But here's the truth:
https://greatawakening.win/p/16aTCUn8Kc/peter-mccullough-md-the-myocardi/c/
Myocarditis from the jab is MUCH worse than mycoarditis from COVID, per Dr. Peter McCullough.
I wonder what, if anything, those damn boots really signify and whether the wearer eventually goes to prison, or avoids prison by cooperating with somebody, or whether it's something else entirely, like the Cabal just funnin' us. Let's go, dang it!
Nice analysis, Tewdryg. I agree that Clements' opinion gives the whole story even more credibility -- and after listening to the actual testimony the other day, I find it pretty damn credible -- plus, how hard is it to believe a drug cartel is bribing officials to advance its business? I mean, that never happens, right? /s.
But yes, we need to stay alert for possible subterfuge.
Trust, but verify.
I just checked the Dictionary app in my copy of MacOS; the file is dated Feb 6 2022:
gen·der | ˈjendər | noun 1 either of the two sexes (male and female), especially when considered with reference to social and cultural differences rather than biological ones. The term is also used more broadly to denote a range of identities that do not correspond to established ideas of male and female: a condition that affects people of both genders | someone of the opposite gender | everyone always asks which gender I identify as. • members of a particular gender considered as a group: social interaction between the genders | encouraging women and girls to join fields traditionally dominated by the male gender. • the fact or condition of belonging to or identifying with a particular gender: video ads will target users based only on age and gender | traditional concepts of gender | I'm a strong believer that gender is fluid.
And remember to “Love your enemies”!
Yes!
A loving connection with others is a fundamental human need, and that truth undergirds Jesus' entire ministry.
That doesn't mean we shouldn't oppose evil with as much energy and (if need be) force as necessary; it means we are literally all one family and must remain in touch with that even when others are misguided or worse.
Jesus specifically said that if you love others, you ARE His disciple. John 13:35 is a simple and direct statement; nothing else is required than having "love one to another."
Argue with that definition of "Christian" if you like, but understand who you are arguing with.
All proper behavior flows from love -- protection of children, fair dealing in the marketplace, not bearing false witness, fidelity in marriage, and so on. Laws and rules can push people to do the right thing -- sometimes -- but only love automatically and reliably guides our behavior properly.
The quotation as given in the King James version:
John: 13:34 A new commandment I give unto you, That ye love one another; as I have loved you, that ye also love one another.
13:35 By this shall all men know that ye are my disciples, if ye have love one to another.
Here's hoping the great reset of actual civilization actually takes place, and soon, and your sensible and healthy "extremism" doesn't ever become hazardous.
That sounds Pollyanna-ish to me but there's enough evidence of the Great Awakening having a real and international effect that I do feel hopeful. Beats being depressed, for certain!
Nice talking with you, MrsCal. Gotta shut the system down now, but I'll be visiting your comments & posts pages.
They assigned you a thesis topic about Marxist theory? And expected / required you to write about it as if Marxism was something other than a toxic siren song for tyranny?
Good for you for coming back at them with the truth, MrsCal. Brave, sane, intelligent, and truthful -- a very positive combination!
Thanks for reminding me of The Peter Principle; like you, I read it a long time ago, and you're right: We've reached the point where shocking incompetence is everywhere. And you're also right that many of those people have power over others.
The older I get, the more I agree with Thoreau and JRR Tolkien: it is POWER, the unfettered use of coercion against other human beings, that is the great danger in the world. Wielding Power over others is hellishly addicting. Power brings out the worst in people. It is tailor made for corruption, and for vile behavior of every type.
I understand your viewpoint and used to have the same opinion myself. But the harm caused by coercively imposing the opinions of non-elected regulators (or even if they were elected) far outweighs any good it does, as we've seen vividly of late in regards the deadly COVID protocols, damaging lockdowns and other COVID theater, and the bioweapon "vaccines."
Back in the '80s, Durk Pearson and Sandy Shaw, in Life Extension: A Practical Scientific Approach, argued that the FDA be limited to providing information so that people could make their own choices. NO COERCION. Freedom, in other words.
The FDA outlawed Stevia for years, starting soon after Monsanto came up with Aspartame -- without the FDA's action, aspartame would have had a very hard time taking over the non-sugar sweetener market because Stevia has been used by humans for centuries, is known to be very safe, and was already used in some zero-cal soft drinks and other products. FDA banned stevia so Monsanto could make $billions, not for any health concern.
That's one of the more benign stories about FDA action.
