Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, and then the subsequent shrugging at legally pursuing their coconspirators?
Because thats what I hear the most from liberals these days.