I agree that there may not be a reason to remove her SS detail, but I'm curious as to why she received protection in the first place? Sure, maybe while her father was pResident, but why are the American tax payers paying for SS coverage for the adult family members of former Presidents? Current Presidents... sure, protect everyone including the family dog. Former Presidents... protect them. Just them. If the family wants protection, they xan move in with dad (or mom, if we elect a female president).
(This is commentary on the idea of SS protection, no shade intended to the comment above or to OP)
It's not that people won't be able to HANDLE it, it's that they won't BELIEVE it. Overton Window. If we "fix the problem" it comes back. If we expose the problem in such a way that EVERYONE gets lissed about it, we can get lasting change.
My favorite recurring thought about all this "destroyed info" is when the prosecutor says "your Honor, Exhibit A shows that the defendant is a treasonous piece of shit who has earned the death penalty," and the defense is like "um, how did the prosecution get those files? We deleted them!?"
This was my initial reaction. Before I agree that he broke the law I'll need to see what he was speaking about, and also who was paying him. I'm certainly not defending this clown, but an unbiased look at the speeches he gave should be the first thing that happens.
Absolutely. I remember back in the EARLY days there were many posts about how to help the site, usually offering monetary support (primarily BTC). The mods consistently turned down any outside help, with the reason being that they wanted full control of the site. They've done a fantastic job so far... evidenced by the fact that the site lived through the great censorship purge of the last decade. I may not always agree with the mod team, but I trust and support them fully.
The wording in the Bill suggests that the compounds are being used for weather modification. Perhaps that’s a way for the White Hats to end the practice without being labeled as conspiracists? At the end of the day, isn't the primary concern to eliminate the problem?
If the Cabal is using "weather modification" as a front for "something else," and the general public thinks that "something else" is pure insanity, then let's just call it "weather modification" and put a stop to that.
I'm not necessarily justifying the mods' position on banning certain topics. I don't really care one way or the other. And you do bring up a good point. I'm interested in hearing other opinions on this. Great question, thanks for asking!
Every time I hear someone claim that Trump has made a terrible appointment, I simply remember Fauci. Sometimes these people are put in the spotlight for a reason that we don't yet understand. To think, at this point, that President Donald J. Trump is going to make "personnel mistakes" is slightly absurd. Is it good for us to dig into everyone's past? Absolutely. It is reasonable to assume that we know better than the man who is the public face of a decades-long Military Operation that has destroyed hundreds of years of evil and subversion? That's a bit of a stretch....
I like the idea of Greenland becoming a territory, but I would absolutely setlle for them being a sovereign state, having a mutually benefical agreement with the US (trade agreement and military protection in exchange for some strategic land assets). In the end, I support what the people of Greenland choose for their own future. Can you even imagine living in a world where every person is truly free? That's where we're headed!
Darbie O'Smith and the Little People.