1
Pepe-le-Queue 1 point ago +1 / -0

This brings up something that festers in the back of my mind. Why are "frens" or "patriots" psychologically coaxed into referring to it as "Q" and "normies" or "lefies" ALWAYS refer to it as QAnon? I mean, like, ALWAYS? What better way for someone, or something, to keep track of who thinks what? Of what artificially created side of the fence someone is on? And what of the curious similarities of the Cicada 3301 puzzle to the syntax and phrasing used by Que (fuck you, algorithm! I'll call it a third thing!) Not saying this isn't full of propoganda, but this at least is one article that ties the two psyops together: https://heavy.com/news/thomas-schoenberger-qanon/

1
Pepe-le-Queue 1 point ago +1 / -0

The question is not whether or not Q is a psyop. It most definitely is. The key important question for us (We the People of the Republic of these United States) is: is Q one of us, and working in our favor, or, is Q part of the same deep state cabal that is against us? The one case, and please prove me wrong, in which all of these points of evidence for the legitamacy of Q become moot, is if Q is simply a cabal psyop, and has game-planned out all the possible scenarios, and that all the seeming prediction is created by immense control (Q even says as much at one point). That white hats and black hats are just two faces of the Janus that is the deep state... or whatever is behind it. I do not know of any method that can determine it one way or another conclusively.

1
Pepe-le-Queue 1 point ago +1 / -0

Don't exalt them by capitlizing the z n zionists.... why do YOU do that by the way? Subconscious reverence? 🤔 (I'm teasing you!)

1
Pepe-le-Queue 1 point ago +1 / -0

Also, what about Q? Why are "frens" or "patriots" psychologically coaxed into referring to it as "Q" and "normies" or "lefies" ALWAYS refer to it ad QAnon? I mean, like, ALWAYS? What better way for someone, or something, to keep track of who thinks what? Of what artificially created side of the fence someone is on? And what of the curious similarities of the Cicada 3301 puzzle to the syntax and phrasing used by Que (fuck you, algorithm! I'll call it a third thing!) Not saying this isn't full of propoganda, but this at least is one article that ties the two psyops together: https://heavy.com/news/thomas-schoenberger-qanon/

1
Pepe-le-Queue 1 point ago +1 / -0

A double-edged sword for them. Concentrating all in one place creates a "One Ring" effect, if you catch my drift. Sauron placing all his power in this one small object that can be destroyed in one fell swoop... interesting how prescient these two great fantasy/scifi novelists were and that they have become so present in our current consciousness at this time. I'm talking about Tolkien and Herbert. The story of Dune is literally exactly what the zionists are doing and striving to manifest. Replace Bene Geserit with zionists and voila... same damn plot!

1
Pepe-le-Queue 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thank you! Fascinating! Ok, so on the topic of psyops: whether or not magic is actually involved or it just seems that way, the end result is the same, so it seems a useful way to think about them. And it wouldn't be surprising, as kabalists are basically straight up sorcerers (although they hardly have the market cornered on the spiritual arts). And part of their spell are these power words that stop all conversation, such as "anti-semite" or "racist" or "conspiracy theorists", or one that is even used amongst us "frens", "black pill", as if to go there is taboo, but I would argue, in the context of spiritual warfare, it is precisely where you want to storm directly into. And how far does this psyop mentioned in the video go? Can we have an open discussion about this? Is the big T-man himself an actor of theirs? His words as to who he supports in the middle-east would certainly suggest so. And what of his son-in-law? Are we all just going to collectively memory-hole that little detail? The moniker "Litteral Hitler" comes full circle? 🤯 What do you y'all think?

3
Pepe-le-Queue 3 points ago +3 / -0

On the flip side of that coin, folks who would now be diagnosed with "disorders" such as schizophrenia were often revered as shamans after having undergone rigorous initiatory rights of passage (key point, perhaps something egregiously missing today).

4
Pepe-le-Queue 4 points ago +4 / -0

Completely agree. They call it "spell"-ing because language casts a spell. T. McKenna called language the original virtual reality, or maybe now we would call it augmented reality. It casts an illusory veil over all of reality and pretends to be the reality it is covering. This distorts and hides many things, such as the interrconnectedness between seemingly unrelated ideas or categories. I have been wondering lately if that abc TV show Once Upon a Time was doing a kind of soft disclosure with their idea of the evil queen having cast a spell over the entire land that made the folks in town believe they were in modern times...

2
Pepe-le-Queue 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's a bit like nobel level quantum physics or string theory. Even if theoretically someone somewhere understands it, what good is their understanding doing you? If it doesn't make sense to you quickly it is of diminishing utility at best and useless at worst.

2
Pepe-le-Queue 2 points ago +2 / -0

I just wrote this in another thread but it's relevant here as well:

It's probably times like these that encourage the resurgance of logic and philosophy. Think Dune mentats as part of the post Butlerian Juhad Duniverse (when humans overthrew sentient machines). Are we being manipulated by a sophisticated AI that has seeded the cultural thoughtscape with mental flak so thick we can scarcely determine truth from fiction? I don't know, but the result is the same. Whether alien, demonic, or technological, an intelligent agency has been set loose on the world at large, infecting the collective societal mind. So many red herrings. Is the the earth round or flat for example? Does it actually matter? All such thought constructs are simply models we use to make sense of our world. No model is exactly as the world actually is, nor can it possibly be. God knows what the world actually is. A better question that is perhaps more useful is: which model is good enough to get me closest to what I need, with the desired results, with the least amount of complication? In other words, the best model is the one that is most useful and passes Occam's Razer. This is the kind of thinking we need now. Efficient, flexible, cunning even, like mental martial arts masters...

2
Pepe-le-Queue 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's probably times like these that encourage the resurgance of logic and philosophy. Think Dune mentats as part of the post Butlerian Juhad Duniverse (when humans overthrew sentient machines). Are we being manipulated by a sophisticated AI that has seeded the cultural thoughtscape with mental flak so thick we can scarcely determine truth from fiction? I don't know, but the result is the same. Whether alien, demonic, or technological, an intelligent agency has been set loose on the world at large, infecting the collective societal mind. So many red herrings. Is the the earth round or flat for example? Does it actually matter? All such thought constructs are simply models we use to make sense of our world. No model is exactly as the world actually is, nor can it possibly be. God knows what the world actually is. A better question that is perhaps more useful is: which model gets me closest to what I need, with the desired results, with the least amount of complication? In other words, the best model is the one that is most useful and passes Occam's Razer. This is the kind of thinking we need now. Efficient, flexible, cunning even, like mental martial arts masters...

1
Pepe-le-Queue 1 point ago +1 / -0

Again, which version of the Bible are you talking about? King James? NIV? NLT?Which do you use? But in any case, do you not see my point, though? A fundamentalist Muslim would say exactly the same thing about the Koran that you just said about the Bible, yet there are plenty of condrafictions between these two texts. Between two people who are absolutely convinced that they are right in this case, war is inevitable, which leads to death, human sufferring and misery. How is that the work of a benevolent god?

2
Pepe-le-Queue 2 points ago +2 / -0

Isn't relying on a sole book for The Truth exactly what a fundamentalist Muslim would say about the Koran? Which version of the Bible? Which translation? Old or New Testament? What about Apochrophal texts? What about non-canonical texts that were not included in the official Bible but thus not adulterated by 2000+ years of various flavors of Cabal control freak manipulation?I would argue the only true path to God is by going within and seeking to know yourself.

1
Pepe-le-Queue 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well...who's been mucking with those texts though? How 'bout we follow what Jesus actually taught? (Holy Spirit - agree you are onto something there)

view more: Next ›