I see 18 if you happen to count the one on the person's hat toward the bottom right, but I don't figure that's part of the intended message.
Besides that, can anyone make out the number given on the Text Trump sign? Coms have been delivered through those before.
After reading this topic, this other stickied topic came to mind:
https://greatawakening.win/p/17s5kLRl27/runit-dome-sabotaged-leaking-a-m/c/
This connection was made in a different topic where post 1320 came up which is about POTUS taking control of Iran.
https://greatawakening.win/p/17s5kLRTia/so-djt-followed-2-random-a/
According to a news article, the target was an Israeli espionage center in the Kurdistan part of Iraq.
Yes Trump is way ahead, but the vote is still being "counted." Forgive me, but I have thoughts of 2020 on my mind.
I can't wait until this is over and we can take votes at face value and not wonder if there will be "surprises" in the middle of the night.
Could the 1320 have something to do with Iran hitting targets in Iraq? The post does say something about POTUS taking control of Iran.
And attacking an Israeli intel center?
I think the point is that she would only be acting the 'public' role of Oprah. Doubt she'd have to do anything other than stay out of sight in her downtime. If it is her, and don't know either, that would be her role. Red pill dispenser like Fetterman has become.
There's another aspect to this that people seem to be missing. Obama was not constitutionally eligible to even run for president. By extension, he never had presidential immunity as fraud cancels out any protections he would have had under standard practice.
Biden won through egregious fraud. Again, by extension, any protections he would have under standard practice are gone.
Trump doesn't need presidential immunity to go away to pursue the last two criminals to occupy the White House, but it is useful to him to destroy the argument being used to attack him by supporting the doctrine of presidential immunity.
Don't know enough about the specific books and films to analyze properly, but I am familiar with two ways a book or movie title can be coms. Either the name of the book in relation to the others presented as well as the subject matter of each. Just based on the titles, some meanings already present themselves such as American Fiction being listed right before Anatomy of a Fall.
Anyone have some takes on these?
Edit: Some additional thoughts:
The Holdovers (Deep state)
Blackberry (Obama who was referred to as Berry, if memory serves)
Oppenheimer (Nukes?)
American Fiction + Anatomy of a fall (Fall of the American Fiction? Truth Rising?)
Monster + Past Lives (Plus the past, revealing the truth about the monsters?)
Air (Not sure)
Polite Society (No idea)
A thousand and One (No clue)
Did a lot of research and came across this. https://www.onlynaturalpet.com/products/only-natural-pet-brewers-yeast-garlic-flea-pills-for-dogs-cats?variant=32340885078052
It's also available through amazon, at a higher cost, and the product has loads of positive reviews going back years. Only a minor chance of allergies to what's in it, as in only one person out of hundreds mentioned any issues.
Later on, I'll be diving back into researching for natural methods for guarding against heart worms. There's also something similar to this for cats that I saw in my search.
Check the Bible. The Nephilum are not dead. They are the result of fallen angels and ... having "relations" with women. The Bible also says that in the end times, it would be as in the times of Noah when Nephilum walked the Earth. It is speculated by legitimate Biblical scholars, like the late Chuck Missler, that demons are the spirits of Nephilum who are wandering Earth until the time of judgement.
Chuck Missler had a background in both science and military intelligence, so he's far from the conspiracy crackpots that you would normally picture talking about this subject. Here's some resources that he helped put together: https://store.khouse.org/pages/alien-encounters
One of his observations from studying the movement of UFO's in footage is their apparent ability to ignore the laws of physics such as inertia when they rapidly change direction without losing speed is that it is likely they are of extra-dimentional origin. As fallen angels, not to be confused with Nephilum or demons, are extra dimensional beings, making them likely culprits.
Nephalum. Men of renown. Abominations that are neither man nor fallen angel. When they die, they are left to wander the Earth until the time of judgement. Disembodied spirits who seek to lead humans astray through affecting the world in whatever limited way they can as 'ghosts' or by possessing humans for more direct control.
Just imagine, if you will, these Nephalum would have the potential of not only having technology developed in secret by those sold out to Satan, but technology that may have originated before the flood. What could be done with technology like that and how advanced may it be?
Add to that, the fallen angels who still hold the ability to manipulate the physical world. I think that is what is beginning to be revealed to the masses.
Have a random question for fellow dog owners. What is a good brand of preventative that won't break the bank?
Ideally, I'm trying to find one that is flea, tick, and heart worm prevention. I think I remember that some medicines could possibly do more harm than good, so I thought I'd put the question to people more likely to be aware of such things.
Thought I saw one posted on here before and a quick search yielded results! :D
Now this is made of epicness and win.
For the actual matter, I'm torn between the two. Dailies were good in that it applied directly to that day, but the topic would vanish so fast when no longer stickied so referencing the past is more difficult. Weekly has an edge there as the topic itself stays relevant longer.
I'd have to go with weekly and a daily sticked topic for Bible Study and Prayer. It could serve as a daily devotional thread and would be a good fellowship opportunity for those without anyone to share things with who are awake off the boards.
