4
Murphy71 4 points ago +4 / -0

Almost identical announcement made by Police Scotland this month.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-68501949

Wonder how many more of these announcements are being made around the West? Seems like it’s open season for would-be tyrants and criminals. While the police are too busy with hate crime, mean tweets and rainbows.

2
Murphy71 2 points ago +2 / -0

I gave 3 examples. However, my conclusions about this man are not just specific to a few examples of conduct or character. Rather, a distillation of years of observing and challenging my views via awareness and skepticism, while following his trajectory. Why do our opinions of anyone change or stay the same? Partly them, partly us, partly the world at large. I now believe this is a seductive, manipulative and deeply compromised individual who put the dark in Intellectual Dark Web.

Hero worship should be kept in check. It is healthy to actively seek out critiques of those to whom we temporarily give our trust, hope, faith, intellect or money .Try it. Check out some of his detractors. I hear Vox Day’s Jordanetics or the documentary Jordan Peterson Dismantled are good starting points. I haven’t read or watched these yet, I have mostly come to my views by watching the man himself.

2
Murphy71 2 points ago +2 / -0

Myocarditis and jabbing children. That’s all he’s got? Wake me up when he interviews his fellow countryman Denis Rancourt, the author of the “17 million killed” worldwide study. Or when he says sorry for joining the pile on to shame refuseniks and promote “just get the bloody jab” forced injections on the people he says didn’t need it. Or when he renounces his spinelessness for folding like a broken deck chair in the face of blatant emergent totalitarianism at the same time as having written the preface to an abridged reprint of the anti-totalitarianism magnum opus, Gulag Archipelago.

This man is about as duplicitous, hypocritical, shallow, corrupt and dark triad as it is possible to be, in my opinion. He’s a typical head doctor - more fucked up than the patients. However, he did bolster my critical thinking. I spent years as a paid up fan boy consuming his output, buying his books, seeing him live, hanging on almost every word. When he revealed his true colours over time, and I realised I had to reconsider my deferential position, it reassured me of my own discernment and ability to change my views as the facts on the ground changed.

1
Murphy71 1 point ago +1 / -0

The biggest insult in all of this is that these megalomaniac psycho globohomos are just reheated new age occultist woke dipshits with serious psych issues. If they were actually just evil, bad humans as opposed to broken, diseased souls with delusional God complexes, with their chakras and Ouija boards and repressed homosexuality and gematria and wacky Crowley secret society red bracelet ritualistic perverted fantasy wackiness, it wouldn’t add so much insult to injury. Like finding out the school bully dresses up as Barbie on weekends.

1
Murphy71 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hm… I see what you mean. It was his refutations of the “reputable” (my descriptor) studies (some cited by Kirsch, others by him) that I considered evidence, which he considers solid. Not the studies themselves, more his informed rebuttals of those studies’ claims as someone with knowledge of the subject matter. Having a strong counter argument that exposes flaws, errors, omissions etc while referencing supporting materials to bolster a thesis is evidence-adjacent, at the very least, and certainly constructive cas- building.

The links he specifically critiques, though, a mix of articles, reports, journals, and studies, seem relevant to his thesis, even if not directly supporting it, since it is only his critiques that reveal his thesis, which is not to say such materials don’t exist elsewhere::

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1600-0447.2004.00504.x

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2884225/pdf/nihms200656.pdf

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/%28SICI%291099-1557%28199707%296%3A4%3C235%3A%3AAID-PDS293%3E3.0.CO%3B2-3

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC167189/pdf/20010900s00008p339.pdf

https://www.columbine-guide.com/columbine-autopsies-harris-klebold

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/106002809302701207

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/036477227790056X

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8807660/

https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2007/021519s000_MedR.pdf

Fact is, Kirsch is deserving of some scrutiny right now, difficult though that may be to accept. He has huge influence, that carries responsibility.

https://open.substack.com/pub/lagatapolitica/p/steve-kirsch-the-king-of-digital?r=pezuu&utm_medium=ios

https://open.substack.com/pub/charleswright1/p/followup-to-la-gata-politica-on-steve?r=pezuu&utm_medium=ios

https://open.substack.com/pub/charleswright1/p/as-covid-vaccine-administrations?r=pezuu&utm_medium=ios

2
Murphy71 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don’t know how much he has shared with Kirsch directly as he does seem mostly to be denigrating the existing pro-studies cited by Kirsch (he may also be keeping his powder dry), but he has also evidently done his own digging… He cites a dozen or so in this article and proceeds to point out their flaws, errors or where they support his thesis, adding his own commentary as well as that of other observers.

https://open.substack.com/pub/anthonycolpo/p/the-great-ssri-scam-how-taking-anti-depressant-drugs-can-kill-you-part-2?r=pezuu&utm_medium=ios

Dude has a beef with SSRIs for sure (I have to concur based on what I have seen happen to people in my own life) and Fluvoxamine in particular, and any association with treating Covid-19 especially. I agree with what I think is your wider point, though: that he has to debate Kirsch to explain or at least present his receipts.

I do think this is an important inflection point for Kirsch. And I am very much a fan boy. He has been called out for alleged Remdesevir shilling, the depop/eugenics “themed” article from years ago, and now his support for another possibly demonstrably harmful pharma product. Possibly all part of an engineered smear campaign, of which our aggrieved Substacker is part. If you are going to put your neck above the parapet, expect to be a target, from friendly fire as well as enemies, I guess.

