Love ya fren. 9/10 folks would have told me to fuck off.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_heads_of_the_Chicago_Police_Department
Looks like it might be fake? Any source beyond the Twitter account?
I see this engagement farming technique being utilized a lot now. Basically they create a fake story and get some engagement because people smash the "like" button because the story makes them happy, but it never actually occurred.
I recommend blocking any account you see engaging in this.
So the obvious difference here is he adds the initial "H" for Hussein to his later, Truth post, and also adds whitespace around it.
Original: 1200x630 pixels
New: 1257x817 pixels
If you search Hussein in the Q drops it really firmly indicates Iran linkages. But it could also be related to Wendy, Haiti, Harvard funding, Clinton Foundation, the "spray" video, college records, Awan IT spying, Obama library, etc.
It just goes on and on with this guy. The lack of accountability feels neverending.
I have no clue how well this will embed here, but this is the json:
https://files.catbox.moe/a0p22t.json
{ "result": { "entity_set": { "hashtags": [], "smarttags": [], "symbols": [], "urls": [], "user_mentions": [] }, "id": "Tm90ZVR3ZWV0OjIwNjkwNzEyNTQ3NjY3MzUzNjE=", "text": "︎︎White House will be Q posting today…\n\n︎\n\n︎\n\n︎\n\n︎\n︎\n\n︎\n\n︎\n\n︎\n\n︎\n\n︎\n\n︎\n\n︎\n\n︎\n\n︎\n\n︎\n\n︎\n\n︎\n\n︎\n\n︎\n\n︎\n\n︎\n︎\n\n︎\n︎\n\n︎ ︎\n︎\n\n︎\n\n︎\n\n︎\n\n︎\n\n︎\n\n︎\n︎\n\n︎\n\n︎\n\n︎\n\n︎\n\n︎\n\n︎\n\n︎\n\n︎\n︎\n\n︎\n\n︎\n\n︎\n\n︎\n\n︎\n︎\n\n︎\n\n︎\n\n︎\n\n︎\n\n︎\n\n︎\n\n︎\n\n︎\n︎\n\n︎\n\n︎\n\n︎\n\n︎\n\n︎\n\n︎\n\n︎\n\n︎\n\n︎\nAnd by Q we mean Quantum. Stay tuned 👀" } }
Staggering the action also has the effect of spreading the pressure around. Don't put the weight of all this on a single patriot's back. Give them each a moderate role and make the cabal spread their firepower broadly.
https://greensdictofslang.com/entry/eaw7fwy
Probably the most neutral source I've found that documents the hostile intent of the term.
Arguably there are quite a few related to this appointment. That's why I included the basic timestamp/date posts and Pulte was even doing stuff like drawing Q's on top of the Computershare DRS circle and now he's DNI.
I think we've gone away from "proofs" and for many of the populace it's just assumed Trump is associated with Q given how often he and staff flash Q symbology.
Some folks notice it but the general public remains oblivious until instructed to look for it by legacy media.
Self correction: the first posts appear gone from Twitter's internal data but are here on archive.org:
https://web.archive.org/web/20210505191644/https://twitter.com/ilsharko
It looks like Brick Suit may have been one of the first to really endorse it:
I had never gone and tracked the first @papitrumpo posts (it's a huge pain to do so in Twitter), but apparently this was the first post (correct me if I'm wrong):
https://x.com/PapiTrumpo/status/1389597638916509702
It looks like early on there were many competing accounts, but major conservative players on Twitter naturally gravitated towards, or were instructed to follow this one and it got massive followers very quickly.
The easiest way to view these early posts is by querying X like so:
from:PapiTrumpo since:2021-01-01 until:2021-05-05
There may be a bit of a clue for the account's creation a year earlier, where it mentions AI tooling being created to counter anons, and that support would be provided through "undisclosed methods".
This whole dig was prompted by AI conversation where I tried to query it on the likelihood of @papitrumpo being under Trump's control in some manner and to their credit, if you feed it the facts of the situation it agrees that is the case (whereas if it queries "the news" it will give a retarded response).
It just endlessly amuses me that Trump has had this account hiding in plain sight for over 5 years now and while many patriots kinda know it's his, zero NPCs know or can even comprehend it, that it somehow escaped Twitter's "control" (indicating they had none or were beyond inept), and that despite the wealth of "hot" takes on it that could be considered political liabilities, none of the legacy media is interested in reporting on it.
Like, how is that not a home run, fun story? "Inside Scoop on the 'secret' account Trump used while being officially banned from Twitter." Are journalists inherently boring, unimaginative, incurious people?
See the thing is though, it's not really "allegedly" at all because no one has alleged it. It's just unattributed, made up engagement spam, masquerading as news.
Recognize the pattern.
🚨 at the top
ALL CAPS SUMMARY
No source/video/evidence at all of the stated claims.
Prompt to follow/share/spam at the end.
It discredits the site to share stuff like this.
Yeah there is no way there are only 350k floating around.