Hm. I was mostly awake at an early age. If memory serves, I was in junior high to late grade school when Clinton was first elected. Even then, I instinctively knew that something wasn't right. I was also blessed to have a wonderful teacher (who was also a coach) that went out of his way to teach real history, even going as far as to teach out of what would have been called an 'out-of-date' history text book. Looking back, while I had some lousy teachers, I had some who were surprising gems as well, especially for a public school.
As to people who are asleep to the truth, just be careful in what you share. Red pilling is sometimes a slow process and is best done in small doses ... And no, red suppositories are not probably not viable options.
My personal view on those who aren't awake to the truth varies. For people who literally can't take in the truth because they aren't mentally wired to take in the full scope of what is really going on, I share only what they can handle. For others? Patience is the key. Some have to learn through seeing things happen in their own lives and maybe they'll start to see evidence proving what you told them before.
The hardest thing is to do it out of love and even care for those who antagonize you. For those who don't know Christ, there's only one outcome, and it's not something that I would even wish upon anyone. Suffering for the cost of your sins is one thing to wrap your mind around, someone doing it for eternity is something else entirely that is hard to even comprehend. Not saying criminals shouldn't suffer the consequences of their crimes, just that keeping the eternal perspective is important. A murderer deserves death which pays for the crime according to our law. God's law is higher and the penalty for rejecting the only way for your sins to be paid for is something infinitely more severe given what it cost to allow for that payment.
That actually wouldn't yield much. You're struggling with the perception of things now being the way they always were. Slavery was a given and acceptable practice for most of history, up until around the time before the Civil War. A lineage of slave owners wouldn't get you much. For one thing, most slave owners treated their slaves well. There were some instances in Mississippi and Louisiana, and I'm sure other exceptions, but slaves being harshly treated was not the norm. Uncle Tom's Cabin, which was often held up as an example showing how slaves were treated portly was later shown to be entirely a work of fiction and not reflecting how things were.
Yes, slaves did still flee and try to get freedom, as many of us would in their shoes, but they were often working on a system that encouraged work through rewards. Picture a system where they were given a base quota but were rewarded for going over it. Rewards could be in the form of passes to town or even money. It was with these that some slaves, like Eli Whitney (the inventor of the cotton gin) bought his own freedom. Slaves often worked alongside the children of their owners in the fields and in some cases even ate with the entire family. This was especially the case for those who owned a few slaves. It didn't make any sense to try to segregate the slaves from the family so they became highly trusted in some cases and were treated like one of the family. Some slaves even rose to positions where they helped manage the plantations they worked on.
The money rewards are also how slaves could turn out to be money lenders to their own owners when finances got tight due to the tariffs. As a note, there were black slave owners as well as white. Eli Whitney invented the cotton gin with the goal of making things easier for slaves. His workforce solution was to purchase slaves of his own, train them, and send them about the south making cotton gins for plantations and farmers.
As for the slave owners, they ran a business, especially in the case of the big plantations. They had to oversee the finances, budgets, see that all the slaves had either clothing or means to make clothes, that enough food was purchased to feed everyone, that the slaves had suitable clothing and shelter to protect them from the elements so they wouldn't get sick, oversee the work being done to rate performance of laborers in determining rewards whether they had the aid of dedicated overseers or not, arrange for things to be brought to market and negotiate prices, purchase seed for crops, pay wages to non-slave laborers, and more. It was hardly sitting back and enjoying a life of luxury without any concerns.
As a further example of how things were, when a plantation owner's son went to war, it wasn't unheard of for him to be accompanied by a fully armed slave and the two would fight side by side.
Now, if you want to find people whose families are connected to the cabal ... I suggest looking into the northern industrialists and banking families of Europe. The factory owners and railroad owners were the ones who benefited from the situation while the majority of the south was going broke. I am sure you'd find some family names that are still relevant even today.
Given all I've learned about the situation, the south mostly wanted to get rid of slavery but lacked the means to industrialize properly which would have made it easier to shift to an entirely free workforce made up of paid laborers. In the social structure, slaves weren't even at the bottom rung. According to the writing of some slaves (yes, it wasn't uncommon for slaves to be educated to broaden the range of work they could do), they even looked down upon poor whites, or white trash as we could call them today. During the course of the war, many plantations were raided or burned to the ground by General Sherman and others. It became a bit of a sick game where slaves would try to help hide any riches that a plantation had and mislead the Union soldiers in the hopes that their plantation wouldn't be pillaged entirely.
The overall summary is the the south was justified in their grievances of taxation (through tariffs) without enough representation to have a say in where the money went. Further conflict was seeded by propaganda in northern papers (and perhaps also southern) that served to divide and stir up conflict between different groups. Radical instigators were also used (on both sides of the political divide, I'm sure) to make it that much more difficult to resolve the situation peacefully. I expect Bloody Kansas would be a good example of that if it could be investigated deeply enough.
