1
RugerP89 1 point ago +1 / -0

I just think the deck is so stacked against Trump that he would not be able to get away with this kind of operation(a staged assassination attempt)

It's interesting that you have that perspective. I would say it is one shared by the majority in our sister forum (patriots.win).

In 2017, I would have agreed with you. Things were very touch and go, and there is a reason why Q started communicating with us in the first place, even trying to teach us Comms. If you recall their threats to Obama, Q wielded the threat of our awareness as a cudgel. The threat was effective.

Yet I believe there's a reason why Q doesn't post anymore. It is simply not needed. Over and over Q has stressed how we are at the end stage of the game. This is cleanup. "We are watching a movie". Do you actually believe that Joe Biden has done irreparable harm to the country?

EDIT: And for clarification, I am not sold on this particular interpretation (G6, chess), either.

3
RugerP89 3 points ago +3 / -0

So you think this was a genuine Assassination attempt? Interesting. Recall Q's 'We are watching a MOVIE'. On the previous attempt:

"The use of real and/or staged tragedy is a truth of politics from the start. It's that entire system of manipulations that is challenged by Trump. An entrenched power that requires every possible angle of effort to overcome. Trump is no longer as fresh of an idea in fighting deep state as he was in 2016 and complacency must be overcame.

Consider Reagan post-assassination attempt.


"cartoonists will have to direct their malice elsewhere". "Public opinion polls already show approval rising" "Will Reagan turn sympathy into votes?".

It's a consequence of the environment of press control and mass shepherding.

I believe what we have now is a unique sequence of efforts meant to culminate in the exposure of the whole. In this way it is justified one final time both to get the power necessary to change it as well as seeding the very ability to expose it! At least that is my thinking on the matter, I'm not always right and I will be digging further into this and will report any new clarity. A lot of focus on how improbable the sequence of events are:

This in turn creates the atmosphere that it's a conspiracy to out Trump.


Seeding the public distrust of existing power structures. The summary of which is that Trump will surge in polls and look to win easily (which is what we see now) but inexplicably the election will be "stolen" again. Only not quite, because the point is to make it as obvious as possible that it's being stolen."

3
RugerP89 3 points ago +3 / -0

Wait, your interpretation of this post, is to go after some leaker?

If this attempt was coordinated with Trump involved, so too would any schedule leaking be purposefully done on behalf of the Patriots. The shooter may have been a useful pawn, genuinely wanting to kill Trump, or he may have been a Patriot playing a role. It doesn't matter, the result (the media coverage, and with that, the Comms sent) is the same.

2
RugerP89 2 points ago +2 / -0

Say what you want about clot shots, Scott Adams has been touting Trump's Persuasion before half this subreddit was on the Trump Train.

Scott Adams predicted in September 2015(!) that Donald Trump would become President because, “he is the best master persuader I have ever seen.”

This post is specifically in regards to the Debate as it pertains to Persuasion.

1
RugerP89 1 point ago +1 / -0

9/11 Decode

https://decodingsymbols.wordpress.com/2024/07/12/9-11-emergency-day/

A Q-based, Comms focused approach.


"Meaning that 9/11 = Pearl Harbor. (PsyOp leading to WAR)

Which is probably why the biggest box office version of pearl Harbor was released in 2001! 6th biggest box office of year.

Note the auto complete draws the parallel. And in fact Bush literally called Iraq part of the “Axis of Evil” to draw more comparison to World War 2.

My point is that just because it’s scripted doesn’t mean I should just assume the whole thing was a scam..."

6
RugerP89 6 points ago +6 / -0

Such Critical Thinking is in short supply. It is all emotions and feelings.

But make no mistake, come election day, the state of the economy will be all that matters.

3
RugerP89 3 points ago +3 / -0

And why would Trump agree, unless Kamala is destined (read: coordinated via Comms) to lose in November?

For optics, is beating another old white man as effective for the broader anti-woke mind virus pendulum shift we're witnessing on Twitter/X, Disney failures, etc, or is defeating a POC woman who is not qualified more effective?

