7
Scwurtle 7 points ago +7 / -0

Before we can successfully Boycott Chyna, we need to Make America Manufacture Again.

8
Scwurtle 8 points ago +8 / -0

I suspect that the gathering of forces at the border is not only to prevent entry, but also to prevent escape.

6
Scwurtle 6 points ago +6 / -0

No shade to OP, but I wonder how eager this guy is to find waste in the Department of Education, or the Department of Housing and Urban Developmeny, or the Social Security Administration, or the Department of Transportation, or the Environmental Protection Agency...

Don't get me wrong, I like what he's doing... but I bet he will have a different attitude when the light starts to shine elsewhere.

2
Scwurtle 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't think the wording matters all that much. What matters is the legal challenge to the Executive Order that will inevitably end up in front of the Supreme Court, where it can be settled permanently.

2
Scwurtle 2 points ago +2 / -0

I can't find any "zero day" references in the drops.

3
Scwurtle 3 points ago +3 / -0

He doesn't have 20 Billion in cash "laying around." He (and whoever he might be working with) have enough liquidity and leverage-able assets to get a 20 Billion dollar loan, which they have already secured in anticipation of making this offer.

6
Scwurtle 6 points ago +6 / -0

This post has no source and nothing in the thread about where the info came from. Can anyone else find a source?

3
Scwurtle 3 points ago +3 / -0

And isn't it a civil trial, where a pardon couldn't even do anyrhing?

1
Scwurtle 1 point ago +1 / -0

Same way they make the pitcher and batter the same size in televised baseball games. The girl in pink was not "literally touching Jill before she disappears a second later." They are on a platform, Joe and Jill on the downstage side and the girls on the upstage side.

5
Scwurtle 5 points ago +5 / -0

This is called "moving the goal posts"... the claim was that firetrucks were being held up for not passing smog tests... that claim is false. Why they need inspections at all is a good question, but irrelevant to the fact that the claim is still false.

I agree with you, by the way. CA Inspection regulations are absolutely insane. But making false claims is also insane. One of the best things about this place is that people call bullshit when they see it.

2
Scwurtle 2 points ago +2 / -0

The farthest I'd be willing to go is to acknowledge that the White Hats knew this was a possibility and pushed the Cabal into a corner where this was one of the few actions they could take. But your last sentence stands. THE GOOD GUYS DON'T LIGHT FIRES.

1
Scwurtle 1 point ago +2 / -1

Devils Advocate: we are in the midst of a psychological war... perhaps Gorka is using cynicism to push the message further. The far left is more likely to share this, to highlight how "crazy" Candace Owens is.

1
Scwurtle 1 point ago +1 / -0

Cue the blue haired brigade complaining that he needs to release 11 Yewomeni terrorists for equality.

5
Scwurtle 5 points ago +5 / -0

Nothing close to that... just 14 inches, northeast KS. I'm not trying to compare to other places, just saying that everyone here is in SNOWMAGEDDON hysteria mode.

9
Scwurtle 9 points ago +9 / -0

We just got the 3rd highest amount of 24 hour snowfall in 125 years... if anyone accuses you of fear mongering, they aren't paying attention. Keep up the good work!

1
Scwurtle 1 point ago +1 / -0

January 2025 begins and ends with WTF. This month gonna be lit.

2
Scwurtle 2 points ago +2 / -0

What do you mean by Israel? The geographic country? The political entity? The "Chosen People" as described in Scripture? The Zionists running the military apparatus / Mossad?

I support the people who live there who oppose the endless war. I don't support genocide. I don't support any one group claiming to have sole rights to the land.

1
Scwurtle 1 point ago +1 / -0

This guy has been incarcerated since 2017... how is this connected to J6?

2
Scwurtle 2 points ago +2 / -0

I do not dispute the following:

Elon Musk owns X. Elon is pro H1-B. Elon said he'd go to war on this issue. Elon told detractors to do some face f---ing. People who oppose Elon's views have been demonitized or banned.

What I can't do, is use those givens tonarrove at these conclusions:

Elon Musk is demonitizing people on X, because they disagree. Elon Musk is banning people on X, because they disagree. Elon Musk is against free speech.

Again, I'm not trying to say "Elon good." I just haven't seen any convincing evidence that Elon Musk is personally and purposefully silencing anyone's voice on X.

If I'm wrong, or I've missed something, I'm ENTIRELY willing to admit it. Thank you for your response. You included relevant info, and left out any person attacks on me. I appreciate that, and if you choose to take the time to help me understand your position, I would appreciate that as well.

1
Scwurtle 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm not seeing the connection to Elon in all of this. If the reasoning is "Elon owns X, everything bad that happens is his fault,"... I would ask if the same logic applies to Trump's first presidential term. Is Trump to blame for everything that the Executive Office did from 2017 to 2020?

There are some circumstantial links, but I can't see how this can be laid at Elon's feet. Now, if nothing is done about these demonitizations and bans, then maybe there's a bit of a link. Even so, I'm skeptical of taking anything at face value during these interdasting times.

2
Scwurtle 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm not quite sure what he's getting at. Okay, yeah, military operations are documented. And?

Legitimate question here... what's the point of the post?

view more: Next ›