3
Rinzler43 3 points ago +3 / -0

People like her hold their ego in high regard.

She's protecting her decisions and religion. Coming straight at her caused the reaction.

Even when it's staring them in the face they will deny it.

2
Rinzler43 2 points ago +2 / -0

If the end of 22 is any indication of what lies ahead, then we're going to see a massive amount of people die suddenly.

3
Rinzler43 3 points ago +3 / -0

Scott was pretty based until he took the Vax. He submitted and just has not been the same since. You can feel the free spirit is gone. SAD!

2
Rinzler43 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ayye

Look at how transparent our government agencies are.

1
Rinzler43 1 point ago +1 / -0

Aren't births down as of late? This could cause that graph to shift as well as SIDS deaths. They don't show the actual number of deaths, just rates.

6
Rinzler43 6 points ago +6 / -0

Went to dig into this and SHOCKER.

The CDC Sids Data Page does not present much data beyond beyond 2019. When 2020 is displayed, it's based on rates via state or race. No actual numbers.

As a matter of fact, there's no hard data within any of the graphs/charts. The opening line reads "Each year, there are about 3,400 sudden unexpected infant deaths (SUID) in the United States."

This data is not shown in any capacity. A following chart breaks down percentages of deaths within SIDS:

41% SIDS 32% UNKNOWN 27% Suffocation /accidental strangulation

It's very convenient that the actual numbers per year are never provided. Even more convenient, the CDC Annual Mortality Rates listed in sources used links to a 404 page. Hmm.

FULL DISCLOSURE - there is also a set of files within the sources panel that I was not able to view on my phone. However, this begs the question - how can I go about disproving this "crazy conspiracy theory" when none of the data on the CDC's WEBSITE is helpful?

1
Rinzler43 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh no! FBI is victim now. FBI good now. Protect Democracy. Protect FBI.

3
Rinzler43 3 points ago +3 / -0

Great catch - just comment on this thread.

I understand the animosity of China/Taiwan to Pelosi, but this standoff does seem a bit... glowy. That's not the right word exact, but it's definitely strange.

What if Pelosi is "killed" and that opens the flood?

1
Rinzler43 1 point ago +1 / -0

11.3 again

It's going to be so damn obvious when this marker finally hits, but I haven't seen much that holds legs aside from the Law of War theory.

3
Rinzler43 3 points ago +3 / -0

The side that continously redefines language and works to actively distort reality also says that both parties and all of their voters ALLLLL switched sides.

8
Rinzler43 8 points ago +8 / -0

Thank you. The slogan was "Get Woke" for the longest time. Hence, "Get Woke, Go Broke."

Not sure why so many say "Go Woke, Go Broke" now. It's not as phonetically appealing nor is it as clever.

by BQnita
11
Rinzler43 11 points ago +11 / -0

This was an absolutely GOLD Trump troll moment. 🀣

4
Rinzler43 4 points ago +4 / -0

The State and Corporations are actively playing and I believe the people are beginning to realize the power they hold.

There were/are many artificial barriers that held back this realization. Some event (which has been lined up according to plan) is going to trigger the mass acceptance of this truth.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0