5
RugerP89 5 points ago +6 / -1

Everyone needs to ask themselves, if their influencer-of-choice doesn't base their research on Q, are they more likely or less likely to be a distraction?


"Q has chimed in on this topic just a few times, and it’s fertile ground for digging.


u/#q92

Let’s begin with the middle left where Q asks us why the survivors are dying –

Eight Las Vegas Witnesses Dead Within 30-Days Of Attack https://www.lvcriminaldefense.com/eight-las-vegas-witnesses-dead-within-30-days-attack/

  • 10/16/2017 Dennis and Lorraine Carver Who Survived Las Vegas Massacre Dies in Car Crash “their car crashed into a metal gate and burst into flames near their home in Riverside County, California” It took firefighters nearly an hour to completely put out the fire (Q highlighted the car control by cell phone shown by Wikileaks.)

Q also asked what those who died soon after the attack said."

  • 10/16/2017 Las Vegas Shooting Survivor Kymberley Suchomel, Who Claimed Multiple Shooters Involved, dies in her sleep Unexpectedly

https://decodingsymbols.wordpress.com/2021/03/21/las-vegas/

0
RugerP89 0 points ago +2 / -2

Conserve your energy.

"The use of real and/or staged tragedy is a truth of politics from the start. It's that entire system of manipulations that is challenged by Trump. An entrenched power that requires every possible angle of effort to overcome. Trump is no longer as fresh of an idea in fighting deep state as he was in 2016 and complacency must be overcame.

Consider Reagan post-assassination attempt.


"cartoonists will have to direct their malice elsewhere". "Public opinion polls already show approval rising" "Will Reagan turn sympathy into votes?".

It's a consequence of the environment of press control and mass shepherding.

I believe what we have now is a unique sequence of efforts meant to culminate in the exposure of the whole. In this way it is justified one final time both to get the power necessary to change it as well as seeding the very ability to expose it! At least that is my thinking on the matter, I'm not always right and I will be digging further into this and will report any new clarity. A lot of focus on how improbable the sequence of events are:

This in turn creates the atmosphere that it's a conspiracy to out Trump.


Seeding the public distrust of existing power structures. The summary of which is that Trump will surge in polls and look to win easily (which is what we see now) but inexplicably the election will be "stolen" again. Only not quite, because the point is to make it as obvious as possible that it's being stolen."

19
RugerP89 19 points ago +20 / -1

Eyes open for Comms, folks.

  • 07/25/2024 KAMALA BEGINS: VOTE UPSIDE-DOWN
  • 07/26/2024 OLYMPICS BEGINS: FLAG UPSIDE-DOWN

"Two inexplicable blunders! Most likely coordinating the same thing.

The point is this Kamala choice of beginning her campaign on a DRAG QUEEN SHOW with an UPSIDE-DOWN VOTE from the blackest person there is a symbol for her throwing the race. Intentionally pandering badly to crucial demographics!"


https://twitter.com/NewClear314/status/1816802660068261938

2
RugerP89 2 points ago +3 / -1

4 very real MK ULTRA victims. Yet 4 faked assassinations/shots.

Each were used for a greater purpose. "The use of real and/or staged tragedy is a truth of politics from the start. It's that entire system of manipulations that is challenged by Trump. An entrenched power that requires every possible angle of effort to overcome. Trump is no longer as fresh of an idea in fighting deep state as he was in 2016 and complacency must be overcame.

Consider Reagan post-assassination attempt."

3
RugerP89 3 points ago +4 / -1

Highly, highly doubt Trump would bring someone in, who has a high probability of becoming the face of MAGA in 4 years, who still had strings that weren't yet cut. Or at least, strings that weren't firmly in the hands of Patriots.


Understand that any politician, especially a SENATOR, is going to have blackmail strings. This is the system we live in. No one would've heard J.D. Vance's name otherwise.

0
RugerP89 0 points ago +1 / -1

That was by design.

8
RugerP89 8 points ago +9 / -1

I get the feeling he was leaning left in order to rub shoulders necessary for a successful book release (multi-million dollars). When the Netflix Hillybilly Elegy was snubbed by critics, that was the final straw for him.

