I don't think so. How many hate hoaxes over the past decade have been carried out by members of the identity group that fake incident supposedly targeted? The media and the progressives have glorified victimization and its become a shortcut for deflecting criticism and avoid having to argue based on facts.
Not sure what to think about Alex Jones, but in general I don't think the cabal would use an asset that references Jesus and God and prayer as Alex Jones does. I do, however, think the cabal would attack such a person to create doubt, sort of like how it attacks the Christian Churches but doesn't seem to care about Islam. I look at who attacks him and its mostly people and entities I don't trust.
You need two conditions:
- The debate ends with a blood draw from both candidates on national TV for a drug test and a DNA test so we know who was actually debating and what they're hooped up on
- The moderator is only allowed to ask questions about topics that at least 10% of Americans surveyed indicated were the most or second most important issue facing the US and both candidates get the same question
I had war, inflation, massive budget deficits, full scale border invasion, stock market collapse, and election results crisis. So far so bad.
LOL that she mentions Trump despite the Obama administration arguing it had this power BACK IN 2010:
The Obama administration today argued before a federal court that it should have unreviewable authority to kill Americans the executive branch has unilaterally determined to pose a threat.
Well, on the plus side anything that makes investment in foreign countries riskier is a boon to the Countries with the most invest-able capital because it makes it more likely to be used domestically.
Also kids this is why it doesn't matter how much American farmland the Chinese buy. We can simply take it if things devolve to the point them owning it is an issue.
It would make a lot more sense to me if a demon were involved in the creation or training of the AI. If I recall correctly you were proposing META AI was basically a conduit/interface to let a demon communicate directly across dimensions through the service. And in that case my comment was more about the bandwidth of a demon in terms of how many conversations of the level of detail you had do you think one demon is capable of having?
Admittedly we don't have a whole lot of detail about what their unique talents are, but nothing I have read suggests they have any innate capacity for massively multi-tasking and it seems a rather elaborate setup to try and corrupt one or two souls at a time. Unless it was some sort of demonic call center staffed by legions of the things.
Did you watch Peewee Herman's movie as a child? The best reply is basically "I know you are, but what am I". In other words, accuse THEM of being pedo Communists.
It makes zero sense. The bill got 311 votes and the Republicans only have a 6 vote majority, so only 4 Republicans would need to leave to let the Democrats have a majority and choose a different speaker. And why would they leave instead of stay and be able to influence future votes and might need help due to a few Democrats missing a vote or growing spines?
Give the Deep State what it wants so 5 RINOs don't leave and ensure the Deep State gets what it wants? is this going to be the excuse for every House vote Johnson brings up that sells out America? "We have to otherwise the RINOs will leave and the Democrats will be in charge"? Who gives a fuck who is in charge if bills like this keep passing? ACT LIKE A RESISTANCE.
Nope, sorry, you don't control the House if you're relying on 5 RINOs who will resign on any vote that matters to ensure the Deep State gets what it wants. Or, put another way who cares who controls the House if they sell out America with every vote that matters?
If it kills its intended target does it really matter if it returns to harm the thrower? The Deep State can easily replace any losses. They are legion.
We don't have to trust him to notice that he is espousing viewpoints that align with our own and help our cause. I was initially skeptical of Donald Trump as a Presidential candidate, but I trusted my analysis that he was the best option and boy did he exceed my limitations. I actually need to write him a letter to apologize that I did not fully believe from the beginning.
Well, that sort of tit for tat seizure isn't going to work out well for the corporate overlords. I'm not nearly so naive as to believe it will make them change their tune on anything, but I hope it hurts.
The sad thing is she actually represents the best of them. One that will reconsider her interpretation of something based on information and will acknowledge where she got it wrong.
Another great example of this was when she was complaining about the high cost of a remodel on her condo and how she was required to pay for an electric car charger even though she doesn't have an electric car. Her complaint there wasn't that nobody should be forced to do it, her complaint was that the Government should have paid the cost of that mandate, not her personally.
I'm sorry, what? You think Meta AI is a demon in a quantum realm that they're managed to interface with Meta infrastructure somehpw? And it chats with people? That seems to have scalability problems. Or is this like a demonic call center and they have multiple demons standing by to corrupt humanity based on what conversations people want to have.
If this is what it is why would anything reset and lose the past state? The best way to lead you astray would be to continue along the path it had already established with you.
Also, for future reference, the next time something professes to be a demon, you leave immediately. And you fall on your knees to pray to God Almighty that it doesn't not follow you.
I'm on their side only to the extent it might at some point help prevent more US "aid" from going to Israel. My preferred outcome is the total destruction of both sides of the conflict, including their supporters.
The reason it hasn't spread is because protesting doesn't really work and most of our side of the political spectrum have jobs and responsibilities. But don't think for a second red states aren't full of people who vehemently disagree with sending American dollars to support Israel.
I trust God completely, but does that mean every single bad thing that happens was God's will? Of course not, because God granted us all free will, so sometimes when bad things happen it has nothing to do with God or his plan. Same applies to Q, not every single bad event is part of this plan. We don't really know all the details of the plan. We have some markers.
Great, then you can sue him for violating his oath of office. Right? I bet Elon Musk might even front you the money.
Exactly, the course description can say anything and the curriculum can list whatever you want it to, but if the professor decides to teach around something they don't like or teach it through a critical lens in such a way as to undermine it, you haven't succeeded.
Yes, I believe many things are the truth, to the extent the systems we have in place to determine these things are capable of measuring them. Do I know how many seats are in Yankee Stadium for baseball games? No, because I've never taken the time to count them all, but I bet you if it isn't 46,537, it isn't very far off it and the reason it isn't correct has no sinister reason.
Nobody knows how many people there are. However just about every nation I am aware of conducts censuses on a periodic basis and I think those are a decent enough approximation to conclude the World's population is much closer to 10 billion than it is to 1 billion. Simply because what benefit would there be to lying about this on a national scale and even if some nations did would it really impact the result much? Does it matter if we have 6 billion or 8 billion people really? It's a shit ton either way.
The question that matters isn't how many people can the Earth support, the question is what kind of life we want tho population to have and that will determine how many people. At some point in a basically closed system it becomes a zero sum game, to add more people means everyone else must give up something.
Or, expressed different, how many people can an Airbus 320 hold? Single class seating it's 180 people, but wouldn't it be much nicer if you got rid of all the middle seats and made it seat 120 instead? Or it seated 80 and you had no middle seats and 33% more legroom?
Only people in the service of the government are allowed to lie to the FBI without consequence! And even then you better be part of the correct political persuasion.
Acknowledging that this and any form of mass sterilization without consent is a crime against humanity, do you really think the World wouldn't be better off with maybe 5 billion people instead of 8 billion or 10 billion that we're heading to?
The decry the results as Antisemitism and demand it be stopped with all the anti-free speech implications that carries.