11
RedPillQ17 11 points ago +11 / -0

Excellent assessment and clarification on what's public knowledge vs. feasible vs. provable in this pool of alleged claims. We can tuck this info in the back of our minds and put it on a shelf until further corroborating evidence presents itself. At least we have a heads up re: what to be on the look-out for, so this is good. Thank you!

1
RedPillQ17 1 point ago +1 / -0

Great post & a glorious list of major SCOTUS wins for We the People.

1
RedPillQ17 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thanks so much for adding the full content. Will be sharing out this fab SCOTUS wins list.

3
RedPillQ17 3 points ago +3 / -0

Great summary of this video - thank you!

NOTE for others: Clif starts talking about 3I/ATLAS around time stamp 8:40 on this video. At about the 1-hour mark is when Clif mentions some findings in his data about this phenomenon. He said, "There's so many weird things about 3I/ATLAS that tell me it's NOT a comet and its appearance is, again, also participatory in where humans are at in this whole event stream..."

Also, on this topic, Clif's X post on 8/2/25 mentions another aspect of what his data is pointing to about activities related to 3I/ATLAS:

https://x.com/clif_high/status/1951651013318119625?s=52

Clif's 8/2/25 tweet content:

"my data suggests we are mere days away from a noticeable intrusion into our reality that i am labeling as "the little pile-on".

This will be characterized by the personalities involved as every wanna-be psychic, channeller, woonaut, and nutbar jump onto the 3IATLAS wave by claiming 'psychic contact' with its owners, and 'secret messages' from them.

It's going to be a very energetic end of Summer."

3
RedPillQ17 3 points ago +3 / -0

I do the same thing - find the actual speaker source (the person being quoted) and see what was actually said vs. what some Fake News outlet CLAIMED was said.

The OP here didn't put a link to what supposed quote was so upsetting, so if the OP doesn't clarify and actually provide the alleged horrible statement coming directly from POTUS then we have no idea what the OP is even talking about, IMO.

4
RedPillQ17 4 points ago +4 / -0

Since the AWOL Dems didn't return by the 3pm deadline today (Aug. 4th), the TX state House passed a motion issuing ARREST WARRANTS for the fleeing Dem legislators.

https://redstate.com/bonchie/2025/08/04/new-texas-house-passes-arrest-warrants-for-democrats-who-fled-to-illinois-to-deny-quorum-n2192440#google_vignette

They didn't waste any time either. The vote held by our TX House Speaker must have happened right after at 3:00pm (Gov. Abbott's deadline for the missing Dems to return). The TX state House vote was 85 to 6 in favor of issuing arrest warrants for the AWOL Dem Reps.

This video of the TX House Speaker talking about the vote's outcome was posted at 3:14pm CT today:

https://twittercom/i/status/1952463279458226305

So I wonder how this particular vote took place in the TX state House today (8/4) with only 91 members present since that number doesn't meet the 2/3 'quorum' threshold (which is such a ridiculous rule in the first place). Maybe there's some type of 'emergency' rule that kicks in or a work-around of some kind? I dunno.

Here's some other tidbits...

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14970249/Texas-signs-ARREST-warrants-Democrats-private-jet-stunt-lawmakers-reveal-theyre-run-children.html

Excerpt:

When none came back, Republican leaders authorized law enforcement to bring them in 'by any means necessary.'

'The sergeant‑at‑arms and any appointed officers are directed to send for all absentees whose attendance is not excused, and to secure and maintain their attendance under warrant of arrest if necessary,' House Speaker Dustin Burrows, a Republican from Lubbock announced.


Also saw a blurb that the AWOL Dems gang flew to Illinois on a PRIVATE chartered jet (allegedly with their FAMILIES too). Sounds very coordinated & possibly a long-term absence?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14970249/Texas-signs-ARREST-warrants-Democrats-private-jet-stunt-lawmakers-reveal-theyre-run-children.html


Oh, and this is interesting... Gov. Abbott is also throwing around allegations that this Dem legislators stunt is a possible BRIBERY situation - where these TX legislators may have taken money to go AWOL to prevent this Congressional map redistricting vote from being held.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/08/showdown-texas-democrats-wont-return-deadline-as-gov/

Excerpt from this GP article:

Governor Abbott confirmed that Texas House Democrats who remain absent and refuse to vote on the newly proposed GOP-backed congressional map could be prosecuted for second‑degree felony bribery estimates, or see their seats forcibly vacated and special elections called.

“So, very simply, it would be bribery if any lawmaker took money to perform—or to refuse to perform—an act in the legislature. And the reports are these legislators have been both… they sought money, and they offered money to skip the vote, to leave the legislature, to take a legislative act. That would be bribery. And so, the facts will have to come out. But I think, based upon comments made by legislators themselves, they face a possibility of facing bribery charges, which is a second-degree felony in the state of Texas,” Abbott told Fox News host Dana Perino.

2
RedPillQ17 2 points ago +2 / -0

Aaaah, I didn't get down that far in the video clips - thank you for the tip! Yeah, sounds like the OP on X is implying that Rubio is talking about "DUMBs and nukes" when it's really just about the strike on Iran's nuclear facilities, which just so happen to be underground. Seems like a pretty click-baity post on X.

Seeing a lot of that lately, unfortunately. And typically, the people doing that rarely share the actual supporting evidence of whatever they're hyping/claiming too, which makes it all the more frustrating (and time-consuming) for readers. Maybe that's their goal. :-(

7
RedPillQ17 7 points ago +7 / -0

Might you know which video clip in the threadreaderapp.com link is the one where Rubio is actually talking about "underground warfare & nuclear strikes" (as the X post claims)? I'm not finding any video clip in the threadreaderapp.com link fitting that description. Already watched some of the video links in there and so far haven't heard Rubio talking about underground battles (like in DUMBs) or anything about nukes so far either.