Problems of corruption and harm are seen in EVERY U.S. regulatory agency going back to the very first one in 1887.
From a 2009 investigative story about Obamacare:
"When Congress created the first U.S. regulatory agency, the Interstate Commerce Commission, in 1887, the railroad barons it was meant to subdue quickly recognized an opportunity. 'It satisfies the popular clamor for a government supervision of railroads at the same time that that supervision is almost entirely nominal,' observed the railroad lawyer Richard Olney. 'Further, the older such a commission gets to be, the more inclined it will be found to take the business and railroad view of things. It thus becomes a sort of barrier between the railroad corporations and the people and a sort of protection against hasty and crude legislation hostile to railroad interests.'"
[Moving into the present, and returning to the topic of Obamacare, Mitchell continues]:
". . . The Democratic deal for the drug companies is, if anything, even sweeter than the Democratic deal for the insurance companies." (from Understanding Obamacare by Luke Mitchell, Harper's Magazine) -- Link no longer active.
Seriously? You think the FDA is controlled by the People? For decades, the FDA has been the single largest cause of death for American citizens. And EVERY federal regulatory agency is "captured" -- controlled for the benefit of special interests, NOT "the People."
Long term, there IS no stopping the dynamic of government agencies becoming used for special interests and against the People. That's why "that government is best, which governs least." Or, as Thoreau put it in Civil Disobedience: "That government is best, which governs not at all." Civil society, not coercive government.
TLDR: The FED is a massive, legalized counterfeiting organization designed to suck most of the wealth from Americans so that those who own and/or control the FED become even richer, and to provide funding for the Deep State's programs, including especially war and noose-tightening regulations and "progressive" programs aimed at weakening, restraining, and impoverishing the general population.
The FED was established in 1913, when bread was 5 cents a loaf, and a $20 bill could be exchanged for a one-ounce gold coin (such as the Gold Eagle). Gold is now $1811.20 / oz as I write this (although try buying a Gold Eagle, or any other one-oz gold coin, for that price) and bread costs -- well, whatever they're charging today at your local store.
"Reducing carbon emissions" is BS, but reducing the staggering number of wasted plastic bags accumulating in the environment is not a bad idea. Also, plastic bags aren't free; the store has to pay for them. I certainly wouldn't boycott any business for charging (even a high-margin price like 10 cents / bag) for plastic bags.
Not to mention Glyphosate -- Monsanto's Roundup -- and traces of tens of thousands of artificial chemicals that exist in various concentrations in our food, air, and water.
Modest estimates have suggested that we are exposed to more than 700,000 different toxic chemicals on a daily basis, and this doesn’t include the crazy poisons that GMO companies are pumping into the food supply. According to Global Healing Center, it isn’t abnormal to be exposed to 2,100,000 toxins each and every day.
Even research from the University of California shows how the average person is being exposed to cancerous levels of toxins like arsenic, dioxins, and DDE. These toxins aren’t only made available to our body, organs, blood, and cells when we eat and drink them, but also when we breathe them or simply come in contact with them. ~ https://nervedoctor.info/daily-toxin-intake-how-many-toxins-are-you-accumulating/
"Climate change" is a malicious fantasy created to help usher in global tyranny while vacuuming trillions of dollars from US to THEM. The real environmental problem is toxic (including radioactive) pollution everywhere, building up in the land, sea, air, and in our bodies.
I'd never given any thought to the Pew Charitable Trust before - although I'd heard the name - but apparently they're just another cog in the Tyranny machine:
Although the Executive Director is Shane Hamlin, he’s just a figurehead. Hamlin was just a kid some 13 years ago when recruited to work on Pew Charitable Trust’s “Voter Modernization Project”, which was ERIC. He’s been under Becker’s thumb ever since. Don’t feel sorry for Hamlin. He aligned himself with a known scumbag, even back then.
And all of us here know -- their being "wrong" wasn't about incompetence or stupidity, but rather a carefully considered part of an evil Plan -- to push the jab on nearly every person on Earth while also destroying the last remnants of liberty on the planet, particularly in the one nation founded specifically to protect and foster liberty -- consolidating power in the hands of those who have already stolen most of the planet's wealth and who, using that wealth, have corrupted most of the Establishment to do their bidding, manipulating them by propaganda, by coercion, by bribery, by blackmail, or by other means.
"They" aren't just inept clowns. "They" are the Renfields and Jezebels of tyrants and psychopaths.
That's what I hear. Just waiting for it to happen . . .