4
Murphy71 4 points ago +4 / -0

Oh, I would expect Steve will respond publicly - his followers (myself as a paid subscriber included) are demanding it.

Adjusted timeline:

Steve: “Fluvoxamine is awesome. Show me evidence to prove me wrong and I will pay you $25k.”

Dude: “Here is evidence of harms and deaths from reputable studies that I consider solid. Where’s my cash?” Steve: “Not so fast. You have to debate me publicly.”

Dude: “A debate wasn’t included in the original wager. You’re obfuscating. I will meme you.”

4
Murphy71 4 points ago +4 / -0

Or… Steve puts out $25k challenge: show evidence a pharma product is harmful in return for $25k. Dude provides solid evidence, claims his $25k. Steve makes it about a debate, hand-waving the evidence. Dude is pissed and makes memes.

2
Murphy71 2 points ago +2 / -0

The ineptitude of this Scottish Power looks genius-level when you compare it to the ineptitude of the other Scottish power, the globohomo psychopathic clowns masquerading as functioning sapiens “in charge”…

16
Murphy71 16 points ago +16 / -0

So true. My head and ears are literally permanently ringing I am so damn alarmed… I’m like a human klaxon-megafone-siren over here…

10
Murphy71 10 points ago +10 / -0

Rapists, pedos, genocidal megalomaniacs, eugenicists… What’s that pop-psychology stuff about we are the sum of who we hang around?

5
Murphy71 5 points ago +5 / -0

My sentiments exactly. And to those who just took the shots to get along, get back their freedoms, go on holiday, get into nightclubs, buy groceries, send kids to school, move around… You are a fucking disgrace, you are not part of the solution, and your mindless compliance and cowardice is a clear and present danger to me and my family’s future. And I count almost everyone I have ever known, befriended, loved, lived with, been related to, worked with or lived close to in this assessment.

1
Murphy71 1 point ago +1 / -0

Capitalism, Crony Capitalism, Communism, Socialism… These are not only outdated once-popular neologisms, they’re meaningless in our era. Word play of old to obscure, divide and ultimately rule.

Globohomo is fond of Stakeholder Capitalism. Paytriots (sic) use Corporatism. Libtards and Leftists will say Neo-Fascism or even Nazism with a straight face and zero self-awareness.

These and all the others are shades of the one -ism to rule them all, which has always been with us. It’s only now getting its full, spectacular, global finale after centuries of auditioning at the level of nations.

Totalitarianism. (Some may say Satanism - I would consider that a synonym)

3
Murphy71 3 points ago +3 / -0

Not difficult to deduce. Such flagrantly destructive policies in plain sight by illegitimate regimes over time are not the actions of benign benefactors. These are the actions of an enemy, and since it is within and at the top, it’s a treasonous coup - institutional capture, infiltration, invasion. The Long March and 1000 cuts writ large…

The unfinished movie A Gray State was likely a fairly accurate prediction of the fascism coming to the US. Which itself is a story repeated throughout modern history in many other countries. Yamamoto’s alleged “behind every blade of grass” axiom will be put to the test: under cover of martial law by law enforcement and military regime loyalists using multinational foot soldiers from imported hordes, blamed on false flag “foreign and domestic enemies”.

10
Murphy71 10 points ago +10 / -0

Certainly describes medics I have known. I went to a university with a large medical training facility so I knew and befriended several for many years until they all showed their true colours in recent years, exactly as you imply…

1
Murphy71 1 point ago +1 / -0

I wouldn’t get too excited. This shitstick is about as globohomo commie “useless eliter” as it gets. Ex DG of the BBC says it all.

1
Murphy71 1 point ago +1 / -0

Good measured response. Thank you. I just came from a Telegram chat positing the polar opposite. There are characters there, many are substackers, who are also pushing all kinds of no virus / no pathogens / no contagion narratives, as well as anti-supplement content. Some of it is compelling and measured, and of course some is slightly shrill and unhinged.

This has a list of who’s who and what’s what in that particular echo chamber - https://open.substack.com/pub/dpl003/p/supplements-medicine-and-food-the?r=pezuu&utm_medium=ios - which only serves to reinforce the need for continued discernment, research, corroboration and keeping an open mind (but not so much that one’s brain falls to the floor…)

3
Murphy71 3 points ago +3 / -0

Both are perfectly plausible. There is enough noise around 5G, EMFs and assorted toxic wave frequencies being potential triggers. Conversely, the notion of toxic by design, and built-in variability of responses from the inherent unpredictability of experimental mad scientist Frankenstein tech being injected into billions, to enable plausible deniability, may also be a play.

I’m inclined to think Total Asymmetric War. The psychogenic response from lockdown isolation, 24/7 fearmongering, relentless amped up gaslighting about cases and deaths, the visual impact of seeing face masks everywhere, solemnity from public figures, hyping the contagion risk, people stressing each other out with their anxieties, the restrictions on antibiotics, the hospital protocols, the knock-on decline of health and lifestyle, and all the other psyop narratives warfare deployed, also maimed and killed normies in their millions.

The global spikes in all cause mortality stats seem real, and can’t all be credited to a single vector. In much the same way the biggest killers in conventional war aren’t just bombs and bullets, but also the impact of hunger, stress, poor health, lack of treatment, inadequate sanitation and drinking water, combat injuries and disease.

4
Murphy71 4 points ago +4 / -0

Brutal… but grounded in truth. We have to live in the world that is, not that the one we imagine.

view more: Next ›