Overall, if you examine the history on its own merit, you'll recognize that the same playbook was used to divide the United States and usher it into a costly civil war that the cabal has used throughout the world. They just happened to have the additional propaganda weapon in slavery as the perception whether it was acceptable or not was changing.
That in context, the southerners who were fighting for the freedom and independence of their own country were every bit the patriots the founding fathers were. On the flip side, you had honest and patriotic people fighting against them under the belief that they were fighting to preserve their country. So yes, there are heroes on both sides in the context of history and the true heroes should be remembered and even celebrated for their acts of valor and what they truly fought for. The hard fact to internalize is that, in the end, due to the machinations of globalist bankers (the cabal and their minions), both sides lost.
I couldn't help but compare it some to the plot Palpatine enacted in Star Wars ... Some significant differences that the Confederacy in Star Wars went on genocidal rampages vs the only acts of aggression on Union soil that the real Confederacy did was things like raiding the north to get ... boots. Seriously, they were that poor off economically.
Just so you are aware, the entire Civil War to end slavery is a lie, like so many others that were taught in our schools. States in the south were preparing to end slavery peacefully through gradual emancipation when they were attacked by John Brown and Nat Turner. Without those two 'abolitionists,' slavery would have likely ended in the south without a shot. While the northern media propped both of them up, their own writings presented a different story of deranged madmen wanting to do things like make an independent country for blacks ... so they could be moved there from everywhere else in the United States.
The main causes were economic. The vast amount of federal revenue came from the rising tariffs on goods from overseas that the southern economy relied on. Their main markets for selling cotton were also overseas, so the south got hit both ways. The majority of money raised through the tariff war against England and the rest of Europe went to prop up northern industrial development and railways.
There were efforts in the south to industrialize, which would have allowed them to get away from slavery even more easily, but railroads placed additional fees on shipping manufactured goods out of the south to the north but placed no such fees on industrial goods going south or raw goods going north to northern factories. The south was going bankrupt and there's records of plantations having to even borrow money from their own slaves to keep in operation due to increasing costs.
The war only started because the Union baited the Confederacy to fire upon Fort Sumter, which was well within it's own borders, to prevent it from being reinforced by more hostile forces. As an additional note, while the more limited role of the Confederate government forbade it from making laws for individual states about what they do about slavery within their own borders under the doctrine of states rights, it could and did immediately outlaw the importation of slaves from overseas ... well before the Union ever did.
Also, the laws about slaves not being counted as a full human? I believe those originated in the north to prevent southern states gaining enough representation to have a say in where the tariff money went. The south wanted all blacks, slave and free, to be counted as full humans as a matter of their economic well being. Additionally, during the war, only the Confederacy had entire black regiments led by blacks. All black regiments fighting for the Union were led by whites.
In the north, you had slavery in the form of wage slaves, immigrants from countries like Ireland who were bated into contracts with absurd terms just to get to America, only to find it impossible to pay off their debt and had no choice but to work in northern factories for abysmal pay while living in ratty apartments that were sub-standard at best. Later, the promise was land for fighting in the war, despite treaties with Indian tribes and other issues.
in the end, it was all a ploy to put the post-war United States in a position where it was in so much debt that it could be taken over and the federal reserve system put in place.
I personally know someone who was a successful campaign manager, and still runs them on the side, so I learned something about how at least some of them think. I spoke with him before and his mentality of things is sectionalising people into groups. As in, this group has this interest that must be spoken to and this group has this interest.
To be fair, one of his ads that he designed won an award and he has a good record of wins ... But his logic is also flawed. As is the logic of any advisor who wants to break up a message to cater to divergent groups.
My advice to your wife, speak to common interests that unite people. Speak to needs. To hopes, to dreams. Do what Trump does. Focus on what can actually be done within the realm of possibility and say what you hope to shoot for beyond. Speak to how things are and how the system is failing us, though I would suggest she try to avoid being personal. Speak of the system but don't make it personal so she doesn't invite sensational attack ads. If those come, have the high ground.
Also, be honest above all.
She needs to play to her strengths of personality. If she is humorous, leverage it to relate with the crowd. Self deprecating humor is a wonderful tool in that case, if done right like how Reagan did to disarm critics.
If she is honest and frank, then she should be that with her future constituents. Let them know who she is, what to expect, and what she hopes to do. Make sensationalist attacks that much more difficult and that much easier to expose.
Above all, remember the most important thing that both you and her can do. Pray. if this is what God wants for her, pray. She should do all that she can to stay within his will. Read the Bible. Study. Consider the lessons about leadership that can be learned from those who came before and what God says. I believe these instructions for leaders are within the Bible itself concerning Isreal's kings. We have both good examples and bad in what kings followed this and what didn't.
You know, just reading someone else sharing how they're in the same situation is encouraging. And please, join me in praying that people's eyes will be opened and God would take hold of their hearts, that it would be peaceful process before the scare event and their eyes are opened solely out of fear.