Could you possibly save us some time by pointing out which of the many video clips is relevant to the posted topic since there's no video associated with the X link? Many thanks!

1
RedPillQ17 1 point ago +1 / -0

That’s one way of seeing it, yes. But when it’s combined with all the other evidence (e.g., gain of function research, off-shore bioweapon labs funding with our tax dollars, billion-dollar COVID propaganda media funding with our tax dollars inside a Congressional omnibus bill, how the plan-demic was used to justify Biden not campaigning at all, derail Trump’s rallies, and enable mass election fraud via paper ballots, etc), it all piles up, IMO. There was also the finding by Glenn Beck about the 2015 agreement between Moderna and Fauci’s NIH for Coronavirus mRNA vaccine development too: https://t.me/StormIsUponUsJM/13156

1
RedPillQ17 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hi, thanks for your reply. The 2015 Rothschild patent application link for COVID testing that I provided (at https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/61/a3/0d/3d91325d909386/US20200279585A1.pdf ) has a section in it about a bunch of “continuations” - so it looks like there were several sequential subsequent patent applications this one is tied to.

My understanding of a “provisional patent application” is an early stage version of a device / invention that is ‘in the works’ but not fully completed yet. So someone can claim invention rights to something on a limited ‘concept’ description without having all the specifics nailed down. And I guess the subsequent patent applications tied to the initial patent application are combined as the maturity of the ‘invention’ progresses.

I am not a patents expert or any type of legal professional though, so I’m only offering my impression / opinion, not legal definitions or anything like that.

But regardless, the patent application dating back to 2015 speaks for itself, IMO.

4
RedPillQ17 4 points ago +4 / -0

There's at least 3 publicly known weather modification companies operating in TX with current ongoing geoengineering projects that have been reported to NOAA (per the Weather Modification Act of 1976):

https://library.noaa.gov/weather-climate/weather-modification-project-reports (search for "Texas" in the location field and "2025" in the date range field).

The 2 that would be most likely implicated in activities that could have impacted the insane flooding over 4th of July weekend are the ones focused on the West and the South of Kerr county. The "West Texas Weather Modification" activities are slated for 3/15/25 - 10/31/25 and the "South Texas Weather Modification Association" activities are slated for 3/5/25 - 11/29/25 (note this is just for the latest round of activities before they expand it or renew it again).

What's really screwy about how these geoengineering companies report their wicked sky activities is they just have to notify NOAA 10 days in advance of starting weather mod operations, but their evil deeds have a date range of 7-8 months! So their specific operations are basically unaccounted for and could be spraying anywhere on any days at any times without having to provide ANY of those details. I haven't found anything anywhere that provides a day-by-day activity log or location notice for any of these demons who are spraying our skies.


Here's details on the West TX geoengineering reported activities (just what they admit to doing):

https://library.oarcloud.noaa.gov/noaa_documents.lib/OAR/OWAQ/Weather_Modification_Project/FY25/Q3/2025TXWT-1.pdf


Here's details on the South TX geoengineering reported activities (just what they admit to doing):

https://library.oarcloud.noaa.gov/noaa_documents.lib/OAR/OWAQ/Weather_Modification_Project/FY25/Q3/2025TXST-1.pdf


Here's details on the North TX (Panhandle) geoengineering reported activities (just what they admit to doing):

https://library.oarcloud.noaa.gov/noaa_documents.lib/OAR/OWAQ/Weather_Modification_Project/FY25/Q3/2025TXTPH-1.pdf

2
RedPillQ17 2 points ago +2 / -0

Um, what possible reason would anyone have to down-vote my comment?

8
RedPillQ17 8 points ago +8 / -0

Here are the direct links for Trump's post & Q #1616...

Trump's 6-27-25 post on Truth Social: https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/114758683463390427

Q's 6-27-18 post #1616: https://qalerts.app/?n=1616

4
RedPillQ17 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yeah, it seems like whenever most countries replace their awful leader, they put in someone who’s actually worse.

5
RedPillQ17 5 points ago +5 / -0

Unfortunately, the "Oversight Project" seems to have precious little teeth. All that a "criminal referral" coming from them does is request the FBI to investigate Wray. But Kash Patel doesn't need any outside/3rd party entity to tell him who to investigate anyway. Patel can task his agents with investigating whoever/whatever he wants based on wherever the evidence leads. Hopefully, Wray is already on Patel's suspect list of high profile, evil-doers.

https://itsyourgov.org/investigation/oversight-project-submits-criminal-referral-against-former-fbi-director-christopher-wray-for-alleged-violations-including-lying-to-congress-and-obstruction/

3
RedPillQ17 3 points ago +3 / -0

IMO, nobody besides POTUS could have pulled off telling the Iran / Israel recap story and the bit about Iran calling to ask what time they could shoot at our empty base in Qatar. But the "no possible way" it could have been a stand-in proof to me is after Mark Rutte injects his "Daddy sometimes has to use strong language" line and Trump immediately quips back, “And every so often you have to use a certain word.” Nobody on earth could have been that fast with such a perfect Trump-esque comeback as that was, IMO.

2
RedPillQ17 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not that the typical media "reporters" are ever fair or neutral, but WTF is that woman asking POTUS if he "regards NATO allies as children"? POTUS isn't the one who referred to him as "daddy" - it was Mark Rutte who said that.

So why wasn't that ridiculous question posed to Rutte instead of POTUS Trump? And the countries being discussed (between Trump & Rutte) were Israel & Iran - which aren't even NATO members. How does any part of her stupid question even have any relevance whatsoever?

And speaking of irrelevant and out-of-place, why was Zelensky (of non-NATO member state Ukraine) doing at the NATO Summit? :-( Who invited that prick?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›