He didn't actually address what was said, though. Christians should be armed because one isn't allowed to test God by demanding a miracle be done for him. BJ is saying, if you believe that then you must agree that people who trust HCQ/Ivermectin/Regeneron to get OUT OF DANGER are demanding a miracle be made for them, whereas people who trust experimental gene therapy to INTENTIONALLY PUT THEMSELVES IN DANGER are avoiding a miracle having to be made for them.
Put another way, it's like asking the theological question "If you have a trolley problem with one person on each track, shouldn't you flip the switch so it hits the other person, even though the train will later end up back on the track headed for the original person?" And theologically, the answer is No; even in the sensical version of this trolley problem (e.g. kill one person to save five), the answer is No, you can't intentionally commit murder to POSSIBLY prevent a death, because it's not a foregone conclusion that God won't make a miracle to save those people.
You're trying to talk logic to shills. Remember, if the military runs a run-off election, they're going to claim Trump isn't neutral. Their biggest fear other than Trump is Pence being popular enough to run and still appear neutral.
It doesn't matter if he's right or not, he's using their own narrative against them. He's basically asking, "according to you India did much better, but also according to you everyone in India is dying, so which is it?"
The way going forward is going to a lot different from how it used to be, because teachers will become like Uber drivers and you're going to have essentially matchmaking apps for their "learning pods" (that's the term for it, I didn't make it up).
Literally as soon as Trump gets back in office, the VC for this is going to unlock and you'll have these apps spring up overnight.
Wouldn't the time to betray Trump (that would have inflicted the most damage in a plausibly deniable fashion) be the debate? Pence destroyed Kamala. Why would they allow someone on their side to destroy them?
https://twitter.com/TaylerUSA/status/1411381968567160840?s=20 "This piece by Spectator [lying about Pence] is disinformation. I can assume someone is paying Cockburn to spread lies, because that’s exactly what he’s doing."
FBI lying because terrified of Pence's ability to seem neutral in a redo election. Why would Pence's security detail feel threatened? He wasn't even there, so why would they be there instead of protecting him? We already knew who the shooter was (Byrd). Why was the FBI so desperate for you to believe this? Why are they (and controlled opposition Tucker) so desperate lately to revive Obama era complaints about NSA whitehats doing spying for MI?
Crickets from OP
Shill tactic throughout all this has been to "debunk" something nobody ever claimed, like that the Facebook Metadata ID meant something, or the fake Pirate Bay screenshot of a 13 GB torrent, or that he needs to output 13 GB of data rather than just a simple magnet link and a decryption key.
THINK CRITICALLY. Why would he name the coin WHACKD and the wallet EPSTEIN, and then specifically caption a photo saying that he got the coin's name tattooed to draw attention to the fact that it powers a deadman switch because he knows he's going to get whacked like Epstein? I fear too many people here are bandwagoning without having followed the whole story.
Boris is up against more so he has to tow the line more, like Trump did by promoting vaccines. Stuff like lockdowns is the opposite of what they expect him to do and takes away their pretext for what they planned as a countermove.
This does read like shilling for crypto, or at very least is getting passed around by people who lost everything in the -35% crash and are desperate to drive the price back up. "Interesting /pol/ dig on how every soldier in WW2 was selected." Except it never gives proof that Conservatives were disproportionately selected, even though you could easily prove that. When you boil it down, it's essentially stuff we all already know ("Democrats spend more money") but with more MUH JOOS shilling to strawman QAnon as a hate movement.
Think about it. Biden isn't replacing all the Trump appointees, demonstrating he has no power. Even if he had, we could just leak it all in a plausibly deniable fashion (it's unclassified, what would the punishment be?). We're intentionally not leaking it.
"Another two weeks, right?". It's not about dates, it's about markers.
" 'Soon', since 2017." All the information dropped followed markers, or date deltas (where there are events with immovable dates that gate future events). "Soon" didn't mean "soon after this post was made". And compared to the pace of change for the past 50 years, "soon" is pretty accurate.
The other audits couldn't happen until the Maricopa audit finished, and the military can't step in until the other audits happen. The mistake you're making is thinking that declas is to support the military stepping in. They purposely don't want to declas anything until 1) Antifa/BLM hold the nation hostage demanding a new election at gunpoint, 2) the DNC commits to a candidate, 3) at the last minute leaked/declassified dirt tanks their candidate the same way we did to Biden and HRC. If we put all our cards on the table now, we're wasting all our ammo, they will just choose a different candidate that doesn't have dirt. We need them to commit to a candidate and run them into the end zone.
Think about all the resignations happening right now. The corrupt insiders are getting ready to reduce the impact of declas by stepping down to make the evidence irrelevant. From "confessions of a forum shill": "This too I learned was one of their techniques: always be on the move, always retire old alts and create new ones, always be making old evidence against your irrelevant."
Which politician was it that put out the demand "If you have something then just release the nothingburger already so we can get it over with, don't endlessly dangle unsubtantiated claims"? You can tell they're starting to get really pissed off how many times they've been tricked.