With that being said, is he a Senator today without that book, and the rise in status that came with it?

4
RugerP89 4 points ago +4 / -0

"The use of real and/or staged tragedy is a truth of politics from the start. It's that entire system of manipulations that is challenged by Trump. An entrenched power that requires every possible angle of effort to overcome. Trump is no longer as fresh of an idea in fighting deep state as he was in 2016 and complacency must be overcame.

Consider Reagan post-assassination attempt.


"cartoonists will have to direct their malice elsewhere". "Public opinion polls already show approval rising" "Will Reagan turn sympathy into votes?".

It's a consequence of the environment of press control and mass shepherding.

I believe what we have now is a unique sequence of efforts meant to culminate in the exposure of the whole. In this way it is justified one final time both to get the power necessary to change it as well as seeding the very ability to expose it! At least that is my thinking on the matter, I'm not always right and I will be digging further into this and will report any new clarity. A lot of focus on how improbable the sequence of events are:

This in turn creates the atmosphere that it's a conspiracy to out Trump.


Seeding the public distrust of existing power structures. The summary of which is that Trump will surge in polls and look to win easily (which is what we see now) but inexplicably the election will be "stolen" again. Only not quite, because the point is to make it as obvious as possible that it's being stolen."

1
RugerP89 1 point ago +2 / -1

Is this a happy accident, or comms from God?

03/26/2024 Assange Extradition ON HOLD
03/26/2024 Dali Ship Wrecks Bridge

05/20/2024 Ruling: Assange appeal
05/20/2024 Dali Ship re-floated


What's the probability of-

06/24/2024 Assange leaves Prison
06/24/2024 Dali Cargo Ship Leaves

2
RugerP89 2 points ago +3 / -1

Understand that Haliey Welch now has millions of followers, and has been interviewed by USA Today and RollingStone.


Voice Size

"In terms of news coverage, how many millions of people are celebrities worth?

For example, when a celebrity dies they are headline news all around the world. They will trend on social media, and get tons of press for days. Contrast that to the thousands of car accident deaths a month, or the millions of people that die of starvation every year.

An average celebrity is worth a lot more than 9 million people if we go by the media!

I’m not saying this is wrong either, because celebrities by virtue of their visibility over time are people who we know. So in a way it’s important news because it’s like a distant relative of ours died. Someone who had impacted our life in some way.

My point isn’t that it’s wrong, I’m pointing out the difference in power between them and you. Their voice has a power that hundreds of millions of people could never hope to achieve.

This is an important thing to understand, because if YOU needed to say something to as many people as possible, what options are open to you? You could try and create a social media account, but you’d quickly realize no matter which platform you choose your voice would be drowned out. The only hope you’d have is if someone else decides to let you have a bigger voice by propping you up.

But they’d only do that if you fit the narrative.

There are figures propped up with giant megaphones on screens all around us. and thru them the culture is shifted in pre-designated directions at the whim of an unseen force behind them. Have you ever wondered the precise mechanism that of it? How are stars created?"


Do you truly believe the MSM would risk giving someone such a loud microphone, 'stardom', if they couldn't be re-assured that she won't start dropping links to Dave's X22? That she won't start dropping knowledge bombs about Seth Rich and CrowdStrike?

3
RugerP89 3 points ago +4 / -1

How many other, equally hilarious 30 second clips about sex on TikTok/Instagram, made on any given day, don't go viral?

Can the same be said for all the struggling, talented musicians out there on internet? Which ones are chosen for 'stardom', and which ones are not. Is it actually about talent at that point?

3
RugerP89 3 points ago +4 / -1

Do you believe that the algorithms on TikTok/Instagram/YouTube are natural, or are they prone to manipulation?

1
RugerP89 1 point ago +3 / -2

► 1846: Lincoln 1st time Elected Congress
+100
► 1946: JFK 1st time Elected Congress


► 1860: Lincoln 1st Elected President
+100
► 1960: JFK 1st Elected President


► 1808: Lincoln VP Johnson born
+100
► 1908: JFK VP Johnson born

view more: Next ›