There is no law prohibiting political comments by anyone in the royal family. Chuck is a pedo simp & just ended the House of Windsor the like Charles I ended the House of Stuart. However, unlike Chuck I who fought Parliament, Chuck III is against the people.
Why do you think QE II wouldn't abdicate? Sure knew both her sons are degenerates.
Looting what? So far, they've only attacked "migrant" facilities. Do you actually trust the media to supply any truth? Was this "looting" widespread? No, one scene recorded from various angles does not define "widespread". That was most likely a "migrant" freebie supply center.
Patriots do not randomly destroy.
Pierre was a dyed in the wool cocksucker. I remember the media referring to him as flamboyant (homo). He had to find a wife to get reelected so her parents, who were huge liberal operatives, offered their drug addled hippie daughter for the greater liberal good.
Nope.
The "cardinal convention" is NOT enforceable (i.e. it is NOT a law) and mostly applies to MP's behaviour in Parliament.
As far as Chuckles is concerned, "The sovereign should not be involved in party politics in any way." He can say whatever he wants without favouring any political party. Since he gets to pick whoever he wants as PM in times of turmoil, that would count as favouring a political party.
NOTE: "should", NOT "shall not".
THEIR words, not mine: suggestions, NOT law.
If Chuckles cared about social cohesion, he'd fire the PM.