5
MaxdOut 5 points ago +5 / -0

Without an honest DOJ, this ain't going nowhere.

1
MaxdOut 1 point ago +1 / -0

You are not getting it or are evading addressing my response. I acknowledge much of what you are saying but I'm talking specifically about Richards, which is who you suggested is involved in all of this.

2
MaxdOut 2 points ago +2 / -0

The prosecution's charter is to expose the truth not winning the case. These idiots were only interested in making a name for themselves, and that they did. Unfortunately some liberal will reward them for their efforts. God wins. God's judgement.

2
MaxdOut 2 points ago +2 / -0

I did. All glory to God. We must always trust His will whether we understand it or not, whether we like it or not. It's His plan not ours. Praise God from whom all blessings flow.

2
MaxdOut 2 points ago +2 / -0

What ever happens we must joyfully accept God's will be done on earth as in heaven. It could have gone the other way. Would we have then accepted it as God's will? It's not over yet. Watch how God may plan to next use this "good" news for his will.

1
MaxdOut 1 point ago +1 / -0

Provide the sauce otherwise you are speculating. And, you don't know what I know or don't know about Racine. Seems you are some sort of mind reader.

1
MaxdOut 1 point ago +1 / -0

My point is that if they feel unsure that a person isn't is guilty they must acquit.

1
MaxdOut 1 point ago +1 / -0

Beyond reasonable doubt only applies to guilty verdicts.

1
MaxdOut 1 point ago +1 / -0

It worked for Jessie through operation push for years.

1
MaxdOut 1 point ago +1 / -0

What was the motive to kill walker? Everything I saw indicated he lost control of the car due an arduous dip in the road and high rate of speed, immediately following a turn.

1
MaxdOut 1 point ago +1 / -0

Technically he doesn't own it because his friend purchased it(with KR's money) and until KR turned 18 it wasn't able to be transferred to him.

1
MaxdOut 1 point ago +1 / -0

How about: "Richards’ covered up extreme crimes including child sex crimes committed by billionaire elites." And, You can't use examples where he may have been the defense attorney.

1
MaxdOut 1 point ago +1 / -0

Justice isn't always served through official channels.

1
MaxdOut 1 point ago +1 / -0

Waiting may expose more of the sympathizers, but what consequence will they face in this world anyway.

2
MaxdOut 2 points ago +2 / -0

So now we are funding DARPA to provide position papers in support of the DS agenda. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency...yeah right. Doesn't anyone ever take a stand and just call BullShit?

4
MaxdOut 4 points ago +4 / -0

As the story goes KR gave him the money to buy the rifle, but KR never takes possession because he knew he had to wait until 18 to transfer ownership. Gun remains in WI under control of WI resident. Rifle is "loaned out" to KR the day of the riots. Nothing illegal in loaning a WI owned rifle to an Illinois resident "in" WI. At 17, KR was in within the law to carry a long gun, either rifle or shotgun. And then used that gun to defend himself. Judge throws out illegal possession charge prior to Jury going into deliberations. Now they must decide if this individual (KR) who is in legal possession of a borrowed rifle within his right to self defense from his attackers. Let's hope the constitution is defended as well as KR was.

2
MaxdOut 2 points ago +2 / -0

Her only defense will be that quail didn't know how to spell potato.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›